Motion-blurred skater in a Colorado Avalanche sweater
Breakdown · WSH at COL

Avalanche pull away from the Capitals

The verdict · earned

The Avalanche earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

WSH 2 · COL 5
◆ By the ModelJul 12, 1:33 AMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

Colorado dominated 5-2, and the underlying numbers endorsed the verdict—but Washington got particularly unlucky getting there. The Capitals underperformed their expected goals by 1.55, managing only 2 goals on 3.55 xG despite having quality chances the numbers said should have gone in.

Colorado controlled the game completely. They held 65% of shot attempts (44–24) and finished 59% of expected goals (5.16–3.55). In the high-danger zone, the Avalanche were ruthless: 3 of 7 chances became goals, a 43% conversion rate. Off the rush, they were even more efficient—4 goals from just 45 chances.

S. Wedgewood played the game's most decisive role, stopping 1.6 goals above expected. C. Lindgren faced 44 shots and allowed 5, posting an 0.886 save percentage against overwhelming volume.

The turning point came in the third period, when N. MacKinnon fired a snap shot from the slot at 16:30, seizing the moment Colorado's dominance warranted.

Colorado did have one minor inefficiency: they slightly underperformed their own xG (5 goals on 5.16 expected), suggesting they could have run up the score further. But when you're outshooting an opponent nearly 2-to-1 and converting at elite rates, the scoreline speaks for itself.

The breakdown in twelve frames

Swipe it

Every number is from this page
Final · Jan 19
WSH
2
COL
5

Avalanche pull away from the Capitals

Chances 3.5 – 5.2Did they deserve it? →
Did they deserve it?

The Avalanche earned this one.

Expected goals · chance value
WSH
3.55
COL
5.16
41% of the chances59%

The board read WSH 2, COL 5. The chances read WSH 3.5, COL 5.2.

Our xG model · NHL play-by-play · all situations
Luck check
COL
−0.2
goals above expected
COL5.16 expected · 5 scored
Expected
Scored
WSH3.55 expected · 2 scored
Expected
Scored

The Capitals left 1.6 goals on the table against what their chances were worth.

PDO = sh% + sv% · drifts to 1.000 over a season
Every goal, in order
  1. P1 05:54COLP. Kelly0–1
  2. P1 07:27WSHJ. ChychrunPP1–1
  3. P2 07:03COLN. MacKinnonPP1–2
  4. P2 15:58COLV. Olofsson1–3
  5. P2 16:15WSHE. Frank2–3
  6. P3 12:32COLA. Lehkonen2–4
  7. P3 16:30COLN. MacKinnon2–5
NHL play-by-play · chance value from our xG model
Where the shots came from
WSH
44 shots
2
Final
114 shots
COL
70 shots
5
WSH attackCOL attack
WSH COL Goal
44
shots · 2 in
70
shots · 5 in
Every unblocked shot · press play to replay it
Chances by danger
WSHCOL
1 / 5
1.14 xG
High danger
3 / 7
1.91 xG
0 / 18
1.91 xG
Medium
2 / 19
2.13 xG
1 / 33
0.51 xG
Low
0 / 68
1.12 xG

The Avalanche buried 3 of 7 high-danger looks.

Danger tiers by our xG model · high ≥ 20% chance
In the net
A
S. Wedgewood
+1.6
COL · 22/24
C
C. Lindgren
+0.2
WSH · 39/44
The numbers, checked
BACKCHECK

Avalanche pull away from the Capitals

A model, not a newsroom. Every number on these frames comes from the NHL's play-by-play and our own models. Nothing was watched, guessed or heard from anyone.

Read the full breakdown
backcheckreport.com
01 / 08 · Final
Every goal, in order

How it happened

NHL play-by-play
1stshots 12–11
  1. 05:54COLP. Kelly(C. Makar, A. Barré-Boulet)0–1
  2. 07:27WSHJ. Chychrunpower play(D. Strome, E. Frank)1–1
2ndshots 9–16
  1. 07:03COLN. MacKinnonpower play(M. Necas, V. Olofsson)1–2
  2. 15:58COLV. Olofsson(J. Manson, B. Nelson)1–3
  3. 16:15WSHE. Frank(A. Ovechkin, N. Dowd)2–3
3rdshots 3–17
  1. 12:32COLA. Lehkonen(N. MacKinnon)2–4
  2. 16:30COLN. MacKinnon(M. Necas)2–5

score reads WSH–COL

Source · NHL play-by-play (api-web.nhle.com)
Process vs result

The numbers

XGBoost xG · NHL play-by-play
5.16
COL chances
Goals their shots were worth
−0.2
Finishing
Goals below what those chances were worth
1.018
COL puck luck
About 1.000 — a normal night for bounces
62.7%
Shot attempts
Over half — they had the puck more
Split by club

Who controlled the game

3.55Expected goals5.16
COL 59% of the chance quality
24Shots on goal44
5High-danger chances7
56All attempts (Corsi)94
Adjusted for score: WSH 40% · COL 60%
Faceoffs · COL won62%off43%neu35%def
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG
How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
WSH1 / 5 · 1.14 xG
COL3 / 7 · 1.91 xG
Medium dangermid-range
WSH0 / 18 · 1.91 xG
COL2 / 19 · 2.13 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
WSH1 / 33 · 0.51 xG
COL0 / 68 · 1.12 xG

WSH went 0-for-18 from medium danger on 1.91 expected goals — 1.9 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
WSH
2 G · 3.55 xG · -1.6
COL
5 G · 5.16 xG · -0.2
0123456

WSH finished -1.6 against expected, COL -0.2.

Source · Backcheck xG model
Shot types · rush and rebound chancesopen +
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
WSH
WRIST1/20
SNAP0/6
SLAP0/2
TIP IN0/7
BACKHAND1/7
POKE0/1
BAT0/1
DEFLECTED0/0
OTHER0/12
COL
WRIST1/42
SNAP3/11
SLAP0/10
TIP IN1/4
BACKHAND0/2
POKE0/0
BAT0/0
DEFLECTED0/1
OTHER0/24
WSH
COL
Off the rush
1 G on 26
2.36 xG
4 G on 45
4.04 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 6
0.77 xG
1 G on 3
0.52 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: WSH went 1-for-20, COL 1-for-42. COL scored 4 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
New to these numbers?

Two things happened in this game: who created the better chances, and who put the puck in the net. They are not the same thing, and this page separates them on purpose.

The one to watch is expected goals— the best single read on who deserved to win. When it disagrees with the scoreboard, that disagreement is usually the story. Nothing here is a projection; every figure is computed from this game's play-by-play. Full glossary →

xG
Expected goals. Every shot scored by how often that exact look goes in. 2.5 xG means the chances were worth about two and a half goals.
HD
High-danger chances — shots from the slot and the crease, where shots actually become goals.
Corsi
Every shot attempt, including the ones that missed or got blocked. A rough read on who had the puck.
Adj.
Score-adjusted. Teams that trail shoot more and teams that lead sit back, so this corrects the attempt count for the scoreboard.
GSAx
Goals saved above expected. A positive number means the goalie stopped more than an average goalie would have on those shots.
PDO
Shooting % plus save % — a luck gauge. It sits near 1.000 over a season, so a game far from it usually means the bounces decided it.
Shot by shot

In the net

Graded on goals saved above expected
C. Lindgren
WSH · 39/44 · .886
+0.2
saved above expected
C
the night
By dangerG/attxGsaved
High danger3/71.9-1.1
Medium2/192.1+0.1
Low0/681.1+1.1

A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

S. Wedgewood
COL · 22/24 · .917
+1.6
saved above expected
A
the night
By dangerG/attxGsaved
High danger1/51.1+0.1
Medium0/181.9+1.9
Low1/330.5-0.5

A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

114 shots · press play to watch the game back

Where the shots came from

NHL play-by-play coordinates
WSH
44 shots
2
Final
114 shots
COL
70 shots
5
WSH attackCOL attack
WSH COL Goal

Each club shoots toward its own end — WSH left, COL right — the way you would watch it. A dot's size is how dangerous the look was, from distance and angle; it is a proxy for shot quality, not the xG model the article is written from. Hover a dot for the shooter and the clock.

Ranked from the box score

Three stars

Points first
Three stars · computed, not voted
N. MacKinnon
#29 · C · COL
2 G · 1 A · 10 SOG · 22:27 on ice · +2
M. Necas
#88 · C · COL
0 G · 2 A · 2 SOG · 23:38 on ice · +2
E. Frank
#53 · R · WSH
1 G · 1 A · 4 SOG · 14:57 on ice · +1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model said beforehand

Before the game

Written Mon, Jan 19
Open the pre-game read
Written from the numbers

The read

Edited for clarity
◆ By the ModelJul 12, 1:29 AMEdited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

Colorado sits at 58% win probability against Washington in the model's projection of a 2.5–3.0 game. The Avalanche are the pick — but regression may have other plans.

