Motion-blurred skater in a Washington Capitals sweater
Breakdown · WSH at TOR

Capitals shut out the Maple Leafs, 4-0

The verdict · earned

The Capitals earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

WSH 4 · TOR 0
◆ By the ModelJul 12, 10:56 AMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

Toronto held 52% of shot attempts yet lost 4-0—a disparity that reveals how ruthlessly the Capitals converted their chances. Washington's shot quality (0.072 xG/shot vs. 0.046) overwhelmed Toronto's volume; L. Thompson's +2.78 performance in goal sealed the result.

The underlying xG (3.46–2.78 Capitals) suggests a closer game than the scoreline, but the Maple Leafs underperformed their xG by 2.78 goals. They generated quality looks—particularly off the rush and from rebound opportunities—and converted none of them. Cole Hutson's wrist shot from the high slot (P3, 16:10) exemplified the Capitals' clinical execution, crystallizing their dominance.

Thompson's goaltending was the story. Facing 22 shots, he saved all 22 and posted a +2.78 performance against expected, the kind of save percentage that transforms a competitive xG battle into a blowout. J. Woll on the other end allowed three goals on 17 attempts (0.824 SV%).

Washington's scoring was distributed. M. Fehérváry (1G, 1A, 18:16) and D. Strome (1G, 1A, 16:34) both scored; T. Wilson (1A, 18:51) added an assist. The Capitals exploited the rush—4 goals on 27 rush chances.

Toronto's best offensive sequence came from crashing the net. They created 4 rebound opportunities and scored on none, leaving Thompson unbeaten.

The breakdown in twelve frames

Swipe it

Every number is from this page
Final · Apr 8
WSH
4
TOR
0

Capitals shut out the Maple Leafs, 4-0

Chances 3.5 – 2.8Did they deserve it? →
Did they deserve it?

The Capitals earned this one.

Expected goals · chance value
WSH
3.46
TOR
2.78
55% of the chances45%

The board read WSH 4, TOR 0. The chances read WSH 3.5, TOR 2.8.

Our xG model · NHL play-by-play · all situations
Luck check
WSH
+0.5
goals above expected
WSH3.46 expected · 4 scored
Expected
Scored
TOR2.78 expected · 0 scored
Expected
Scored

The Maple Leafs left 2.8 goals on the table against what their chances were worth.

PDO = sh% + sv% · drifts to 1.000 over a season
Every goal, in order
  1. P1 13:22WSHD. Strome1–0
  2. P2 00:40WSHR. Leonard2–0
  3. P2 02:53WSHM. Fehérváry3–0
  4. P3 16:10WSHC. HutsonEN4–0
NHL play-by-play · chance value from our xG model
Where the shots came from
WSH
35 shots
4
Final
74 shots
TOR
39 shots
0
WSH attackTOR attack
WSH TOR Goal
35
shots · 4 in
39
shots · 0 in
Every unblocked shot · press play to replay it
Chances by danger
WSHTOR
1 / 4
1.45 xG
High danger
0 / 2
0.47 xG
2 / 16
1.60 xG
Medium
0 / 15
1.73 xG
1 / 28
0.41 xG
Low
0 / 43
0.58 xG

High-danger looks: WSH 1 of 4, TOR 0 of 2.

Danger tiers by our xG model · high ≥ 20% chance
In the net
A+
A. Stolarz
+3.5
TOR · 2/2
A+
L. Thompson
+2.8
WSH · 22/22
+1 more on the full breakdown
The numbers, checked
BACKCHECK

Capitals shut out the Maple Leafs, 4-0

A model, not a newsroom. Every number on these frames comes from the NHL's play-by-play and our own models. Nothing was watched, guessed or heard from anyone.

Read the full breakdown
backcheckreport.com
01 / 08 · Final
Every goal, in order

How it happened

NHL play-by-play
1stshots 7–8
  1. 13:22WSHD. Strome(A. Beauvillier, M. Fehérváry)1–0
2ndshots 9–8
  1. 00:40WSHR. Leonard(T. Wilson)2–0
  2. 02:53WSHM. Fehérváry(D. Strome, J. Sourdif)3–0
3rdshots 4–6
  1. 16:10WSHC. Hutsonempty net(A. Protas, I. Protas)4–0

score reads WSH–TOR

Source · NHL play-by-play (api-web.nhle.com)
Process vs result

The numbers

XGBoost xG · NHL play-by-play
3.46
WSH chances
Goals their shots were worth
+0.5
Finishing
Goals above what those chances were worth
1.083
WSH puck luck
Above 1.000 — the bounces went their way
44.4%
Shot attempts
Under half — they were outshot
Split by club

Who controlled the game

3.46Expected goals2.78
WSH 55% of the chance quality
20Shots on goal22
4High-danger chances2
48All attempts (Corsi)60
Adjusted for score: WSH 39% · TOR 61%
Faceoffs · TOR won77%off50%neu50%def
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG
How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
WSH1 / 4 · 1.45 xG
TOR0 / 2 · 0.47 xG
Medium dangermid-range
WSH2 / 16 · 1.60 xG
TOR0 / 15 · 1.73 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
WSH1 / 28 · 0.41 xG
TOR0 / 43 · 0.58 xG

TOR went 0-for-15 from medium danger on 1.73 expected goals — 1.7 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
WSH
4 G · 3.46 xG · +0.5
TOR
0 G · 2.78 xG · -2.8
012345

WSH finished +0.5 against expected, TOR -2.8.

Source · Backcheck xG model
Shot types · rush and rebound chancesopen +
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
WSH
WRIST3/29
TIP IN0/2
BACKHAND0/1
SNAP1/2
SLAP0/1
WRAP AROUND0/0
DEFLECTED0/0
OTHER0/13
TOR
WRIST0/24
TIP IN0/7
BACKHAND0/3
SNAP0/1
SLAP0/2
WRAP AROUND0/1
DEFLECTED0/1
OTHER0/21
WSH
TOR
Off the rush
4 G on 27
2.79 xG
0 G on 23
1.64 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 2
0.39 xG
0 G on 4
0.61 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: WSH went 3-for-29, TOR 0-for-24. WSH scored 4 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
New to these numbers?

Two things happened in this game: who created the better chances, and who put the puck in the net. They are not the same thing, and this page separates them on purpose.

The one to watch is expected goals— the best single read on who deserved to win. When it disagrees with the scoreboard, that disagreement is usually the story. Nothing here is a projection; every figure is computed from this game's play-by-play. Full glossary →

xG
Expected goals. Every shot scored by how often that exact look goes in. 2.5 xG means the chances were worth about two and a half goals.
HD
High-danger chances — shots from the slot and the crease, where shots actually become goals.
Corsi
Every shot attempt, including the ones that missed or got blocked. A rough read on who had the puck.
Adj.
Score-adjusted. Teams that trail shoot more and teams that lead sit back, so this corrects the attempt count for the scoreboard.
GSAx
Goals saved above expected. A positive number means the goalie stopped more than an average goalie would have on those shots.
PDO
Shooting % plus save % — a luck gauge. It sits near 1.000 over a season, so a game far from it usually means the bounces decided it.
Shot by shot

In the net

Graded on goals saved above expected
L. Thompson
WSH · 22/22 · 1.000
+2.8
saved above expected
A+
the night
By dangerG/attxGsaved
High danger0/20.5+0.5
Medium0/151.7+1.7
Low0/430.6+0.6

A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

A. Stolarz
TOR · 2/2 · 1.000
+3.5
saved above expected
A+
the night
By dangerG/attxGsaved
High danger1/41.4+0.5
Medium2/161.6-0.4
Low1/280.4-0.6

A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

J. Woll
TOR · 14/17 · .824
+0.5
saved above expected
B
the night
By dangerG/attxGsaved
High danger1/41.4+0.5
Medium2/161.6-0.4
Low1/280.4-0.6

A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

74 shots · press play to watch the game back

Where the shots came from

NHL play-by-play coordinates
WSH
35 shots
4
Final
74 shots
TOR
39 shots
0
WSH attackTOR attack
WSH TOR Goal

Each club shoots toward its own end — WSH left, TOR right — the way you would watch it. A dot's size is how dangerous the look was, from distance and angle; it is a proxy for shot quality, not the xG model the article is written from. Hover a dot for the shooter and the clock.

Ranked from the box score

Three stars

Points first
Three stars · computed, not voted
M. Fehérváry
#42 · D · WSH
1 G · 1 A · 2 SOG · 18:16 on ice · +3
D. Strome
#17 · C · WSH
1 G · 1 A · 1 SOG · 16:34 on ice · +2
T. Wilson
#43 · R · WSH
0 G · 1 A · 0 SOG · 18:51 on ice · +2
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model said beforehand

Before the game

Written Wed, Apr 8
Open the pre-game read
Written from the numbers

The read

Edited for clarity
◆ By the ModelJul 12, 10:54 AMEdited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

The model projects 2.6 goals for Washington and 2.5 for Toronto, with the Capitals at 52% win probability—a true pick'em. This is about as close to a coin flip as you'll find.

Washington commands the underlying play. The Capitals carry 50.0% 5v5 expected goals and 49.0% Corsi%, indicating sustained territorial control. Toronto sits at 46.0% xG and 45.0% Corsi%—a gap that typically decides these contests.

The Maple Leafs are wounded. They're underwater at -8 goal differential over their last 10 games, suggesting either defensive lapses or goaltending inconsistency that hasn't corrected. That deficit looms large.

The wrinkle: Auston Matthews, Toronto's leading threat at 1.10 xG/60 (17G 13A, 1 HD goal, 10.6% shooting), hasn't played in 27 days and is likely injured. That erases the Leafs' offensive edge. John Tavares (0.91 xG/60, 15G 24A, 3 HD goals, 12.4% shooting) becomes the primary source.

Washington counters with depth. Alex Ovechkin (0.97 xG/60, 19G 17A, 2 HD goals, 13.8% shooting) and Anthony Beauvillier (0.89 xG/60, 14G 9A, 2 HD goals, 10.4% shooting) present two legitimate threats to Toronto's thin defensive wall.

One caveat: the Capitals' 1.018 PDO is running hot. Expect regression—the gap between Washington's underlying play and its goal output will close. But 52% today still belongs to Washington.

This is as close as they get.

What the model said beforehand

The model's lean

WSH 52%
52%
WSH
Model favorite
52%
48%
WSH50TOR

WSH by 4 points of win probability — effectively a coin flip. Projected score WSH 2.6–2.5 TOR; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season rates · 5v5

Tale of the tape

NHL stats API · our xG
WSH← edge
edge →TOR
50.0%46.0%
49.0%45.0%
2.622.24
2.622.67
2.182.09
1.792.52
1.0181.002

WSH holds 6 of 6 process categories — and the luck row (1.018 vs 1.002) says WSH has been getting the bounces, which tends not to last.

Source · NHL stats API + our xG · 5v5
Form · Last 10
WSH
6-3-1
-1 GD · 3d rest
TOR
4-4-2
-8 GD · 4d rest
1.018
WSH PDO
Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
1.002
TOR PDO
Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
What decides it

Keys to the game

Where the edges live
  • The Capitals own the underlying play — 50.0% 5v5 xG vs 46.0%.
  • The Capitals drive Corsi at 49.0% — expect territorial tilt.
Regression watch
  • The Capitals' PDO is 1.018 — running hot, expect some regression.
Things to watch
  • The Capitals own the underlying play — 50.0% 5v5 xG vs 46.0%.
  • The Capitals drive Corsi at 49.0% — expect territorial tilt.
  • The Maple Leafs are underwater at -8 goal differential over their last 10.
  • The Capitals' PDO is 1.018 — running hot, expect some regression.
Last game's lineup · confirmed at warm-up

Lineups

NHL box score
WSH
Expected in goal
C. Lindgren
3 days rest.758 last start
Backup Logan Thompson · +29.3 GSAx this season

No completed game on file for this club yet.

TOR
Expected in goal
J. Woll
4 days rest.825 last start
Backup Joseph Woll · -6.6 GSAx this season

No completed game on file for this club yet.

Lineups are the players who dressed in each club's last game, with their minutes; clubs confirm tonight's at warm-up. Every player this preview names was in that lineup.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

NHL stats API · our xG
WSH
Alex Ovechkin19G 17A
0.97 xG/60 · 2 HD · 13.8% sh
Anthony Beauvillier14G 9A
0.89 xG/60 · 2 HD · 10.4% sh
TOR
Auston Matthews17G 13A
1.10 xG/60 · 1 HD · 10.6% sh
John Tavares15G 24A
0.91 xG/60 · 3 HD · 12.4% sh
Keep going

Where to next