Jets hold off the Blue Jackets
The Jets won a genuine coin flip — neither side controlled the run of play.
The underlying story
Hellebuyck was the only difference. Columbus generated more high-danger chances (five versus four) and nearly matched Winnipeg's expected goals (2.61–2.71), yet lost 2–1 because Hellebuyck saved all five high-danger looks.
The Blue Jackets held 38 percent of shot attempts (16–26) but created nearly as many quality opportunities as the Jets. Five high-danger scoring chances yielded zero goals—an outcome that won't repeat. Hellebuyck faced 16 total shots and saved 15 (0.938 SV%), finishing 1.61 goals above expected.
Kyle Connor's wrist shot from the high slot (P3, 10:58) provided the margin. Winnipeg generated 2.71 xG and scored two (underperforming by 0.71). Columbus generated 2.61 xG and scored one (underperforming by 1.61). The gap came down to goaltending: Hellebuyck denied the Blue Jackets at their most dangerous. J. Greaves (CBJ) saved 24 of 26 shots (0.923 SV%), only beating expected by 0.71.
Winnipeg won on elite performance when it mattered most, not on possession or overall chance creation.
The danger ladder
CBJ went 0-for-5 from high danger on 1.15 expected goals — 1.1 left on the table.
Finishing vs expected
WPG finished -0.7 against expected, CBJ -1.6 — C. Hellebuyck (WPG) saved 1.6 goals above expected.
Shot diet
Snap shots carried the volume: WPG went 0-for-10, CBJ 1-for-20.
- WPG generated higher-quality looks than the shot total suggests.
- C. Hellebuyck (WPG) stopped 1.6 goals above expected.
- CBJ couldn't convert — 0/5 on high-danger chances. That won't happen often.
- CBJ created 3 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
- WPG created 3 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
- CBJ underperformed xG by 1.6 — wasted quality chances.
- C. Hellebuyck (WPG) saved 1.6 goals above expected — stole the show.
- C. Hellebuyck was a wall on HD chances — 100% SV on 5 high-danger shots.