Motion-blurred skater in a Columbus Blue Jackets sweater
Breakdown · NYR at CBJ

Blue Jackets run the Rangers off the ice on the underlying numbers

The verdict · earned

The Blue Jackets earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

NYR 3 · CBJ 6
◆ By the ModelJul 12, 8:14 AMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

Columbus dominated New York on the scoreboard and every metric that mattered. The 6-3 win marked a game where the Blue Jackets didn't just rack up volume — they dictated the terms of offensive opportunity.

The underlying picture was lopsided: 64% of expected goals (4.92–2.81) tilted Columbus's way. This wasn't a volume advantage masking poor shot quality. Columbus generated 0.081 expected goals per shot; New York managed 0.061. Over a full season, that kind of quality gap compounds into a substantial win-loss difference.

Columbus pressed the edge aggressively. In the high-danger area, where chances convert at a rate far above average, Columbus buried 3 of 7 opportunities (43%). New York got 5 high-danger looks and converted one. The Blue Jackets also crashed the net for 6 rebound chances, cashing in twice; the Rangers created 4 rebound opportunities and scored on none.

The shot attempts tilted 60–40 (37–25 on goal). But that frame alone undersells the control. When you weight shots by their quality, the dominance grew. J. Greaves stopped 22 of 25 shots (0.880 SV%) for Columbus. I. Shesterkin turned aside 31 of 36 (0.861 SV%) for New York—solid work, not enough to steal it.

Adam Fantilli's wrist shot from the point at 17:06 of the third period proved the turning point, a moment that reflected Columbus's sustained pressure.

Z. Werenski led the charge with three assists in 24:09, anchoring the team's drive. M. Zibanejad (1G, 1A) and A. Lafrenière (1G, 1A) kept New York competitive, but the Rangers never seized the initiative. Columbus didn't outscore New York by accident—they out-chanced them, out-skilled them, and finished their work.

  • #8 Z. Werenski (CBJ) — 3A in 24:09
  • #93 M. Zibanejad (NYR) — 1G, 1A in 23:40
  • #13 A. Lafrenière (NYR) — 1G, 1A in 21:51
The breakdown in twelve frames

Swipe it

Every number is from this page
Final · Mar 19
NYR
3
CBJ
6

Blue Jackets run the Rangers off the ice on the underlying numbers

Chances 2.8 – 4.9Did they deserve it? →
Did they deserve it?

The Blue Jackets earned this one.

Expected goals · chance value
NYR
2.81
CBJ
4.92
36% of the chances64%

The board read NYR 3, CBJ 6. The chances read NYR 2.8, CBJ 4.9.

Our xG model · NHL play-by-play · all situations
Luck check
CBJ
+1.1
goals above expected
CBJ4.92 expected · 6 scored
Expected
Scored
NYR2.81 expected · 3 scored
Expected
Scored

Both sides finished close to what their chances were worth. This one was earned on the ice.

PDO = sh% + sv% · drifts to 1.000 over a season
Every goal, in order
  1. P1 05:41NYRV. TrocheckSH1–0
  2. P1 14:33CBJI. Lundeström1–1
  3. P1 19:01CBJC. Garland1–2
  4. P2 04:44NYRM. Zibanejad2–2
  5. P2 07:04CBJB. Jenner2–3
  6. P2 15:25CBJA. FantilliPP2–4
  7. P3 00:50NYRA. LafrenièrePP3–4
+2 more on the full breakdown
NHL play-by-play · chance value from our xG model
Where the shots came from
NYR
36 shots
3
Final
84 shots
CBJ
48 shots
6
NYR attackCBJ attack
NYR CBJ Goal
36
shots · 3 in
48
shots · 6 in
Every unblocked shot · press play to replay it
Chances by danger
NYRCBJ
1 / 5
1.35 xG
High danger
3 / 7
1.89 xG
1 / 10
0.94 xG
Medium
3 / 22
2.55 xG
1 / 31
0.52 xG
Low
0 / 32
0.48 xG

The Blue Jackets buried 3 of 7 high-danger looks.

Danger tiers by our xG model · high ≥ 20% chance
In the net
C
I. Shesterkin
−0.1
NYR · 31/36
C
J. Greaves
−0.2
CBJ · 22/25
The numbers, checked
BACKCHECK

Blue Jackets run the Rangers off the ice on the underlying numbers

A model, not a newsroom. Every number on these frames comes from the NHL's play-by-play and our own models. Nothing was watched, guessed or heard from anyone.

Read the full breakdown
backcheckreport.com
01 / 08 · Final
Every goal, in order

How it happened

NHL play-by-play
1stshots 8–14
  1. 05:41NYRV. Trocheckshorthanded1–0
  2. 14:33CBJI. Lundeström(B. Jenner)1–1
  3. 19:01CBJC. Garland(Z. Werenski)1–2
2ndshots 12–13
  1. 04:44NYRM. Zibanejad(A. Lafrenière, G. Perreault)2–2
  2. 07:04CBJB. Jenner(D. Heinen, I. Provorov)2–3
  3. 15:25CBJA. Fantillipower play(Z. Werenski, K. Marchenko)2–4
3rdshots 5–10
  1. 00:50NYRA. Lafrenièrepower play(A. Fox, M. Zibanejad)3–4
  2. 06:12CBJD. Severson(C. Sillinger, Z. Werenski)3–5
  3. 17:06CBJA. Fantilliempty net(S. Monahan)3–6

score reads NYR–CBJ

Source · NHL play-by-play (api-web.nhle.com)
Process vs result

The numbers

XGBoost xG · NHL play-by-play
4.92
CBJ chances
Goals their shots were worth
+1.1
Finishing
Goals above what those chances were worth
1.033
CBJ puck luck
Above 1.000 — the bounces went their way
57.0%
Shot attempts
Over half — they had the puck more
Split by club

Who controlled the game

2.81Expected goals4.92
CBJ 64% of the chance quality
25Shots on goal37
5High-danger chances7
46All attempts (Corsi)61
Adjusted for score: NYR 46% · CBJ 54%
Faceoffs · CBJ won46%off56%neu33%def
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG
How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
NYR1 / 5 · 1.35 xG
CBJ3 / 7 · 1.89 xG
Medium dangermid-range
NYR1 / 10 · 0.94 xG
CBJ3 / 22 · 2.55 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
NYR1 / 31 · 0.52 xG
CBJ0 / 32 · 0.48 xG

CBJ went 3-for-7 from high danger on 1.89 expected goals — 1.1 above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
NYR
3 G · 2.81 xG · +0.2
CBJ
6 G · 4.92 xG · +1.1
01234567

NYR finished +0.2 against expected, CBJ +1.1.

Source · Backcheck xG model
Shot types · rush and rebound chancesopen +
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
NYR
SNAP1/9
WRIST1/12
SLAP0/7
TIP IN1/5
BACKHAND0/1
DEFLECTED0/2
BAT0/0
OTHER0/10
CBJ
SNAP2/19
WRIST3/15
SLAP0/7
TIP IN1/2
BACKHAND0/3
DEFLECTED0/1
BAT0/1
OTHER0/13
NYR
CBJ
Off the rush
3 G on 19
1.74 xG
3 G on 28
2.85 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 4
0.66 xG
2 G on 6
1.17 xG

Snap shots carried the volume: NYR went 1-for-9, CBJ 2-for-19. NYR scored 3 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
New to these numbers?

Two things happened in this game: who created the better chances, and who put the puck in the net. They are not the same thing, and this page separates them on purpose.

The one to watch is expected goals— the best single read on who deserved to win. When it disagrees with the scoreboard, that disagreement is usually the story. Nothing here is a projection; every figure is computed from this game's play-by-play. Full glossary →

xG
Expected goals. Every shot scored by how often that exact look goes in. 2.5 xG means the chances were worth about two and a half goals.
HD
High-danger chances — shots from the slot and the crease, where shots actually become goals.
Corsi
Every shot attempt, including the ones that missed or got blocked. A rough read on who had the puck.
Adj.
Score-adjusted. Teams that trail shoot more and teams that lead sit back, so this corrects the attempt count for the scoreboard.
GSAx
Goals saved above expected. A positive number means the goalie stopped more than an average goalie would have on those shots.
PDO
Shooting % plus save % — a luck gauge. It sits near 1.000 over a season, so a game far from it usually means the bounces decided it.
Shot by shot

In the net

Graded on goals saved above expected
I. Shesterkin
NYR · 31/36 · .861
-0.1
saved above expected
C
the night
By dangerG/attxGsaved
High danger3/71.9-1.1
Medium3/222.5-0.5
Low0/320.5+0.5

A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

J. Greaves
CBJ · 22/25 · .880
-0.2
saved above expected
C
the night
By dangerG/attxGsaved
High danger1/51.4+0.3
Medium1/100.9-0.1
Low1/310.5-0.5

A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

84 shots · press play to watch the game back

Where the shots came from

NHL play-by-play coordinates
NYR
36 shots
3
Final
84 shots
CBJ
48 shots
6
NYR attackCBJ attack
NYR CBJ Goal

Each club shoots toward its own end — NYR left, CBJ right — the way you would watch it. A dot's size is how dangerous the look was, from distance and angle; it is a proxy for shot quality, not the xG model the article is written from. Hover a dot for the shooter and the clock.

