Motion-blurred skater in a Buffalo Sabres sweater
Breakdown · BUF at VGK

Sabres shut out the Golden Knights, 2-0

The verdict · stolen

The Sabres stole one. They lost the expected-goals battle 3.03–3.99 and won anyway.

BUF 2 · VGK 0
◆ By the ModelJul 12, 7:38 AMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

Vegas controlled the game and lost it anyway. The Golden Knights held 54% of shot attempts and 57% of expected goals—3.99 to Buffalo's 3.03—but couldn't finish, and U. Luukkonen closed the door at 29/29.

That xG split tells you Vegas was the better team operationally; the scoreboard tells you it didn't matter. Buffalo didn't need to be dominant. They needed J. Norris's wrist shot from the top of the circles in the third period (19:02) to open it, then one more to seal it. Vegas, meanwhile, went 0/7 on high-danger chances—the most damning stat of the night.

The goaltending gap explains the rest. Luukkonen finished at 1.000 SV%, stopping 3.99 goals above expected—meaning he made saves that would beat a league-average tender. A. Hill (VGK) stopped 2.03 above expected on 23/24 attempts, respectable work that simply couldn't match the Sabres' wall.

Vegas's collapse on quality looks is the real lesson here. They created 7 high-danger chances and converted zero—a failure of finish, not setup. Buffalo's rush game, by contrast, was surgical: 2 goals on 26 attempts. When one team dominates territory but can't score, and the other scores on efficiency, the scoreboard is right.

Three Stars

  • #23 M. Samuelsson (BUF), 1A in 22:20
  • #91 J. Doan (BUF), 1G in 13:30
  • #9 J. Norris (BUF), 1G in 13:28
The breakdown in twelve frames

Swipe it

Every number is from this page
Final · Mar 17
BUF
2
VGK
0

Sabres shut out the Golden Knights, 2-0

Chances 3.0 – 4.0Did they deserve it? →
Did they deserve it?

The Golden Knights deserved better.

Expected goals · chance value
BUF
3.03
VGK
3.99
43% of the chances57%

The board read BUF 2, VGK 0. The chances read BUF 3.0, VGK 4.0.

Our xG model · NHL play-by-play · all situations
Luck check
BUF
−1.0
goals above expected
BUF3.03 expected · 2 scored
Expected
Scored
VGK3.99 expected · 0 scored
Expected
Scored

The Golden Knights left 4.0 goals on the table against what their chances were worth.

PDO = sh% + sv% · drifts to 1.000 over a season
Every goal, in order
  1. P1 18:02BUFJ. Doan1–0
  2. P3 19:02BUFJ. NorrisEN2–0
NHL play-by-play · chance value from our xG model
Where the shots came from
BUF
38 shots
2
Final
86 shots
VGK
48 shots
0
BUF attackVGK attack
BUF VGK Goal
38
shots · 2 in
48
shots · 0 in
Every unblocked shot · press play to replay it
Chances by danger
BUFVGK
1 / 2
0.76 xG
High danger
0 / 7
1.88 xG
0 / 14
1.68 xG
Medium
0 / 13
1.43 xG
1 / 34
0.58 xG
Low
0 / 43
0.68 xG

The Golden Knights went 0 for 7 from the slot.

Danger tiers by our xG model · high ≥ 20% chance
In the net
A+
U. Luukkonen
+4.0
BUF · 29/29
A
A. Hill
+2.0
VGK · 23/24
The numbers, checked
BACKCHECK

Sabres shut out the Golden Knights, 2-0

A model, not a newsroom. Every number on these frames comes from the NHL's play-by-play and our own models. Nothing was watched, guessed or heard from anyone.

Read the full breakdown
backcheckreport.com
01 / 08 · Final
Every goal, in order

How it happened

NHL play-by-play
1stshots 10–11
  1. 18:02BUFJ. Doan1–0
2ndshots 9–9no goals
    3rdshots 6–9
    1. 19:02BUFJ. Norrisempty net(P. Krebs, M. Samuelsson)2–0

    score reads BUF–VGK

    Source · NHL play-by-play (api-web.nhle.com)
    Process vs result

    The numbers

    XGBoost xG · NHL play-by-play
    3.03
    BUF chances
    Goals their shots were worth
    −1.0
    Finishing
    Goals below what those chances were worth
    1.040
    BUF puck luck
    Above 1.000 — the bounces went their way
    44.2%
    Shot attempts
    Under half — they were outshot
    Split by club

    Who controlled the game

    3.03Expected goals3.99
    VGK 57% of the chance quality
    25Shots on goal29
    2High-danger chances7
    50All attempts (Corsi)63
    Adjusted for score: BUF 42% · VGK 58%
    Faceoffs · VGK won63%off53%neu43%def
    Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG
    How the game was won

    The danger ladder

    shotsgoalsexpected
    High dangerslot & crease
    BUF1 / 2 · 0.76 xG
    VGK0 / 7 · 1.88 xG
    Medium dangermid-range
    BUF0 / 14 · 1.68 xG
    VGK0 / 13 · 1.43 xG
    Low dangerperimeter & point
    BUF1 / 34 · 0.58 xG
    VGK0 / 43 · 0.68 xG

    VGK went 0-for-7 from high danger on 1.88 expected goals — 1.9 left on the table.

    Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
    The luck layer

    Finishing vs expected

    expectedactual
    BUF
    2 G · 3.03 xG · -1.0
    VGK
    0 G · 3.99 xG · -4.0
    012345

    BUF finished -1.0 against expected, VGK -4.0.

    Source · Backcheck xG model
    Shot types · rush and rebound chancesopen +
    What they shot — and what went in

    Shot diet

    goalsshots
    BUF
    WRIST1/23
    SNAP0/3
    TIP IN0/4
    SLAP0/2
    BACKHAND1/5
    DEFLECTED0/1
    OTHER0/12
    VGK
    WRIST0/20
    SNAP0/8
    TIP IN0/6
    SLAP0/7
    BACKHAND0/3
    DEFLECTED0/4
    OTHER0/15
    BUF
    VGK
    Off the rush
    2 G on 26
    2.46 xG
    0 G on 28
    2.78 xG
    Off rebounds
    0 G on 4
    0.40 xG
    0 G on 3
    0.86 xG

    Wrist shots carried the volume: BUF went 1-for-23, VGK 0-for-20. BUF scored 2 of theirs off the rush.

    Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
    New to these numbers?

    Two things happened in this game: who created the better chances, and who put the puck in the net. They are not the same thing, and this page separates them on purpose.

    The one to watch is expected goals— the best single read on who deserved to win. When it disagrees with the scoreboard, that disagreement is usually the story. Nothing here is a projection; every figure is computed from this game's play-by-play. Full glossary →

    xG
    Expected goals. Every shot scored by how often that exact look goes in. 2.5 xG means the chances were worth about two and a half goals.
    HD
    High-danger chances — shots from the slot and the crease, where shots actually become goals.
    Corsi
    Every shot attempt, including the ones that missed or got blocked. A rough read on who had the puck.
    Adj.
    Score-adjusted. Teams that trail shoot more and teams that lead sit back, so this corrects the attempt count for the scoreboard.
    GSAx
    Goals saved above expected. A positive number means the goalie stopped more than an average goalie would have on those shots.
    PDO
    Shooting % plus save % — a luck gauge. It sits near 1.000 over a season, so a game far from it usually means the bounces decided it.
    Shot by shot

    In the net

    Graded on goals saved above expected
    U. Luukkonen
    BUF · 29/29 · 1.000
    +4.0
    saved above expected
    A+
    the night
    By dangerG/attxGsaved
    High danger0/71.9+1.9
    Medium0/131.4+1.4
    Low0/430.7+0.7

    A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

    A. Hill
    VGK · 23/24 · .958
    +2.0
    saved above expected
    A
    the night
    By dangerG/attxGsaved
    High danger1/20.8-0.2
    Medium0/141.7+1.7
    Low1/340.6-0.4

    A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

    86 shots · press play to watch the game back

    Where the shots came from

    NHL play-by-play coordinates
    BUF
    38 shots
    2
    Final
    86 shots
    VGK
    48 shots
    0
    BUF attackVGK attack
    BUF VGK Goal

    Each club shoots toward its own end — BUF left, VGK right — the way you would watch it. A dot's size is how dangerous the look was, from distance and angle; it is a proxy for shot quality, not the xG model the article is written from. Hover a dot for the shooter and the clock.

    Ranked from the box score

    Three stars

    Points first
    Three stars · computed, not voted
    M. Samuelsson
    #23 · D · BUF
    0 G · 1 A · 1 SOG · 22:20 on ice · +1
    J. Doan
    #91 · R · BUF
    1 G · 0 A · 3 SOG · 13:30 on ice · +2
    J. Norris
    #9 · C · BUF
    1 G · 0 A · 5 SOG · 13:28 on ice · +2
    Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
    What the model said beforehand

    Before the game

    Written Tue, Mar 17
    Open the pre-game read
    Written from the numbers

    The read

    Edited for clarity
    ◆ By the ModelJul 12, 7:37 AMEdited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

    The model projects Vegas at 56% win probability with a scoring expectation of BUF 2.3 - 2.7 VGK. The Golden Knights dominate the underlying play: 54.0% 5v5 xG share against Buffalo's 50.0%, and 52.0% Corsi dominance against 49.0%. That territorial control compounds into shot quality advantage.

    Buffalo enters on a hot streak—9-1-0 in their last 10—but that run masks structural advantage for Vegas. The culprit is PDO, the combined metric of shooting percentage and save percentage. Buffalo's sits at 1.020, meaning the Sabres are getting and receiving unsustainable luck. Vegas runs at 0.983, cold despite strong underlying play. Regression will widen the scoring gap: Buffalo's fortunes normalize downward, Vegas's upward.

    Jason Zucker anchors Buffalo at 1.07 xG/60 with 14G 14A and 6 high-danger goals at a 15.1% shooting rate. Josh Doan (15G 18A, 1.01 xG/60, 11.5% shooting) provides secondary punch. Vegas counters with Tomas Hertl (5G 17A, 0.88 xG/60, 4.3% shooting) as its offensive engine. Brandon Saad, marked inactive, is removed from Vegas's equation despite his 0.91 xG/60 rate. Both teams sit at 0% high-danger and 0% rebound goal rate. Jack Quinn is Buffalo's defensive weak link; Rasmus Andersson is Vegas's.

    Vegas wins on the underlying play and the regression math.

    What the model said beforehand

    The model's lean

    VGK 56%
    56%
    VGK
    Model favorite
    44%
    56%
    BUF50VGK

    VGK by 12 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score BUF 2.3–2.7 VGK; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

    Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
    Season rates · 5v5

    Tale of the tape

    NHL stats API · our xG
    BUF← edge
    edge →VGK
    50.0%54.0%
    49.0%52.0%
    2.552.52
    2.552.11
    2.352.12
    1.902.10
    1.0200.983

    The season numbers split 3–3 — no clear process edge — and the luck row (1.020 vs 0.983) says BUF has been getting the bounces, which tends not to last.

    Source · NHL stats API + our xG · 5v5
    Form · Last 10
    BUF
    9-1-0
    +16 GD · 3d rest
    VGK
    4-6-0
    -1 GD · 2d rest
    1.020
    BUF PDO
    Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
    0.983
    VGK PDO
    Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
    What decides it

    Keys to the game

    Where the edges live
    • The Golden Knights own the underlying play — 54.0% 5v5 xG vs 50.0%.
    • The Golden Knights drive Corsi at 52.0% — expect territorial tilt.
    Regression watch
    • The Golden Knights' PDO is 0.983 — running cold, due for positive regression.
    • The Sabres' PDO is 1.020 — running hot, expect some regression.
    Things to watch
    • The Golden Knights own the underlying play — 54.0% 5v5 xG vs 50.0%.
    • The Golden Knights drive Corsi at 52.0% — expect territorial tilt.
    • The Sabres are the hotter team by points pace (9-1-0 in their last 10).
    • The Golden Knights' PDO is 0.983 — running cold, due for positive regression.
    Last game's lineup · confirmed at warm-up

    Lineups

    NHL box score
    BUF
    Expected in goal
    A. Lyon
    3 days rest.889 last start
    Backup Ukko-Pekka Luukkonen · +10.5 GSAx this season

    No completed game on file for this club yet.

    VGK
    Expected in goal
    A. Hill
    2 days rest1.000 last start
    Backup Akira Schmid · -1.0 GSAx this season

    No completed game on file for this club yet.

    Lineups are the players who dressed in each club's last game, with their minutes; clubs confirm tonight's at warm-up. Every player this preview names was in that lineup.

    Computed danger · scouting

    Players to watch

    NHL stats API · our xG
    BUF
    Jason Zucker14G 14A
    1.07 xG/60 · 6 HD · 15.1% sh
    Josh Doan15G 18A
    1.01 xG/60 · 2 HD · 11.5% sh
    VGK
    Brandon Saad3G 6A
    0.91 xG/60 · 1 HD · 4.1% sh
    Tomas Hertl5G 17A
    0.88 xG/60 · 1 HD · 4.3% sh
    Keep going

    Where to next