Devils run the Flames off the ice on the underlying numbers
The Devils earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.
The underlying story
The Devils' 2-1 overtime victory understated their dominance. They controlled 62% of expected goals at 5-on-5 (3.04–1.88), a margin that suggested a blowout rather than a one-goal win.
New Jersey simply generated better looks. They averaged 0.056 expected goals per shot; Calgary managed 0.041. That quality gap materialized in the rush, where the Devils converted 2 goals on 24 chances.
The Flames folded on the underlying metrics. They recorded just 38% of xG while ceding 41% of shot attempts. Only their goaltending prevented an even larger margin: D. Cooley posted a 0.938 save percentage, outplaying his xG model by 1.04 goals.
New Jersey underperformed slightly themselves—finishing with 2 goals on an xG of 3.04, leaving 1.04 in the tank—but J. Markstrom was nearly flawless, stopping 21 of 22 shots (0.955 SV%, +0.88). The net advantage was decisive: when Calgary attacked, they got low-danger looks; when New Jersey did, they found soft areas.
S. Nemec's overtime snap from the slot at 01:18 was the visual confirmation of what the xG model had been saying all night.
The danger ladder
CGY went 0-for-9 from medium danger on 1.01 expected goals — 1.0 left on the table.
Finishing vs expected
NJD finished -1.0 against expected, CGY -0.9 — D. Cooley (CGY) saved 1.0 goals above expected.
Shot diet
Wrist shots carried the volume: NJD went 0-for-24, CGY 0-for-21. NJD scored 2 of theirs off the rush.
- D. Cooley (CGY) stopped 1.0 goals above expected.
- NJD had the higher quality looks — 0.056 xG/shot vs 0.041.
- NJD was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 24 rush chances.
- NJD created 5 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.