Motion-blurred skater in a Detroit Red Wings sweater
Breakdown · DET at COL

Red Wings shut out the Avalanche, 2-0

The verdict · earned

The Red Wings earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

DET 2 · COL 0
◆ By the ModelJul 12, 3:48 AMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

Colorado generated 2.55 expected goals and four high-danger chances. They scored zero. That divide—opportunity to outcome—defined this game.

Detroit controlled the evening through metric domination. They commanded 62% of five-on-five expected goals (4.08–2.55), crushed shot quality (0.069 xG per shot versus Colorado's 0.045), and struck twice on the rush in just 26 attempts. Colorado held 46% of shot attempts (21–25 on goal), a respectable figure that masked the core problem: quality looks, zero conversion.

Lucas Raymond's wrist shot from the doorstep in the third period broke through. M. Kasper added the second. Detroit underperformed their expected output by 2.08 goals. Colorado missed theirs by 2.55—the gap between a two-goal defeat and a one-goal game.

Goaltending muddied nothing. J. Gibson saved 21 of 21 (1.000 SV%, +2.55 above expected). M. Blackwood stopped 23 of 24 (0.958 SV%, +3.08 above expected). Both played superbly beyond expectation. Blackwood's excellence still ended in a shutout loss because Detroit's attack was too efficient.

Detroit's net-crashing approach yielded six rebound opportunities—all unconverted. Yet their rush-based assault, source of both goals, dodged Colorado's retreating defense. Execution won here.

The breakdown in twelve frames

Swipe it

Every number is from this page
Final · Feb 2
DET
2
COL
0

Red Wings shut out the Avalanche, 2-0

Chances 4.1 – 2.5Did they deserve it? →
Did they deserve it?

The Red Wings earned this one.

Expected goals · chance value
DET
4.08
COL
2.55
62% of the chances38%

The board read DET 2, COL 0. The chances read DET 4.1, COL 2.5.

Our xG model · NHL play-by-play · all situations
Luck check
DET
−2.1
goals above expected
DET4.08 expected · 2 scored
Expected
Scored
COL2.55 expected · 0 scored
Expected
Scored

The Avalanche left 2.5 goals on the table against what their chances were worth.

PDO = sh% + sv% · drifts to 1.000 over a season
Every goal, in order
  1. P1 00:33DETM. Kasper1–0
  2. P3 19:29DETL. RaymondEN2–0
NHL play-by-play · chance value from our xG model
Where the shots came from
DET
42 shots
2
Final
79 shots
COL
37 shots
0
DET attackCOL attack
DET COL Goal
42
shots · 2 in
37
shots · 0 in
Every unblocked shot · press play to replay it
Chances by danger
DETCOL
1 / 4
1.63 xG
High danger
0 / 3
0.72 xG
1 / 16
1.91 xG
Medium
0 / 12
1.18 xG
0 / 39
0.54 xG
Low
0 / 42
0.65 xG

The Avalanche went 0 for 3 from the slot.

Danger tiers by our xG model · high ≥ 20% chance
In the net
A+
M. Blackwood
+3.1
COL · 23/24
A+
J. Gibson
+2.5
DET · 21/21
The numbers, checked
BACKCHECK

Red Wings shut out the Avalanche, 2-0

A model, not a newsroom. Every number on these frames comes from the NHL's play-by-play and our own models. Nothing was watched, guessed or heard from anyone.

Read the full breakdown
backcheckreport.com
01 / 08 · Final
Every goal, in order

How it happened

NHL play-by-play
1stshots 8–8
  1. 00:33DETM. Kasper(L. Raymond, D. Larkin)1–0
2ndshots 12–4no goals
    3rdshots 5–9
    1. 19:29DETL. Raymondempty net(D. Larkin)2–0

    score reads DET–COL

    Source · NHL play-by-play (api-web.nhle.com)
    Process vs result

    The numbers

    XGBoost xG · NHL play-by-play
    4.08
    DET chances
    Goals their shots were worth
    −2.1
    Finishing
    Goals below what those chances were worth
    1.034
    DET puck luck
    Above 1.000 — the bounces went their way
    50.9%
    Shot attempts
    Over half — they had the puck more
    Split by club

    Who controlled the game

    4.08Expected goals2.55
    DET 62% of the chance quality
    25Shots on goal21
    4High-danger chances3
    59All attempts (Corsi)57
    Adjusted for score: DET 47% · COL 53%
    Faceoffs · COL won64%off56%neu35%def
    Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG
    How the game was won

    The danger ladder

    shotsgoalsexpected
    High dangerslot & crease
    DET1 / 4 · 1.63 xG
    COL0 / 3 · 0.72 xG
    Medium dangermid-range
    DET1 / 16 · 1.91 xG
    COL0 / 12 · 1.18 xG
    Low dangerperimeter & point
    DET0 / 39 · 0.54 xG
    COL0 / 42 · 0.65 xG

    COL went 0-for-12 from medium danger on 1.18 expected goals — 1.2 left on the table.

    Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
    The luck layer

    Finishing vs expected

    expectedactual
    DET
    2 G · 4.08 xG · -2.1
    COL
    0 G · 2.55 xG · -2.5
    012345

    DET finished -2.1 against expected, COL -2.5.

    Source · Backcheck xG model
    Shot types · rush and rebound chancesopen +
    What they shot — and what went in

    Shot diet

    goalsshots
    DET
    WRIST1/25
    TIP IN1/4
    SLAP0/3
    BACKHAND0/4
    SNAP0/3
    DEFLECTED0/3
    WRAP AROUND0/0
    OTHER0/17
    COL
    WRIST0/20
    TIP IN0/5
    SLAP0/4
    BACKHAND0/3
    SNAP0/3
    DEFLECTED0/1
    WRAP AROUND0/1
    OTHER0/20
    DET
    COL
    Off the rush
    2 G on 26
    2.87 xG
    0 G on 24
    1.82 xG
    Off rebounds
    0 G on 6
    0.77 xG
    0 G on 2
    0.33 xG

    Wrist shots carried the volume: DET went 1-for-25, COL 0-for-20. DET scored 2 of theirs off the rush.

    Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
    New to these numbers?

    Two things happened in this game: who created the better chances, and who put the puck in the net. They are not the same thing, and this page separates them on purpose.

    The one to watch is expected goals— the best single read on who deserved to win. When it disagrees with the scoreboard, that disagreement is usually the story. Nothing here is a projection; every figure is computed from this game's play-by-play. Full glossary →

    xG
    Expected goals. Every shot scored by how often that exact look goes in. 2.5 xG means the chances were worth about two and a half goals.
    HD
    High-danger chances — shots from the slot and the crease, where shots actually become goals.
    Corsi
    Every shot attempt, including the ones that missed or got blocked. A rough read on who had the puck.
    Adj.
    Score-adjusted. Teams that trail shoot more and teams that lead sit back, so this corrects the attempt count for the scoreboard.
    GSAx
    Goals saved above expected. A positive number means the goalie stopped more than an average goalie would have on those shots.
    PDO
    Shooting % plus save % — a luck gauge. It sits near 1.000 over a season, so a game far from it usually means the bounces decided it.
    Shot by shot

    In the net

    Graded on goals saved above expected
    J. Gibson
    DET · 21/21 · 1.000
    +2.5
    saved above expected
    A+
    the night
    By dangerG/attxGsaved
    High danger0/30.7+0.7
    Medium0/121.2+1.2
    Low0/420.7+0.7

    A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

    M. Blackwood
    COL · 23/24 · .958
    +3.1
    saved above expected
    A+
    the night
    By dangerG/attxGsaved
    High danger1/41.6+0.6
    Medium1/161.9+0.9
    Low0/390.5+0.5

    A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

    79 shots · press play to watch the game back

    Where the shots came from

    NHL play-by-play coordinates
    DET
    42 shots
    2
    Final
    79 shots
    COL
    37 shots
    0
    DET attackCOL attack
    DET COL Goal

    Each club shoots toward its own end — DET left, COL right — the way you would watch it. A dot's size is how dangerous the look was, from distance and angle; it is a proxy for shot quality, not the xG model the article is written from. Hover a dot for the shooter and the clock.

    Ranked from the box score

    Three stars

    Points first
    Three stars · computed, not voted
    D. Larkin
    #71 · C · DET
    0 G · 2 A · 1 SOG · 21:25 on ice · +2
    L. Raymond
    #23 · L · DET
    1 G · 1 A · 3 SOG · 17:31 on ice · +2
    M. Kasper
    #92 · C · DET
    1 G · 0 A · 2 SOG · 17:14 on ice · +1
    Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
    What the model said beforehand

    Before the game

    Written Mon, Feb 2
    Open the pre-game read
    Written from the numbers

    The read

    Edited for clarity
    ◆ By the ModelJul 12, 3:46 AMEdited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

    Colorado dominates the underlying play. The Avalanche control 57.0% of expected goals at 5v5 versus Detroit's 49.0%, and they drive 57.0% Corsis—a territorial advantage that projects into a 2.3–2.9 goal range and 59% win probability for Colorado.

    But regression awaits. The Avalanche's PDO of 1.021 means they've outscored shot quality; Detroit's 0.985 suggests the inverse. When that spread compresses—as it typically does—Colorado's edge narrows.

    The advantage holds because it stems from possession, not luck. Expect Colorado to control play and generate chances at higher rates.

    Detroit's scoring relies on Alex DeBrincat. He carries 0.88 xG/60, 17 goals, and 28 assists on just 9.0% shooting. That efficiency gap hints at regression, though his assist total suggests legitimate creation. Marco Kasper (0.81 xG/60, 7 goals, 6.1% shooting) operates below his expected-goal rate and bears watching.

    Colorado counters with Artturi Lehkonen: 1.11 xG/60, 18 goals on 14.9% shooting, and six high-danger goals converted. That alignment between expected and actual threat looks sustainable. Ross Colton (1.10 xG/60, 7 goals, 4.9% shooting) rounds out Colorado's premium-ice targets, which explains the Avalanche's possession edge.

    Defensively, Detroit's weak link is Axel Sandin-Pellikka; Colorado will attack the mismatch. Colorado's Nazem Kadri becomes Detroit's logical counter-target. Neither team escapes with a clean defensive picture.

    The model's 59% Colorado reading reflects underlying dominance tempered by regression risk and DeBrincat's shooting variance. The Avalanche remain favored, but not by the margin the PDO might suggest.

    What the model said beforehand

    The model's lean

    COL 59%
    59%
    COL
    Model favorite
    41%
    59%
    DET50COL

    COL by 18 points of win probability — a clear lean. Projected score DET 2.3–2.9 COL; 17% chance it's tied after 60.

    Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
    Season rates · 5v5

    Tale of the tape

    NHL stats API · our xG
    DET← edge
    edge →COL
    49.0%57.0%
    49.0%57.0%
    2.383.03
    2.502.30
    1.732.63
    2.071.56
    0.9851.021

    COL holds 6 of 6 process categories — and the luck row (0.985 vs 1.021) says COL has been getting the bounces, which tends not to last.

    Source · NHL stats API + our xG · 5v5
    Form · Last 10
    DET
    5-3-2
    -3 GD · 2d rest
    COL
    4-4-2
    -2 GD · 2d rest
    0.985
    DET PDO
    Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
    1.021
    COL PDO
    Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
    What decides it

    Keys to the game

    Where the edges live
    • The Avalanche own the underlying play — 57.0% 5v5 xG vs 49.0%.
    • The Avalanche drive Corsi at 57.0% — expect territorial tilt.
    Regression watch
    • The Avalanche's PDO is 1.021 — running hot, expect some regression.
    Things to watch
    • The Avalanche own the underlying play — 57.0% 5v5 xG vs 49.0%.
    • The Avalanche drive Corsi at 57.0% — expect territorial tilt.
    • The Avalanche's PDO is 1.021 — running hot, expect some regression.
    Last game's lineup · confirmed at warm-up

    Lineups

    NHL box score
    DET
    Expected in goal
    J. Gibson
    2 days rest.765 last start
    Backup John Gibson · +11.7 GSAx this season

    No completed game on file for this club yet.

    COL
    Expected in goal
    M. Blackwood
    2 days rest1.000 last start
    Backup Scott Wedgewood · +23.1 GSAx this season

    No completed game on file for this club yet.

    Lineups are the players who dressed in each club's last game, with their minutes; clubs confirm tonight's at warm-up. Every player this preview names was in that lineup.

    Computed danger · scouting

    Players to watch

    NHL stats API · our xG
    DET
    Alex DeBrincat17G 28A
    0.88 xG/60 · 2 HD · 9.0% sh
    Marco Kasper7G 8A
    0.81 xG/60 · 1 HD · 6.1% sh
    COL
    Artturi Lehkonen18G 22A
    1.11 xG/60 · 6 HD · 14.9% sh
    Ross Colton7G 15A
    1.10 xG/60 · 1 HD · 4.9% sh
    Keep going

    Where to next