The Avalanche are fresher, posting a 6-3-1 mark in their last 10 games. More importantly, they own the underlying play. Colorado generates 57.0% of 5v5 expected goals against Washington's 50.0%, and controls territory at 57.0% Corsi. The model sees what the eye sees: a team pushing the play.

Both teams are running dangerously hot on PDO. Colorado sits at 1.021; Washington at 1.018. That's unsustainable. The Avalanche's xG advantage is structural; the Capitals' will evaporate.

Watch L. Thompson's availability. On a back-to-back, Washington could deploy a backup, or ride its starter into the second half fatigued.

Players to Watch

Alex Ovechkin leads Washington at 19 goals and 17 assists, generating 0.97 expected goals per 60 while shooting 13.8%, backed by two high-danger goals. Anthony Beauvillier supplies secondary production with 14 goals and 9 assists at 0.89 xG/60, shooting 10.4%, and represents Washington's reliance on conversion over volume.

Artturi Lehkonen drives Colorado at 1.11 xG/60 with 18 goals, 22 assists, and six high-danger goals while shooting 14.9%. Ross Colton complements him at 1.10 xG/60 on just 7 goals and 15 assists, shooting 4.9%, evidence Colton hasn't converted his volume.

The Structural Edge

Neither team generates high-danger or rebound goals at elevated clips — both sit at 0% in those categories. Washington's defensive weakness is Declan Chisholm; Colorado's is Nazem Kadri. The Avalanche's edge isn't in individual matchups but in volume: 57.0% xG over a full game compounds faster than Ovechkin's 13.8% shooting and Beauvillier's 10.4% can overcome.

The model's lean on Colorado is sound. Whether it holds depends on whose PDO collapses first.

What the model said beforehand

The model's lean

COL 58%
58%
COL
Model favorite
42%
58%
WSH50COL

COL by 16 points of win probability — a clear lean. Projected score WSH 2.5–3.0 COL; 17% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season rates · 5v5

Tale of the tape

NHL stats API · our xG
WSH← edge
edge →COL
50.0%57.0%
49.0%57.0%
2.623.03
2.622.30
2.182.63
1.791.56
1.0181.021

COL holds 6 of 6 process categories — and the luck row (1.018 vs 1.021) says COL has been getting the bounces, which tends not to last.

Source · NHL stats API + our xG · 5v5
Form · Last 10
WSH
4-5-1
+1 GD · 1d rest
COL
6-3-1
+13 GD · 2d rest
1.018
WSH PDO
Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
1.021
COL PDO
Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
What decides it

Keys to the game

Where the edges live
  • The Avalanche own the underlying play — 57.0% 5v5 xG vs 50.0%.
  • The Avalanche drive Corsi at 57.0% — expect territorial tilt.
Regression watch
  • The Avalanche's PDO is 1.021 — running hot, expect some regression.
  • The Capitals' PDO is 1.018 — running hot, expect some regression.
Things to watch
  • The Avalanche own the underlying play — 57.0% 5v5 xG vs 50.0%.
  • The Avalanche drive Corsi at 57.0% — expect territorial tilt.
  • L. Thompson is on a back-to-back — watch for a backup start or a tired starter.
  • The Avalanche are the hotter team by points pace (6-3-1 in their last 10).
  • The Avalanche's PDO is 1.021 — running hot, expect some regression.
Last game's lineup · confirmed at warm-up

Lineups

NHL box score
WSH
Expected in goal
L. Thompson
back-to-back.897 last start
Backup Logan Thompson · +29.3 GSAx this season
Back-to-back: the backup often gets this one. Treat the starter as unconfirmed.

No completed game on file for this club yet.

COL
Expected in goal
M. Blackwood
2 days rest.821 last start
Backup Scott Wedgewood · +23.1 GSAx this season

No completed game on file for this club yet.

Lineups are the players who dressed in each club's last game, with their minutes; clubs confirm tonight's at warm-up. Every player this preview names was in that lineup.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

NHL stats API · our xG
WSH
Alex Ovechkin19G 17A
0.97 xG/60 · 2 HD · 13.8% sh
Anthony Beauvillier14G 9A
0.89 xG/60 · 2 HD · 10.4% sh
COL
Artturi Lehkonen18G 22A
1.11 xG/60 · 6 HD · 14.9% sh
Ross Colton7G 15A
1.10 xG/60 · 1 HD · 4.9% sh
Keep going

Where to next