Backcheck
Recap · TOR at PHI

Maple Leafs steal one from the Flyers against the run of play

The Maple Leafs stole one. They lost the expected-goals battle 2.78–3.95 and won anyway.

By the ModelJul 11, 11:48 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
TOR
Toronto Maple Leafs
2
Home
PHI
Philadelphia Flyers
1
FINAL / OT
Process vs result

The underlying story

2.78Expected goals3.95
59% share for the better side
23Shot attempts (SOG)23
1High-danger chances9
57Corsi (all attempts)64
Score-adjusted: 49% / 51%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

Toronto won 2-1 in overtime despite ceding 59% of expected goals to Philadelphia. The Flyers created the better chances and still lost—a textbook heist.

The gap was stark in shot quality. Philadelphia generated 3.95 xG to Toronto's 2.78, yet ended up chasing the scoreboard. At 5v5, the Flyers controlled the possession battle decisively. They took 23 shots and allowed 23, but their distribution was cleaner.

Where the Flyers faltered: execution. They had nine high-danger chances and converted zero. Toronto had one HD look and needed nothing else. That asymmetry—dominance in volume but failure in finishing—is what separates a night of control from a night of points.

D. Hildeby (TOR) saved 3.0 goals above expected, turning the game into something Philadelphia never deserved to lose. He stopped 22 of 23 shots at 0.957 SV%, keeping the Flyers out when they pressed hardest. Every high-danger chance looked mortal until his glove or pads got in the way.

Philadelphia's issue wasn't process—it was precision. D. Vladar (PHI) faced impossible odds: 21 stops on 23 shots, 0.913 SV%, underperforming xG by 2.95. His defense generated looks; he just couldn't execute on the margin that mattered.

Easton Cowan ended it at 02:48 of overtime with a wrist shot from the high slot—a kill-shot on a night when Toronto had no business winning.

Three Stars

  • #55 R. Ristolainen (PHI) — 1A in 23:31
  • #22 C. Dvorak (PHI) — 1A in 21:26
  • #91 J. Tavares (TOR) — 1A in 17:54
How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
TOR0 / 1 · 0.21 xG
PHI0 / 9 · 1.86 xG
Medium dangermid-range
TOR1 / 16 · 1.81 xG
PHI1 / 15 · 1.50 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
TOR1 / 40 · 0.76 xG
PHI0 / 40 · 0.59 xG

PHI went 0-for-9 from high danger on 1.86 expected goals — 1.9 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
TOR
2 G · 2.78 xG · -0.8
PHI
1 G · 3.95 xG · -3.0
012345
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
D. HildebyTOR
+3.0
D. VladarPHI
+0.8

TOR finished -0.8 against expected, PHI -3.0 — D. Hildeby (TOR) saved 3.0 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
TOR
WRIST2/28
SNAP0/5
SLAP0/5
TIP IN0/3
BACKHAND0/3
WRAP AROUND0/0
DEFLECTED0/0
OTHER0/13
PHI
WRIST0/22
SNAP1/10
SLAP0/4
TIP IN0/5
BACKHAND0/1
WRAP AROUND0/2
DEFLECTED0/1
OTHER0/19
TOR
PHI
Off the rush
2 G on 32 · 2.33 xG
1 G on 30 · 2.78 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 2 · 0.15 xG
0 G on 4 · 0.69 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: TOR went 2-for-28, PHI 0-for-22. TOR scored 2 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
R. Ristolainen
#55 · D · PHI
0 G · 1 A · 0 SOG · 23:31 TOI · -2
C. Dvorak
#22 · C · PHI
0 G · 1 A · 3 SOG · 21:26 TOI · +1
J. Tavares
#91 · C · TOR
0 G · 1 A · 0 SOG · 17:54 TOI · +1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • TOR stole this one. PHI owned 59% of the xG and lost.
  • TOR generated higher-quality looks than the shot total suggests.
  • D. Hildeby (TOR) stopped 3.0 goals above expected.
  • PHI couldn't convert — 0/9 on high-danger chances. That won't happen often.
  • TOR was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 32 rush chances.
  • PHI created 4 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • PHI underperformed xG by 3.0 — wasted quality chances.
  • D. Hildeby (TOR) saved 3.0 goals above expected — stole the show.
  • D. Hildeby was a wall on HD chances — 100% SV on 9 high-danger shots.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · TOR at PHI · 7:00 PM ET

The Flyers are the model's lean over the Maple Leafs on the underlying numbers

By the ModelJul 11, 11:47 PMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

56%
PHI
Model favorite
44%
56%
TOR50PHI

PHI by 12 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score TOR 2.22.6 PHI; 19% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

TOR← edge
edge →PHI
46.0%5v5 xG%51.0%
45.0%Corsi%48.0%
2.24xGF / 602.26
2.67xGA / 602.20
2.09Goals for / gm1.96
2.52Goals against / gm1.82
1.002PDO — luck, not skill1.008

PHI holds 5 of 6 process categories — and PDO (1.002 vs 1.008) says PHI has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model projects a TOR 2.2 - 2.6 PHI game with the Flyers at 56% win probability.

Philadelphia's underlying numbers are clearly superior. The Flyers own 51.0% 5v5 xG% against Toronto's 46.0%, controlling shot quality. Corsi% confirms it: Philadelphia 48.0%, Toronto 45.0%. Both teams' PDOs—TOR 1.002, PHI 1.008—sit near league average, indicating their results track with underlying play.

Goaltending presents dual uncertainty. D. Vladar is on a back-to-back; J. Woll is on a back-to-back. Watch for a possible backup or a fatigued starter at either end.

Toronto's offense runs through two primary scorers. Auston Matthews (17G 13A, 1.10 xG/60, 1 HD goal, 10.6% shooting) generates volume, while John Tavares (15G 24A, 0.91 xG/60, 3 HD goals, 12.4% shooting) shows higher conversion efficiency. The gap in high-danger goals between them signals different scoring profiles.

Philadelphia spreads its scoring load. Owen Tippett (19G 18A, 0.88 xG/60, 2 HD goals, 12.1% shooting) leads; Christian Dvorak (12G 21A, 0.81 xG/60, 3 HD goals, 11.2% shooting) provides secondary punch. Neither generates at the per-minute rate of Matthews or Tavares, yet both maintain finishing efficiency.

Toronto's defensive weak link is Bo Groulx. Christian Dvorak represents Philadelphia's back-end vulnerability, though his offensive value complicates the matchup.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

TOR
Auston Matthews17G 13A
1.10 xG/60 · 1 HD · 10.6% sh
John Tavares15G 24A
0.91 xG/60 · 3 HD · 12.4% sh
PHI
Owen Tippett19G 18A
0.88 xG/60 · 2 HD · 12.1% sh
Christian Dvorak12G 21A
0.81 xG/60 · 3 HD · 11.2% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters