Backcheck
Recap · MTL at LAK

Canadiens steal one from the Kings against the run of play

The Canadiens stole one. They lost the expected-goals battle 2.98–6.48 and won anyway.

By the ModelJul 12, 6:04 AMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
MTL
Montreal Canadiens
4
Home
LAK
Los Angeles Kings
3
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

2.98Expected goals6.48
69% share for the better side
23Shot attempts (SOG)39
5High-danger chances12
44Corsi (all attempts)86
Score-adjusted: 35% / 65%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

The Kings owned this game by every measure that mattered — except the scoreboard. Montreal won 4-3 despite losing the xG battle 6.48–2.98, a brutal 68–32 split. The gap was the heist: J. Dobes (MTL) played at another level while D. Kuemper (LAK) couldn't match the quality he faced.

Every underlying metric screamed Kings domination. LAK held 63 percent of shot attempts (39–23). They crushed Montreal 12–5 in high-danger chances. Yet the Canadiens' rush game made the difference. N. Suzuki's slap shot from the top of the circles at 15:27 of the third broke through. Montreal finished with two goals on 23 rush attempts. Los Angeles needed 41 attempts to score twice.

Dobes stopped 36 of 39 shots for a 0.923 save percentage — 3.48 goals better than expected. That's a game stolen. D. Kuemper faced fewer shots (19 of 23) but finished 1.02 below expected, signaling quality chances that went unfinished.

J. Slafkovský (2G, 1A) led the Montreal attack. B. Clarke (LAK, 2A) orchestrated from the back. High-danger chances told the story: Montreal 0/5, LAK generating 12 rebounds but converting only 1. Montreal created 3 rebounds and converted none.

This was variance meeting execution. LAK earned a better fate.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
MTL0 / 5 · 1.51 xG
LAK2 / 12 · 2.73 xG
Medium dangermid-range
MTL2 / 9 · 0.96 xG
LAK1 / 24 · 2.75 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
MTL2 / 30 · 0.50 xG
LAK0 / 50 · 0.99 xG

LAK went 1-for-24 from medium danger on 2.75 expected goals — 1.8 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
MTL
4 G · 2.98 xG · +1.0
LAK
3 G · 6.48 xG · -3.5
01234567
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
J. DobesMTL
+3.5
D. KuemperLAK
-1.0

MTL finished +1.0 against expected, LAK -3.5 — J. Dobes (MTL) saved 3.5 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
MTL
WRIST1/18
SLAP3/3
BACKHAND0/7
TIP IN0/2
SNAP0/1
DEFLECTED0/0
POKE0/0
OTHER0/13
LAK
WRIST2/41
SLAP0/11
BACKHAND0/4
TIP IN1/9
SNAP0/2
DEFLECTED0/1
POKE0/1
OTHER0/17
MTL
LAK
Off the rush
2 G on 23 · 1.69 xG
2 G on 41 · 3.69 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 3 · 0.58 xG
1 G on 12 · 2.01 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: MTL went 1-for-18, LAK 2-for-41. MTL scored 2 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
N. Suzuki
#14 · C · MTL
1 G · 2 A · 5 SOG · 17:14 TOI
J. Slafkovský
#20 · L · MTL
2 G · 1 A · 4 SOG · 16:38 TOI · +1
B. Clarke
#92 · D · LAK
0 G · 2 A · 3 SOG · 24:38 TOI · +2
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • MTL stole this one. LAK owned 68% of the xG and lost.
  • J. Dobes (MTL) stopped 3.5 goals above expected.
  • D. Kuemper (LAK) gave up 1.0 goals more than expected — well below their workload.
  • Open game — 17 high-danger chances combined (LAK 12, MTL 5).
  • MTL couldn't convert — 0/5 on high-danger chances. That won't happen often.
  • MTL scored 2 goals from low-danger spots — the opposing goalie needs to have those.
  • LAK was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 41 rush chances.
  • MTL was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 23 rush chances.
  • LAK created 12 rebound opportunities (1 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • MTL created 3 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • LAK underperformed xG by 3.5 — wasted quality chances.
  • J. Dobes (MTL) saved 3.5 goals above expected — stole the show.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · MTL at LAK · 7:00 PM ET

The Kings are the model's lean over the Canadiens — with PDO regression in play

By the ModelJul 12, 6:24 AMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

56%
LAK
Model favorite
44%
56%
MTL50LAK

LAK by 12 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score MTL 2.32.6 LAK; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

MTL← edge
edge →LAK
48.0%5v5 xG%52.0%
49.0%Corsi%52.0%
2.41xGF / 602.42
2.62xGA / 602.20
2.24Goals for / gm1.85
1.96Goals against / gm1.71
1.018PDO — luck, not skill1.002

LAK holds 5 of 6 process categories — and PDO (1.018 vs 1.002) says MTL has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model projects Los Angeles at 56% win probability in a 2.3-2.6 game, favoring the Kings because their underlying play advantage outweighs Montreal's recent hot streak.

Los Angeles controls territory and shot quality. The Kings land at 52.0% xG and 52.0% Corsi versus Montreal's 48.0% and 49.0%—dominance in both volume and efficiency. Montreal's 5-3-2 record over their last 10 disguises a passive underlying game; they're benefiting from variance, not structural superiority.

Los Angeles's -15 goal differential over their last 10 looks damning in isolation. The xG and Corsi numbers indicate the Kings should win that stretch—the negative margin reflects variance and occasional poor luck, not systematic failure.

Montreal carries regression risk. At 1.018, their PDO signals unsustainable luck; shooting percentages and on-ice save rates this high don't hold. Los Angeles at 1.002 sits at expected levels with nothing to lose.

The Kings own a rest edge at 1 day versus Montreal's 3, compounding their advantage. D. Kuemper's back-to-back creates uncertainty: a tired starter or backup appearance would erode Los Angeles's depth cushion.

Cole Caufield (33G, 16A, 0.97 xG/60, 20.0% shooting) and Oliver Kapanen (19G, 12A, 0.83 xG/60, 17.8% shooting) drive Montreal's offense. Los Angeles counters with Alex Laferriere (16G, 18A, 0.87 xG/60) and Jared Wright (0G, 4A, 0.83 xG/60). The Kings' underlying advantage should translate to outproduction.

For Montreal to win, they need to suppress Los Angeles's shot generation or sustain improbable shooting efficiency. Neither is impossible, but neither is favored against a team generating 52.0% xG.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

MTL
Cole Caufield33G 16A
0.97 xG/60 · 1 HD · 20.0% sh
Oliver Kapanen19G 12A
0.83 xG/60 · 4 HD · 17.8% sh
LAK
Alex Laferriere16G 18A
0.87 xG/60 · 2 HD · 9.9% sh
Jared Wright0G 4A
0.83 xG/60 · 0 HD · 0.0% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters