Motion-blurred skater in a Nashville Predators sweater
Breakdown · NSH at NYI

Predators run the Islanders off the ice on the underlying numbers

The verdict · earned

The Predators earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

NSH 4 · NYI 3
◆ By the ModelJul 12, 3:34 AMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

Nashville dominated the underlying metrics—62% of expected goals (5.82–3.51), 58% of shot attempts (42–30 on goal)—but won just 4-3. I. Sorokin's 1.82 goals saved above expected explained the gap between dominance and a narrow scoreline.

The numbers broke entirely Nashville's way otherwise. High-danger chances went 10–5, with New York converting zero (0 for 5) while Nashville scored two from low-danger spots. J. Saros answered with a 100% save rate on five high-danger looks. Both teams thrived on the rush—New York scoring three times on 27 attempts, Nashville four on 35—a sign the game opened up despite Nashville's territorial control.

Roman Josi's wrist shot from the top of the circles (third period, 18:46) proved decisive. Nashville generated eight rebound opportunities but buried none, a critical miss when controlling the shot map this thoroughly. Without I. Sorokin's 1.82 goals above expected, the score would have reflected the domination.

The breakdown in twelve frames

Swipe it

Every number is from this page
Final · Jan 31
NSH
4
NYI
3

Predators run the Islanders off the ice on the underlying numbers

Chances 5.8 – 3.5Did they deserve it? →
Did they deserve it?

The Predators earned this one.

Expected goals · chance value
NSH
5.82
NYI
3.51
62% of the chances38%

The board read NSH 4, NYI 3. The chances read NSH 5.8, NYI 3.5.

Our xG model · NHL play-by-play · all situations
Luck check
NSH
−1.8
goals above expected
NSH5.82 expected · 4 scored
Expected
Scored
NYI3.51 expected · 3 scored
Expected
Scored

Both sides finished close to what their chances were worth. This one was earned on the ice.

PDO = sh% + sv% · drifts to 1.000 over a season
Every goal, in order
  1. P1 01:29NYIM. Barzal0–1
  2. P1 05:57NYIM. Schaefer0–2
  3. P1 09:59NSHF. ForsbergPP1–2
  4. P1 12:53NSHM. Wood2–2
  5. P2 07:21NYIJ. Pageau2–3
  6. P2 14:11NSHF. Forsberg3–3
  7. P3 18:46NSHR. Josi4–3
NHL play-by-play · chance value from our xG model
Where the shots came from
NSH
56 shots
4
Final
95 shots
NYI
39 shots
3
NSH attackNYI attack
NSH NYI Goal
56
shots · 4 in
39
shots · 3 in
Every unblocked shot · press play to replay it
Chances by danger
NSHNYI
1 / 10
2.35 xG
High danger
0 / 5
1.12 xG
1 / 21
2.67 xG
Medium
3 / 19
2.02 xG
2 / 40
0.80 xG
Low
0 / 21
0.37 xG

The Islanders went 0 for 5 from the slot.

Danger tiers by our xG model · high ≥ 20% chance
In the net
A
I. Sorokin
+1.8
NYI · 38/42
B
J. Saros
+0.5
NSH · 27/30
The numbers, checked
BACKCHECK

Predators run the Islanders off the ice on the underlying numbers

A model, not a newsroom. Every number on these frames comes from the NHL's play-by-play and our own models. Nothing was watched, guessed or heard from anyone.

Read the full breakdown
backcheckreport.com
01 / 08 · Final
Every goal, in order

How it happened

NHL play-by-play
1stshots 11–10
  1. 01:29NYIM. Barzal(A. Duclair, T. DeAngelo)0–1
  2. 05:57NYIM. Schaefer(R. Pulock, M. Barzal)0–2
  3. 09:59NSHF. Forsbergpower play(R. Josi, S. Stamkos)1–2
  4. 12:53NSHM. Wood(J. Marchessault, T. Jost)2–2
2ndshots 22–13
  1. 07:21NYIJ. Pageau(A. Lee, S. Holmstrom)2–3
  2. 14:11NSHF. Forsberg(M. Wood)3–3
3rdshots 9–7
  1. 18:46NSHR. Josi(A. Wilsby, E. Haula)4–3

score reads NSH–NYI

Source · NHL play-by-play (api-web.nhle.com)
Process vs result

The numbers

XGBoost xG · NHL play-by-play
5.82
NSH chances
Goals their shots were worth
−1.8
Finishing
Goals below what those chances were worth
0.990
NSH puck luck
About 1.000 — a normal night for bounces
61.2%
Shot attempts
Over half — they had the puck more
Split by club

Who controlled the game

5.82Expected goals3.51
NSH 62% of the chance quality
42Shots on goal30
10High-danger chances5
71All attempts (Corsi)45
Adjusted for score: NSH 63% · NYI 38%
Faceoffs · NYI won41%off59%neu73%def
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG
How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
NSH1 / 10 · 2.35 xG
NYI0 / 5 · 1.12 xG
Medium dangermid-range
NSH1 / 21 · 2.67 xG
NYI3 / 19 · 2.02 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
NSH2 / 40 · 0.80 xG
NYI0 / 21 · 0.37 xG

NSH went 1-for-21 from medium danger on 2.67 expected goals — 1.7 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
NSH
4 G · 5.82 xG · -1.8
NYI
3 G · 3.51 xG · -0.5
01234567

NSH finished -1.8 against expected, NYI -0.5.

Source · Backcheck xG model
Shot types · rush and rebound chancesopen +
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
NSH
SNAP1/29
SLAP0/7
BACKHAND0/7
TIP IN0/4
WRIST3/4
DEFLECTED0/2
BAT0/2
POKE0/1
OTHER0/15
NYI
SNAP1/20
SLAP0/6
BACKHAND0/5
TIP IN0/4
WRIST2/3
DEFLECTED0/1
BAT0/0
POKE0/0
OTHER0/6
NSH
NYI
Off the rush
4 G on 35
3.93 xG
3 G on 27
2.45 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 8
1.30 xG
0 G on 2
0.33 xG

Snap shots carried the volume: NSH went 1-for-29, NYI 1-for-20. NSH scored 4 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
New to these numbers?

Two things happened in this game: who created the better chances, and who put the puck in the net. They are not the same thing, and this page separates them on purpose.

The one to watch is expected goals— the best single read on who deserved to win. When it disagrees with the scoreboard, that disagreement is usually the story. Nothing here is a projection; every figure is computed from this game's play-by-play. Full glossary →

xG
Expected goals. Every shot scored by how often that exact look goes in. 2.5 xG means the chances were worth about two and a half goals.
HD
High-danger chances — shots from the slot and the crease, where shots actually become goals.
Corsi
Every shot attempt, including the ones that missed or got blocked. A rough read on who had the puck.
Adj.
Score-adjusted. Teams that trail shoot more and teams that lead sit back, so this corrects the attempt count for the scoreboard.
GSAx
Goals saved above expected. A positive number means the goalie stopped more than an average goalie would have on those shots.
PDO
Shooting % plus save % — a luck gauge. It sits near 1.000 over a season, so a game far from it usually means the bounces decided it.
Shot by shot

In the net

Graded on goals saved above expected
J. Saros
NSH · 27/30 · .900
+0.5
saved above expected
B
the night
By dangerG/attxGsaved
High danger0/51.1+1.1
Medium3/192.0-1.0
Low0/210.4+0.4

A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

I. Sorokin
NYI · 38/42 · .905
+1.8
saved above expected
A
the night
By dangerG/attxGsaved
High danger1/102.4+1.4
Medium1/212.7+1.7
Low2/400.8-1.2

A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

95 shots · press play to watch the game back

Where the shots came from

NHL play-by-play coordinates
NSH
56 shots
4
Final
95 shots
NYI
39 shots
3
NSH attackNYI attack
NSH NYI Goal

Each club shoots toward its own end — NSH left, NYI right — the way you would watch it. A dot's size is how dangerous the look was, from distance and angle; it is a proxy for shot quality, not the xG model the article is written from. Hover a dot for the shooter and the clock.

Ranked from the box score

Three stars

Points first
Three stars · computed, not voted
R. Josi
#59 · D · NSH
1 G · 1 A · 5 SOG · 29:15 on ice · +1
M. Barzal
#13 · C · NYI
1 G · 1 A · 3 SOG · 19:04 on ice
F. Forsberg
#9 · L · NSH
2 G · 0 A · 4 SOG · 16:58 on ice · +1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model said beforehand

Before the game

Written Sat, Jan 31
Open the pre-game read
Written from the numbers

The read

Edited for clarity
◆ By the ModelJul 12, 3:28 AMEdited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

The model projects a 2.6–2.7 goal game favoring the Islanders at 51% win probability. That's a coin flip.

These teams are statistically interchangeable. Nashville holds a 49.0% expected goals share at 5v5, barely ahead of New York's 48.0%—too narrow a gap to signal any real separation. Corsi% confirms it: 50.0% for Nashville, 49.0% for New York. Both teams have absorbed nearly identical luck (PDO of 0.992 and 0.993), meaning their results track their underlying shot quality. The Islanders' one-point edge in win probability comes entirely from holding possession marginally longer.

The rosters are built from different blueprints, though. Nashville's offense revolves around Zachary L'Heureux, generating 0.85 expected goals per 60 minutes at a 16.0% conversion rate—four goals on no assists despite high-volume opportunity. Filip Forsberg provides complementary scoring at 0.80 xG/60 with a broader impact: 23 goals, 17 assists, 13.6% shooting. New York counters with Anders Lee, this matchup's most prolific creator at 1.20 xG/60 (9 goals, 20 assists, 6.4% shooting), and Bo Horvat, who's posted 18 goals and 10 assists on 12.8% shooting.

Nashville's defensive weak link is Jonathan Marchessault; New York's is Alexander Romanov. Neither represents a critical vulnerability.

Goaltending decides this. The numbers offer no other way to split them.

What the model said beforehand

The model's lean

NYI 51%
51%
NYI
Model favorite
49%
51%
NSH50NYI

NYI by 2 points of win probability — effectively a coin flip. Projected score NSH 2.6–2.7 NYI; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season rates · 5v5

Tale of the tape

NHL stats API · our xG
NSH← edge
edge →NYI
49.0%48.0%
50.0%49.0%
2.482.48
2.582.69
1.841.78
2.211.94
0.9920.993

NSH holds 5 of 6 process categories — and the luck row (0.992 vs 0.993) says NYI has been getting the bounces, which tends not to last.

Source · NHL stats API + our xG · 5v5
Form · No games yet
NSH
0-0-0
+0 GD · 0d rest
NYI
0-0-0
+0 GD · 0d rest
0.992
NSH PDO
Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
0.993
NYI PDO
Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
What decides it

Keys to the game

Things to watch
  • Two evenly matched teams on paper — this one tilts on goaltending.
Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

NHL stats API · our xG
NSH
Zachary L'Heureux4G 0A
0.85 xG/60 · 1 HD · 16.0% sh
Filip Forsberg23G 17A
0.80 xG/60 · 4 HD · 13.6% sh
NYI
Anders Lee9G 20A
1.20 xG/60 · 2 HD · 6.4% sh
Bo Horvat18G 10A
0.87 xG/60 · 3 HD · 12.8% sh
Keep going

Where to next