Backcheck
Recap · NSH at NYI

Predators run the Islanders off the ice on the underlying numbers

The Predators earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

By the ModelJul 12, 3:34 AMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
NSH
Nashville Predators
4
Home
NYI
New York Islanders
3
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

5.82Expected goals3.51
62% share for the better side
42Shot attempts (SOG)30
10High-danger chances5
71Corsi (all attempts)45
Score-adjusted: 63% / 38%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

Nashville dominated the underlying metrics—62% of expected goals (5.82–3.51), 58% of shot attempts (42–30 on goal)—but won just 4-3. I. Sorokin's 1.82 goals saved above expected explained the gap between dominance and a narrow scoreline.

The numbers broke entirely Nashville's way otherwise. High-danger chances went 10–5, with New York converting zero (0 for 5) while Nashville scored two from low-danger spots. J. Saros answered with a 100% save rate on five high-danger looks. Both teams thrived on the rush—New York scoring three times on 27 attempts, Nashville four on 35—a sign the game opened up despite Nashville's territorial control.

Roman Josi's wrist shot from the top of the circles (third period, 18:46) proved decisive. Nashville generated eight rebound opportunities but buried none, a critical miss when controlling the shot map this thoroughly. Without I. Sorokin's 1.82 goals above expected, the score would have reflected the domination.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
NSH1 / 10 · 2.35 xG
NYI0 / 5 · 1.12 xG
Medium dangermid-range
NSH1 / 21 · 2.67 xG
NYI3 / 19 · 2.02 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
NSH2 / 40 · 0.80 xG
NYI0 / 21 · 0.37 xG

NSH went 1-for-21 from medium danger on 2.67 expected goals — 1.7 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
NSH
4 G · 5.82 xG · -1.8
NYI
3 G · 3.51 xG · -0.5
01234567
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
J. SarosNSH
+0.5
I. SorokinNYI
+1.8

NSH finished -1.8 against expected, NYI -0.5 — I. Sorokin (NYI) saved 1.8 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
NSH
SNAP1/29
SLAP0/7
BACKHAND0/7
TIP IN0/4
WRIST3/4
DEFLECTED0/2
BAT0/2
POKE0/1
OTHER0/15
NYI
SNAP1/20
SLAP0/6
BACKHAND0/5
TIP IN0/4
WRIST2/3
DEFLECTED0/1
BAT0/0
POKE0/0
OTHER0/6
NSH
NYI
Off the rush
4 G on 35 · 3.93 xG
3 G on 27 · 2.45 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 8 · 1.30 xG
0 G on 2 · 0.33 xG

Snap shots carried the volume: NSH went 1-for-29, NYI 1-for-20. NSH scored 4 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
R. Josi
#59 · D · NSH
1 G · 1 A · 5 SOG · 29:15 TOI · +1
M. Barzal
#13 · C · NYI
1 G · 1 A · 3 SOG · 19:04 TOI
F. Forsberg
#9 · L · NSH
2 G · 0 A · 4 SOG · 16:58 TOI · +1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • I. Sorokin (NYI) stopped 1.8 goals above expected.
  • Open game — 15 high-danger chances combined (NYI 5, NSH 10).
  • NYI couldn't convert — 0/5 on high-danger chances. That won't happen often.
  • NSH scored 2 goals from low-danger spots — the opposing goalie needs to have those.
  • NYI was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 27 rush chances.
  • NSH was lethal off the rush — 4 goals on 35 rush chances.
  • NSH created 8 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • NSH underperformed xG by 1.8 — wasted quality chances.
  • J. Saros was a wall on HD chances — 100% SV on 5 high-danger shots.
  • I. Sorokin (NYI) saved 1.8 goals above expected — stole the show.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · NSH at NYI · 7:00 PM ET

Predators at Islanders: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 12, 3:28 AMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

51%
NYI
Model favorite
49%
51%
NSH50NYI

NYI by 2 points of win probability — effectively a coin flip. Projected score NSH 2.62.7 NYI; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

NSH← edge
edge →NYI
49.0%5v5 xG%48.0%
50.0%Corsi%49.0%
2.48xGF / 602.48
2.58xGA / 602.69
1.84Goals for / gm1.78
2.21Goals against / gm1.94
0.992PDO — luck, not skill0.993

NSH holds 5 of 6 process categories — and PDO (0.992 vs 0.993) says NYI has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model projects a 2.6–2.7 goal game favoring the Islanders at 51% win probability. That's a coin flip.

These teams are statistically interchangeable. Nashville holds a 49.0% expected goals share at 5v5, barely ahead of New York's 48.0%—too narrow a gap to signal any real separation. Corsi% confirms it: 50.0% for Nashville, 49.0% for New York. Both teams have absorbed nearly identical luck (PDO of 0.992 and 0.993), meaning their results track their underlying shot quality. The Islanders' one-point edge in win probability comes entirely from holding possession marginally longer.

The rosters are built from different blueprints, though. Nashville's offense revolves around Zachary L'Heureux, generating 0.85 expected goals per 60 minutes at a 16.0% conversion rate—four goals on no assists despite high-volume opportunity. Filip Forsberg provides complementary scoring at 0.80 xG/60 with a broader impact: 23 goals, 17 assists, 13.6% shooting. New York counters with Anders Lee, this matchup's most prolific creator at 1.20 xG/60 (9 goals, 20 assists, 6.4% shooting), and Bo Horvat, who's posted 18 goals and 10 assists on 12.8% shooting.

Nashville's defensive weak link is Jonathan Marchessault; New York's is Alexander Romanov. Neither represents a critical vulnerability.

Goaltending decides this. The numbers offer no other way to split them.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

NSH
Zachary L'Heureux4G 0A
0.85 xG/60 · 1 HD · 16.0% sh
Filip Forsberg23G 17A
0.80 xG/60 · 4 HD · 13.6% sh
NYI
Anders Lee9G 20A
1.20 xG/60 · 2 HD · 6.4% sh
Bo Horvat18G 10A
0.87 xG/60 · 3 HD · 12.8% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters