Backcheck
Recap · NJD at PIT

Penguins pull away from the Devils

The Penguins earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

By the ModelJul 11, 11:48 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
NJD
New Jersey Devils
1
Home
PIT
Pittsburgh Penguins
4
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

3.07Expected goals3.62
54% share for the better side
29Shot attempts (SOG)29
2High-danger chances4
57Corsi (all attempts)67
Score-adjusted: 52% / 48%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

The 4-1 scoreline flattered Pittsburgh. Expected goals split 3.62–3.07, too narrow a margin to justify the final.

The disconnect came from goaltending and execution. S. Skinner stopped 2.07 goals above expected; New Jersey underperformed its xG by 2.07. J. Allen's 0.862 SV% captured the gap—the Devils created looks but couldn't finish them.

Shot attempts landed 29–29, dead even. High-danger chances favored Pittsburgh 4–2. The Penguins exploited transition: 4 goals on 27 rush attempts, a conversion rate that broke the game.

Blake Lizotte's tip-in from the slot (P3, 13:26) marked the turning point, when Pittsburgh took control.

Neither team converted rebounds. Pittsburgh created 5 rebound opportunities; New Jersey 4. The gap lay in transition execution and shot placement earlier in the possession.

Three Stars:

  • #65 E. Karlsson (PIT) — 1G, 1A in 22:56
  • #67 R. Rakell (PIT) — 2A in 19:11
  • #87 S. Crosby (PIT) — 2A in 17:33
How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
NJD0 / 2 · 0.52 xG
PIT0 / 4 · 0.86 xG
Medium dangermid-range
NJD0 / 17 · 1.98 xG
PIT4 / 22 · 2.23 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
NJD1 / 38 · 0.57 xG
PIT0 / 41 · 0.53 xG

NJD went 0-for-17 from medium danger on 1.98 expected goals — 2.0 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
NJD
1 G · 3.07 xG · -2.1
PIT
4 G · 3.62 xG · +0.4
012345
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
J. AllenNJD
-0.4
S. SkinnerPIT
+2.1

NJD finished -2.1 against expected, PIT +0.4 — S. Skinner (PIT) saved 2.1 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
NJD
WRIST0/25
TIP IN0/6
SLAP1/4
BACKHAND0/4
DEFLECTED0/1
SNAP0/1
BAT0/0
OTHER0/16
PIT
WRIST2/28
TIP IN1/8
SLAP1/6
BACKHAND0/1
DEFLECTED0/2
SNAP0/1
BAT0/1
OTHER0/20
NJD
PIT
Off the rush
0 G on 27 · 2.29 xG
4 G on 27 · 2.41 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 4 · 0.47 xG
0 G on 5 · 0.70 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: NJD went 0-for-25, PIT 2-for-28. PIT scored 4 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
E. Karlsson
#65 · D · PIT
1 G · 1 A · 2 SOG · 22:56 TOI · +1
R. Rakell
#67 · R · PIT
0 G · 2 A · 4 SOG · 19:11 TOI · +2
S. Crosby
#87 · C · PIT
0 G · 2 A · 1 SOG · 17:33 TOI · +1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • S. Skinner (PIT) stopped 2.1 goals above expected.
  • PIT was lethal off the rush — 4 goals on 27 rush chances.
  • PIT created 5 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • NJD created 4 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • NJD underperformed xG by 2.1 — wasted quality chances.
  • S. Skinner (PIT) saved 2.1 goals above expected — stole the show.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · NJD at PIT · 7:00 PM ET

Devils at Penguins: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 11, 11:47 PMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

54%
PIT
Model favorite
46%
54%
NJD50PIT

PIT by 8 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score NJD 2.52.7 PIT; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

NJD← edge
edge →PIT
50.0%5v5 xG%51.0%
51.0%Corsi%50.0%
2.45xGF / 602.66
2.50xGA / 602.55
1.66Goals for / gm2.45
2.23Goals against / gm2.12
0.971PDO — luck, not skill1.012

PIT holds 4 of 6 process categories — and PDO (0.971 vs 1.012) says PIT has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model projects a 2.5-to-2.7 goal range with Pittsburgh at 54% win probability. This is pick'em hockey.

The matchup is remarkably balanced at even strength. New Jersey owns 51.0% Corsi and 50.0% expected goals, while Pittsburgh sits at 50.0% Corsi and 51.0% expected goals—a statistical dead heat. The real separation lies in puck luck: New Jersey's PDO of 0.971 suggests cold-shooting regression ahead, whereas Pittsburgh's 1.012 indicates the Penguins are running hot. That gap matters.

New Jersey arrives wounded. Over its last 10 games, the Devils sit at minus-13 goal differential—underwater enough to raise questions about whether this matchup finds them on the rebound or in freefall. The Penguins, conversely, arrive rested on four days' recovery to New Jersey's single day off. That rest advantage is real.

The wild card is goaltending. J. Markstrom faces the back-to-back situation; Pittsburgh's defense must account for the possibility of a backup start or a fatigued starter.

Jack Hughes (18G, 17A, 1 hard-chance goal, 11.5% shooting) leads New Jersey's offense, his shot percentage reflecting opportunism over volume. Timo Meier (13G, 15A, 3 hard-chance goals, 1.08 xG/60) drives the Devils' dangerous chances at a higher rate but shoots at just 6.7%—an underperformance due for correction. Pittsburgh's Rickard Rakell (13G, 13A, 3 hard-chance goals, 1.01 xG/60) matches Meier's elite chance creation on fewer points; his 12.1% shooting mirrors Hughes' conversion edge. Filip Hallander (1.28 xG/60) occupies the highest chance-per-minute slot but is expected to miss the game.

The defensive weak links are notable: New Jersey's Johnathan Kovacevic and Pittsburgh's Caleb Jones both represent leverage points. Both teams have failed to convert high-danger chances (0% hard-chance and rebound rates), suggesting the game may turn on finishing rather than chance quality.

This is the rarest of regular-season predictions: a game where the model sees no edge and the circumstances reinforce it.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

NJD
Timo Meier13G 15A
1.08 xG/60 · 3 HD · 6.7% sh
Jack Hughes18G 17A
0.88 xG/60 · 1 HD · 11.5% sh
PIT
Filip Hallander0G 3A
1.28 xG/60 · 0 HD · 0.0% sh
Rickard Rakell13G 13A
1.01 xG/60 · 3 HD · 12.1% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters