Flyers pull away from the Avalanche
The Flyers earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.
The underlying story
Colorado held 64% of shot attempts (35–20), yet Philadelphia controlled 55% of 5v5 expected goals (4.00–3.25). The Flyers more than doubled Colorado's danger rate—0.093 xG per shot to 0.044—and scored 7 goals on 4.00 xG, a 3.00-goal overperformance.
The goaltending reflected the gap: S. Ersson (PHI) stopped 32 of 35 shots (0.914 save percentage), while M. Blackwood (COL) made 13 saves on 19 (0.684 mark), 2.00 goals worse than expected.
Both teams executed on the rush. Colorado buried 3 goals on 30 chances; Philadelphia converted 5 on 22 attempts. The Flyers dominated high-danger situations (7–3) and scored twice from low-danger spots—plays opposing goalies are supposed to stop.
Matvei Michkov's wrist shot from the top of the circles (P3, 16:53) marked the turning point, when the Flyers' efficiency widened into separation.
The danger ladder
PHI went 2-for-21 from low danger on 0.33 expected goals — 1.7 above expected.
Finishing vs expected
PHI finished +3.0 against expected, COL -0.3 — M. Blackwood (COL) allowed 2.0 more goals than expected.
Shot diet
Wrist shots carried the volume: PHI went 6-for-18, COL 2-for-24. PHI scored 5 of theirs off the rush.
- COL had the shot volume but the chances weren't dangerous.
- M. Blackwood (COL) gave up 2.0 goals more than expected — well below their workload.
- PHI had the higher quality looks — 0.093 xG/shot vs 0.044.
- PHI scored 2 goals from low-danger spots — the opposing goalie needs to have those.
- COL was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 30 rush chances.
- PHI was lethal off the rush — 5 goals on 22 rush chances.
- PHI created 3 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
- PHI outperformed their expected goals by 3.0 — elite finishing or lucky bounces.