Jets run the Canucks off the ice on the underlying numbers
The Jets earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.
The underlying story
Winnipeg controlled 62% of 5v5 expected goals (4.05–2.51) and won 3-2 in overtime. The scoreline reflected the dominance, though the Jets underperformed their xG by 1.05 goals. K. Lankinen stopped 1.1 goals above expected—offsetting performances that kept the game closer than the underlying numbers predicted.
The Jets held 61% of shot attempts (36–23) and won high-danger chances 6–4. Lankinen's 0.917 save percentage was the reason Vancouver remained competitive throughout. Winnipeg's volume and quality advantages never became a rout.
The Jets' edge appeared most clearly in rush execution. Winnipeg scored three goals on 31 rush chances while Vancouver managed two on 21. Winnipeg created nine rebound opportunities (none converted); Vancouver three (none converted). The asymmetry showed how much harder Winnipeg pushed inside the blue paint.
Josh Morrissey's slap shot from the top of the circles at 01:49 of overtime decided the game.
The danger ladder
VAN went 0-for-4 from high danger on 0.95 expected goals — 0.9 left on the table.
Finishing vs expected
VAN finished -0.5 against expected, WPG -1.1 — K. Lankinen (VAN) saved 1.1 goals above expected.
Shot diet
Wrist shots carried the volume: VAN went 1-for-19, WPG 1-for-24. WPG scored 3 of theirs off the rush.
- K. Lankinen (VAN) stopped 1.1 goals above expected.
- WPG was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 31 rush chances.
- VAN was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 21 rush chances.
- WPG created 9 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
- VAN created 3 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.