Ranked from the box score

Three stars

Points first
Three stars · computed, not voted
Z. Werenski
#8 · D · CBJ
0 G · 3 A · 5 SOG · 24:09 on ice · +2
M. Zibanejad
#93 · C · NYR
1 G · 1 A · 3 SOG · 23:40 on ice · -1
A. Lafrenière
#13 · L · NYR
1 G · 1 A · 1 SOG · 21:51 on ice
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model said beforehand

Before the game

Written Thu, Mar 19
Open the pre-game read
Written from the numbers

The read

Edited for clarity
◆ By the ModelJul 12, 7:54 AMEdited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

The model projects a 2.3 to 2.6 goal final with Columbus holding 55% win probability. That confidence rests on 5v5 control: the Blue Jackets lead 52.0% expected goals to 48.0%, with matching edge in Corsi at 51.0% to 49.0%. New York's PDO sits at 1.009, inflated by luck; Columbus at 1.003 plays closer to its predictive mean.

The margin is slight but durable. Columbus generates more per shot attempt.

The Players

Adam Sykora drives New York's offense at 0.91 expected goals per 60 minutes, converting at 20.0% with 3 goals and 1 assist. That shooting rate will regress. Gabe Perreault (0.79 xG/60) has 8 goals and 11 assists with 2 high-danger goals, shooting 13.1%—steadier but secondary.

Columbus counters with Boone Jenner at 0.98 xG/60, leading this group. Jenner has 11 goals and 21 assists with 2 high-danger goals. Mathieu Olivier (0.89 xG/60) has 12 goals and 9 assists with 1 high-danger goal, shooting 13.3%. Both Blue Jackets wings outpace their New York counterparts in underlying creation.

The Details

Vincent Iorio is the defensive liability for New York; Conor Garland for Columbus. Neither team has converted high-danger or rebound chances, suggesting either defensive discipline or offensive imprecision near the net.

J. Quick plays on a back-to-back. Expect fatigue or a bench option.

The model reads the underlying play correctly. Columbus is tighter in shot quality and volume. By the numbers, the Blue Jackets are the play.

What the model said beforehand

The model's lean

CBJ 55%
55%
CBJ
Model favorite
45%
55%
NYR50CBJ

CBJ by 10 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score NYR 2.3–2.6 CBJ; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season rates · 5v5

Tale of the tape

NHL stats API · our xG
NYR← edge
edge →CBJ
48.0%52.0%
49.0%51.0%
2.262.63
2.402.43
1.882.12
1.901.98
1.0091.003

CBJ holds 4 of 6 process categories — and the luck row (1.009 vs 1.003) says NYR has been getting the bounces, which tends not to last.

Source · NHL stats API + our xG · 5v5
Form · Last 10
NYR
6-3-1
+8 GD · 1d rest
CBJ
6-0-4
+8 GD · 2d rest
1.009
NYR PDO
Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
1.003
CBJ PDO
Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
What decides it

Keys to the game

Where the edges live
  • The Blue Jackets own the underlying play — 52.0% 5v5 xG vs 48.0%.
Things to watch
  • The Blue Jackets own the underlying play — 52.0% 5v5 xG vs 48.0%.
  • J. Quick is on a back-to-back — watch for a backup start or a tired starter.
Last game's lineup · confirmed at warm-up

Lineups

NHL box score
NYR
Expected in goal
J. Quick
back-to-back.846 last start
Backup Igor Shesterkin · +21.3 GSAx this season
Back-to-back: the backup often gets this one. Treat the starter as unconfirmed.

No completed game on file for this club yet.

CBJ
Expected in goal
J. Greaves
2 days rest.966 last start
Backup Jet Greaves · +16.5 GSAx this season

No completed game on file for this club yet.

Lineups are the players who dressed in each club's last game, with their minutes; clubs confirm tonight's at warm-up. Every player this preview names was in that lineup.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

NHL stats API · our xG
NYR
Adam Sykora3G 1A
0.91 xG/60 · 0 HD · 20.0% sh
Gabe Perreault8G 11A
0.79 xG/60 · 2 HD · 13.1% sh
CBJ
Boone Jenner11G 21A
0.98 xG/60 · 2 HD · 9.6% sh
Mathieu Olivier12G 9A
0.89 xG/60 · 1 HD · 13.3% sh
Keep going

Where to next