Motion-blurred skater in a New York Islanders sweater
Breakdown · NYI at NYR

Islanders hold off the Rangers

The verdict · coin flip

The Islanders won a genuine coin flip — neither side controlled the run of play.

NYI 2 · NYR 1
◆ By the ModelJul 12, 3:12 AMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

The Islanders won 2–1 despite being outchanced, because I. Sorokin played exceptionally well while the Rangers squandered their opportunities. The Rangers created a slight edge in expected goals (2.67–2.59) and dominated high-danger chances (6–2), but scored only once, underperforming their xG by 1.67 goals. Sorokin, by contrast, saved 1.67 goals above expected, stopping all 6 high-danger shots at 100% SV.

The Rangers' inefficiency was brutal. They generated 0 goals from 6 high-danger chances—a conversion rate that won't repeat. They also created 5 rebound opportunities and converted none. Meanwhile, the Islanders scored twice from low-danger spots, the kind of luck that requires an opposing goaltender to fail. J. Quick (19/21, 0.905 SV%) actually played fine; Sorokin (20/21, 0.952 SV%) simply played better.

Mika Zibanejad's slap shot from the top of the circles in the third period gave the Rangers their one goal at 2:48, but it wasn't enough. The Islanders controlled the result through a combination of Sorokin's brilliance and New York's inability to finish despite multiple clear-cut chances.

The shot-attempt battle finished even at 21–21. The high-danger-chance disparity—6–2 in the Rangers' favor—suggested they should have won this game. That they didn't speaks to Sorokin's performance and the Rangers' execution at the finish line.

The breakdown in twelve frames

Swipe it

Every number is from this page
Final · Jan 29
NYI
2
NYR
1

Islanders hold off the Rangers

Chances 2.6 – 2.7Did they deserve it? →
Did they deserve it?

Dead even on chances. The Islanders took it anyway.

Expected goals · chance value
NYI
2.59
NYR
2.67
49% of the chances51%

The board read NYI 2, NYR 1. The chances read NYI 2.6, NYR 2.7.

Our xG model · NHL play-by-play · all situations
Luck check
NYI
−0.6
goals above expected
NYI2.59 expected · 2 scored
Expected
Scored
NYR2.67 expected · 1 scored
Expected
Scored

The Rangers left 1.7 goals on the table against what their chances were worth.

PDO = sh% + sv% · drifts to 1.000 over a season
Every goal, in order
  1. P2 17:18NYIC. Soucy1–0
  2. P2 18:53NYIM. Schaefer2–0
  3. P3 02:48NYRM. ZibanejadPP2–1
NHL play-by-play · chance value from our xG model
Where the shots came from
NYI
36 shots
2
Final
67 shots
NYR
31 shots
1
NYI attackNYR attack
NYI NYR Goal
36
shots · 2 in
31
shots · 1 in
Every unblocked shot · press play to replay it
Chances by danger
NYINYR
0 / 2
1.09 xG
High danger
0 / 6
1.37 xG
0 / 9
0.92 xG
Medium
1 / 8
0.80 xG
2 / 36
0.58 xG
Low
0 / 35
0.50 xG

The Rangers went 0 for 6 from the slot.

Danger tiers by our xG model · high ≥ 20% chance
In the net
A
I. Sorokin
+1.7
NYI · 20/21
B
J. Quick
+0.6
NYR · 19/21
The numbers, checked
BACKCHECK

Islanders hold off the Rangers

A model, not a newsroom. Every number on these frames comes from the NHL's play-by-play and our own models. Nothing was watched, guessed or heard from anyone.

Read the full breakdown
backcheckreport.com
01 / 08 · Final
Every goal, in order

How it happened

NHL play-by-play
1stshots 6–6no goals
    2ndshots 5–8
    1. 17:18NYIC. Soucy(M. Shabanov, S. Mayfield)1–0
    2. 18:53NYIM. Schaefer(B. Horvat)2–0
    3rdshots 10–7
    1. 02:48NYRM. Zibanejadpower play(V. Gavrikov, J. Miller)2–1

    score reads NYI–NYR

    Source · NHL play-by-play (api-web.nhle.com)
    Process vs result

    The numbers

    XGBoost xG · NHL play-by-play
    2.59
    NYI chances
    Goals their shots were worth
    −0.6
    Finishing
    Goals below what those chances were worth
    1.022
    NYI puck luck
    Above 1.000 — the bounces went their way
    49.0%
    Shot attempts
    Under half — they were outshot
    Split by club

    Who controlled the game

    2.59Expected goals2.67
    NYR 51% of the chance quality
    21Shots on goal21
    2High-danger chances6
    47All attempts (Corsi)49
    Adjusted for score: NYI 47% · NYR 53%
    Faceoffs · NYR won52%off81%neu59%def
    Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG
    How the game was won

    The danger ladder

    shotsgoalsexpected
    High dangerslot & crease
    NYI0 / 2 · 1.09 xG
    NYR0 / 6 · 1.37 xG
    Medium dangermid-range
    NYI0 / 9 · 0.92 xG
    NYR1 / 8 · 0.80 xG
    Low dangerperimeter & point
    NYI2 / 36 · 0.58 xG
    NYR0 / 35 · 0.50 xG

    NYI went 2-for-36 from low danger on 0.58 expected goals — 1.4 above expected.

    Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
    The luck layer

    Finishing vs expected

    expectedactual
    NYI
    2 G · 2.59 xG · -0.6
    NYR
    1 G · 2.67 xG · -1.7
    0123

    NYI finished -0.6 against expected, NYR -1.7.

    Source · Backcheck xG model
    Shot types · rush and rebound chancesopen +
    What they shot — and what went in

    Shot diet

    goalsshots
    NYI
    WRIST1/21
    SNAP1/6
    SLAP0/4
    TIP IN0/3
    DEFLECTED0/2
    BACKHAND0/0
    OTHER0/11
    NYR
    WRIST0/17
    SNAP0/7
    SLAP1/3
    TIP IN0/2
    DEFLECTED0/1
    BACKHAND0/1
    OTHER0/18
    NYI
    NYR
    Off the rush
    1 G on 20
    2.00 xG
    1 G on 20
    1.73 xG
    Off rebounds
    0 G on 2
    0.02 xG
    0 G on 5
    0.72 xG

    Wrist shots carried the volume: NYI went 1-for-21, NYR 0-for-17.

    Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
    New to these numbers?

    Two things happened in this game: who created the better chances, and who put the puck in the net. They are not the same thing, and this page separates them on purpose.

    The one to watch is expected goals— the best single read on who deserved to win. When it disagrees with the scoreboard, that disagreement is usually the story. Nothing here is a projection; every figure is computed from this game's play-by-play. Full glossary →

    xG
    Expected goals. Every shot scored by how often that exact look goes in. 2.5 xG means the chances were worth about two and a half goals.
    HD
    High-danger chances — shots from the slot and the crease, where shots actually become goals.
    Corsi
    Every shot attempt, including the ones that missed or got blocked. A rough read on who had the puck.
    Adj.
    Score-adjusted. Teams that trail shoot more and teams that lead sit back, so this corrects the attempt count for the scoreboard.
    GSAx
    Goals saved above expected. A positive number means the goalie stopped more than an average goalie would have on those shots.
    PDO
    Shooting % plus save % — a luck gauge. It sits near 1.000 over a season, so a game far from it usually means the bounces decided it.
    Shot by shot

    In the net

    Graded on goals saved above expected
    I. Sorokin
    NYI · 20/21 · .952
    +1.7
    saved above expected
    A
    the night
    By dangerG/attxGsaved
    High danger0/61.4+1.4
    Medium1/80.8-0.2
    Low0/350.5+0.5

    A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

    J. Quick
    NYR · 19/21 · .905
    +0.6
    saved above expected
    B
    the night
    By dangerG/attxGsaved
    High danger0/21.1+1.1
    Medium0/90.9+0.9
    Low2/360.6-1.4

    A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

    67 shots · press play to watch the game back

    Where the shots came from

    NHL play-by-play coordinates
    NYI
    36 shots
    2
    Final
    67 shots
    NYR
    31 shots
    1
    NYI attackNYR attack
    NYI NYR Goal

    Each club shoots toward its own end — NYI left, NYR right — the way you would watch it. A dot's size is how dangerous the look was, from distance and angle; it is a proxy for shot quality, not the xG model the article is written from. Hover a dot for the shooter and the clock.

    Ranked from the box score

    Three stars

    Points first
    Three stars · computed, not voted
    V. Gavrikov
    #44 · D · NYR
    0 G · 1 A · 2 SOG · 26:55 on ice · -1
    M. Zibanejad
    #93 · C · NYR
    1 G · 0 A · 5 SOG · 23:50 on ice
    M. Schaefer
    #48 · D · NYI
    1 G · 0 A · 2 SOG · 23:25 on ice · +1
    Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
    What the model said beforehand

    Before the game

    Written Thu, Jan 29
    Open the pre-game read
    Written from the numbers

    The read

    Edited for clarity
    ◆ By the ModelJul 12, 3:11 AMEdited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

    The model projects a 2.4–2.6 goal game favoring New York, with the Rangers at 53% win probability—as pure a coin flip as projection modeling produces.

    The underlying metrics explain the stalemate. Season 5v5, both teams sport identical 48.0% expected goal shares and 49.0% Corsi percentages. The only separation is luck: the Rangers' PDO sits at 1.009 against the Islanders' 0.993, meaning New York's goals-for and goals-against have both run slightly in their favor. Strip that away and this is a dead-even matchup.

    Recent form tilts Islanders' way. They're 5–4–1 over their last 10, riding genuine momentum. The Rangers, meanwhile, are underwater at minus-19 goal differential over the same span—a sign that their lucky PDO isn't translating to wins when the details matter.

    Anders Lee (1.20 xG per 60, nine goals, 20 assists, 6.4% shooting) drives the Islanders' expected output; Bo Horvat (0.87 xG per 60, 18 goals, 12.8% shooting) converts that into goals at an efficient rate. Adam Sykora (0.91 xG per 60, 20.0% shooting) and Gabe Perreault (0.79 xG per 60, eight goals, 13.1% shooting) shoulder the Rangers' offensive load.

    Defensive exposure exists for both. The Islanders lean on Alexander Romanov at the back; the Rangers on Vincent Iorio. Both have gaps—not atypical for playoff-contention teams, but worth tracking when margins are this thin.

    The verdict sits exactly where the math lands: neither team commands a structural edge. The Islanders have momentum, the Rangers have run-of-play equality and a favorable PDO. One will shade out the other, but the projection models can't cleanly pick it. You shouldn't pretend to, either.

    What the model said beforehand

    The model's lean

    NYR 53%
    53%
    NYR
    Model favorite
    47%
    53%
    NYI50NYR

    NYR by 6 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score NYI 2.4–2.6 NYR; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

    Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
    Season rates · 5v5

    Tale of the tape

    NHL stats API · our xG
    NYI← edge
    edge →NYR
    48.0%48.0%
    49.0%49.0%
    2.482.26
    2.692.40
    1.781.88
    1.941.90
    0.9931.009

    NYR holds 5 of 6 process categories — and the luck row (0.993 vs 1.009) says NYR has been getting the bounces, which tends not to last.

    Source · NHL stats API + our xG · 5v5
    Form · Last 10
    NYI
    5-4-1
    +4 GD · 2d rest
    NYR
    2-7-1
    -19 GD · 2d rest
    0.993
    NYI PDO
    Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
    1.009
    NYR PDO
    Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
    What decides it

    Keys to the game

    Things to watch
    • The Islanders are the hotter team by points pace (5-4-1 in their last 10).
    • The Rangers are underwater at -19 goal differential over their last 10.
    Last game's lineup · confirmed at warm-up

    Lineups

    NHL box score
    NYI
    Expected in goal
    I. Sorokin
    2 days rest1.000 last start
    Backup Ilya Sorokin · +25.3 GSAx this season

    No completed game on file for this club yet.

    NYR
    Expected in goal
    J. Quick
    2 days rest.875 last start
    Backup Igor Shesterkin · +21.3 GSAx this season

    No completed game on file for this club yet.

    Lineups are the players who dressed in each club's last game, with their minutes; clubs confirm tonight's at warm-up. Every player this preview names was in that lineup.

    Computed danger · scouting

    Players to watch

    NHL stats API · our xG
    NYI
    Anders Lee9G 20A
    1.20 xG/60 · 2 HD · 6.4% sh
    Bo Horvat18G 10A
    0.87 xG/60 · 3 HD · 12.8% sh
    NYR
    Adam Sykora3G 1A
    0.91 xG/60 · 0 HD · 20.0% sh
    Gabe Perreault8G 11A
    0.79 xG/60 · 2 HD · 13.1% sh
    Keep going

    Where to next