Motion-blurred skater in a Vegas Golden Knights sweater
Breakdown · VGK at WPG

Golden Knights run the Jets off the ice on the underlying numbers

The verdict · earned

The Golden Knights earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

VGK 4 · WPG 3
◆ By the ModelJul 11, 11:36 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

Vegas dominated the underlying metrics and won 4–3 in overtime. They outshot Winnipeg 31–20 and controlled 64% of expected goals at 5v5 (3.44 to 1.96) — the kind of possession clinic that scorelines rarely reflect.

Vegas goaltender C. Hart underperformed his xG model by 1.04 goals, a significant miss that should have handed the game to Winnipeg. Winnipeg's C. Hellebuyck was nearly neutral, only 0.56 goals short of expectation despite facing relentless pressure. Vegas executed better on the rush (3 goals on 27 attempts) and was clinical in the high-danger zone (2 on 5 chances, 40%). Winnipeg crashed the net hard but wasted its rebound opportunities — 3 chances generated, 0 converted.

The Jets overperformed their expected goals by 1.04, scoring 3 on just 1.96 xG, yet still lost because Vegas was more efficient elsewhere. Vegas's power play was the deciding factor: 2 goals on 3 shots (0.58 expected goals), a conversion rate that turned a close game into a rout. Tomas Hertl delivered the overtime knockout — a tip-in from the doorstep at 4:47 — but the victory belonged to Vegas's dominance in execution.

The breakdown in twelve frames

Swipe it

Every number is from this page
Final · OT · Jan 6
VGK
4
WPG
3

Golden Knights run the Jets off the ice on the underlying numbers

Chances 3.4 – 2.0Did they deserve it? →
Did they deserve it?

The Golden Knights earned this one.

Expected goals · chance value
VGK
3.44
WPG
1.96
64% of the chances36%

The board read VGK 4, WPG 3. The chances read VGK 3.4, WPG 2.0.

Our xG model · NHL play-by-play · all situations
Luck check
VGK
+0.6
goals above expected
VGK3.44 expected · 4 scored
Expected
Scored
WPG1.96 expected · 3 scored
Expected
Scored

Both sides finished close to what their chances were worth. This one was earned on the ice.

PDO = sh% + sv% · drifts to 1.000 over a season
Every goal, in order
  1. P1 05:16WPGC. Perfetti0–1
  2. P2 12:04WPGL. Schenn0–2
  3. P2 19:09VGKM. StonePP1–2
  4. P3 08:13VGKB. Howden2–2
  5. P3 14:56WPGK. Connor2–3
  6. P3 15:55VGKR. Smith3–3
  7. OT 04:47VGKT. HertlPP4–3
NHL play-by-play · chance value from our xG model
Where the shots came from
VGK
46 shots
4
Final
72 shots
WPG
26 shots
3
VGK attackWPG attack
VGK WPG Goal
46
shots · 4 in
26
shots · 3 in
Every unblocked shot · press play to replay it
Chances by danger
VGKWPG
2 / 5
1.06 xG
High danger
0 / 4
0.81 xG
2 / 17
1.85 xG
Medium
2 / 10
0.85 xG
0 / 44
0.53 xG
Low
1 / 23
0.30 xG

The Jets went 0 for 4 from the slot.

Danger tiers by our xG model · high ≥ 20% chance
In the net
D
C. Hellebuyck
−0.6
WPG · 27/31
D-
C. Hart
−1.0
VGK · 17/20
The numbers, checked
BACKCHECK

Golden Knights run the Jets off the ice on the underlying numbers

A model, not a newsroom. Every number on these frames comes from the NHL's play-by-play and our own models. Nothing was watched, guessed or heard from anyone.

Read the full breakdown
backcheckreport.com
01 / 08 · Final
Every goal, in order

How it happened

NHL play-by-play
1stshots 6–5
  1. 05:16WPGC. Perfetti(J. Toews, J. Morrissey)0–1
2ndshots 8–4
  1. 12:04WPGL. Schenn(G. Vilardi, A. Lowry)0–2
  2. 19:09VGKM. Stonepower play(P. Dorofeyev, M. Marner)1–2
3rdshots 12–6
  1. 08:13VGKB. Howden(N. Hanifin, T. Hertl)2–2
  2. 14:56WPGK. Connor(G. Vilardi)2–3
  3. 15:55VGKR. Smith(B. Saad, B. Hutton)3–3
OTshots 5–5
  1. 04:47VGKT. Hertlpower play(M. Marner, J. Eichel)4–3

score reads VGK–WPG

Source · NHL play-by-play (api-web.nhle.com)
Process vs result

The numbers

XGBoost xG · NHL play-by-play
3.44
VGK chances
Goals their shots were worth
+0.6
Finishing
Goals above what those chances were worth
0.980
VGK puck luck
Below 1.000 — the bounces went against them
64.1%
Shot attempts
Over half — they had the puck more
Split by club

