Backcheck
Recap · COL at DET

Avalanche shut out the Red Wings, 5-0

The Avalanche earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

By the ModelJul 12, 3:21 AMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
COL
Colorado Avalanche
5
Home
DET
Detroit Red Wings
0
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

3.77Expected goals3.30
53% share for the better side
21Shot attempts (SOG)28
4High-danger chances3
61Corsi (all attempts)57
Score-adjusted: 45% / 55%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

Colorado's 5-0 shutout masks a close underlying game: xG split 3.30–3.77, nearly even. The Avalanche won through goaltending variance and execution, not dominance.

M. Blackwood saved 3.3 goals above expected, stealing the night. Detroit held 57% of shot attempts (28–21), generating chances but failing to finish—the Red Wings underperformed their xG by 3.30 goals. In the high-danger zone, Colorado converted 50% (2 of 4) while Detroit managed 0 of 3. The Avalanche also scored twice from low-danger positions, a margin no goalie can concede.

Colorado's rush attack was lethal—three goals on 32 chances. N. MacKinnon (2G, 1A) and A. Lehkonen (2A) orchestrated a clinical performance.

J. Gibson (13/17, 0.765 SV%) and C. Talbot (3/4, 0.750 SV%) both underperformed their expected outcomes. Blackwood's excellence was the difference.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
COL2 / 4 · 1.11 xG
DET0 / 3 · 0.75 xG
Medium dangermid-range
COL1 / 17 · 1.99 xG
DET0 / 16 · 1.94 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
COL2 / 40 · 0.67 xG
DET0 / 38 · 0.61 xG

DET went 0-for-16 from medium danger on 1.94 expected goals — 1.9 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
COL
5 G · 3.77 xG · +1.2
DET
0 G · 3.30 xG · -3.3
0123456
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
M. BlackwoodCOL
+3.3
J. GibsonDET
-1.0
C. TalbotDET
-0.3

COL finished +1.2 against expected, DET -3.3 — M. Blackwood (COL) saved 3.3 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
COL
SNAP2/13
WRIST1/17
SLAP1/11
TIP IN0/3
BACKHAND1/1
DEFLECTED0/1
OTHER0/15
DET
SNAP0/17
WRIST0/12
SLAP0/4
TIP IN0/7
BACKHAND0/3
DEFLECTED0/0
OTHER0/14
COL
DET
Off the rush
3 G on 32 · 2.50 xG
0 G on 27 · 2.45 xG
Off rebounds
1 G on 5 · 0.89 xG
0 G on 1 · 0.22 xG

Snap shots carried the volume: COL went 2-for-13, DET 0-for-17. COL scored 3 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
N. MacKinnon
#29 · C · COL
2 G · 1 A · 4 SOG · 21:36 TOI · +3
A. Lehkonen
#62 · L · COL
0 G · 2 A · 1 SOG · 18:41 TOI · +3
V. Nichushkin
#13 · R · COL
0 G · 1 A · 1 SOG · 22:57 TOI · +3
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • DET had the shot volume but the chances weren't dangerous.
  • M. Blackwood (COL) stopped 3.3 goals above expected.
  • COL was clinical in the high-danger zone — 2/4 on HD chances (50%).
  • COL scored 2 goals from low-danger spots — the opposing goalie needs to have those.
  • COL was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 32 rush chances.
  • COL created 5 rebound opportunities (1 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • DET underperformed xG by 3.3 — wasted quality chances.
  • M. Blackwood (COL) saved 3.3 goals above expected — stole the show.
  • C. Talbot (DET) saved 2.8 goals above expected — stole the show.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · COL at DET · 1:00 PM ET

The Avalanche are the model's lean over the Red Wings — with PDO regression in play

By the ModelJul 12, 3:20 AMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

55%
COL
Model favorite
55%
45%
COL50DET

COL by 10 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score COL 2.82.5 DET; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

COL← edge
edge →DET
57.0%5v5 xG%49.0%
57.0%Corsi%49.0%
3.03xGF / 602.38
2.30xGA / 602.50
2.63Goals for / gm1.73
1.56Goals against / gm2.07
1.021PDO — luck, not skill0.985

COL holds 6 of 6 process categories — and PDO (1.021 vs 0.985) says COL has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model projects a 2.8-2.5 Avalanche win with Colorado at 55% win probability. The case is straightforward: Colorado owns the underlying play.

The Avalanche control 57.0% of 5v5 expected goals against Detroit's 49.0%—a gap that signals sustained territorial dominance. Their Corsi sits at 57.0% as well, meaning the edge comes from shot volume, not variance. Colorado will dictate tempo.

But Colorado's 1.021 PDO is a regression risk. Teams at that level typically see goaltending and shooting percentages normalize downward. Detroit, at 0.985 PDO, has underperformed relative to their underlying play. Regression would tighten the spread.

Goaltending enters a back-to-back scenario. J. Gibson takes the net on a second night for Colorado; S. Wedgewood does the same for Detroit. Both could see backup relief if coaches prioritize rest, or both start fatigued. Pre-game confirmations will clarify.

Artturi Lehkonen drives Colorado's forward group at 1.11 xG/60 with 18 goals and 22 assists; his 6 high-danger goals indicate consistent volume near the net. Ross Colton posts 7 goals and 15 assists at 1.10 xG/60, but his 4.9% shooting efficiency is suppressing output. For Detroit, Alex DeBrincat's 0.88 xG/60 looks modest until you see 17 goals and 28 assists; he finishes ruthlessly. Marco Kasper contributes 7 goals and 8 assists at 0.81 xG/60 as depth scoring.

Defensively, Nazem Kadri is Colorado's liability, while Axel Sandin-Pellikka anchors Detroit's weak point.

The model's lean holds. Colorado's control metrics justify the edge—though PDO regression is a live risk that could tighten the final score. Not enough to fade the Avalanche, but enough to respect Detroit's variance upside.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

COL
Artturi Lehkonen18G 22A
1.11 xG/60 · 6 HD · 14.9% sh
Ross Colton7G 15A
1.10 xG/60 · 1 HD · 4.9% sh
DET
Alex DeBrincat17G 28A
0.88 xG/60 · 2 HD · 9.0% sh
Marco Kasper7G 8A
0.81 xG/60 · 1 HD · 6.1% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters