Motion-blurred skater in a Washington Capitals sweater
Breakdown · WSH at CHI

L. Thompson stands tall as the Capitals edge the Blackhawks

The verdict · stolen

The Capitals stole one. They lost the expected-goals battle 2.23–3.78 and won anyway.

WSH 5 · CHI 1
◆ By the ModelJul 12, 12:00 AMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

Chicago dominated the underlying play and lost 5-1 anyway. The Blackhawks held 63% of expected goals (3.78–2.23) on even shot volume (24–24), owning nearly every meaningful metric—and walking away with nothing. Washington stole this one through efficiency and goaltending.

The Capitals' power was surgical. They overperformed their 2.23 xG by 2.77 goals, converting at rates the shot quality didn't predict. On just 21 rush chances, Washington scored 4 goals. That's lethality compressed into a few precise looks.

Chicago's collapse was mirror-image. The Blackhawks generated more dangerous chances at 0.076 xG per shot (versus Washington's 0.052) and led 8–3 in high-danger attempts. They converted zero of those eight. D. Commesso added to the toll: he gave up 2.77 goals above expected, a gap that magnified every mistake into a scoreboard entry.

L. Thompson was the story. The Washington goalie stopped 23 of 24 shots for a 0.958 save percentage, saving 2.78 goals above expected and posting a perfect record on Chicago's eight high-danger chances. This was goaltending that transformed play quality into a rout.

Alex Ovechkin's snap shot from the high slot (P3, 13:33) was the turning point. Once Washington found their rhythm on the rush, the Blackhawks couldn't recover. Chicago generated 5 rebound opportunities but converted none, a pattern of offensive pressure meeting an immovable object.

The Three Stars belonged to Washington: J. Carlson (2A, 19:43), M. Fehérváry (2A, 17:59), and C. McMichael (1G, 1A, 14:49). This was the difference between dominating the play and dominating the scoresheet.

The breakdown in twelve frames

Swipe it

Every number is from this page
Final · Jan 9
WSH
5
CHI
1

L. Thompson stands tall as the Capitals edge the Blackhawks

Chances 2.2 – 3.8Did they deserve it? →
Did they deserve it?

The Blackhawks deserved better.

Expected goals · chance value
WSH
2.23
CHI
3.78
37% of the chances63%

The board read WSH 5, CHI 1. The chances read WSH 2.2, CHI 3.8.

Our xG model · NHL play-by-play · all situations
Luck check
WSH
+2.8
goals above expected
WSH2.23 expected · 5 scored
Expected
Scored
CHI3.78 expected · 1 scored
Expected
Scored

The Capitals scored 2.8 more than their chances were worth. That does not repeat.

PDO = sh% + sv% · drifts to 1.000 over a season
Every goal, in order
  1. P1 04:03WSHA. Beauvillier1–0
  2. P1 15:07WSHC. McMichael2–0
  3. P1 18:54WSHE. Frank3–0
  4. P2 08:48CHIO. MoorePP3–1
  5. P2 12:38WSHJ. Sourdif4–1
  6. P3 13:33WSHA. Ovechkin5–1
NHL play-by-play · chance value from our xG model
Where the shots came from
WSH
36 shots
5
Final
77 shots
CHI
41 shots
1
WSH attackCHI attack
WSH CHI Goal
36
shots · 5 in
41
shots · 1 in
Every unblocked shot · press play to replay it
Chances by danger
WSHCHI
2 / 3
0.70 xG
High danger
0 / 8
2.35 xG
3 / 11
0.95 xG
Medium
1 / 11
0.98 xG
0 / 29
0.59 xG
Low
0 / 31
0.45 xG

The Blackhawks went 0 for 8 from the slot.

Danger tiers by our xG model · high ≥ 20% chance
In the net
A+
L. Thompson
+2.8
WSH · 23/24
F
D. Commesso
−2.8
CHI · 19/24
The numbers, checked
BACKCHECK

L. Thompson stands tall as the Capitals edge the Blackhawks

A model, not a newsroom. Every number on these frames comes from the NHL's play-by-play and our own models. Nothing was watched, guessed or heard from anyone.

Read the full breakdown
backcheckreport.com
01 / 08 · Final
Every goal, in order

How it happened

NHL play-by-play
1stshots 6–10
  1. 04:03WSHA. Beauvillier(M. Fehérváry, J. Carlson)1–0
  2. 15:07WSHC. McMichael(R. Leonard)2–0
  3. 18:54WSHE. Frank(J. Carlson, N. Dowd)3–0
2ndshots 10–6
  1. 08:48CHIO. Moorepower play(M. Grzelcyk, N. Lardis)3–1
  2. 12:38WSHJ. Sourdif(C. McMichael, R. Leonard)4–1
3rdshots 8–8
  1. 13:33WSHA. Ovechkin(M. Fehérváry)5–1

score reads WSH–CHI

Source · NHL play-by-play (api-web.nhle.com)
Process vs result

The numbers

XGBoost xG · NHL play-by-play
2.23
WSH chances
Goals their shots were worth
+2.8
Finishing
Goals above what those chances were worth
1.096
WSH puck luck
Above 1.000 — the bounces went their way
46.2%
Shot attempts
Under half — they were outshot
Split by club

Who controlled the game

2.23Expected goals3.78
CHI 63% of the chance quality
24Shots on goal24
3High-danger chances8
43All attempts (Corsi)50
Adjusted for score: WSH 40% · CHI 60%
Faceoffs · CHI won61%off59%neu41%def
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG
How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
WSH2 / 3 · 0.70 xG
CHI0 / 8 · 2.35 xG
Medium dangermid-range
WSH3 / 11 · 0.95 xG
CHI1 / 11 · 0.98 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
WSH0 / 29 · 0.59 xG
CHI0 / 31 · 0.45 xG

CHI went 0-for-8 from high danger on 2.35 expected goals — 2.4 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
WSH
5 G · 2.23 xG · +2.8
CHI
1 G · 3.78 xG · -2.8
0123456

WSH finished +2.8 against expected, CHI -2.8.

Source · Backcheck xG model
Shot types · rush and rebound chancesopen +
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
WSH
WRIST3/19
SNAP1/8
SLAP0/5
TIP IN0/1
BACKHAND1/3
DEFLECTED0/0
OTHER0/7
CHI
WRIST0/23
SNAP1/8
SLAP0/2
TIP IN0/5
BACKHAND0/2
DEFLECTED0/1
OTHER0/9
WSH
CHI
Off the rush
4 G on 21
1.55 xG
1 G on 22
2.23 xG
Off rebounds
1 G on 2
0.34 xG
0 G on 5
0.92 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: WSH went 3-for-19, CHI 0-for-23. WSH scored 4 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
New to these numbers?

Two things happened in this game: who created the better chances, and who put the puck in the net. They are not the same thing, and this page separates them on purpose.

The one to watch is expected goals— the best single read on who deserved to win. When it disagrees with the scoreboard, that disagreement is usually the story. Nothing here is a projection; every figure is computed from this game's play-by-play. Full glossary →

xG
Expected goals. Every shot scored by how often that exact look goes in. 2.5 xG means the chances were worth about two and a half goals.
HD
High-danger chances — shots from the slot and the crease, where shots actually become goals.
Corsi
Every shot attempt, including the ones that missed or got blocked. A rough read on who had the puck.
Adj.
Score-adjusted. Teams that trail shoot more and teams that lead sit back, so this corrects the attempt count for the scoreboard.
GSAx
Goals saved above expected. A positive number means the goalie stopped more than an average goalie would have on those shots.
PDO
Shooting % plus save % — a luck gauge. It sits near 1.000 over a season, so a game far from it usually means the bounces decided it.
Shot by shot

In the net

Graded on goals saved above expected
L. Thompson
WSH · 23/24 · .958
+2.8
saved above expected
A+
the night
By dangerG/attxGsaved
High danger0/82.4+2.4
Medium1/111.0-0.0
Low0/310.5+0.5

A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

D. Commesso
CHI · 19/24 · .792
-2.8
saved above expected
F
the night
By dangerG/attxGsaved
High danger2/30.7-1.3
Medium3/110.9-2.0
Low0/290.6+0.6

A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

77 shots · press play to watch the game back

Where the shots came from

NHL play-by-play coordinates
WSH
36 shots
5
Final
77 shots
CHI
41 shots
1
WSH attackCHI attack
WSH CHI Goal

Each club shoots toward its own end — WSH left, CHI right — the way you would watch it. A dot's size is how dangerous the look was, from distance and angle; it is a proxy for shot quality, not the xG model the article is written from. Hover a dot for the shooter and the clock.

Ranked from the box score

Three stars

Points first
Three stars · computed, not voted
J. Carlson
#74 · D · WSH
0 G · 2 A · 0 SOG · 19:43 on ice · +3
M. Fehérváry
#42 · D · WSH
0 G · 2 A · 1 SOG · 17:59 on ice · +4
C. McMichael
#24 · L · WSH
1 G · 1 A · 3 SOG · 14:49 on ice · +2
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model said beforehand

Before the game

Written Fri, Jan 9
Open the pre-game read
Written from the numbers

The read

Edited for clarity
◆ By the ModelJul 11, 11:59 PMEdited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

The model projects a WSH 2.8 - 2.5 CHI game with Capitals holding 54% win probability. This is essentially a coin flip.

Washington owns the underlying play. The Capitals generate 50.0% expected goals share versus Chicago's 42.0%, backed by a Corsi edge of 49.0% to 46.0%. Recent form complicates the picture: WSH is underwater at minus-8 goal differential over their last 10, and a PDO of 1.018 suggests regression looms. Chicago's 0.996 PDO sits neutral; their underlying metrics show a team being outplayed at both shot and expected-goals levels.

Goaltending presents uncertainty. S. Knight is on a back-to-back for Washington, as is L. Thompson for Chicago—both situations invite backup deployments or fatigued starters.

Washington's offense runs through Alex Ovechkin (19G, 17A, 0.97 xG/60, 2 HD goals) and Anthony Beauvillier (14G, 9A, 0.89 xG/60, 10.4% shooting rate). Ovechkin's 13.8% clip could normalize. Chicago counters with Tyler Bertuzzi, who leads the team with 20 goals and 15 assists while generating 0.85 xG/60 and delivering 7 high-danger goals—evidence of finishing prowess. Connor Bedard (17G, 27A, 0.82 xG/60) constructs play rather than finishes, though his 11.8% shooting rate leaves upside.

Both teams register 0% on high-danger and rebound goal rates—metrics that rarely persist. Washington's Declan Chisholm and Chicago's Anton Frondell represent defensive vulnerabilities.

The game turns on whether Washington's underlying advantage holds or whether regression in PDO and recent form narrows the gap. Chicago remains a live dog on an off night. At 54%, this truly is a coin flip.

What the model said beforehand

The model's lean

WSH 54%
54%
WSH
Model favorite
54%
46%
WSH50CHI

WSH by 8 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score WSH 2.8–2.5 CHI; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season rates · 5v5

Tale of the tape

NHL stats API · our xG
WSH← edge
edge →CHI
50.0%42.0%
49.0%46.0%
2.622.17
2.622.94
2.181.84
1.792.41
1.0180.996

WSH holds 6 of 6 process categories — and the luck row (1.018 vs 0.996) says WSH has been getting the bounces, which tends not to last.

Source · NHL stats API + our xG · 5v5
Form · Last 10
WSH
3-5-2
-8 GD · 1d rest
CHI
5-4-1
-4 GD · 1d rest
1.018
WSH PDO
Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
0.996
CHI PDO
Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
What decides it

Keys to the game

Where the edges live
  • The Capitals own the underlying play — 50.0% 5v5 xG vs 42.0%.
Regression watch
  • The Capitals' PDO is 1.018 — running hot, expect some regression.
Things to watch
  • The Capitals own the underlying play — 50.0% 5v5 xG vs 42.0%.
  • S. Knight is on a back-to-back — watch for a backup start or a tired starter.
  • L. Thompson is on a back-to-back — watch for a backup start or a tired starter.
  • The Capitals are underwater at -8 goal differential over their last 10.
  • The Capitals' PDO is 1.018 — running hot, expect some regression.
Last game's lineup · confirmed at warm-up

Lineups

NHL box score
WSH
Expected in goal
L. Thompson
back-to-back.914 last start
Backup Logan Thompson · +29.3 GSAx this season
Back-to-back: the backup often gets this one. Treat the starter as unconfirmed.

No completed game on file for this club yet.

CHI
Expected in goal
S. Knight
back-to-back.900 last start
Backup Spencer Knight · +10.9 GSAx this season
Back-to-back: the backup often gets this one. Treat the starter as unconfirmed.

No completed game on file for this club yet.

Lineups are the players who dressed in each club's last game, with their minutes; clubs confirm tonight's at warm-up. Every player this preview names was in that lineup.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

NHL stats API · our xG
WSH
Alex Ovechkin19G 17A
0.97 xG/60 · 2 HD · 13.8% sh
Anthony Beauvillier14G 9A
0.89 xG/60 · 2 HD · 10.4% sh
CHI
Tyler Bertuzzi20G 15A
0.85 xG/60 · 7 HD · 18.0% sh
Connor Bedard17G 27A
0.82 xG/60 · 5 HD · 11.8% sh
Keep going

Where to next