Rush defense leaked all night
Gave up 25 rush shots worth 2.48 xG (2 goals) — transition gaps were there every period.
Tighten neutral-zone structure and keep D gaps closed on entries.

Split squads and prospects, not the club that will take the ice in October. The shots and grades below describe this game only: nothing here counts toward season records, form, rankings or player numbers.
New Jersey held off a determined push from the Islanders, escaping with a 2-1 win after New York struck first on the power play. Connor Brown's third-period wrist shot from the high slot broke a tie and turned out to be all the Devils would need to see out the final twenty minutes.
C. Eiserman opened the scoring for New York early in the second period, converting a power-play chance set up by V. Dravecký and C. Ritchie. New Jersey answered later in the same period when R. Schmelzer tied it, assisted by B. Steeves and E. Edwards. The Devils then took the lead for good in the third, when Brown's unassisted wrist shot from the slot made it 1-2. D. Rittich was steady behind it, and V. Vanecek kept the Islanders within reach at the other end for most of the night before Brown's goal settled things.
Here's the part of the game the scoreboard doesn't tell you: New Jersey won the high-danger chances 4-1. A one-goal final makes this look like a coin flip, but the chance count says the Devils controlled the dangerous ice for most of the night. The overall shot-attempt battle was close — the Devils held 48% — and expected goals gave New Jersey only a modest edge, 2.96 to 2.51. The gap that actually mattered was off the rush, where the Devils generated 25 rush shots worth 2.48 expected goals against 20 rush shots worth 1.47 allowed the other way.
The goaltending explains why the score wasn't more lopsided than that. D. Rittich stopped 1.51 goals above expected on 24 shots, the best mark either goalie posted, while V. Vanecek was nearly as sharp for New York, saving 0.96 goals above expected on 22 shots. Both teams underperformed their own expected-goal totals against a roughly 2.70-expected-goal league-average game — the Islanders by the wider margin — which says more about two goalies standing tall than about either group of shooters going cold.
The one number that should worry New Jersey: the power play went 0-for-3, a shutout against a league conversion rate near 21%. That's the gap between this being a comfortable win and one that needed a highlight-reel goal from Brown to close it out. New York's power play actually converted at 25% and still lost — a reminder that a game even in the shot-attempt column can still be decided by who owns the high-danger chances and who gets the better goaltending.
Devils hold off the Islanders
The Devils earned this one.
The board read NYI 1, NJD 2. The chances read NYI 2.5, NJD 3.0.
The Islanders left 1.5 goals on the table against what their chances were worth.
High-danger looks: NYI 0 of 1, NJD 0 of 4.
Devils hold off the Islanders
A model, not a newsroom. Every number on these frames comes from the NHL's play-by-play and our own models. Nothing was watched, guessed or heard from anyone.
Read the full breakdownscore reads NYI–NJD
NJD went 0-for-4 from high danger on 0.98 expected goals — 1.0 left on the table.
NYI finished -1.5 against expected, NJD -1.0.
Wrist shots carried the volume: NYI went 0-for-16, NJD 2-for-12. NJD scored 2 of theirs off the rush.
Two things happened in this game: who created the better chances, and who put the puck in the net. They are not the same thing, and this page separates them on purpose.
The one to watch is expected goals— the best single read on who deserved to win. When it disagrees with the scoreboard, that disagreement is usually the story. Nothing here is a projection; every figure is computed from this game's play-by-play. Full glossary →
A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5
A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5
NYI Created 2.51 xG against a ~2.70 league-average game; 1 high-danger shots (0.21 xG) and 20 rush shots (1.47 xG).
NJD Created 2.96 xG against a ~2.70 league-average game; 4 high-danger shots (0.98 xG) and 25 rush shots (2.48 xG).
NYI Allowed 2.96 xG against a ~2.70 league-average game; conceded 4 high-danger shots (0.98 xG) and 25 rush shots (2.48 xG).
NJD Allowed 2.51 xG against a ~2.70 league-average game; conceded 1 high-danger shots (0.21 xG) and 20 rush shots (1.47 xG).
NYI Rush shots 20–25, rush xG 1.47–2.48 (rush-based; public data has no zone entries).
NJD Rush shots 25–20, rush xG 2.48–1.47 (rush-based; public data has no zone entries).
NYI 1-for-4 on the power play (25%; league ≈21%) with 0.66 PP xG.
NJD 0-for-3 on the power play (0%; league ≈21%) with 0.59 PP xG.
NYI +0.96 goals saved above expected on 22 shots against.
NJD +1.51 goals saved above expected on 24 shots against.
NYI Took 5 penalties for 10 PIM vs 6 for 12 on the other side.
NJD Took 6 penalties for 12 PIM vs 5 for 10 on the other side.
Grades bounces, not skill — C is neutral
NYI Finishing -1.51 goals vs xG plus +0.96 GSAx of save luck = -0.55 total. This grades luck, not skill — C is neutral, A is very lucky.
NJD Finishing -0.96 goals vs xG plus +1.51 GSAx of save luck = +0.55 total. This grades luck, not skill — C is neutral, A is very lucky.
Gave up 25 rush shots worth 2.48 xG (2 goals) — transition gaps were there every period.
Tighten neutral-zone structure and keep D gaps closed on entries.
2 goals on 25 rush shots worth 2.48 xG.
Gave up 20 rush shots worth 1.47 xG (1 goals) — transition gaps were there every period.
Tighten neutral-zone structure and keep D gaps closed on entries.
1 goals on 20 rush shots worth 1.47 xG.
Scored 1 on 2.51 xG — -1.51 vs expected. The looks were there; the finish will come back.
D. Rittich stopped 23 of 24 (0.958), +1.51 goals above expected.