The Mammoth earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.
Utah dominated Seattle across every possession metric—they controlled 62 percent of expected goals (4.17–2.59) and won 6-2.
The gap in shot quality was decisive. Utah generated seven high-danger chances to Seattle's two, and Utah's average shot was worth 0.067 expected goals versus Seattle's 0.050—meaning Utah's attempts were categorically more dangerous. Seattle generated volume (27 shot attempts, 47 percent of the total), but without quality it becomes a liability.
J. Daccord bore the cost. His 0.806 save percentage finished 1.83 goals below expectation, a massive underperformance against his workload. K. Vejmelka stopped 25 of 27 shots for a 0.926 save percentage, 1.83 goals above expected—a function of Utah's superior shot quality rather than goaltending excellence.
Utah's power play was the decisive edge. Three goals on 12 shots and 0.89 expected goals represents conversion at the elite ceiling. On the rush, Utah was equally lethal: five goals on 32 chances, a rate Seattle's transition defense couldn't match.
Utah ultimately outperformed their expected goals by 1.83, meaning the 6-2 margin reflected finish and dominance alike. The underlying story was one-directional: Utah created better chances, finished cleaner, and ran Seattle off the ice in every measure that matters.