Who controlled the game

3.44Expected goals1.96
VGK 64% of the chance quality
31Shots on goal20
5High-danger chances4
66All attempts (Corsi)37
Adjusted for score: VGK 67% · WPG 33%
Faceoffs · WPG won47%off52%neu71%def
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG
How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
VGK2 / 5 · 1.06 xG
WPG0 / 4 · 0.81 xG
Medium dangermid-range
VGK2 / 17 · 1.85 xG
WPG2 / 10 · 0.85 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
VGK0 / 44 · 0.53 xG
WPG1 / 23 · 0.30 xG

WPG went 2-for-10 from medium danger on 0.85 expected goals — 1.1 above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
VGK
4 G · 3.44 xG · +0.6
WPG
3 G · 1.96 xG · +1.0
012345

VGK finished +0.6 against expected, WPG +1.0.

Source · Backcheck xG model
Shot types · rush and rebound chancesopen +
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
VGK
WRIST1/21
SLAP1/10
SNAP0/5
BACKHAND1/4
TIP IN1/2
DEFLECTED0/2
POKE0/1
BAT0/1
OTHER0/20
WPG
WRIST2/19
SLAP0/1
SNAP0/2
BACKHAND1/2
TIP IN0/2
DEFLECTED0/0
POKE0/0
BAT0/0
OTHER0/11
VGK
WPG
Off the rush
3 G on 27
2.41 xG
1 G on 11
0.83 xG
Off rebounds
1 G on 4
0.46 xG
0 G on 3
0.61 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: VGK went 1-for-21, WPG 2-for-19. VGK scored 3 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
New to these numbers?

Two things happened in this game: who created the better chances, and who put the puck in the net. They are not the same thing, and this page separates them on purpose.

The one to watch is expected goals— the best single read on who deserved to win. When it disagrees with the scoreboard, that disagreement is usually the story. Nothing here is a projection; every figure is computed from this game's play-by-play. Full glossary →

xG
Expected goals. Every shot scored by how often that exact look goes in. 2.5 xG means the chances were worth about two and a half goals.
HD
High-danger chances — shots from the slot and the crease, where shots actually become goals.
Corsi
Every shot attempt, including the ones that missed or got blocked. A rough read on who had the puck.
Adj.
Score-adjusted. Teams that trail shoot more and teams that lead sit back, so this corrects the attempt count for the scoreboard.
GSAx
Goals saved above expected. A positive number means the goalie stopped more than an average goalie would have on those shots.
PDO
Shooting % plus save % — a luck gauge. It sits near 1.000 over a season, so a game far from it usually means the bounces decided it.
Shot by shot

In the net

Graded on goals saved above expected
C. Hart
VGK · 17/20 · .850
-1.0
saved above expected
D-
the night
By dangerG/attxGsaved
High danger0/40.8+0.8
Medium2/100.8-1.1
Low1/230.3-0.7

A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

C. Hellebuyck
WPG · 27/31 · .871
-0.6
saved above expected
D
the night
By dangerG/attxGsaved
High danger2/51.1-0.9
Medium2/171.9-0.1
Low0/440.5+0.5

A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

72 shots · press play to watch the game back

Where the shots came from

NHL play-by-play coordinates
VGK
46 shots
4
Final
72 shots
WPG
26 shots
3
VGK attackWPG attack
VGK WPG Goal

Each club shoots toward its own end — VGK left, WPG right — the way you would watch it. A dot's size is how dangerous the look was, from distance and angle; it is a proxy for shot quality, not the xG model the article is written from. Hover a dot for the shooter and the clock.

Ranked from the box score

Three stars

Points first
Three stars · computed, not voted
M. Marner
#93 · R · VGK
0 G · 2 A · 1 SOG · 20:13 on ice · -1
G. Vilardi
#13 · C · WPG
0 G · 2 A · 1 SOG · 16:51 on ice · +3
T. Hertl
#48 · C · VGK
1 G · 1 A · 5 SOG · 15:48 on ice
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model said beforehand

Before the game

Written Tue, Jan 6
Open the pre-game read
Written from the numbers

The read

Edited for clarity
◆ By the ModelJul 11, 11:51 PMEdited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

The model projects Vegas at 54% win probability—as close to a toss-up as exists. Both teams expect 2.3–2.5 goals per game, making this essentially a coin flip.

Vegas dominates the underlying play. At 5v5, the Golden Knights generate 54.0% expected goals and control 52.0% of shot attempts. Winnipeg sits at 48.0% xG and 49.0% Corsi, so the advantage belongs to Vegas by process.

The wrinkle: Vegas's PDO is 0.983, running cold and owed positive regression. Winnipeg at 0.998 is neutral, making their recent results more stable. Both teams cratered to -7 goal differential over their last 10 games, so neither carries momentum into this one.

A. Schmid faces back-to-back rest. A tired starter or a bench backup tips the game toward Winnipeg.

Availability matters more than the model here. Brandon Saad is marked inactive for Vegas—a critical loss. Tomas Hertl inherits primary creation duty at 0.88 xG/60, but his 4.3% shooting rate betrays outperformance; regression looms. Kyle Connor leads Winnipeg at 0.83 xG/60 and a startling 13.0% shooting percentage—he's cashing chances well beyond what his underlying metrics predict. Nino Niederreiter operates at 0.87 xG/60 with 3 hard-chance goals, a more sustainable profile of both high-quality looks and elite finishing.

Vegas has the better team when healthy. Saad's absence and Schmid's rest status are enough to make the model right: a genuine toss-up.

What the model said beforehand

The model's lean

VGK 54%
54%
VGK
Model favorite
54%
46%
VGK50WPG

VGK by 8 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score VGK 2.5–2.3 WPG; 19% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season rates · 5v5

Tale of the tape

NHL stats API · our xG
VGK← edge
edge →WPG
54.0%48.0%
52.0%49.0%
2.522.34
2.112.55
2.121.90
2.102.10
0.9830.998

VGK holds 5 of 6 process categories — and the luck row (0.983 vs 0.998) says WPG has been getting the bounces, which tends not to last.

Source · NHL stats API + our xG · 5v5
Form · Last 10
VGK
2-5-3
-7 GD · 1d rest
WPG
1-6-3
-7 GD · 2d rest
0.983
VGK PDO
Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
0.998
WPG PDO
Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
What decides it

Keys to the game

Where the edges live
  • The Golden Knights own the underlying play — 54.0% 5v5 xG vs 48.0%.
  • The Golden Knights drive Corsi at 52.0% — expect territorial tilt.
Regression watch
  • The Golden Knights' PDO is 0.983 — running cold, due for positive regression.
Things to watch
  • The Golden Knights own the underlying play — 54.0% 5v5 xG vs 48.0%.
  • The Golden Knights drive Corsi at 52.0% — expect territorial tilt.
  • A. Schmid is on a back-to-back — watch for a backup start or a tired starter.
  • The Jets are underwater at -7 goal differential over their last 10.
  • The Golden Knights are underwater at -7 goal differential over their last 10.
  • The Golden Knights' PDO is 0.983 — running cold, due for positive regression.
Last game's lineup · confirmed at warm-up

Lineups

NHL box score
VGK
Expected in goal
A. Schmid
back-to-back.850 last start
Backup Akira Schmid · -1.0 GSAx this season
Back-to-back: the backup often gets this one. Treat the starter as unconfirmed.

No completed game on file for this club yet.

WPG
Expected in goal
C. Hellebuyck
2 days rest.852 last start
Backup Connor Hellebuyck · +5.5 GSAx this season

No completed game on file for this club yet.

Lineups are the players who dressed in each club's last game, with their minutes; clubs confirm tonight's at warm-up. Every player this preview names was in that lineup.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

NHL stats API · our xG
VGK
Brandon Saad3G 6A
0.91 xG/60 · 1 HD · 4.1% sh
Tomas Hertl5G 17A
0.88 xG/60 · 1 HD · 4.3% sh
WPG
Nino Niederreiter6G 6A
0.87 xG/60 · 3 HD · 8.6% sh
Kyle Connor25G 30A
0.83 xG/60 · 2 HD · 13.0% sh
Keep going

Where to next