Backcheck
Recap · STL at VAN

Blues run the Canucks off the ice on the underlying numbers

The Blues earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

By the ModelJul 12, 8:22 AMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
STL
St. Louis Blues
3
Home
VAN
Vancouver Canucks
1
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

3.36Expected goals2.12
61% share for the better side
21Shot attempts (SOG)15
4High-danger chances1
54Corsi (all attempts)37
Score-adjusted: 56% / 44%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

The 3-1 scoreline masked St. Louis's control. The Blues dominated expected goals 61–39 (3.36–2.12) and won high-danger chances 4–1, painting a starker picture than the final score.

J. Binnington recorded +1.12 against expected; K. Lankinen, +1.36. Yet the Canucks' shortfalls in shot volume (15–21) and quality chances determined the outcome. Vancouver underperformed its xG by 1.12, managing one goal from 2.12 expected. Three rebound opportunities went unconverted.

Jordan Kyrou's backhander from the high slot (P3, 19:12) was the game's turning point.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
STL1 / 4 · 1.39 xG
VAN0 / 1 · 0.33 xG
Medium dangermid-range
STL1 / 15 · 1.49 xG
VAN0 / 12 · 1.52 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
STL1 / 35 · 0.48 xG
VAN1 / 24 · 0.27 xG

VAN went 0-for-12 from medium danger on 1.52 expected goals — 1.5 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
STL
3 G · 3.36 xG · -0.4
VAN
1 G · 2.12 xG · -1.1
01234
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
J. BinningtonSTL
+1.1
K. LankinenVAN
+1.4

STL finished -0.4 against expected, VAN -1.1 — K. Lankinen (VAN) saved 1.4 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
STL
SNAP1/27
TIP IN0/2
WRIST0/4
SLAP0/1
BACKHAND1/1
DEFLECTED1/1
OTHER0/18
VAN
SNAP1/15
TIP IN0/3
WRIST0/0
SLAP0/3
BACKHAND0/1
DEFLECTED0/0
OTHER0/15
STL
VAN
Off the rush
1 G on 25 · 2.50 xG
0 G on 14 · 1.28 xG
Off rebounds
1 G on 1 · 0.67 xG
0 G on 3 · 0.50 xG

Snap shots carried the volume: STL went 1-for-27, VAN 1-for-15.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
L. Mailloux
#23 · D · STL
0 G · 2 A · 1 SOG · 21:59 TOI · +1
P. Buchnevich
#89 · L · STL
1 G · 1 A · 1 SOG · 16:42 TOI · +1
F. Hronek
#17 · D · VAN
1 G · 0 A · 2 SOG · 26:28 TOI · -1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • J. Binnington (STL) stopped 1.1 goals above expected.
  • VAN created 3 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · STL at VAN · 7:00 PM ET

Blues at Canucks: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 12, 8:20 AMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

52%
STL
Model favorite
52%
48%
STL50VAN

STL by 4 points of win probability — effectively a coin flip. Projected score STL 2.62.4 VAN; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

STL← edge
edge →VAN
49.0%5v5 xG%44.0%
48.0%Corsi%46.0%
2.34xGF / 602.22
2.40xGA / 602.81
2.00Goals for / gm1.60
2.12Goals against / gm2.56
1.000PDO — luck, not skill0.974

STL holds 6 of 6 process categories — and PDO (1.000 vs 0.974) says STL has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model projects 2.6 goals for St. Louis and 2.4 for Vancouver, with the Blues at 52% win probability—as close to a pick'em as the numbers produce.

St. Louis enters hotter. The Blues are 6-2-2 in their last 10 games, while Vancouver carries a -14 goal differential over the same span. The underlying play favors St. Louis decisively: 49.0% expected goals at 5v5 versus Vancouver's 44.0%, with a 48.0% Corsis% edge as well.

Vancouver's counter-narrative sits in their PDO. At 0.974, the Canucks are running cold—mathematically due for positive regression. They're losing more than their underlying play would suggest.

K. Lankinen arrives on a back-to-back; watch for either a backup start or a tired starter in goal for Vancouver.

Jimmy Snuggerud (0.86 xG/60, 15 goals, 22 assists, 2 high-danger goals, 11.9% shooting) and Dylan Holloway (0.82 xG/60, 13 goals, 24 assists, 1 high-danger goal, 10.8% shooting) carry St. Louis's offensive load. For Vancouver, Filip Chytil (1.03 xG/60, 3 goals, 0 assists, 1 high-danger goal, 15.0% shooting) is unavailable after 47 days out. Drew O'Connor (0.85 xG/60, 13 goals, 11 assists, 3 high-danger goals, 11.8% shooting) becomes the Canucks' secondary option.

Both teams register 0% high-danger goal rate and 0% rebound goal rate—suggesting minimal second-chance play for either offense. St. Louis's defensive weakness is Jimmy Snuggerud; Vancouver's is Victor Mancini.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

STL
Jimmy Snuggerud15G 22A
0.86 xG/60 · 2 HD · 11.9% sh
Dylan Holloway13G 24A
0.82 xG/60 · 1 HD · 10.8% sh
VAN
Filip Chytil3G 0A
1.03 xG/60 · 1 HD · 15.0% sh
Drew O'Connor13G 11A
0.85 xG/60 · 3 HD · 11.8% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters