Backcheck
Recap · NJD at NYR

Devils run the Rangers off the ice on the underlying numbers

The Devils earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

By the ModelJul 12, 7:40 AMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
NJD
New Jersey Devils
6
Home
NYR
New York Rangers
3
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

4.86Expected goals2.11
70% share for the better side
39Shot attempts (SOG)18
8High-danger chances3
65Corsi (all attempts)43
Score-adjusted: 58% / 42%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

The Devils won 6-3, but the underlying numbers showed a wider gap: New Jersey controlled 70% of 5v5 expected goals (4.86–2.11), a dominance the scoreline downplays.

The Rangers held just 32% of shot attempts (18–39) and generated only three high-danger chances to the Devils' eight. Yet they managed to overperform their xG by 0.89 goals—Rangers finished 3 on 2.11 expected. The Devils also beat their model, scoring 1.14 goals over their 4.86 xG. Both teams punched above their chances.

New Jersey's power play was the difference. They converted twice on 11 shots (1.18 xG), making the advantage count when it mattered. On even strength, the Devils generated superior looks: 0.075 xG per shot versus the Rangers' 0.049. New Jersey also capitalized on rush opportunities, scoring four goals on 32 rush chances. The Rangers found just two in 18.

The Devils' shot quality told the story. Two of their tallies came from low-danger spots—the kind that demand perfection from opposing goalies. J. Quick (NYR) finished 33/39 saves (0.846 SV%) but gave up 1.14 goals above expected. J. Markstrom (NJD) stopped 15/18 (0.833 SV%) but underperformed by 0.89.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
NJD2 / 8 · 2.09 xG
NYR1 / 3 · 0.71 xG
Medium dangermid-range
NJD2 / 18 · 1.90 xG
NYR1 / 7 · 0.81 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
NJD2 / 39 · 0.87 xG
NYR1 / 33 · 0.59 xG

NJD went 2-for-39 from low danger on 0.87 expected goals — 1.1 above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
NJD
6 G · 4.86 xG · +1.1
NYR
3 G · 2.11 xG · +0.9
01234567
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
J. MarkstromNJD
-0.9
J. QuickNYR
-1.1

NJD finished +1.1 against expected, NYR +0.9 — J. Quick (NYR) allowed 1.1 more goals than expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
NJD
WRIST4/33
SNAP2/9
DEFLECTED0/3
BACKHAND0/4
SLAP0/4
TIP IN0/3
WRAP AROUND0/1
OTHER0/8
NYR
WRIST0/13
SNAP3/11
DEFLECTED0/3
BACKHAND0/1
SLAP0/1
TIP IN0/1
WRAP AROUND0/0
OTHER0/13
NJD
NYR
Off the rush
4 G on 32 · 2.87 xG
2 G on 18 · 1.44 xG
Off rebounds
2 G on 8 · 1.55 xG
0 G on 3 · 0.30 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: NJD went 4-for-33, NYR 0-for-13. NJD scored 4 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
J. Hughes
#86 · C · NJD
1 G · 2 A · 5 SOG · 17:48 TOI · +1
C. Brown
#16 · R · NJD
1 G · 2 A · 1 SOG · 16:03 TOI · +1
N. Hischier
#13 · C · NJD
1 G · 1 A · 3 SOG · 18:52 TOI · -1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • J. Quick (NYR) gave up 1.1 goals more than expected — well below their workload.
  • NJD had the higher quality looks — 0.075 xG/shot vs 0.049.
  • NJD scored 2 goals from low-danger spots — the opposing goalie needs to have those.
  • NYR was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 18 rush chances.
  • NJD was lethal off the rush — 4 goals on 32 rush chances.
  • NYR created 3 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • NJD created 8 rebound opportunities (2 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • NJD power play was dominant — 2 PPG on 11 PP shots (1.18 xG).
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · NJD at NYR · 7:00 PM ET

Devils at Rangers: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 12, 7:39 AMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

51%
NYR
Model favorite
49%
51%
NJD50NYR

NYR by 2 points of win probability — effectively a coin flip. Projected score NJD 2.42.5 NYR; 19% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

NJD← edge
edge →NYR
50.0%5v5 xG%48.0%
51.0%Corsi%49.0%
2.45xGF / 602.26
2.50xGA / 602.40
1.66Goals for / gm1.88
2.23Goals against / gm1.90
0.971PDO — luck, not skill1.009

The season numbers split 33 — no clear process edge — and PDO (0.971 vs 1.009) says NYR has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model projects a 2.4-2.5 goal game with the Rangers at 51% win probability—essentially a pick'em. New Jersey should win this on pure talent, but New York has an escape route.

New Jersey owns the underlying advantage. The Devils lead in expected goals at 50.0% xG% and shot attempts at 51.0% Corsi%, controlling play. But their 0.971 PDO tells the real story: puck luck is working against them, and positive regression is coming.

The Rangers are the mirror. They sit at 48.0% xG% and 49.0% Corsi%, trailing New Jersey in volume and quality, yet their 1.009 PDO keeps them competitive. New York is beating the model through fortune, and that margin compresses eventually.

So which team's math wins out? That's the game.

Timo Meier generates New Jersey's volume at 1.08 xG/60, combining 13 goals with 15 assists and 3 high-danger chances. His 6.7% shooting sits below average and will regress. Jack Hughes operates at 0.88 xG/60 with 18 goals and 17 assists, but his 11.5% shooting is inflated and masks volatility.

Adam Sykora anchors New York at 0.91 xG/60 with 3 goals and 1 assist. His 20.0% shooting is unsustainable, likely signaling underlying inconsistency. Gabe Perreault provides secondary scoring at 0.79 xG/60 with 8 goals, 11 assists, and 2 high-danger chances; his 13.1% shooting suggests more stable output.

Defensively, Johnathan Kovacevic is New Jersey's weak link, likely on-ice for high-danger chances. Vincent Iorio plays the same role for New York. Neither team has an obvious edge.

New Jersey has the better case on paper. New York has the shooting rates to steal this. Rangers at 51% is fair.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

NJD
Timo Meier13G 15A
1.08 xG/60 · 3 HD · 6.7% sh
Jack Hughes18G 17A
0.88 xG/60 · 1 HD · 11.5% sh
NYR
Adam Sykora3G 1A
0.91 xG/60 · 0 HD · 20.0% sh
Gabe Perreault8G 11A
0.79 xG/60 · 2 HD · 13.1% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters