Flyers hold off the Capitals
The Flyers earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.
The underlying story
Philadelphia's 4-2 win over Washington masked a sizable control advantage. The Flyers held 58% of expected goals at 5v5 (4.14–2.95), with shots split 22-28 in Washington's favor—a gap that reflected quality over volume. Philadelphia generated looks at 0.086 xG per shot while the Capitals managed 0.046.
Washington's looks were higher-quality than their shot total suggested, yet the team underperformed its expected goals by 0.95. C. Stevenson (0.857 SV%) couldn't overcome the deficit. D. Vladar (26 of 28, 0.929 SV%) didn't need to work as hard.
Philadelphia converted efficiently. The Flyers scored twice from low-danger areas—opportunities the opposing goalie is expected to deny. They held the high-danger advantage 7–4 and capitalized on two of 19 rush chances. R. Ristolainen's wrist shot from the high slot at 19:43 of the third set the tone. Washington had decent looks but lacked the conversion rate to stay competitive.
The danger ladder
PHI went 2-for-25 from low danger on 0.30 expected goals — 1.7 above expected.
Finishing vs expected
WSH finished -0.9 against expected, PHI -0.1 — C. Stevenson (WSH) saved 1.1 goals above expected.
Shot diet
Wrist shots carried the volume: WSH went 1-for-21, PHI 2-for-15. PHI scored 2 of theirs off the rush.
- WSH generated higher-quality looks than the shot total suggests.
- C. Stevenson (WSH) stopped 1.1 goals above expected.
- PHI generated far more dangerous chances — 0.086 xG/shot vs 0.046. Quality over quantity.
- PHI scored 2 goals from low-danger spots — the opposing goalie needs to have those.
- PHI was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 19 rush chances.
- PHI created 4 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.