Backcheck
Recap · NJD at DET

Devils hold off the Red Wings

The Devils earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

By the ModelJul 12, 11:15 AMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
NJD
New Jersey Devils
5
Home
DET
Detroit Red Wings
3
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

5.60Expected goals3.77
60% share for the better side
33Shot attempts (SOG)28
9High-danger chances6
64Corsi (all attempts)58
Score-adjusted: 53% / 47%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

The Devils beat the Red Wings 5-3, with expected goals validating the result—they controlled 60% of xG (5.60–3.77).

New Jersey's dominance was sharpest in high-danger chances (9–6). J. Allen posted a 0.893 SV% and stopped all six of Detroit's HD chances, while J. Gibson posted 28/32 stops with +1.60 goals saved above expected. Detroit's response—two low-danger goals and two rush tallies on 22 chances—fell short of New Jersey's four rush goals on 30 attempts.

J. Bratt (2G, 1A in 17:01) and D. Hamilton (2A in 21:55) led the Devils' attack, while D. Larkin (2A in 20:08) anchored Detroit's effort.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
NJD2 / 9 · 2.66 xG
DET0 / 6 · 1.57 xG
Medium dangermid-range
NJD2 / 21 · 2.41 xG
DET1 / 13 · 1.42 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
NJD1 / 34 · 0.53 xG
DET2 / 39 · 0.78 xG

DET went 0-for-6 from high danger on 1.57 expected goals — 1.6 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
NJD
5 G · 5.60 xG · -0.6
DET
3 G · 3.77 xG · -0.8
0123456
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
J. AllenNJD
+0.8
J. GibsonDET
+1.6

NJD finished -0.6 against expected, DET -0.8 — J. Gibson (DET) saved 1.6 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
NJD
SNAP1/10
WRIST4/23
TIP IN0/3
SLAP0/4
BACKHAND0/6
DEFLECTED0/1
BAT0/1
POKE0/1
OTHER0/15
DET
SNAP2/20
WRIST0/6
TIP IN0/8
SLAP0/6
BACKHAND1/4
DEFLECTED0/1
BAT0/0
POKE0/0
OTHER0/13
NJD
DET
Off the rush
4 G on 30 · 4.05 xG
2 G on 22 · 1.80 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 10 · 1.35 xG
1 G on 6 · 1.36 xG

Snap shots carried the volume: NJD went 1-for-10, DET 2-for-20. NJD scored 4 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
J. Bratt
#63 · L · NJD
2 G · 1 A · 3 SOG · 17:01 TOI · +2
D. Hamilton
#7 · D · NJD
0 G · 2 A · 1 SOG · 21:55 TOI · +3
D. Larkin
#71 · C · DET
0 G · 2 A · 4 SOG · 20:08 TOI · -1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • J. Gibson (DET) stopped 1.6 goals above expected.
  • Open game — 15 high-danger chances combined (DET 6, NJD 9).
  • NJD had the higher quality looks — 0.088 xG/shot vs 0.065.
  • DET couldn't convert — 0/6 on high-danger chances. That won't happen often.
  • DET scored 2 goals from low-danger spots — the opposing goalie needs to have those.
  • DET was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 22 rush chances.
  • NJD was lethal off the rush — 4 goals on 30 rush chances.
  • DET created 6 rebound opportunities (1 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • NJD created 10 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • J. Allen was a wall on HD chances — 100% SV on 6 high-danger shots.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · NJD at DET · 5:00 PM ET

Devils at Red Wings: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 12, 11:13 AMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

51%
DET
Model favorite
49%
51%
NJD50DET

DET by 2 points of win probability — effectively a coin flip. Projected score NJD 2.52.6 DET; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

NJD← edge
edge →DET
50.0%5v5 xG%49.0%
51.0%Corsi%49.0%
2.45xGF / 602.38
2.50xGA / 602.50
1.66Goals for / gm1.73
2.23Goals against / gm2.07
0.971PDO — luck, not skill0.985

The season numbers split 33 — no clear process edge — and PDO (0.971 vs 0.985) says DET has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model projects a 2.5–2.6 goal game with Detroit at 51% to win—about as close to a pick'em as you'll find.

New Jersey arrives hot: 5-4-1 over their last ten games. Detroit, by contrast, is underwater at -6 goal differential in the same span, bleeding chances without converting them.

The underlying 5v5 picture is tightly matched. New Jersey holds 50.0% expected goals share and 51.0% Corsi; Detroit sits at 49.0% on both metrics. This is genuine parity, not a talent gap.

But New Jersey's PDO at 0.971 tells a regression story: the Devils are running cold and due for positive correction. Detroit's 0.985 is healthier, suggesting their recent struggles aren't yet fully reflected in their underlying numbers.

New Jersey's offense runs through Timo Meier, who carries 1.08 xG/60 with 13 goals and 15 assists. He has 3 high-danger chances on a 6.7% shooting rate, suggesting he's pressing to convert. Jack Hughes adds 0.88 xG/60, 18 goals and 17 assists; his 11.5% shooting rate raises questions about whether that efficiency will hold.

Detroit counters with Alex DeBrincat, who generates 0.88 xG/60 alongside 17 goals and 28 assists. He's scored 2 high-danger goals while shooting 9.0%. Marco Kasper—0.81 xG/60, 7 goals and 8 assists—serves as Detroit's secondary threat with 1 high-danger goal on 6.1% shooting.

Defensively, New Jersey's Johnathan Kovacevic is the weak link; Axel Sandin-Pellikka represents Detroit's vulnerability.

New Jersey's recent run carries weight, and the PDO gap favors positive regression. But Detroit's underlying play hasn't deteriorated nearly as much as the -6 differential suggests. This remains a genuine toss-up.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

NJD
Timo Meier13G 15A
1.08 xG/60 · 3 HD · 6.7% sh
Jack Hughes18G 17A
0.88 xG/60 · 1 HD · 11.5% sh
DET
Alex DeBrincat17G 28A
0.88 xG/60 · 2 HD · 9.0% sh
Marco Kasper7G 8A
0.81 xG/60 · 1 HD · 6.1% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters