Motion-blurred skater in a Winnipeg Jets sweater
Breakdown · WPG at NYR

Jets edge the Rangers in a shootout

The verdict · coin flip

The Jets won a genuine coin flip — neither side controlled the run of play.

WPG 3 · NYR 2
◆ By the ModelJul 12, 8:24 AMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

The Rangers underperformed their expected goals by 1.54; Winnipeg underperformed by 0.78. In a game where both teams generated similar chances—3.78 xG for New York, 3.54 for the Jets—that precision gap determined the outcome. G. Vilardi's snap shot from the high slot in the shootout broke it.

New York controlled pace through efficiency. The Rangers held just 44% of shot attempts, yet created seven high-danger chances to Winnipeg's six. Both teams crashed the net for three rebound opportunities and converted zero. E. Comrie made 27 saves on 29 shots (0.931 SV%, +1.54 vs. expected), while D. Garand stopped 35 of 37 (0.946 SV%, +1.78 vs. expected). Each goaltender surpassed his xG mark by roughly a goal.

Winnipeg's ruthlessness on the rush separated the teams. The Jets scored twice on 31 rush chances, an efficiency New York couldn't match. In a tightly matched game, that margin loomed large.

Three Stars

  • J. Miller (NYR) — 2A in 20:21
  • G. Vilardi (WPG) — 1G, 1A in 17:19
  • J. Morrissey (WPG) — 1A in 26:47
The breakdown in twelve frames

Swipe it

Every number is from this page
Final · SO · Mar 22
WPG
3
NYR
2

Jets edge the Rangers in a shootout

Chances 3.8 – 3.5Did they deserve it? →
Did they deserve it?

Dead even on chances. The Jets took it anyway.

Expected goals · chance value
WPG
3.78
NYR
3.54
52% of the chances48%

The board read WPG 3, NYR 2. The chances read WPG 3.8, NYR 3.5.

Our xG model · NHL play-by-play · all situations
Luck check
WPG
−0.8
goals above expected
WPG3.78 expected · 3 scored
Expected
Scored
NYR3.54 expected · 2 scored
Expected
Scored

The Rangers left 1.5 goals on the table against what their chances were worth.

PDO = sh% + sv% · drifts to 1.000 over a season
Every goal, in order
  1. P1 13:06WPGA. Lowry1–0
  2. P2 00:41NYRT. Kartye1–1
  3. P2 06:43WPGG. VilardiPP2–1
  4. P2 14:03NYRM. ZibanejadPP2–2
  5. SO 00:00WPGK. ConnorPP2–2
  6. SO 00:00WPGG. VilardiPP2–2
NHL play-by-play · chance value from our xG model
Where the shots came from
WPG
56 shots
4
Final
106 shots
NYR
50 shots
2
WPG attackNYR attack
WPG NYR Goal

Shootout goals are not shots and are not drawn; the scoreboard above counts goals from the shot log.

56
shots · 4 in
50
shots · 2 in
Every unblocked shot · press play to replay it
Chances by danger
WPGNYR
1 / 7
1.72 xG
High danger
1 / 6
1.51 xG
1 / 12
1.11 xG
Medium
1 / 13
1.32 xG
0 / 48
0.95 xG
Low
0 / 39
0.71 xG

High-danger looks: WPG 1 of 7, NYR 1 of 6.

Danger tiers by our xG model · high ≥ 20% chance
In the net
A
D. Garand
+1.8
NYR · 35/37
A
E. Comrie
+1.5
WPG · 27/29
The numbers, checked
BACKCHECK

Jets edge the Rangers in a shootout

A model, not a newsroom. Every number on these frames comes from the NHL's play-by-play and our own models. Nothing was watched, guessed or heard from anyone.

Read the full breakdown
backcheckreport.com
01 / 08 · Final
Every goal, in order

How it happened

NHL play-by-play
1stshots 11–4
  1. 13:06WPGA. Lowry(G. Vilardi, C. Perfetti)1–0
2ndshots 14–16
  1. 00:41NYRT. Kartye(J. Miller)1–1
  2. 06:43WPGG. Vilardipower play(K. Connor, J. Morrissey)2–1
  3. 14:03NYRM. Zibanejadpower play(A. Fox, J. Miller)2–2
3rdshots 11–5no goals
    OTshots 1–4no goals
      SO
      1. 00:00WPGK. Connorpower play2–2
      2. 00:00WPGG. Vilardipower play2–2

      score reads WPG–NYR

      Source · NHL play-by-play (api-web.nhle.com)
      Process vs result

      The numbers

      XGBoost xG · NHL play-by-play
      3.78
      WPG chances
      Goals their shots were worth
      −0.8
      Finishing
      Goals below what those chances were worth
      0.995
      WPG puck luck
      About 1.000 — a normal night for bounces
      53.6%
      Shot attempts
      Over half — they had the puck more
      Split by club

      Who controlled the game

      3.78Expected goals3.54
      WPG 52% of the chance quality
      37Shots on goal29
      7High-danger chances6
      67All attempts (Corsi)58
      Adjusted for score: WPG 53% · NYR 47%
      Faceoffs · NYR won37%off58%neu73%def
      Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG
      How the game was won

      The danger ladder

      shotsgoalsexpected
      High dangerslot & crease
      WPG1 / 7 · 1.72 xG
      NYR1 / 6 · 1.51 xG
      Medium dangermid-range
      WPG1 / 12 · 1.11 xG
      NYR1 / 13 · 1.32 xG
      Low dangerperimeter & point
      WPG0 / 48 · 0.95 xG
      NYR0 / 39 · 0.71 xG

      WPG went 0-for-48 from low danger on 0.95 expected goals — 0.9 left on the table.

      Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
      The luck layer

      Finishing vs expected

      expectedactual
      WPG
      3 G · 3.78 xG · -0.8
      NYR
      2 G · 3.54 xG · -1.5
      012345

      WPG finished -0.8 against expected, NYR -1.5.

      Source · Backcheck xG model
      Shot types · rush and rebound chancesopen +
      What they shot — and what went in

      Shot diet

      goalsshots
      WPG
      WRIST1/28
      SLAP0/6
      SNAP1/9
      BACKHAND0/6
      TIP IN0/3
      DEFLECTED0/2
      OTHER0/13
      NYR
      WRIST0/25
      SLAP1/12
      SNAP1/8
      BACKHAND0/1
      TIP IN0/2
      DEFLECTED0/0
      OTHER0/10
      WPG
      NYR
      Off the rush
      2 G on 31
      2.89 xG
      1 G on 24
      2.22 xG
      Off rebounds
      0 G on 3
      0.24 xG
      0 G on 3
      0.35 xG

      Wrist shots carried the volume: WPG went 1-for-28, NYR 0-for-25. WPG scored 2 of theirs off the rush.

      Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
      New to these numbers?

      Two things happened in this game: who created the better chances, and who put the puck in the net. They are not the same thing, and this page separates them on purpose.

      The one to watch is expected goals— the best single read on who deserved to win. When it disagrees with the scoreboard, that disagreement is usually the story. Nothing here is a projection; every figure is computed from this game's play-by-play. Full glossary →

      xG
      Expected goals. Every shot scored by how often that exact look goes in. 2.5 xG means the chances were worth about two and a half goals.
      HD
      High-danger chances — shots from the slot and the crease, where shots actually become goals.
      Corsi
      Every shot attempt, including the ones that missed or got blocked. A rough read on who had the puck.
      Adj.
      Score-adjusted. Teams that trail shoot more and teams that lead sit back, so this corrects the attempt count for the scoreboard.
      GSAx
      Goals saved above expected. A positive number means the goalie stopped more than an average goalie would have on those shots.
      PDO
      Shooting % plus save % — a luck gauge. It sits near 1.000 over a season, so a game far from it usually means the bounces decided it.
      Shot by shot

      In the net

      Graded on goals saved above expected
      E. Comrie
      WPG · 27/29 · .931
      +1.5
      saved above expected
      A
      the night
      By dangerG/attxGsaved
      High danger1/61.5+0.5
      Medium1/131.3+0.3
      Low0/390.7+0.7

      A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

      D. Garand
      NYR · 35/37 · .946
      +1.8
      saved above expected
      A
      the night
      By dangerG/attxGsaved
      High danger1/71.7+0.7
      Medium1/121.1+0.1
      Low0/480.9+0.9

      A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

      106 shots · press play to watch the game back

      Where the shots came from

      NHL play-by-play coordinates
      WPG
      56 shots
      4
      Final
      106 shots
      NYR
      50 shots
      2
      WPG attackNYR attack
      WPG NYR Goal

      Shootout goals are not shots and are not drawn; the scoreboard above counts goals from the shot log.

      Each club shoots toward its own end — WPG left, NYR right — the way you would watch it. A dot's size is how dangerous the look was, from distance and angle; it is a proxy for shot quality, not the xG model the article is written from. Hover a dot for the shooter and the clock.

      Ranked from the box score

      Three stars

      Points first
      Three stars · computed, not voted
      J. Miller
      #8 · C · NYR
      0 G · 2 A · 2 SOG · 20:21 on ice
      G. Vilardi
      #13 · C · WPG
      1 G · 1 A · 2 SOG · 17:19 on ice
      J. Morrissey
      #44 · D · WPG
      0 G · 1 A · 4 SOG · 26:47 on ice · +1
      Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
      What the model said beforehand

      Before the game

      Written Sun, Mar 22
      Open the pre-game read
      Written from the numbers

      The read

      Edited for clarity
      ◆ By the ModelJul 12, 8:22 AMEdited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

      The model projects a 2.4–2.5 goal game with the Rangers at 53% win probability. This is about as close to a pick'em as you'll find.

      Both teams are identical at 5v5: 48.0% expected goal share and 49.0% Corsi percentage. The separation sits in the margins. The Rangers' PDO stands at 1.009 against the Jets' 0.998, suggesting New York has been slightly luckier. But the Jets' -5 goal differential over their last 10 games indicates they're playing poorly regardless—they've been outshot and out-competed even before luck enters the equation.

      The Rangers hold a rest advantage, arriving on three days off while the Jets come in on one. That edge matters in late-season hockey, particularly when depth has thinned.

      C. Hellebuyck starts on back-to-back duty for Winnipeg. Monitor whether he plays the full game or yields to a backup; a tired Hellebuyck changes the entire calculus.

      For the Jets, Nino Niederreiter (0.87 xG per 60, 6 goals, 6 assists, 3 high-danger chances, 8.6% shooting rate) is the offensive engine. His efficiency has been respectable, though his goal total suggests he's not overheating. Kyle Connor (0.83 xG per 60, 25 goals, 30 assists, 2 high-danger chances, 13.0% shooting rate) is the secondary scoring threat with elite finishing discipline.

      The Rangers counter with Adam Sykora (0.91 xG per 60, 3 goals, 1 assist, 20.0% shooting rate), who finishes at an elite rate but with limited goal accumulation, while Gabe Perreault (0.79 xG per 60, 8 goals, 11 assists, 2 high-danger chances, 13.1% shooting rate) is the more established scorer.

      Both teams have converted 0% of high-danger chances and 0% of rebound opportunities. For New York, that's a concerning drought—they're generating looks but not burying them. For Winnipeg, it's equally troubling, as the team needs secondary scoring to offset Niederreiter's offensive burden.

      Winnipeg's defensive weak link is Colin Miller; the Rangers' is Vincent Iorio. Both teams have liabilities on the back end that can be exploited with patience.

      The rest advantage and Hellebuyck's fatigue risk tilt slightly toward New York, but when possession metrics are identical, the gap narrows to almost nothing. You're essentially choosing between two teams that play the same game and differ mainly in circumstance. At 53%, the model is telling you what your eyes already know: this is as close to a true coin flip as hockey gets.

      What the model said beforehand

      The model's lean

      NYR 53%
      53%
      NYR
      Model favorite
      47%
      53%
      WPG50NYR

      NYR by 6 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score WPG 2.4–2.5 NYR; 19% chance it's tied after 60.

      Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
      Season rates · 5v5

      Tale of the tape

      NHL stats API · our xG
      WPG← edge
      edge →NYR
      48.0%48.0%
      49.0%49.0%
      2.342.26
      2.552.40
      1.901.88
      2.101.90
      0.9981.009

      NYR holds 4 of 6 process categories — and the luck row (0.998 vs 1.009) says NYR has been getting the bounces, which tends not to last.

      Source · NHL stats API + our xG · 5v5
      Form · Last 10
      WPG
      5-3-2
      -5 GD · 1d rest
      NYR
      5-4-1
      +4 GD · 3d rest
      0.998
      WPG PDO
      Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
      1.009
      NYR PDO
      Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
      What decides it

      Keys to the game

      Things to watch
      • C. Hellebuyck is on a back-to-back — watch for a backup start or a tired starter.
      • The Jets are underwater at -5 goal differential over their last 10.
      • The Rangers have 2 more days of rest.
      Last game's lineup · confirmed at warm-up

      Lineups

      NHL box score
      WPG
      Expected in goal
      C. Hellebuyck
      back-to-back.875 last start
      Backup Connor Hellebuyck · +5.5 GSAx this season
      Back-to-back: the backup often gets this one. Treat the starter as unconfirmed.

      No completed game on file for this club yet.

      NYR
      Expected in goal
      I. Shesterkin
      3 days rest.861 last start
      Backup Igor Shesterkin · +21.3 GSAx this season

      No completed game on file for this club yet.

      Lineups are the players who dressed in each club's last game, with their minutes; clubs confirm tonight's at warm-up. Every player this preview names was in that lineup.

      Computed danger · scouting

      Players to watch

      NHL stats API · our xG
      WPG
      Nino Niederreiter6G 6A
      0.87 xG/60 · 3 HD · 8.6% sh
      Kyle Connor25G 30A
      0.83 xG/60 · 2 HD · 13.0% sh
      NYR
      Adam Sykora3G 1A
      0.91 xG/60 · 0 HD · 20.0% sh
      Gabe Perreault8G 11A
      0.79 xG/60 · 2 HD · 13.1% sh
      Keep going

      Where to next