Backcheck
Recap · DET at OTT

Red Wings steal one from the Senators against the run of play

The Red Wings stole one. They lost the expected-goals battle 2.26–3.84 and won anyway.

By the ModelJul 12, 4:31 AMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
DET
Detroit Red Wings
2
Home
OTT
Ottawa Senators
1
FINAL / OT
Process vs result

The underlying story

2.26Expected goals3.84
63% share for the better side
20Shot attempts (SOG)27
0High-danger chances7
59Corsi (all attempts)66
Score-adjusted: 48% / 52%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

Detroit stole this one. Ottawa controlled 63% of expected goals at 5v5 and still lost 2–1 in overtime—a rout on paper that the Red Wings refused to accept.

The Senators dominated the volume: 57% of shot attempts (27–20 on goal), 63–37% split in xG (3.84–2.26). But Ottawa's quality was wasted. The Senators generated 7 high-danger chances to Detroit's 0, yet converted none. That 0/7 finish won't happen often.

J. Gibson (DET) was the difference. He saved 2.8 goals above expected, posting a 0.963 SV% and stopping all 7 high-danger shots. L. Ullmark (OTT) finished at 0.900 SV%, and the gap between those two numbers—less than 7 percentage points—contained the entire game.

Ottawa didn't lack for opportunity. They created 5 rebound chances (0 converted) and generated far more dangerous looks per shot (0.058 xG/shot vs Detroit's 0.038). The Senators underperformed their xG by 2.84 goals—a crushing miss that spoke to execution more than luck.

The turning point: Dylan Larkin's backhander from the slot at 01:50 of overtime. Not a rebound, not a defensive breakdown, but a clean shot that ended it. Fitting for a game Detroit had no right to win.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
DET0 / 0 · 0.00 xG
OTT0 / 7 · 1.96 xG
Medium dangermid-range
DET2 / 14 · 1.82 xG
OTT1 / 13 · 1.21 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
DET0 / 45 · 0.44 xG
OTT0 / 46 · 0.66 xG

OTT went 0-for-7 from high danger on 1.96 expected goals — 2.0 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
DET
2 G · 2.26 xG · -0.3
OTT
1 G · 3.84 xG · -2.8
012345
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
J. GibsonDET
+2.8
L. UllmarkOTT
+0.3

DET finished -0.3 against expected, OTT -2.8 — J. Gibson (DET) saved 2.8 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
DET
WRIST0/18
SLAP0/2
BACKHAND1/5
SNAP1/3
TIP IN0/4
BAT0/1
OTHER0/26
OTT
WRIST1/21
SLAP0/14
BACKHAND0/4
SNAP0/4
TIP IN0/1
BAT0/0
OTHER0/22
DET
OTT
Off the rush
1 G on 21 · 1.48 xG
1 G on 29 · 2.71 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 3 · 0.46 xG
0 G on 5 · 0.94 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: DET went 0-for-18, OTT 1-for-21.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
D. Larkin
#71 · C · DET
2 G · 0 A · 3 SOG · 23:11 TOI · +1
L. Raymond
#23 · L · DET
0 G · 2 A · 4 SOG · 20:42 TOI · +1
J. Sanderson
#85 · D · OTT
0 G · 1 A · 3 SOG · 26:39 TOI
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • DET stole this one. OTT owned 63% of the xG and lost.
  • J. Gibson (DET) stopped 2.8 goals above expected.
  • OTT generated far more dangerous chances — 0.058 xG/shot vs 0.038. Quality over quantity.
  • OTT couldn't convert — 0/7 on high-danger chances. That won't happen often.
  • OTT created 5 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • DET created 3 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • OTT underperformed xG by 2.8 — wasted quality chances.
  • J. Gibson (DET) saved 2.8 goals above expected — stole the show.
  • J. Gibson was a wall on HD chances — 100% SV on 7 high-danger shots.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · DET at OTT · 7:00 PM ET

The Senators are the model's lean over the Red Wings on the underlying numbers

By the ModelJul 12, 4:30 AMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

58%
OTT
Model favorite
42%
58%
DET50OTT

OTT by 16 points of win probability — a clear lean. Projected score DET 2.32.7 OTT; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

DET← edge
edge →OTT
49.0%5v5 xG%56.0%
49.0%Corsi%53.0%
2.38xGF / 602.66
2.50xGA / 602.12
1.73Goals for / gm2.18
2.07Goals against / gm1.99
0.985PDO — luck, not skill0.993

OTT holds 6 of 6 process categories — and PDO (0.985 vs 0.993) says OTT has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

Ottawa's path to victory runs through control. The model projects the Senators at 58% win probability in a forecast game of 2.2–2.7 goals, built on a clean advantage in 5v5 play.

The underlying numbers tell the story. Ottawa out-generates scoring chances at 56.0% expected goals share versus Detroit's 49.0%. That gap matters: the Senators push the puck into dangerous areas more often. On the territorial front, the Corsi edge extends to 53.0% for Ottawa, dictating where play happens most of the time. Detroit finds itself hemmed in, which is the recipe for reactive hockey.

Players to Watch

Detroit Red Wings

  • Alex DeBrincat — 0.88 xG/60, 17G 28A, 2 HD goals, 9.0% shooting
  • Marco Kasper — 0.81 xG/60, 7G 8A, 1 HD goals, 6.1% shooting

Ottawa Senators

  • Brady Tkachuk — 1.19 xG/60, 11G 20A, 2 HD goals, 7.5% shooting
  • Dylan Cozens — 1.00 xG/60, 13G 15A, 1 HD goals, 9.5% shooting

DeBrincat is Detroit's anchor at 17 goals and 28 assists, though his 9.0% shooting rate leaves room to cool. Brady Tkachuk provides Ottawa's principal threat at 1.19 expected goals per 60, backed by 11 goals and 20 assists. Tkachuk's counterpart Dylan Cozens shoots at 9.5%, adding 13 goals and 15 assists. Kasper's 6.1% efficiency reflects Detroit's broader problem: the team generates chances at lower volume and converts them less frequently.

The efficiency metrics hint at sustainability. Ottawa's PDO of 0.993 sits marginally above neutral, while Detroit's 0.985 sits just below. Neither team is running hot or cold on luck. Defensively, Axel Sandin-Pellikka represents Detroit's vulnerability, while Nick Jensen fills that role for Ottawa. Thursday's game should reflect the underlying talent balance: one team in control, one team reactive.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

DET
Alex DeBrincat17G 28A
0.88 xG/60 · 2 HD · 9.0% sh
Marco Kasper7G 8A
0.81 xG/60 · 1 HD · 6.1% sh
OTT
Brady Tkachuk11G 20A
1.19 xG/60 · 2 HD · 7.5% sh
Dylan Cozens13G 15A
1.00 xG/60 · 1 HD · 9.5% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters