Motion-blurred skater in a Columbus Blue Jackets sweater
Breakdown · CBJ at NJD

Blue Jackets shut out the Devils, 3-0

The verdict · earned

The Blue Jackets earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

CBJ 3 · NJD 0
◆ By the ModelJul 12, 3:52 AMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

E. Merzlikins' exceptional goaltending turned a competitive underlying matchup into a blowout. The Devils generated 2.57 expected goals but were blanked by a goalie playing 2.57 goals above expected — the game's decisive margin.

Columbus actually dominated the metrics. They controlled 57% of 5v5 xG (3.41–2.57), converted two rush chances into goals across 22 attempts, and generated higher-quality looks at 0.071 xG per shot versus New Jersey's 0.049. They had six high-danger chances to the Devils' two.

But New Jersey wasn't completely overrun by volume. The Devils held 48% of shot attempts (24–26) and created legitimate scoring opportunities — just none that found the net against Merzlikins.

M. Olivier's shot from the high slot early in the third period (P3, 16:00) served as the turning point, a moment when Columbus' control crystallized into separation on the scoreboard. Olivier finished with two goals in just over 14 minutes; Z. Werenski added an assist across 23:11; C. Coyle chipped in another setup in 16:35.

J. Markstrom stopped 23 of 25 shots and actually outperformed expected performance slightly (+1.41 vs xG), so the loss falls squarely on his team's reduced volume and quality, not goaltending. Columbus' 3-0 scoreline was real — but Merzlikins made it more decisive than the underlying play suggested.

The breakdown in twelve frames

Swipe it

Every number is from this page
Final · Feb 3
CBJ
3
NJD
0

Blue Jackets shut out the Devils, 3-0

Chances 3.4 – 2.6Did they deserve it? →
Did they deserve it?

The Blue Jackets earned this one.

Expected goals · chance value
CBJ
3.41
NJD
2.57
57% of the chances43%

The board read CBJ 3, NJD 0. The chances read CBJ 3.4, NJD 2.6.

Our xG model · NHL play-by-play · all situations
Luck check
CBJ
−0.4
goals above expected
CBJ3.41 expected · 3 scored
Expected
Scored
NJD2.57 expected · 0 scored
Expected
Scored

The Devils left 2.6 goals on the table against what their chances were worth.

PDO = sh% + sv% · drifts to 1.000 over a season
Every goal, in order
  1. P3 05:24CBJD. Fabbro1–0
  2. P3 12:05CBJM. Olivier2–0
  3. P3 16:00CBJM. OlivierEN3–0
NHL play-by-play · chance value from our xG model
Where the shots came from
CBJ
37 shots
3
Final
75 shots
NJD
38 shots
0
CBJ attackNJD attack
CBJ NJD Goal
37
shots · 3 in
38
shots · 0 in
Every unblocked shot · press play to replay it
Chances by danger
CBJNJD
2 / 6
1.80 xG
High danger
0 / 2
0.48 xG
0 / 10
1.06 xG
Medium
0 / 13
1.57 xG
1 / 32
0.56 xG
Low
0 / 37
0.53 xG

The Blue Jackets buried 2 of 6 high-danger looks.

Danger tiers by our xG model · high ≥ 20% chance
In the net
A+
E. Merzlikins
+2.6
CBJ · 24/24
B+
J. Markstrom
+1.4
NJD · 23/25
The numbers, checked
BACKCHECK

Blue Jackets shut out the Devils, 3-0

A model, not a newsroom. Every number on these frames comes from the NHL's play-by-play and our own models. Nothing was watched, guessed or heard from anyone.

Read the full breakdown
backcheckreport.com
01 / 08 · Final
Every goal, in order

How it happened

NHL play-by-play
1stshots 3–7no goals
    2ndshots 9–10no goals
      3rdshots 14–7
      1. 05:24CBJD. Fabbro1–0
      2. 12:05CBJM. Olivier(C. Sillinger, B. Jenner)2–0
      3. 16:00CBJM. Olivierempty net(C. Coyle, Z. Werenski)3–0

      score reads CBJ–NJD

      Source · NHL play-by-play (api-web.nhle.com)
      Process vs result

      The numbers

      XGBoost xG · NHL play-by-play
      3.41
      CBJ chances
      Goals their shots were worth
      −0.4
      Finishing
      Goals below what those chances were worth
      1.063
      CBJ puck luck
      Above 1.000 — the bounces went their way
      48.0%
      Shot attempts
      Under half — they were outshot
      Split by club

      Who controlled the game

      3.41Expected goals2.57
      CBJ 57% of the chance quality
      26Shots on goal24
      6High-danger chances2
      48All attempts (Corsi)52
      Adjusted for score: CBJ 47% · NJD 53%
      Faceoffs · NJD won47%off31%neu59%def
      Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG
      How the game was won

      The danger ladder

      shotsgoalsexpected
      High dangerslot & crease
      CBJ2 / 6 · 1.80 xG
      NJD0 / 2 · 0.48 xG
      Medium dangermid-range
      CBJ0 / 10 · 1.06 xG
      NJD0 / 13 · 1.57 xG
      Low dangerperimeter & point
      CBJ1 / 32 · 0.56 xG
      NJD0 / 37 · 0.53 xG

      NJD went 0-for-13 from medium danger on 1.57 expected goals — 1.6 left on the table.

      Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
      The luck layer

      Finishing vs expected

      expectedactual
      CBJ
      3 G · 3.41 xG · -0.4
      NJD
      0 G · 2.57 xG · -2.6
      01234

      CBJ finished -0.4 against expected, NJD -2.6.

      Source · Backcheck xG model
      Shot types · rush and rebound chancesopen +
      What they shot — and what went in

      Shot diet

      goalsshots
      CBJ
      WRIST1/19
      SNAP0/6
      TIP IN0/5
      DEFLECTED0/2
      BACKHAND1/2
      SLAP0/2
      WRAP AROUND0/0
      OTHER1/12
      NJD
      WRIST0/15
      SNAP0/12
      TIP IN0/7
      DEFLECTED0/2
      BACKHAND0/1
      SLAP0/0
      WRAP AROUND0/1
      OTHER0/14
      CBJ
      NJD
      Off the rush
      2 G on 22
      2.57 xG
      0 G on 28
      2.15 xG
      Off rebounds
      0 G on 2
      0.47 xG
      0 G on 1
      0.16 xG

      Wrist shots carried the volume: CBJ went 1-for-19, NJD 0-for-15. CBJ scored 2 of theirs off the rush.

      Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
      New to these numbers?

      Two things happened in this game: who created the better chances, and who put the puck in the net. They are not the same thing, and this page separates them on purpose.

      The one to watch is expected goals— the best single read on who deserved to win. When it disagrees with the scoreboard, that disagreement is usually the story. Nothing here is a projection; every figure is computed from this game's play-by-play. Full glossary →

      xG
      Expected goals. Every shot scored by how often that exact look goes in. 2.5 xG means the chances were worth about two and a half goals.
      HD
      High-danger chances — shots from the slot and the crease, where shots actually become goals.
      Corsi
      Every shot attempt, including the ones that missed or got blocked. A rough read on who had the puck.
      Adj.
      Score-adjusted. Teams that trail shoot more and teams that lead sit back, so this corrects the attempt count for the scoreboard.
      GSAx
      Goals saved above expected. A positive number means the goalie stopped more than an average goalie would have on those shots.
      PDO
      Shooting % plus save % — a luck gauge. It sits near 1.000 over a season, so a game far from it usually means the bounces decided it.
      Shot by shot

      In the net

      Graded on goals saved above expected
      E. Merzlikins
      CBJ · 24/24 · 1.000
      +2.6
      saved above expected
      A+
      the night
      By dangerG/attxGsaved
      High danger0/20.5+0.5
      Medium0/131.6+1.6
      Low0/370.5+0.5

      A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

      J. Markstrom
      NJD · 23/25 · .920
      +1.4
      saved above expected
      B+
      the night
      By dangerG/attxGsaved
      High danger2/61.8-0.2
      Medium0/101.1+1.1
      Low1/320.6-0.4

      A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

      75 shots · press play to watch the game back

      Where the shots came from

      NHL play-by-play coordinates
      CBJ
      37 shots
      3
      Final
      75 shots
      NJD
      38 shots
      0
      CBJ attackNJD attack
      CBJ NJD Goal

      Each club shoots toward its own end — CBJ left, NJD right — the way you would watch it. A dot's size is how dangerous the look was, from distance and angle; it is a proxy for shot quality, not the xG model the article is written from. Hover a dot for the shooter and the clock.

      Ranked from the box score

      Three stars

      Points first
      Three stars · computed, not voted
      M. Olivier
      #24 · R · CBJ
      2 G · 0 A · 1 SOG · 14:09 on ice · +2
      Z. Werenski
      #8 · D · CBJ
      0 G · 1 A · 2 SOG · 23:11 on ice · +1
      C. Coyle
      #3 · C · CBJ
      0 G · 1 A · 1 SOG · 16:35 on ice · +1
      Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
      What the model said beforehand

      Before the game

      Written Tue, Feb 3
      Open the pre-game read
      Written from the numbers

      The read

      Edited for clarity
      ◆ By the ModelJul 12, 3:48 AMEdited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

      The model can't separate them. It projects 2.6 goals for Columbus against 2.6 for New Jersey and gives the Devils exactly 50% to win—a genuine toss-up.

      Columbus comes in hot with nine wins in their last ten games, but the underlying metrics tell a tighter story. The Blue Jackets' 52.0% expected-goal share inches past New Jersey's 50.0%, yet both teams sit at 51.0% on Corsi—puck control essentially identical. The gap emerges elsewhere: Columbus has run hot (PDO of 1.003, meaning their actual scoring beats the shot maps), while the Devils are running cold (0.971 PDO, primed for positive regression).

      Boone Jenner powers Columbus's attack at 0.98 expected goals per 60 minutes, with 11 goals and 21 assists anchored by a sustainable 9.6% shooting rate and 2 high-danger conversions. Mathieu Olivier provides secondary impact—0.89 xG/60, 12 goals, and an elite 13.3% shooting rate. The weak link is defensive: Conor Garland.

      New Jersey counters with Timo Meier at 1.08 xG/60, the highest volume here, plus 13 goals, 15 assists, and 3 high-danger goals. Jack Hughes trails in opportunity (0.88 xG/60) but leads in scoring: 18 goals and 17 assists on an 11.5% rate that will eventually normalize. Johnathan Kovacevic represents their defensive vulnerability.

      The oddity: both teams have registered 0% of their goals from high-danger and rebound situations, meaning their offense lives entirely on top-end talent. When the model cannot split possession metrics, shot quality, or depth-scoring patterns, when luck is the only separator, and when both defenses show similar soft spots, you get a true coin flip.

      What the model said beforehand

      The model's lean

      NJD 50%
      50%
      NJD
      Model favorite
      50%
      50%
      CBJ50NJD

      NJD by 0 points of win probability — effectively a coin flip. Projected score CBJ 2.6–2.6 NJD; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

      Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
      Season rates · 5v5

      Tale of the tape

      NHL stats API · our xG
      CBJ← edge
      edge →NJD
      52.0%50.0%
      51.0%51.0%
      2.632.45
      2.432.50
      2.121.66
      1.982.23
      1.0030.971

      CBJ holds 5 of 6 process categories — and the luck row (1.003 vs 0.971) says CBJ has been getting the bounces, which tends not to last.

      Source · NHL stats API + our xG · 5v5
      Form · Last 10
      CBJ
      9-1-0
      +14 GD · 2d rest
      NJD
      6-4-0
      -1 GD · 2d rest
      1.003
      CBJ PDO
      Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
      0.971
      NJD PDO
      Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
      What decides it

      Keys to the game

      Regression watch
      • The Devils' PDO is 0.971 — running cold, due for positive regression.
      Things to watch
      • The Blue Jackets are the hotter team by points pace (9-1-0 in their last 10).
      • The Devils' PDO is 0.971 — running cold, due for positive regression.
      Last game's lineup · confirmed at warm-up

      Lineups

      NHL box score
      CBJ
      Expected in goal
      J. Greaves
      2 days rest.909 last start
      Backup Jet Greaves · +16.5 GSAx this season

      No completed game on file for this club yet.

      NJD
      Expected in goal
      J. Allen
      2 days rest.909 last start
      Backup Jacob Markstrom · -11.9 GSAx this season

      No completed game on file for this club yet.

      Lineups are the players who dressed in each club's last game, with their minutes; clubs confirm tonight's at warm-up. Every player this preview names was in that lineup.

      Computed danger · scouting

      Players to watch

      NHL stats API · our xG
      CBJ
      Boone Jenner11G 21A
      0.98 xG/60 · 2 HD · 9.6% sh
      Mathieu Olivier12G 9A
      0.89 xG/60 · 1 HD · 13.3% sh
      NJD
      Timo Meier13G 15A
      1.08 xG/60 · 3 HD · 6.7% sh
      Jack Hughes18G 17A
      0.88 xG/60 · 1 HD · 11.5% sh
      Keep going

      Where to next