The Ducks' 5-4 overtime win masks a lopsided dominance. Anaheim generated 57% of expected goals (6.82–5.07) and 16 high-danger chances to Winnipeg's 5, yet underperformed their xG by 1.82 goals. They dominated and still barely won.

Anaheim controlled 55% of shot attempts (40–33), with higher-quality opportunities: 0.097 expected goals per shot versus Winnipeg's 0.073. They scored twice from the rush on 32 chances and generated 14 rebound opportunities, converting 2. Winnipeg couldn't capitalize on high-danger plays (0/5) and surrendered two goals from low-danger spots where Dostal should have had both.

Hellebuyck (WPG) made 35/40 saves (0.875 SV%), posting a 1.82 goals-above-expected performance that kept Winnipeg alive. Winnipeg's rush attack was itself dangerous—4 goals on 37 chances—but Chris Kreider's backhander from the doorstep at 04:47 of overtime won it for Anaheim. Dostal (ANA) finished with a 0.879 SV%, saving 1.07 above expected.

The model favors Anaheim by a thin margin: 56% win probability with a projected score of 2.5 to 2.8. The edge belongs to the Ducks' underlying play, though regression risk looms for both sides.

Anaheim has earned this lean on recent form. The Ducks are 8-2-0 in their last 10, while Winnipeg sits at minus-10 in goal differential over the same stretch—a deterioration that signals the Jets' recent results don't match their fundamentals.

At 5v5, the gap widens. Anaheim controls shot quality at 52.0% xG% and 52.0% Corsi%, while Winnipeg lags at 48.0% and 49.0% respectively. That territorial tilt means the Ducks will spend the evening in the offensive zone.

The PDO numbers cut both ways. Winnipeg's 0.998 sits close to neutral, offering little predictive insight. Anaheim's 0.981 flags a team running cold, suggesting positive regression. If the Ducks' underlying work translates to shooting percentage, their margin grows.

Goaltending adds uncertainty. Both L. Dostal and E. Comrie face back-to-back games, creating the possibility of a tired starter or a backup appearance.

The forward matchups tilt Anaheim's way. Beckett Sennecke leads the Ducks' charge at 1.03 xG/60, having compiled 20 goals and 19 assists with 8 high-danger goals—a marker of both volume and quality. Cutter Gauthier supports at 0.99 xG/60, with 25 goals, 16 assists, and 2 high-danger goals.

Winnipeg counters with Nino Niederreiter (0.87 xG/60, 6 goals, 6 assists, 3 high-danger goals) and Kyle Connor (0.83 xG/60, 25 goals, 30 assists, 2 high-danger goals). Sennecke carries 8 high-danger goals to Niederreiter's 3, while his 13.5% shooting outpaces Niederreiter's 8.6%. Connor's 13.0% shooting is efficient, though Sennecke's rate edge and high-danger goal volume reflect a clear advantage for the Ducks in dangerous areas.

Colin Miller represents a weak point for Winnipeg's defense; Mason McTavish leads the Ducks' back end. Anaheim should control the game's flow—the Ducks' tilt in both xG% and Corsi% suggests the model's 56% lean reflects a durable edge.

Whether that converts to the projected 2.5-to-2.8 finish depends on shooting variance. Here, the PDO gap hints at Anaheim's favor: running cold at 0.981 against a neutral 0.998 suggests the Ducks are due for positive regression.