Motion-blurred skater in a green sweater
Breakdown · DAL at COL

J. Oettinger stands tall as the Stars edge the Avalanche

The verdict · stolen

The Stars stole one. They lost the expected-goals battle 3.50–4.12 and won anyway.

DAL 2 · COL 1
◆ By the ModelJul 12, 7:49 AMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

The Stars won 2-1 in a shootout despite Colorado's commanding underlying numbers. The Avalanche finished with 4.12 expected goals to Dallas's 3.50—a 54-46 advantage that should have been enough.

Shot volume tells part of the story. Colorado controlled 65% of shot attempts (34-18 on goal). High-danger chances finished 8-8, completely even. Yet the Avalanche couldn't convert. They went 0-for-8 on those looks—a miss rate that won't repeat.

The gap came down to shot quality and goaltending. Dallas's shots averaged 0.081 expected goals each; Colorado's averaged 0.057. Marginal difference, but at volume, it compounds. More importantly, J. Oettinger saved 3.12 goals above expected on 33 saves. He stopped 100% of Colorado's high-danger chances.

S. Wedgewood wasn't the problem. She posted a 0.944 save percentage, +2.50 above expected. But when Colorado's forwards squeeze off eight premium looks and cash zero, the goalie's heroics only do so much.

The Avalanche weren't careless. They created four rebound opportunities (zero conversions) and controlled the slot. The problem was precision: everything got shot—nothing got scored. Dallas did the inverse, generating just enough danger at just the right moments. Wyatt Johnston's shootout winner felt inevitable in that context.

This game lives in the gap between possession and results. Colorado dominated the crease; Oettinger occupied it like a fortress. The Avalanche underperformed their xG by 3.12 goals. Dallas underperformed theirs by 1.50. Close to that margin was the difference in the game.

The breakdown in twelve frames

Swipe it

Every number is from this page
Final · SO · Mar 18
DAL
2
COL
1

J. Oettinger stands tall as the Stars edge the Avalanche

Chances 3.5 – 4.1Did they deserve it? →
Did they deserve it?

The Avalanche deserved better.

Expected goals · chance value
DAL
3.50
COL
4.12
46% of the chances54%

The board read DAL 2, COL 1. The chances read DAL 3.5, COL 4.1.

Our xG model · NHL play-by-play · all situations
Luck check
DAL
−1.5
goals above expected
DAL3.50 expected · 2 scored
Expected
Scored
COL4.12 expected · 1 scored
Expected
Scored

The Avalanche left 3.1 goals on the table against what their chances were worth.

PDO = sh% + sv% · drifts to 1.000 over a season
Every goal, in order
  1. P1 18:33COLC. MakarPP0–1
  2. P2 06:18DALJ. Robertson1–1
  3. SO 00:00DALW. JohnstonPP1–1
NHL play-by-play · chance value from our xG model
Where the shots came from
DAL
38 shots
2
Final
93 shots
COL
55 shots
1
DAL attackCOL attack
DAL COL Goal
38
shots · 2 in
55
shots · 1 in
Every unblocked shot · press play to replay it
Chances by danger
DALCOL
1 / 8
1.97 xG
High danger
0 / 8
1.83 xG
0 / 10
1.09 xG
Medium
1 / 15
1.57 xG
0 / 25
0.44 xG
Low
0 / 49
0.73 xG

The Avalanche went 0 for 8 from the slot.

Danger tiers by our xG model · high ≥ 20% chance
In the net
A+
J. Oettinger
+3.1
DAL · 33/34
A+
S. Wedgewood
+2.5
COL · 17/18
The numbers, checked
BACKCHECK

J. Oettinger stands tall as the Stars edge the Avalanche

A model, not a newsroom. Every number on these frames comes from the NHL's play-by-play and our own models. Nothing was watched, guessed or heard from anyone.

Read the full breakdown
backcheckreport.com
01 / 08 · Final
Every goal, in order

How it happened

NHL play-by-play
1stshots 2–6
  1. 18:33COLC. Makarpower play(N. Kadri, N. MacKinnon)0–1
2ndshots 7–15
  1. 06:18DALJ. Robertson(N. Bastian, T. Harley)1–1
3rdshots 5–10no goals
    OTshots 4–3no goals
      SO
      1. 00:00DALW. Johnstonpower play1–1

      score reads DAL–COL

      Source · NHL play-by-play (api-web.nhle.com)
      Process vs result

      The numbers

      XGBoost xG · NHL play-by-play
      3.50
      DAL chances
      Goals their shots were worth
      −1.5
      Finishing
      Goals below what those chances were worth
      1.009
      DAL puck luck
      About 1.000 — a normal night for bounces
      37.4%
      Shot attempts
      Under half — they were outshot
      Split by club

      Who controlled the game

      3.50Expected goals4.12
      COL 54% of the chance quality
      18Shots on goal34
      8High-danger chances8
      43All attempts (Corsi)72
      Adjusted for score: DAL 38% · COL 62%
      Faceoffs · COL won71%off55%neu44%def
      Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG
      How the game was won

      The danger ladder

      shotsgoalsexpected
      High dangerslot & crease
      DAL1 / 8 · 1.97 xG
      COL0 / 8 · 1.83 xG
      Medium dangermid-range
      DAL0 / 10 · 1.09 xG
      COL1 / 15 · 1.57 xG
      Low dangerperimeter & point
      DAL0 / 25 · 0.44 xG
      COL0 / 49 · 0.73 xG

      COL went 0-for-8 from high danger on 1.83 expected goals — 1.8 left on the table.

      Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
      The luck layer

      Finishing vs expected

      expectedactual
      DAL
      2 G · 3.50 xG · -1.5
      COL
      1 G · 4.12 xG · -3.1
      012345

      DAL finished -1.5 against expected, COL -3.1.

      Source · Backcheck xG model
      Shot types · rush and rebound chancesopen +
      What they shot — and what went in

      Shot diet

      goalsshots
      DAL
      WRIST1/19
      SNAP0/6
      TIP IN0/5
      SLAP0/1
      BACKHAND0/2
      WRAP AROUND0/2
      DEFLECTED0/0
      OTHER0/8
      COL
      WRIST0/29
      SNAP1/12
      TIP IN0/2
      SLAP0/5
      BACKHAND0/2
      WRAP AROUND0/0
      DEFLECTED0/2
      OTHER0/20
      DAL
      COL
      Off the rush
      0 G on 25
      2.60 xG
      1 G on 33
      3.31 xG
      Off rebounds
      1 G on 4
      0.56 xG
      0 G on 4
      0.56 xG

      Wrist shots carried the volume: DAL went 1-for-19, COL 0-for-29.

      Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
      New to these numbers?

      Two things happened in this game: who created the better chances, and who put the puck in the net. They are not the same thing, and this page separates them on purpose.

      The one to watch is expected goals— the best single read on who deserved to win. When it disagrees with the scoreboard, that disagreement is usually the story. Nothing here is a projection; every figure is computed from this game's play-by-play. Full glossary →

      xG
      Expected goals. Every shot scored by how often that exact look goes in. 2.5 xG means the chances were worth about two and a half goals.
      HD
      High-danger chances — shots from the slot and the crease, where shots actually become goals.
      Corsi
      Every shot attempt, including the ones that missed or got blocked. A rough read on who had the puck.
      Adj.
      Score-adjusted. Teams that trail shoot more and teams that lead sit back, so this corrects the attempt count for the scoreboard.
      GSAx
      Goals saved above expected. A positive number means the goalie stopped more than an average goalie would have on those shots.
      PDO
      Shooting % plus save % — a luck gauge. It sits near 1.000 over a season, so a game far from it usually means the bounces decided it.
      Shot by shot

      In the net

      Graded on goals saved above expected
      J. Oettinger
      DAL · 33/34 · .971
      +3.1
      saved above expected
      A+
      the night
      By dangerG/attxGsaved
      High danger0/81.8+1.8
      Medium1/151.6+0.6
      Low0/490.7+0.7

      A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

      S. Wedgewood
      COL · 17/18 · .944
      +2.5
      saved above expected
      A+
      the night
      By dangerG/attxGsaved
      High danger1/82.0+1.0
      Medium0/101.1+1.1
      Low0/250.4+0.4

      A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

      93 shots · press play to watch the game back

      Where the shots came from

      NHL play-by-play coordinates
      DAL
      38 shots
      2
      Final
      93 shots
      COL
      55 shots
      1
      DAL attackCOL attack
      DAL COL Goal

      Each club shoots toward its own end — DAL left, COL right — the way you would watch it. A dot's size is how dangerous the look was, from distance and angle; it is a proxy for shot quality, not the xG model the article is written from. Hover a dot for the shooter and the clock.

      Ranked from the box score

      Three stars

      Points first
      Three stars · computed, not voted
      N. MacKinnon
      #29 · C · COL
      0 G · 1 A · 5 SOG · 26:40 on ice
      C. Makar
      #8 · D · COL
      1 G · 0 A · 4 SOG · 24:39 on ice
      T. Harley
      #55 · D · DAL
      0 G · 1 A · 2 SOG · 22:45 on ice · +1
      Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
      What the model said beforehand

      Before the game

      Written Wed, Mar 18
      Open the pre-game read
      Written from the numbers

      The read

      Edited for clarity
      ◆ By the ModelJul 12, 7:47 AMEdited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

      The model projects a 2.3–2.8 goal Avalanche victory with Colorado at 58% win probability. This is a game where the better play should win, and the data says Colorado has it.

      Colorado dominates the underlying metrics: 57.0% expected goals and 57.0% Corsi to Dallas's 51.0% and 47.0%. That xG gap represents territorial control and higher-quality chances. The Avalanche don't just generate more shots; they're converting a superior share into dangerous looks, the kind that stick on the board.

      Dallas has surged recently—8-1-1 over their last 10—but the Stars' underlying play remains exposed. The efficiency gap is structural, not fluky.

      Both teams carry PDO red flags. Colorado's 1.021 and Dallas's 1.024 indicate unsustainable puck luck in the standings. Regression is coming for one or both sides, though the timing is uncertain. If it arrives before puck drop, the goal differential compresses.

      Goaltending adds texture. M. Blackwood and C. DeSmith are both on back-to-backs, risking either tired starters or surprise backups. Whoever faces more high-danger chances—Colorado's depth should generate them—carries a disadvantage.

      The player edge favors Colorado. Artturi Lehkonen (1.11 xG/60, 18 goals, 6 high-danger goals) and Ross Colton (1.10 xG/60, 7 goals, 1 high-danger goal) give the Avalanche multiple mid-lineup threats. Dallas leans on Jason Robertson (0.96 xG/60, 25 goals, 2 high-danger goals) supported by Michael Bunting (0.83 xG/60), but that's a sharper lead without depth. Denver's multiple threats win the matchup.

      Colorado's advantage holds if the play does. Dallas's variance hinges on whether their recent streak signals a tactical shift, and whether back-to-back goaltending becomes pivotal. The model sees through both: Avalanche at 58%, which is what happens when the better team executes.

      What the model said beforehand

      The model's lean

      COL 58%
      58%
      COL
      Model favorite
      42%
      58%
      DAL50COL

      COL by 16 points of win probability — a clear lean. Projected score DAL 2.3–2.8 COL; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

      Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
      Season rates · 5v5

      Tale of the tape

      NHL stats API · our xG
      DAL← edge
      edge →COL
      51.0%57.0%
      47.0%57.0%
      2.363.03
      2.292.30
      2.072.63
      1.681.56
      1.0241.021

      COL holds 5 of 6 process categories — and the luck row (1.024 vs 1.021) says DAL has been getting the bounces, which tends not to last.

      Source · NHL stats API + our xG · 5v5
      Form · Last 10
      DAL
      8-1-1
      +18 GD · 1d rest
      COL
      6-4-0
      +3 GD · 1d rest
      1.024
      DAL PDO
      Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
      1.021
      COL PDO
      Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
      What decides it

      Keys to the game

      Where the edges live
      • The Avalanche own the underlying play — 57.0% 5v5 xG vs 51.0%.
      • The Avalanche drive Corsi at 57.0% — expect territorial tilt.
      Regression watch
      • The Avalanche's PDO is 1.021 — running hot, expect some regression.
      • The Stars' PDO is 1.024 — running hot, expect some regression.
      Things to watch
      • The Avalanche own the underlying play — 57.0% 5v5 xG vs 51.0%.
      • The Avalanche drive Corsi at 57.0% — expect territorial tilt.
      • M. Blackwood is on a back-to-back — watch for a backup start or a tired starter.
      • C. DeSmith is on a back-to-back — watch for a backup start or a tired starter.
      • The Stars are the hotter team by points pace (8-1-1 in their last 10).
      • The Avalanche's PDO is 1.021 — running hot, expect some regression.
      Last game's lineup · confirmed at warm-up

      Lineups

      NHL box score
      DAL
      Expected in goal
      C. DeSmith
      back-to-back.762 last start
      Backup Jake Oettinger · +5.7 GSAx this season
      Back-to-back: the backup often gets this one. Treat the starter as unconfirmed.

      No completed game on file for this club yet.

      COL
      Expected in goal
      M. Blackwood
      back-to-back.733 last start
      Backup Scott Wedgewood · +23.1 GSAx this season
      Back-to-back: the backup often gets this one. Treat the starter as unconfirmed.

      No completed game on file for this club yet.

      Lineups are the players who dressed in each club's last game, with their minutes; clubs confirm tonight's at warm-up. Every player this preview names was in that lineup.

      Computed danger · scouting

      Players to watch

      NHL stats API · our xG
      DAL
      Jason Robertson25G 21A
      0.96 xG/60 · 2 HD · 12.4% sh
      Michael Bunting8G 14A
      0.83 xG/60 · 0 HD · 7.6% sh
      COL
      Artturi Lehkonen18G 22A
      1.11 xG/60 · 6 HD · 14.9% sh
      Ross Colton7G 15A
      1.10 xG/60 · 1 HD · 4.9% sh
      Keep going

      Where to next