Backcheck
Recap · PHI at WSH

Capitals hold off the Flyers

The Capitals earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

By the ModelJul 12, 4:24 AMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
PHI
Philadelphia Flyers
1
Home
WSH
Washington Capitals
3
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

3.31Expected goals3.91
54% share for the better side
24Shot attempts (SOG)29
6High-danger chances7
49Corsi (all attempts)65
Score-adjusted: 44% / 56%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

The Flyers underperformed their expected goals by 2.31—enough to explain the 3–1 final despite xG of nearly even (3.91–3.31). Philadelphia's shooting shortfall explains what otherwise would have been a closer result.

The Capitals held 55% of shot attempts (29–24 on goal) and 54% of expected goals. High-danger chances split 7–6. By underlying metrics, this was even.

Philadelphia was not. Zero for 6 on high-danger chances—a finishing drought that rendered quality look generation useless. Washington converted on transition: 2 goals on 24 rush attempts, a rate that turned possession parity into command.

Both goalies beat expected-save models. L. Thompson (WSH) posted 0.958 SV% (23/24), plus-2.31 vs expected. D. Vladar (PHI) was strong at 0.929 (26/28), +1.91 vs expected. Vladar couldn't overcome a 2.31-goal deficit.

The Capitals held because Philadelphia didn't finish. Possession and shot quality cannot compensate for that kind of waste.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
PHI0 / 6 · 1.79 xG
WSH1 / 7 · 1.81 xG
Medium dangermid-range
PHI1 / 13 · 1.18 xG
WSH2 / 16 · 1.65 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
PHI0 / 30 · 0.35 xG
WSH0 / 42 · 0.46 xG

PHI went 0-for-6 from high danger on 1.79 expected goals — 1.8 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
PHI
1 G · 3.31 xG · -2.3
WSH
3 G · 3.91 xG · -0.9
012345
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
D. VladarPHI
+1.9
L. ThompsonWSH
+2.3

PHI finished -2.3 against expected, WSH -0.9 — L. Thompson (WSH) saved 2.3 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
PHI
SNAP0/15
SLAP0/5
WRIST0/5
TIP IN1/5
BACKHAND0/3
DEFLECTED0/0
WRAP AROUND0/1
OTHER0/15
WSH
SNAP3/22
SLAP0/8
WRIST0/6
TIP IN0/3
BACKHAND0/4
DEFLECTED0/2
WRAP AROUND0/0
OTHER0/20
PHI
WSH
Off the rush
1 G on 23 · 2.35 xG
2 G on 24 · 1.87 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 2 · 0.73 xG
0 G on 4 · 0.46 xG

Snap shots carried the volume: PHI went 0-for-15, WSH 3-for-22. WSH scored 2 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
A. Protas
#21 · L · WSH
1 G · 1 A · 1 SOG · 15:44 TOI · +1
J. Chychrun
#6 · D · WSH
0 G · 1 A · 1 SOG · 24:14 TOI · +1
T. Sanheim
#6 · D · PHI
0 G · 1 A · 0 SOG · 21:59 TOI · -1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • D. Vladar (PHI) stopped 1.9 goals above expected.
  • PHI couldn't convert — 0/6 on high-danger chances. That won't happen often.
  • WSH was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 24 rush chances.
  • WSH created 4 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • PHI underperformed xG by 2.3 — wasted quality chances.
  • D. Vladar (PHI) saved 1.9 goals above expected — stole the show.
  • L. Thompson (WSH) saved 2.3 goals above expected — stole the show.
  • L. Thompson was a wall on HD chances — 100% SV on 6 high-danger shots.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · PHI at WSH · 7:00 PM ET

Flyers at Capitals: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 12, 4:23 AMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

52%
WSH
Model favorite
48%
52%
PHI50WSH

WSH by 4 points of win probability — effectively a coin flip. Projected score PHI 2.42.5 WSH; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

PHI← edge
edge →WSH
51.0%5v5 xG%50.0%
48.0%Corsi%49.0%
2.26xGF / 602.62
2.20xGA / 602.62
1.96Goals for / gm2.18
1.82Goals against / gm1.79
1.008PDO — luck, not skill1.018

WSH holds 4 of 6 process categories — and PDO (1.008 vs 1.018) says WSH has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model has Washington at 52% win probability in a game it projects at roughly 2.4-2.5 goals per side—about as close to even as you get in hockey.

Philadelphia enters with a -8 goal differential over the last 10 games, so form is working against them. But the underlying numbers paint a more competitive picture. The Flyers control 51.0% of expected goals at 5v5 while the Capitals sit at 50.0%, a gap too small to move confidence. Possession favors Washington at 49.0% Corsi to Philadelphia's 48.0%, yet again—marginal.

The real story is Washington's luck. The Capitals are running at a 1.018 PDO. That's variance, and it regresses. Philadelphia's 1.008 PDO is closer to neutral, which means what you see is what you get.

Owen Tippett is the engine for Philly, posting 19 goals and 18 assists with 0.88 xG/60 and 2 high-danger goals, shooting at 12.1%. Christian Dvorak mirrors him one tier down: 12 goals, 21 assists, 3 high-danger goals, 0.81 xG/60, and 11.2% conversion. On the defensive end, however, he surfaces as a weak link.

Washington's counter is Alex Ovechkin generating 0.97 xG/60, the highest rate on ice. He has 19 goals, 17 assists, 2 high-danger goals, and shoots at 13.8%. Anthony Beauvillier contributes 14 goals, 9 assists, 0.89 xG/60, 2 high-danger goals, and 10.4% conversion.

Philadelphia has produced zero high-danger goals and zero rebound goals at measurable rates. Washington registers the same across both categories. That's either discipline or chance; five games should clarify which.

Declan Chisholm is Washington's defensive weak link—the seam Philly can target if secondary scoring awakens.

The model is right: this is a coin flip with a slight Washington tilt.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

PHI
Owen Tippett19G 18A
0.88 xG/60 · 2 HD · 12.1% sh
Christian Dvorak12G 21A
0.81 xG/60 · 3 HD · 11.2% sh
WSH
Alex Ovechkin19G 17A
0.97 xG/60 · 2 HD · 13.8% sh
Anthony Beauvillier14G 9A
0.89 xG/60 · 2 HD · 10.4% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters