Golden Knights run the Canucks off the ice on the underlying numbers
The Golden Knights earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.
The underlying story
K. Lankinen stopped 1.54 goals above expected. His team lost anyway. Vegas's dominance was complete: 67% of 5v5 expected goals (4.54–2.25), 59% of shot attempts (34–24 on goal), and 9–3 in high-danger chances. The 4-2 final was inevitable.
Vancouver never generated enough offense to compete. Vegas was efficient off the rush—3 goals on 30 chances. Vancouver scored 2 on 19. Cole Smith's backhander from the wing (P3, 18:50) was the turning point.
K. Lankinen made 30 of 33 saves (0.909 SV%, +1.54 vs expected) and kept the margin close. A. Hill (0.917 SV%) had an easier night. F. Hronek led with 1A in 28:00. #27 S. Theodore (1G, 22:35) and #3 B. McNabb (1A, 21:38) drove Vegas's advantage.
The danger ladder
VGK went 1-for-19 from medium danger on 1.91 expected goals — 0.9 left on the table.
Finishing vs expected
VAN finished -0.3 against expected, VGK -0.5 — K. Lankinen (VAN) saved 1.5 goals above expected.
Shot diet
Wrist shots carried the volume: VAN went 0-for-13, VGK 2-for-28. VGK scored 3 of theirs off the rush.
- VAN generated higher-quality looks than the shot total suggests.
- K. Lankinen (VAN) stopped 1.5 goals above expected.
- VGK was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 30 rush chances.
- VAN was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 19 rush chances.
- K. Lankinen (VAN) saved 1.5 goals above expected — stole the show.