Backcheck
Recap · PHI at COL

Flyers pull away from the Avalanche

The Flyers earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

By the ModelJul 12, 2:20 AMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
PHI
Philadelphia Flyers
7
Home
COL
Colorado Avalanche
3
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

4.00Expected goals3.25
55% share for the better side
20Shot attempts (SOG)35
7High-danger chances3
43Corsi (all attempts)74
Score-adjusted: 33% / 67%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

Colorado held 64% of shot attempts (35–20), yet Philadelphia controlled 55% of 5v5 expected goals (4.00–3.25). The Flyers more than doubled Colorado's danger rate—0.093 xG per shot to 0.044—and scored 7 goals on 4.00 xG, a 3.00-goal overperformance.

The goaltending reflected the gap: S. Ersson (PHI) stopped 32 of 35 shots (0.914 save percentage), while M. Blackwood (COL) made 13 saves on 19 (0.684 mark), 2.00 goals worse than expected.

Both teams executed on the rush. Colorado buried 3 goals on 30 chances; Philadelphia converted 5 on 22 attempts. The Flyers dominated high-danger situations (7–3) and scored twice from low-danger spots—plays opposing goalies are supposed to stop.

Matvei Michkov's wrist shot from the top of the circles (P3, 16:53) marked the turning point, when the Flyers' efficiency widened into separation.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
PHI2 / 7 · 1.98 xG
COL1 / 3 · 0.66 xG
Medium dangermid-range
PHI3 / 15 · 1.70 xG
COL1 / 18 · 1.89 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
PHI2 / 21 · 0.33 xG
COL1 / 53 · 0.70 xG

PHI went 2-for-21 from low danger on 0.33 expected goals — 1.7 above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
PHI
7 G · 4.00 xG · +3.0
COL
3 G · 3.25 xG · -0.3
012345678
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
S. ErssonPHI
+0.3
M. BlackwoodCOL
-2.0

PHI finished +3.0 against expected, COL -0.3 — M. Blackwood (COL) allowed 2.0 more goals than expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
PHI
WRIST6/18
SNAP0/6
TIP IN1/6
SLAP0/1
BACKHAND0/0
WRAP AROUND0/1
OTHER0/11
COL
WRIST2/24
SNAP0/9
TIP IN0/6
SLAP0/8
BACKHAND1/3
WRAP AROUND0/0
OTHER0/24
PHI
COL
Off the rush
5 G on 22 · 2.30 xG
3 G on 30 · 2.17 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 3 · 0.49 xG
0 G on 2 · 0.32 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: PHI went 6-for-18, COL 2-for-24. PHI scored 5 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
O. Tippett
#74 · R · PHI
3 G · 1 A · 4 SOG · 16:04 TOI · +1
M. Michkov
#39 · R · PHI
2 G · 1 A · 5 SOG · 14:31 TOI · +3
N. MacKinnon
#29 · C · COL
0 G · 2 A · 1 SOG · 26:15 TOI · -1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • COL had the shot volume but the chances weren't dangerous.
  • M. Blackwood (COL) gave up 2.0 goals more than expected — well below their workload.
  • PHI had the higher quality looks — 0.093 xG/shot vs 0.044.
  • PHI scored 2 goals from low-danger spots — the opposing goalie needs to have those.
  • COL was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 30 rush chances.
  • PHI was lethal off the rush — 5 goals on 22 rush chances.
  • PHI created 3 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • PHI outperformed their expected goals by 3.0 — elite finishing or lucky bounces.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · PHI at COL · 9:00 PM ET

The Avalanche are the model's lean over the Flyers — with PDO regression in play

By the ModelJul 12, 2:19 AMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

58%
COL
Model favorite
42%
58%
PHI50COL

COL by 16 points of win probability — a clear lean. Projected score PHI 2.32.8 COL; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

PHI← edge
edge →COL
51.0%5v5 xG%57.0%
48.0%Corsi%57.0%
2.26xGF / 603.03
2.20xGA / 602.30
1.96Goals for / gm2.63
1.82Goals against / gm1.56
1.008PDO — luck, not skill1.021

COL holds 5 of 6 process categories — and PDO (1.008 vs 1.021) says COL has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model projects a PHI 2.3–2.8 COL scoreline with Colorado at 58% win probability, a lean anchored by structural advantage rather than shooting variance.

The Avalanche control possession at 57.0% expected goals share against the Flyers' 51.0%, and own the territorial battle decisively at 57.0% Corsi. Philadelphia enters wounded: -13 goal differential over the last 10 games signals dysfunction beyond random variance. That gap opens space for Colorado's elite play generation.

The catch: Colorado's 1.021 PDO is running hot against Philadelphia's 1.008, meaning the Avalanche are overdue for regression. Shooting percentage and save percentage don't stay this elevated for long. The Flyers, meanwhile, have underperformed their underlying play, so even a loss preserves the structural story.

Both teams will navigate goaltending uncertainty. S. Wedgewood and S. Ersson are both on back-to-backs, raising the specter of backup appearances or depleted starters.

On the scoresheet, Colorado's production engines hold the edge. Artturi Lehkonen leads at 1.11 xG/60 and has converted 6 high-danger chances into 18 goals and 22 assists at 14.9% shooting. Ross Colton generates at a similar 1.10 xG/60, though his finishing lags at 4.9% shooting with 7 goals, 15 assists, and 1 high-danger goal.

Philadelphia's attack offers weaker counterweight. Owen Tippett sits at 0.88 xG/60 with 19 goals and 18 assists, driven by 2 high-danger conversions at 12.1% shooting. Christian Dvorak runs 0.81 xG/60, producing 12 goals and 21 assists off 3 high-danger goals at 11.2% shooting. Neither approaches the volume or consistency of Colorado's best.

The Avalanche figure to control the majority of play and should benefit from territorial dominance—if either team avoids a backup between the pipes tonight. The Flyers' -13 spread over ten games forecasts more of the same: adequate chance generation starved of finish, buried under a better team's grip.

Colorado's PDO regresses eventually. Against Philadelphia's current form, that regress can absorb half a goal and still leave room for victory.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

PHI
Owen Tippett19G 18A
0.88 xG/60 · 2 HD · 12.1% sh
Christian Dvorak12G 21A
0.81 xG/60 · 3 HD · 11.2% sh
COL
Artturi Lehkonen18G 22A
1.11 xG/60 · 6 HD · 14.9% sh
Ross Colton7G 15A
1.10 xG/60 · 1 HD · 4.9% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters