Backcheck
Recap · STL at SJS

Blues edge the Sharks in overtime

The Blues stole one. They lost the expected-goals battle 2.81–3.37 and won anyway.

By the ModelJul 12, 5:57 AMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
STL
St. Louis Blues
3
Home
SJS
San Jose Sharks
2
FINAL / OT
Process vs result

The underlying story

2.81Expected goals3.37
55% share for the better side
14Shot attempts (SOG)25
8High-danger chances5
32Corsi (all attempts)52
Score-adjusted: 35% / 65%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

St. Louis won a game San Jose dominated. The Sharks held 64% of shot attempts and posted 3.37 expected goals to 2.81, yet Robert Thomas scored at 00:54 of overtime to end it.

San Jose generated eight high-danger chances to St. Louis's five and dominated shot volume decisively (25–14 on goal). San Jose should have won on the numbers. But the Sharks went 0 for 5 on high-danger looks—a conversion drought that won't repeat—while J. Binnington posted a 0.920 save percentage, stopping 23 of 25 shots. He was +1.37 goals better than expected. A. Nedeljkovic allowed 11 of 14, a 0.786 mark, unable to overcome St. Louis's superior efficiency: the Blues generated 0.088 expected goals per shot to San Jose's 0.065.

Both teams thrived on rushes—St. Louis converted 2 of 14; San Jose converted 2 of 24. Neither drove the transition game. St. Louis created five rebound opportunities and converted one. San Jose created four and converted none. Shot volume went to San Jose. Conversion went to St. Louis.

D. Holloway (3 assists in 15:48) orchestrated St. Louis's attack. Robert Thomas (2 goals in 19:06) delivered the overtime winner. J. Snuggerud (1 goal, 1 assist in 17:08) provided secondary punch.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
STL1 / 8 · 1.72 xG
SJS0 / 5 · 1.09 xG
Medium dangermid-range
STL1 / 6 · 0.76 xG
SJS1 / 12 · 1.61 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
STL1 / 18 · 0.33 xG
SJS1 / 35 · 0.66 xG

SJS went 0-for-5 from high danger on 1.09 expected goals — 1.1 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
STL
3 G · 2.81 xG · +0.2
SJS
2 G · 3.37 xG · -1.4
01234
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
J. BinningtonSTL
+1.4
A. NedeljkovicSJS
-0.2

STL finished +0.2 against expected, SJS -1.4 — J. Binnington (STL) saved 1.4 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
STL
WRIST2/14
SLAP0/3
TIP IN0/2
BACKHAND0/1
BAT0/1
SNAP1/1
OTHER0/10
SJS
WRIST1/24
SLAP1/8
TIP IN0/5
BACKHAND0/3
BAT0/0
SNAP0/0
OTHER0/12
STL
SJS
Off the rush
2 G on 14 · 1.84 xG
2 G on 24 · 2.26 xG
Off rebounds
1 G on 5 · 0.86 xG
0 G on 4 · 0.68 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: STL went 2-for-14, SJS 1-for-24. STL scored 2 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
D. Holloway
#81 · L · STL
0 G · 3 A · 0 SOG · 15:48 TOI · +3
R. Thomas
#18 · C · STL
2 G · 0 A · 5 SOG · 19:06 TOI · +3
J. Snuggerud
#21 · R · STL
1 G · 1 A · 2 SOG · 17:08 TOI · +1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • SJS had the shot volume but the chances weren't dangerous.
  • J. Binnington (STL) stopped 1.4 goals above expected.
  • STL had the higher quality looks — 0.088 xG/shot vs 0.065.
  • SJS couldn't convert — 0/5 on high-danger chances. That won't happen often.
  • SJS was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 24 rush chances.
  • STL was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 14 rush chances.
  • SJS created 4 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • STL created 5 rebound opportunities (1 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • J. Binnington was a wall on HD chances — 100% SV on 5 high-danger shots.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · STL at SJS · 10:00 PM ET

Blues at Sharks: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 12, 5:56 AMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

50%
SJS
Model favorite
50%
50%
STL50SJS

SJS by 0 points of win probability — effectively a coin flip. Projected score STL 2.52.5 SJS; 19% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

STL← edge
edge →SJS
49.0%5v5 xG%48.0%
48.0%Corsi%47.0%
2.34xGF / 602.33
2.40xGA / 602.56
2.00Goals for / gm1.99
2.12Goals against / gm2.32
1.000PDO — luck, not skill0.998

STL holds 6 of 6 process categories — and PDO (1.000 vs 0.998) says STL has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model projects a STL 2.5 - 2.5 SJS game with the Sharks at 50% win probability—about as close to a pick'em as you'll find. Both teams' underlying metrics are virtually indistinguishable: STL posts 49.0% xG%, 48.0% Corsi%, and 1.000 PDO, while SJS sits at 48.0% xG%, 47.0% Corsi%, and 0.998 PDO. Special teams and personnel will decide this one.

Watch J. Hofer's status before puck drop. The goaltender is on a back-to-back, raising the possibility of a backup start or an unusually tired starter for STL.

Players to Watch

STL

  • Jimmy Snuggerud — 0.86 xG/60, 15G 22A, 2 HD goals, 11.9% shooting
  • Dylan Holloway — 0.82 xG/60, 13G 24A, 1 HD goals, 10.8% shooting

SJS

  • Pavol Regenda — 1.10 xG/60, 5G 1A, 2 HD goals, 16.1% shooting (likely out)
  • Igor Chernyshov — 0.91 xG/60, 6G 8A, 1 HD goals, 15.0% shooting

Jimmy Snuggerud is STL's primary engine at 15 goals and 0.86 xG/60, but he's also the team's defensive weak link—an unusual combination that defines their risk profile. Dylan Holloway's 10.8% shooting rate suggests regression is coming; he's exceeded his underlying output.

The Sharks lack a clear personnel advantage. Pavol Regenda entered as a matchup concern with 1.10 xG/60 but is likely inactive. Igor Chernyshov (15.0% shooting) is their volume threat and also serves as SJS's defensive weak link—another mirrored vulnerability.

Both teams register 0% rates for high-danger and rebound goals, unsustainable metrics that will eventually regress. In an even matchup, the timing of that regression will likely decide it.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

STL
Jimmy Snuggerud15G 22A
0.86 xG/60 · 2 HD · 11.9% sh
Dylan Holloway13G 24A
0.82 xG/60 · 1 HD · 10.8% sh
SJS
Pavol Regenda5G 1A
1.10 xG/60 · 2 HD · 16.1% sh
Igor Chernyshov6G 8A
0.91 xG/60 · 1 HD · 15.0% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters