Motion-blurred skater in a New Jersey Devils sweater
Breakdown · NSH at NJD

Devils edge the Predators in overtime

The verdict · earned

The Devils earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

NSH 2 · NJD 3
◆ By the ModelJul 12, 3:02 AMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

The Devils' 3-2 overtime victory masked a quality-chance advantage for Nashville: the Predators created six high-danger opportunities to New Jersey's five, yet finished with only two goals. The gap between underlying structure and scoreline reveals how much goaltending and small-sample variance can swing close contests.

The underlying play split nearly even. New Jersey held 55% of shot attempts (35–29 on goal) and led in expected goals 3.84 to 3.53. But conversion told a different story. The Devils scored twice from low-danger spots—plays that most goalies stop. They converted zero of five high-danger attempts. Nashville, meanwhile, couldn't convert its high-danger opportunities, underperforming their 3.53 expected goals by 1.53 goals.

Goaltending decided the game. J. Markstrom (NJD) saved 1.53 goals above expected. J. Annunen (NSH) stopped all five high-danger shots but allowed two from low-danger territory.

Nico Hischier ended it 42 seconds into overtime, firing a slap shot from the top of the circles. The Devils' rush-attack edge proved decisive: they scored three goals on 34 rush chances, the only metric that mattered in a night both teams left opportunities on the table.

The breakdown in twelve frames

Swipe it

Every number is from this page
Final · OT · Jan 29
NSH
2
NJD
3

Devils edge the Predators in overtime

Chances 3.5 – 3.8Did they deserve it? →
Did they deserve it?

Dead even on chances. The Devils took it anyway.

Expected goals · chance value
NSH
3.53
NJD
3.84
48% of the chances52%

The board read NSH 2, NJD 3. The chances read NSH 3.5, NJD 3.8.

Our xG model · NHL play-by-play · all situations
Luck check
NJD
−0.8
goals above expected
NJD3.84 expected · 3 scored
Expected
Scored
NSH3.53 expected · 2 scored
Expected
Scored

The Predators left 1.5 goals on the table against what their chances were worth.

PDO = sh% + sv% · drifts to 1.000 over a season
Every goal, in order
  1. P1 05:07NSHM. McCarron1–0
  2. P2 10:01NJDD. Hamilton1–1
  3. P3 01:34NSHF. Forsberg2–1
  4. P3 10:42NJDJ. Bratt2–2
  5. OT 00:42NJDN. Hischier2–3
NHL play-by-play · chance value from our xG model
Where the shots came from
NSH
49 shots
2
Final
107 shots
NJD
58 shots
3
NSH attackNJD attack
NSH NJD Goal
49
shots · 2 in
58
shots · 3 in
Every unblocked shot · press play to replay it
Chances by danger
NSHNJD
1 / 6
1.31 xG
High danger
0 / 5
1.11 xG
1 / 16
1.54 xG
Medium
1 / 16
1.79 xG
0 / 47
0.68 xG
Low
2 / 51
0.94 xG

High-danger looks: NSH 1 of 6, NJD 0 of 5.

Danger tiers by our xG model · high ≥ 20% chance
In the net
A
J. Markstrom
+1.5
NJD · 27/29
B+
J. Annunen
+0.8
NSH · 32/35
The numbers, checked
BACKCHECK

Devils edge the Predators in overtime

A model, not a newsroom. Every number on these frames comes from the NHL's play-by-play and our own models. Nothing was watched, guessed or heard from anyone.

Read the full breakdown
backcheckreport.com
01 / 08 · Final
Every goal, in order

How it happened

NHL play-by-play
1stshots 7–13
  1. 05:07NSHM. McCarron(J. Marchessault, C. Smith)1–0
2ndshots 13–13
  1. 10:01NJDD. Hamilton(L. Hameenaho, A. Gritsyuk)1–1
3rdshots 9–8
  1. 01:34NSHF. Forsberg(A. Wilsby)2–1
  2. 10:42NJDJ. Bratt2–2
OTshots 0–1
  1. 00:42NJDN. Hischier(D. Mercer)2–3

score reads NSH–NJD

Source · NHL play-by-play (api-web.nhle.com)
Process vs result

The numbers

XGBoost xG · NHL play-by-play
3.84
NJD chances
Goals their shots were worth
−0.8
Finishing
Goals below what those chances were worth
1.013
NJD puck luck
About 1.000 — a normal night for bounces
51.1%
Shot attempts
Over half — they had the puck more
Split by club

Who controlled the game

3.53Expected goals3.84
NJD 52% of the chance quality
29Shots on goal35
6High-danger chances5
69All attempts (Corsi)72
Adjusted for score: NSH 47% · NJD 53%
Faceoffs · NJD won50%off41%neu56%def
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG
How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
NSH1 / 6 · 1.31 xG
NJD0 / 5 · 1.11 xG
Medium dangermid-range
NSH1 / 16 · 1.54 xG
NJD1 / 16 · 1.79 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
NSH0 / 47 · 0.68 xG
NJD2 / 51 · 0.94 xG

NJD went 0-for-5 from high danger on 1.11 expected goals — 1.1 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
NSH
2 G · 3.53 xG · -1.5
NJD
3 G · 3.84 xG · -0.8
012345

NSH finished -1.5 against expected, NJD -0.8.

Source · Backcheck xG model
Shot types · rush and rebound chancesopen +
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
NSH
WRIST0/13
SLAP0/20
SNAP1/9
TIP IN0/2
BACKHAND0/2
WRAP AROUND1/2
POKE0/1
OTHER0/20
NJD
WRIST1/29
SLAP1/12
SNAP1/7
TIP IN0/6
BACKHAND0/4
WRAP AROUND0/0
POKE0/0
OTHER0/14
NSH
NJD
Off the rush
1 G on 29
2.60 xG
3 G on 34
2.39 xG
Off rebounds
1 G on 3
0.46 xG
0 G on 6
0.84 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: NSH went 0-for-13, NJD 1-for-29. NJD scored 3 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
New to these numbers?

Two things happened in this game: who created the better chances, and who put the puck in the net. They are not the same thing, and this page separates them on purpose.

The one to watch is expected goals— the best single read on who deserved to win. When it disagrees with the scoreboard, that disagreement is usually the story. Nothing here is a projection; every figure is computed from this game's play-by-play. Full glossary →

xG
Expected goals. Every shot scored by how often that exact look goes in. 2.5 xG means the chances were worth about two and a half goals.
HD
High-danger chances — shots from the slot and the crease, where shots actually become goals.
Corsi
Every shot attempt, including the ones that missed or got blocked. A rough read on who had the puck.
Adj.
Score-adjusted. Teams that trail shoot more and teams that lead sit back, so this corrects the attempt count for the scoreboard.
GSAx
Goals saved above expected. A positive number means the goalie stopped more than an average goalie would have on those shots.
PDO
Shooting % plus save % — a luck gauge. It sits near 1.000 over a season, so a game far from it usually means the bounces decided it.
Shot by shot

In the net

Graded on goals saved above expected
J. Annunen
NSH · 32/35 · .914
+0.8
saved above expected
B+
the night
By dangerG/attxGsaved
High danger0/51.1+1.1
Medium1/161.8+0.8
Low2/510.9-1.1

A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

J. Markstrom
NJD · 27/29 · .931
+1.5
saved above expected
A
the night
By dangerG/attxGsaved
High danger1/61.3+0.3
Medium1/161.5+0.5
Low0/470.7+0.7

A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

107 shots · press play to watch the game back

Where the shots came from

NHL play-by-play coordinates
NSH
49 shots
2
Final
107 shots
NJD
58 shots
3
NSH attackNJD attack
NSH NJD Goal

Each club shoots toward its own end — NSH left, NJD right — the way you would watch it. A dot's size is how dangerous the look was, from distance and angle; it is a proxy for shot quality, not the xG model the article is written from. Hover a dot for the shooter and the clock.

Ranked from the box score

Three stars

Points first
Three stars · computed, not voted
N. Hischier
#13 · C · NJD
1 G · 0 A · 7 SOG · 26:09 on ice · +1
J. Bratt
#63 · L · NJD
1 G · 0 A · 1 SOG · 20:51 on ice
D. Hamilton
#7 · D · NJD
1 G · 0 A · 5 SOG · 20:43 on ice · +1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model said beforehand

Before the game

Written Thu, Jan 29
Open the pre-game read
Written from the numbers

The read

Edited for clarity
◆ By the ModelJul 12, 3:01 AMEdited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

The model projects a 2.5–2.6 goal difference with New Jersey at 53% to win. This is about as close to a true toss-up as you'll find in hockey.

Nashville sits underwater at −5 goal differential over their last ten games, which explains some caution. Yet the underlying numbers tell a different story. At 5v5, the Predators' xG% is 49.0%, Corsi% 50.0%, and PDO 0.992—the exact kind of marginal possession metrics that reveal a team treading water, not sinking. The Devils mirror this mediocrity: xG% 50.0%, Corsi% 51.0%. These aren't dominant performances; they're dead even.

Where New Jersey shows weakness is PDO. At 0.971, the Devils are running cold in the luck department, which means positive regression is due. Hockey's variance usually corrects itself.

The goaltending matchup clouds the forecast. Both J. Allen and J. Saros are on back-to-backs, which means backup appearances or tired starters are possible. Whoever shows up fresher has a real edge.

Players to Watch

NSH

  • Zachary L'Heureux — 0.85 xG/60, 4G, 1 HD goal, 16.0% shooting
  • Filip Forsberg — 0.80 xG/60, 23G 17A, 4 HD goals, 13.6% shooting

NJD

  • Timo Meier — 1.08 xG/60, 13G 15A, 3 HD goals, 6.7% shooting
  • Jack Hughes — 0.88 xG/60, 18G 17A, 1 HD goal, 11.5% shooting

L'Heureux's efficiency marks dangerous skill that will regress. Forsberg adds depth with multiple high-danger goals. Meier leads in volume and carries the most upside; Hughes represents the other Devils outlet. Defensively, Jonathan Marchessault is Nashville's weak link, while Johnathan Kovacevic represents New Jersey's vulnerability.

Neither team is particularly vulnerable on rebounds or high-danger setups—both sit at 0%—so puck management and transition discipline become deciding factors.

The verdict remains unchanged: this is a genuine coin flip. Nashville has form working against them, but underlying metrics suggest they're closer than their recent record implies. New Jersey has the slight model edge and PDO room to run, but neither advantage is substantial. Expect tightly contested hockey that could hinge on whether Meier or L'Heureux gets the bounces.

What the model said beforehand

The model's lean

NJD 53%
53%
NJD
Model favorite
47%
53%
NSH50NJD

NJD by 6 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score NSH 2.5–2.6 NJD; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season rates · 5v5

Tale of the tape

NHL stats API · our xG
NSH← edge
edge →NJD
49.0%50.0%
50.0%51.0%
2.482.45
2.582.50
1.841.66
2.212.23
0.9920.971

The season numbers split 3–3 — no clear process edge — and the luck row (0.992 vs 0.971) says NSH has been getting the bounces, which tends not to last.

Source · NHL stats API + our xG · 5v5
Form · Last 10
NSH
5-4-1
-5 GD · 1d rest
NJD
5-5-0
-3 GD · 1d rest
0.992
NSH PDO
Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
0.971
NJD PDO
Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
What decides it

Keys to the game

Regression watch
  • The Devils' PDO is 0.971 — running cold, due for positive regression.
Things to watch
  • J. Allen is on a back-to-back — watch for a backup start or a tired starter.
  • J. Saros is on a back-to-back — watch for a backup start or a tired starter.
  • The Predators are underwater at -5 goal differential over their last 10.
  • The Devils' PDO is 0.971 — running cold, due for positive regression.
Last game's lineup · confirmed at warm-up

Lineups

NHL box score
NSH
Expected in goal
J. Saros
back-to-back.893 last start
Backup Juuse Saros · -9.3 GSAx this season
Back-to-back: the backup often gets this one. Treat the starter as unconfirmed.

No completed game on file for this club yet.

NJD
Expected in goal
J. Allen
back-to-back.846 last start
Backup Jacob Markstrom · -11.9 GSAx this season
Back-to-back: the backup often gets this one. Treat the starter as unconfirmed.

No completed game on file for this club yet.

Lineups are the players who dressed in each club's last game, with their minutes; clubs confirm tonight's at warm-up. Every player this preview names was in that lineup.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

NHL stats API · our xG
NSH
Zachary L'Heureux4G 0A
0.85 xG/60 · 1 HD · 16.0% sh
Filip Forsberg23G 17A
0.80 xG/60 · 4 HD · 13.6% sh
NJD
Timo Meier13G 15A
1.08 xG/60 · 3 HD · 6.7% sh
Jack Hughes18G 17A
0.88 xG/60 · 1 HD · 11.5% sh
Keep going

Where to next