Motion-blurred skater in a Minnesota Wild sweater
Breakdown · MIN at VGK

Wild hold off the Golden Knights

The verdict · earned

The Wild earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

MIN 4 · VGK 2
◆ By the ModelJul 12, 6:00 AMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

Minnesota beat Vegas 4–2 despite the Golden Knights dominating possession. Vegas held 56% of shot attempts (31 to 24) and owned 53% of expected goals (4.46 to 3.95). But the scoreboard didn't match the play.

Goaltending and execution broke the tie. F. Gustavsson posted a 0.935 save percentage and stopped 1.95 goals above expected—he stole the game. A. Schmid managed only 0.833 (20 saves on 24 shots), and Vegas couldn't cash in where it mattered: they went 0-for-6 on high-danger chances. Minnesota converted twice from low-danger spots—the kind of goal variance that usually self-corrects.

Mitch Marner's wrist shot from the doorstep (16:55, third period) was the turning point. It came when the game was still negotiable.

The rush game was efficient on both sides. Vegas scored 2 goals on 33 rush chances; Minnesota buried 3 on 29. When the third period tightened, Minnesota's superior finishing held. Vegas underperformed their expected goals by 1.9, a telling stat that captures their night: strong possession, weak conversion.

The underlying lesson: shot volume and expected goals matter, but they don't guarantee results. F. Gustavsson's brilliance and Vegas's wasted chances determined this one.

The breakdown in twelve frames

Swipe it

Every number is from this page
Final · Mar 6
MIN
4
VGK
2

Wild hold off the Golden Knights

Chances 4.5 – 4.0Did they deserve it? →
Did they deserve it?

The Wild earned this one.

Expected goals · chance value
MIN
4.46
VGK
3.95
53% of the chances47%

The board read MIN 4, VGK 2. The chances read MIN 4.5, VGK 4.0.

Our xG model · NHL play-by-play · all situations
Luck check
MIN
−0.5
goals above expected
MIN4.46 expected · 4 scored
Expected
Scored
VGK3.95 expected · 2 scored
Expected
Scored

The Golden Knights left 1.9 goals on the table against what their chances were worth.

PDO = sh% + sv% · drifts to 1.000 over a season
Every goal, in order
  1. P2 05:18MINM. Zuccarello1–0
  2. P2 08:07MINZ. Bogosian2–0
  3. P2 08:25MINM. McCarron3–0
  4. P3 02:17VGKP. DorofeyevPP3–1
  5. P3 15:42MINV. Tarasenko4–1
  6. P3 16:55VGKM. Marner4–2
NHL play-by-play · chance value from our xG model
Where the shots came from
MIN
41 shots
4
Final
91 shots
VGK
50 shots
2
MIN attackVGK attack
MIN VGK Goal
41
shots · 4 in
50
shots · 2 in
Every unblocked shot · press play to replay it
Chances by danger
MINVGK
0 / 5
2.09 xG
High danger
0 / 6
1.48 xG
2 / 17
1.81 xG
Medium
2 / 20
1.97 xG
2 / 37
0.55 xG
Low
0 / 36
0.50 xG

The Golden Knights went 0 for 6 from the slot.

Danger tiers by our xG model · high ≥ 20% chance
In the net
A
F. Gustavsson
+1.9
MIN · 29/31
B
A. Schmid
+0.5
VGK · 20/24
The numbers, checked
BACKCHECK

Wild hold off the Golden Knights

A model, not a newsroom. Every number on these frames comes from the NHL's play-by-play and our own models. Nothing was watched, guessed or heard from anyone.

Read the full breakdown
backcheckreport.com
01 / 08 · Final
Every goal, in order

How it happened

NHL play-by-play
1stshots 6–8no goals
    2ndshots 7–10
    1. 05:18MINM. Zuccarello1–0
    2. 08:07MINZ. Bogosian(D. Yurov, Y. Trenin)2–0
    3. 08:25MINM. McCarron(B. Faber, Q. Hughes)3–0
    3rdshots 11–13
    1. 02:17VGKP. Dorofeyevpower play(J. Eichel, B. Bowman)3–1
    2. 15:42MINV. Tarasenko(J. Spurgeon, M. McCarron)4–1
    3. 16:55VGKM. Marner(P. Dorofeyev, T. Hertl)4–2

    score reads MIN–VGK

    Source · NHL play-by-play (api-web.nhle.com)
    Process vs result

    The numbers

    XGBoost xG · NHL play-by-play
    4.46
    MIN chances
    Goals their shots were worth
    −0.5
    Finishing
    Goals below what those chances were worth
    1.036
    MIN puck luck
    Above 1.000 — the bounces went their way
    48.8%
    Shot attempts
    Under half — they were outshot
    Split by club

    Who controlled the game

    4.46Expected goals3.95
    MIN 53% of the chance quality
    24Shots on goal31
    5High-danger chances6
    59All attempts (Corsi)62
    Adjusted for score: MIN 44% · VGK 56%
    Faceoffs · VGK won71%off71%neu64%def
    Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG
    How the game was won

    The danger ladder

    shotsgoalsexpected
    High dangerslot & crease
    MIN0 / 5 · 2.09 xG
    VGK0 / 6 · 1.48 xG
    Medium dangermid-range
    MIN2 / 17 · 1.81 xG
    VGK2 / 20 · 1.97 xG
    Low dangerperimeter & point
    MIN2 / 37 · 0.55 xG
    VGK0 / 36 · 0.50 xG

    MIN went 0-for-5 from high danger on 2.09 expected goals — 2.1 left on the table.

    Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
    The luck layer

    Finishing vs expected

    expectedactual
    MIN
    4 G · 4.46 xG · -0.5
    VGK
    2 G · 3.95 xG · -1.9
    012345

    MIN finished -0.5 against expected, VGK -1.9.

    Source · Backcheck xG model
    Shot types · rush and rebound chancesopen +
    What they shot — and what went in

    Shot diet

    goalsshots
    MIN
    WRIST2/25
    TIP IN1/4
    BACKHAND0/5
    SLAP1/4
    SNAP0/3
    DEFLECTED0/0
    OTHER0/18
    VGK
    WRIST2/27
    TIP IN0/8
    BACKHAND0/6
    SLAP0/4
    SNAP0/4
    DEFLECTED0/1
    OTHER0/12
    MIN
    VGK
    Off the rush
    3 G on 29
    3.07 xG
    2 G on 33
    3.05 xG
    Off rebounds
    0 G on 3
    0.50 xG
    0 G on 2
    0.36 xG

    Wrist shots carried the volume: MIN went 2-for-25, VGK 2-for-27. MIN scored 3 of theirs off the rush.

    Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
    New to these numbers?

    Two things happened in this game: who created the better chances, and who put the puck in the net. They are not the same thing, and this page separates them on purpose.

    The one to watch is expected goals— the best single read on who deserved to win. When it disagrees with the scoreboard, that disagreement is usually the story. Nothing here is a projection; every figure is computed from this game's play-by-play. Full glossary →

    xG
    Expected goals. Every shot scored by how often that exact look goes in. 2.5 xG means the chances were worth about two and a half goals.
    HD
    High-danger chances — shots from the slot and the crease, where shots actually become goals.
    Corsi
    Every shot attempt, including the ones that missed or got blocked. A rough read on who had the puck.
    Adj.
    Score-adjusted. Teams that trail shoot more and teams that lead sit back, so this corrects the attempt count for the scoreboard.
    GSAx
    Goals saved above expected. A positive number means the goalie stopped more than an average goalie would have on those shots.
    PDO
    Shooting % plus save % — a luck gauge. It sits near 1.000 over a season, so a game far from it usually means the bounces decided it.
    Shot by shot

    In the net

    Graded on goals saved above expected
    F. Gustavsson
    MIN · 29/31 · .935
    +1.9
    saved above expected
    A
    the night
    By dangerG/attxGsaved
    High danger0/61.5+1.5
    Medium2/202.0-0.0
    Low0/360.5+0.5

    A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

    A. Schmid
    VGK · 20/24 · .833
    +0.5
    saved above expected
    B
    the night
    By dangerG/attxGsaved
    High danger0/52.1+2.1
    Medium2/171.8-0.2
    Low2/370.6-1.4

    A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

    91 shots · press play to watch the game back

    Where the shots came from

    NHL play-by-play coordinates
    MIN
    41 shots
    4
    Final
    91 shots
    VGK
    50 shots
    2
    MIN attackVGK attack
    MIN VGK Goal

    Each club shoots toward its own end — MIN left, VGK right — the way you would watch it. A dot's size is how dangerous the look was, from distance and angle; it is a proxy for shot quality, not the xG model the article is written from. Hover a dot for the shooter and the clock.

    Ranked from the box score

    Three stars

    Points first
    Three stars · computed, not voted
    P. Dorofeyev
    #16 · R · VGK
    1 G · 1 A · 3 SOG · 18:01 on ice · -1
    M. McCarron
    #47 · C · MIN
    1 G · 1 A · 1 SOG · 10:41 on ice · +1
    Q. Hughes
    #43 · D · MIN
    0 G · 1 A · 0 SOG · 27:46 on ice · +1
    Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
    What the model said beforehand

    Before the game

    Written Fri, Mar 6
    Open the pre-game read
    Written from the numbers

    The read

    Edited for clarity
    ◆ By the ModelJul 12, 5:57 AMEdited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

    The model projects a 2.3–2.6 goals difference with the Golden Knights at 54% win probability—about as close to a pick'em as you'll find in the NHL.

    Minnesota is the hotter team by points pace, sitting 7-2-1 over their last 10. But the Golden Knights control puck movement at 5v5, running 52.0% Corsi to Minnesota's 48.0%. Minnesota's expected goals percentage (52.0%) nearly matches Vegas (54.0%), creating a genuinely even underlying matchup.

    Vegas' PDO sits at 0.983, running cold and due for positive regression. Minnesota's 1.007 PDO tells a very different story, yet the territorial game still tilts toward Vegas.

    Goaltending could be the tiebreaker. A. Hill is on a back-to-back; watch for either a backup start or a tired starter.

    For Minnesota, Matt Boldy (22G 18A, 0.89 xG/60, 5 hard-chance goals, 13.7% shooting) remains the primary offensive engine. Robby Fabbri (2G 3A, 0.88 xG/60, 1 hard-chance goal, 6.9% shooting) is likely out, which removes depth scoring. Minnesota's weak point defensively is Matt Kiersted, while they've generated no production from hard chances or rebounds this season—a reliance on elite shot quality that can't sustain a hot streak.

    For Vegas, Brandon Saad (3G 6A, 0.91 xG/60, 1 hard-chance goal, 4.1% shooting) projects as likely inactive, which stings their edge depth. That leaves Tomas Hertl (5G 17A, 0.88 xG/60, 1 hard-chance goal, 4.3% shooting) as the main offensive option. Vegas' weak link defensively is Rasmus Andersson; they too have generated zero hard-chance and rebound production, relying entirely on territorial dominance to generate offense.

    This matchup hinges on whether Minnesota's hot hand survives Vegas' territorial grip. In a true coin flip, it almost certainly doesn't—but the 54% number already prices in that regression.

    What the model said beforehand

    The model's lean

    VGK 54%
    54%
    VGK
    Model favorite
    46%
    54%
    MIN50VGK

    VGK by 8 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score MIN 2.3–2.6 VGK; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

    Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
    Season rates · 5v5

    Tale of the tape

    NHL stats API · our xG
    MIN← edge
    edge →VGK
    52.0%54.0%
    48.0%52.0%
    2.552.52
    2.402.11
    2.042.12
    1.932.10
    1.0070.983

    VGK holds 4 of 6 process categories — and the luck row (1.007 vs 0.983) says MIN has been getting the bounces, which tends not to last.

    Source · NHL stats API + our xG · 5v5
    Form · Last 10
    MIN
    7-2-1
    +11 GD · 2d rest
    VGK
    4-5-1
    -1 GD · 1d rest
    1.007
    MIN PDO
    Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
    0.983
    VGK PDO
    Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
    What decides it

    Keys to the game

    Where the edges live
    • The Golden Knights drive Corsi at 52.0% — expect territorial tilt.
    Regression watch
    • The Golden Knights' PDO is 0.983 — running cold, due for positive regression.
    Things to watch
    • The Golden Knights drive Corsi at 52.0% — expect territorial tilt.
    • A. Hill is on a back-to-back — watch for a backup start or a tired starter.
    • The Wild are the hotter team by points pace (7-2-1 in their last 10).
    • The Golden Knights' PDO is 0.983 — running cold, due for positive regression.
    Last game's lineup · confirmed at warm-up

    Lineups

    NHL box score
    MIN
    Expected in goal
    F. Gustavsson
    2 days rest.960 last start
    Backup Filip Gustavsson · +1.4 GSAx this season

    No completed game on file for this club yet.

    VGK
    Expected in goal
    A. Hill
    back-to-back.885 last start
    Backup Akira Schmid · -1.0 GSAx this season
    Back-to-back: the backup often gets this one. Treat the starter as unconfirmed.

    No completed game on file for this club yet.

    Lineups are the players who dressed in each club's last game, with their minutes; clubs confirm tonight's at warm-up. Every player this preview names was in that lineup.

    Computed danger · scouting

    Players to watch

    NHL stats API · our xG
    MIN
    Matt Boldy22G 18A
    0.89 xG/60 · 5 HD · 13.7% sh
    Robby Fabbri2G 3A
    0.88 xG/60 · 1 HD · 6.9% sh
    VGK
    Brandon Saad3G 6A
    0.91 xG/60 · 1 HD · 4.1% sh
    Tomas Hertl5G 17A
    0.88 xG/60 · 1 HD · 4.3% sh
    Keep going

    Where to next