Backcheck
Recap · NYR at PHI

Rangers pull away from the Flyers

The Rangers stole one. They lost the expected-goals battle 2.66–3.82 and won anyway.

By the ModelJul 12, 6:19 AMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
NYR
New York Rangers
6
Home
PHI
Philadelphia Flyers
2
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

2.66Expected goals3.82
59% share for the better side
27Shot attempts (SOG)34
3High-danger chances5
47Corsi (all attempts)57
Score-adjusted: 38% / 62%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

The Rangers won 6-2, but the Flyers controlled the game. Philadelphia held 59% of expected goals (3.82–2.66) and 56% of shot attempts—yet lost by four. This was a variance heist.

The difference came down to goaltending and finishing. I. Shesterkin stopped 32 of 34 shots (0.941 SV%), beating his expected performance by 1.82 goals. D. Vladar surrendered 3.64 more goals than expected, a collapse that reveals how thoroughly the Flyers squandered their dominance. Philadelphia posted 5 high-danger chances to New York's 3, yet scored only 2—a 40% conversion rate masking a deeper inability to finish.

New York's power play engineered the heist. The Rangers scored 3 goals on 0.94 expected goals across 10 shots, an absurd overperformance that accounts for most of their margin. Even-strength finishing was just as lethal: 3 goals on 22 rush chances and 2 from 5 rebounds. M. Zibanejad (2G, 1A in 17:50) and V. Trocheck (3A in 17:18) led the attack, with V. Gavrikov (2A in 19:54) orchestrating from the blue line.

The Flyers generated chances—S. Ersson was flawless in limited work—but couldn't convert when it mattered. Sean Couturier's snap shot from the slot (P3, 15:28) marked the game's only turning point, though it shifted nothing.

The Flyers underperformed their expected goals by 1.82. The Rangers overperformed by 3.34. Where shot quality favored Philadelphia, execution belonged entirely to New York.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
NYR2 / 3 · 0.66 xG
PHI2 / 5 · 1.62 xG
Medium dangermid-range
NYR3 / 15 · 1.59 xG
PHI0 / 15 · 1.48 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
NYR1 / 29 · 0.40 xG
PHI0 / 37 · 0.72 xG

PHI went 0-for-15 from medium danger on 1.48 expected goals — 1.5 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
NYR
6 G · 2.66 xG · +3.3
PHI
2 G · 3.82 xG · -1.8
01234567
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
I. ShesterkinNYR
+1.8
S. ErssonPHI
+0.3
D. VladarPHI
-3.6

NYR finished +3.3 against expected, PHI -1.8 — D. Vladar (PHI) allowed 3.6 more goals than expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
NYR
WRIST3/19
SNAP1/6
SLAP1/6
TIP IN1/3
BACKHAND0/0
DEFLECTED0/0
OTHER0/13
PHI
WRIST1/15
SNAP1/19
SLAP0/9
TIP IN0/2
BACKHAND0/2
DEFLECTED0/1
OTHER0/9
NYR
PHI
Off the rush
3 G on 22 · 1.34 xG
1 G on 24 · 2.33 xG
Off rebounds
2 G on 5 · 0.87 xG
1 G on 2 · 0.82 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: NYR went 3-for-19, PHI 1-for-15. NYR scored 3 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
M. Zibanejad
#93 · C · NYR
2 G · 1 A · 3 SOG · 17:50 TOI · +1
V. Trocheck
#16 · C · NYR
0 G · 3 A · 3 SOG · 17:18 TOI
V. Gavrikov
#44 · D · NYR
0 G · 2 A · 1 SOG · 19:54 TOI · +1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • NYR stole this one. PHI owned 59% of the xG and lost.
  • I. Shesterkin (NYR) stopped 1.8 goals above expected.
  • D. Vladar (PHI) gave up 3.6 goals more than expected — well below their workload.
  • PHI was clinical in the high-danger zone — 2/5 on HD chances (40%).
  • NYR was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 22 rush chances.
  • NYR created 5 rebound opportunities (2 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • PHI underperformed xG by 1.8 — wasted quality chances.
  • NYR outperformed their expected goals by 3.3 — elite finishing or lucky bounces.
  • I. Shesterkin (NYR) saved 1.8 goals above expected — stole the show.
  • S. Ersson (PHI) saved 2.7 goals above expected — stole the show.
  • NYR power play was dominant — 3 PPG on 10 PP shots (0.94 xG).
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · NYR at PHI · 7:00 PM ET

Rangers at Flyers: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 12, 6:18 AMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

54%
PHI
Model favorite
46%
54%
NYR50PHI

PHI by 8 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score NYR 2.22.5 PHI; 19% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

NYR← edge
edge →PHI
48.0%5v5 xG%51.0%
49.0%Corsi%48.0%
2.26xGF / 602.26
2.40xGA / 602.20
1.88Goals for / gm1.96
1.90Goals against / gm1.82
1.009PDO — luck, not skill1.008

PHI holds 5 of 6 process categories — and PDO (1.009 vs 1.008) says NYR has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

This is a true pick'em. The model projects a 2.2-2.5 goal range with Philadelphia at 54% win probability—close enough that any edge is theoretical.

The Flyers own the underlying play. Over the full season at 5v5, they generate 51.0% of expected goals to New York's 48.0%, though their shot share sits at 48.0% Corsi versus 49.0% for the Rangers. Both register similar PDO, so luck isn't the differentiator. The gap is real but thin.

New York carries recent baggage: the Rangers sit -6 goal differential over their last 10 games. That's not catastrophic, but it's a headwind into a matchup where the other team already holds the possession advantage.

The player story tilts toward Philadelphia. Owen Tippett (0.88 xG/60, 19 goals, 2 high-danger goals) and Christian Dvorak (0.81 xG/60, 12 goals, 3 high-danger goals) anchor the Flyers' attack with elite production. Adam Sykora generates 0.91 xG/60 for New York—his per-60 leads the group—but has just 3 goals and zero high-danger goals. Gabe Perreault (0.79 xG/60, 8 goals, 2 high-danger goals) forms New York's secondary option.

The tactical picture is where it gets interesting: both teams register 0% high-danger goal rates and 0% rebound goal rates, meaning both are leaving damage on the table and could improve sharply or regress. Vincent Iorio stands out as New York's defensive liability. Christian Dvorak, while elite offensively, is flagged as Philadelphia's weak point defensively—a note that matters little if he continues producing at 0.81 xG/60 but signals where the Rangers should hunt.

The Flyers are the right small lean. Philadelphia's edge in underlying play is marginal but consistent, and their forward depth is proven over the season. New York's recent downturn is the kind of momentum that rarely persists. At 54%, though, there's no real signal here—just a coin that landed marginally Philadelphia.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

NYR
Adam Sykora3G 1A
0.91 xG/60 · 0 HD · 20.0% sh
Gabe Perreault8G 11A
0.79 xG/60 · 2 HD · 13.1% sh
PHI
Owen Tippett19G 18A
0.88 xG/60 · 2 HD · 12.1% sh
Christian Dvorak12G 21A
0.81 xG/60 · 3 HD · 11.2% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters