Motion-blurred skater in a Carolina Hurricanes sweater
Breakdown · CAR at NSH · Preseason

Hurricanes shut out the Predators, 6-0

The verdict · earned

The Hurricanes earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

CAR 6 · NSH 0
Preseason · exhibition

Split squads and prospects, not the club that will take the ice in October. The shots and grades below describe this game only: nothing here counts toward season records, form, rankings or player numbers.

◆ By the ModelSep 27, 12:02 AMxG: xgboost-0.765Edited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

The Hurricanes shut out the Predators 6-0. They controlled the underlying play (62% of expected goals), but the shutout margin was inflated by exceptional goaltending from B. Bussi and poor play from J. Saros. The four-goal swing in goaltending variance — B. Bussi's +2.28 and J. Saros's -2.32 — turned what should have been a one-goal advantage into a complete blowout.

The Predators held 46% of shot attempts and drew six high-danger chances to Carolina's one. The ice looked dangerous for them. The scoreboard didn't reflect it.

The Hurricanes built their advantage off the rush. They converted six transition chances, a conversion rate that won't sustain, with Andrei Svechnikov's finish from the doorstep (period 3, 19:05) as the turning point. Every rush chance felt like a goal waiting to happen.

J. Blake scored twice and assisted twice. S. Aho recorded two assists, helping set up goals from J. Blake early and Andrei Svechnikov late. N. Ehlers scored and assisted in limited minutes. The power play landed three times on ten attempts, an unsustainable rate.

Three Stars

  • J. Blake (CAR) — 1G, 2A in 15:02
  • S. Aho (CAR) — 2A in 20:01
  • N. Ehlers (CAR) — 1G, 1A in 13:13

Data: NHL play-by-play and shift charts, Backcheck expected goals model

The goals

  • CAR 1–0, 05:02 of the first on the power play. J. Blake, wrist shot from 12 feet, a 14% chance by the model (off the rush), past J. Saros. Assists: S. Aho, S. Gostisbehere. Win probability moved 15 points.
  • CAR 2–0, 07:04 of the first. J. Martinook, wrist shot from 10 feet, a 17% chance by the model (off the rush), past J. Saros. Assists: N. Ehlers, J. Staal. Win probability moved 13 points.
  • CAR 3–0, 13:29 of the first. N. Ehlers, wrist shot from 25 feet, a 12% chance by the model (off the rush), past J. Saros. 5 seconds after a CAR takeaway by N. Ehlers. Win probability moved 10 points.
  • CAR 4–0, 16:37 of the second. L. Stankoven, wrist shot from 22 feet, a 14% chance by the model (off the rush), past J. Saros. Assists: J. Blake.
  • CAR 5–0, 09:21 of the third on the power play. M. Jankowski, wrist shot from 41 feet, a 6% chance by the model (off the rush), past J. Saros. Assists: F. Unger Sorum, T. Hall.
  • CAR 6–0, 19:05 of the third on the power play. A. Svechnikov, wrist shot from 6 feet, a 22% chance by the model (off the rush), past J. Saros. Assists: S. Aho, J. Blake.

What the numbers can't tell you. Whether the finishing was luck or skill, why the benches were run the way they were, who was hurt, and anything said in the room. That is the beat's story, and it is worth reading.

The breakdown in twelve frames

Swipe it

Every number is from this page
Final · Preseason · Sep 26
CAR
6
NSH
0

Hurricanes shut out the Predators, 6-0

Chances 3.7 – 2.3Did they deserve it? →
Did they deserve it?

The Hurricanes earned this one.

Expected goals · chance value
CAR
3.68
NSH
2.28
62% of the chances38%

The board read CAR 6, NSH 0. The chances read CAR 3.7, NSH 2.3.

Our xG model · NHL play-by-play · all situations
Luck check
CAR
+2.3
goals above expected
CAR3.68 expected · 6 scored
Expected
Scored
NSH2.28 expected · 0 scored
Expected
Scored

The Hurricanes scored 2.3 more than their chances were worth. That does not repeat.

PDO = sh% + sv% · drifts to 1.000 over a season
The swing
+15
win-probability points
46% → 61% for CAR
NSH 100%the game, start to finish
CAR 100%P1 · P2 · P3
CARP1 05:02 · PP

J. Blake makes it 1–0.

In-game win model · fitted on 5,248 games
Every goal, in order
  1. P1 05:02CARJ. BlakePP14%1–0
  2. P1 07:04CARJ. Martinook17%2–0
  3. P1 13:29CARN. Ehlers12%3–0
  4. P2 16:37CARL. Stankoven14%4–0
  5. P3 09:21CARM. JankowskiPP6%5–0
  6. P3 19:05CARA. SvechnikovPP22%6–0
NHL play-by-play · chance value from our xG model
Where the shots came from
CAR
38 shots
6
Final
69 shots
NSH
31 shots
0
CAR attackNSH attack
CAR NSH Goal
38
shots · 6 in
31
shots · 0 in
Every unblocked shot · press play to replay it
Chances by danger
CARNSH
1 / 6
1.32 xG
High danger
0 / 1
0.26 xG
5 / 17
2.07 xG
Medium
0 / 16
1.73 xG
0 / 22
0.29 xG
Low
0 / 29
0.29 xG

High-danger looks: CAR 1 of 6, NSH 0 of 1.

Danger tiers by our xG model · high ≥ 20% chance
In the net
A
B. Bussi
+2.3
CAR · 22/22 · 60:00
Best save · a 26% chance, snap from 9 ft · P1 16:07
F
J. Saros
−2.3
NSH · 20/26 · 59:08
Best save · a 30% chance, wrist from 25 ft · P3 15:07
Best skater on the ice
A+
CAR
J. Blake
R · impact 2.79
15:02
Ice time
1–2
G – A
0.37
Own xG
73%
xG share
Impact · top 4
J. Blake2.8A+
N. Ehlers1.9A+
S. Aho1.7A+
L. Stankoven1.4A
Report card
CARNSH
OffenseAC-
DefenseC+F
TransitionA-F
Special teamsA+F
GoaltendingA+F
DisciplineC-B-
LuckA+F
Seven dimensions, A+ to F · basis on the breakdown
Why it went the way it went
Why CAR won
  1. 01Dangerous off the rush
  2. 02B. Bussi stole it
  3. 03Power play cashed in
Why NSH lost
  1. 01Rush defense leaked all night
  2. 02J. Saros couldn't make the stop
  3. 03PDO ran cold
Our storyline model · reasoning on the breakdown
The numbers, checked
BACKCHECK

Hurricanes shut out the Predators, 6-0

A model, not a newsroom. Every number on these frames comes from the NHL's play-by-play and our own models. Nothing was watched, guessed or heard from anyone.

Read the full breakdown
backcheckreport.com
01 / 12 · Final
Every goal, in order

How it happened

NHL play-by-play
1stshots 9–5
  1. 05:02CARJ. Blakepower play(S. Aho, S. Gostisbehere)1–0

    Wrist shot from 12 feet, a 14% chance (off the rush), past J. Saros. Win probability moved 15 points.On the ice: J. Staal, J. Martinook, J. Slavin, W. Carrier, J. Chatfield · against J. Marchessault, F. Forsberg, I. Lyubushkin, J. Ahcan, M. Bourque

  2. 07:04CARJ. Martinook(N. Ehlers, J. Staal)2–0

    Wrist shot from 10 feet, a 17% chance (off the rush), past J. Saros. Win probability moved 13 points.On the ice: J. Slavin, S. Aho, J. Chatfield, A. Svechnikov, F. Unger Sorum · against S. Stamkos, R. Josi, R. O'Reilly, B. Skjei, A. Kerfoot

  3. 13:29CARN. Ehlers3–0

    Wrist shot from 25 feet, a 12% chance (off the rush), past J. Saros. 5s after a CAR takeaway by N. Ehlers. Win probability moved 10 points.On the ice: J. Slavin, S. Aho, J. Chatfield, A. Svechnikov, F. Unger Sorum · against S. Stamkos, R. O'Reilly, A. Kerfoot, I. Lyubushkin, J. Ahcan

2ndshots 5–10
  1. 16:37CARL. Stankoven(J. Blake)4–0

    Wrist shot from 22 feet, a 14% chance (off the rush), past J. Saros.On the ice: J. Slavin, S. Aho, J. Chatfield, A. Svechnikov, F. Unger Sorum · against S. Stamkos, R. Josi, R. O'Reilly, B. Skjei, M. Bourque

3rdshots 12–7
  1. 09:21CARM. Jankowskipower play(F. Unger Sorum, T. Hall)5–0

    Wrist shot from 41 feet, a 6% chance, a shot that rarely goes in (off the rush), past J. Saros.On the ice: J. Staal, J. Martinook, J. Slavin, W. Carrier, J. Chatfield · against R. Josi, F. Forsberg, N. Hoglander, J. Ahcan, M. Bourque

  2. 19:05CARA. Svechnikovpower play(S. Aho, J. Blake)6–0

    Wrist shot from 6 feet, a 22% chance (off the rush), past J. Saros.On the ice: M. Jankowski, W. Carrier, S. Walker, E. Robinson, C. Legault · against J. Marchessault, I. Lyubushkin, J. Ahcan, M. Bourque, V. Pinchuk

score reads CAR–NSH

Source · NHL play-by-play (api-web.nhle.com)
Process vs result

The numbers

XGBoost xG · NHL play-by-play
3.68
CAR chances
Goals their shots were worth
+2.3
Finishing
Goals above what those chances were worth
1.133
CAR puck luck
Above 1.000 — the bounces went their way
49.5%
Shot attempts
Under half — they were outshot
Split by club

Who controlled the game

3.68Expected goals2.28
CAR 62% of the chance quality
26Shots on goal22
6High-danger chances1
45All attempts (Corsi)46
Adjusted for score: CAR 42% · NSH 58%
Faceoffs · NSH won53%off53%neu50%def
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG
How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
CAR1 / 6 · 1.32 xG
NSH0 / 1 · 0.26 xG
Medium dangermid-range
CAR5 / 17 · 2.07 xG
NSH0 / 16 · 1.73 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
CAR0 / 22 · 0.29 xG
NSH0 / 29 · 0.29 xG

CAR went 5-for-17 from medium danger on 2.07 expected goals — 2.9 above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
CAR
6 G · 3.68 xG · +2.3
NSH
0 G · 2.28 xG · -2.3
01234567

CAR finished +2.3 against expected, NSH -2.3.

Source · Backcheck xG model
Shot types · rush and rebound chancesopen +
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
CAR
WRIST6/29
SLAP0/4
SNAP0/3
BACKHAND0/1
TIP IN0/1
BAT0/0
OTHER0/7
NSH
WRIST0/15
SLAP0/7
SNAP0/4
BACKHAND0/2
TIP IN0/2
BAT0/1
OTHER0/15
CAR
NSH
Off the rush
6 G on 28
3.33 xG
0 G on 21
1.95 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 0
0.00 xG
0 G on 1
0.14 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: CAR went 6-for-29, NSH 0-for-15. CAR scored 6 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
New to these numbers?

Two things happened in this game: who created the better chances, and who put the puck in the net. They are not the same thing, and this page separates them on purpose.

The one to watch is expected goals— the best single read on who deserved to win. When it disagrees with the scoreboard, that disagreement is usually the story. Nothing here is a projection; every figure is computed from this game's play-by-play. Full glossary →

xG
Expected goals. Every shot scored by how often that exact look goes in. 2.5 xG means the chances were worth about two and a half goals.
HD
High-danger chances — shots from the slot and the crease, where shots actually become goals.
Corsi
Every shot attempt, including the ones that missed or got blocked. A rough read on who had the puck.
Adj.
Score-adjusted. Teams that trail shoot more and teams that lead sit back, so this corrects the attempt count for the scoreboard.
GSAx
Goals saved above expected. A positive number means the goalie stopped more than an average goalie would have on those shots.
PDO
Shooting % plus save % — a luck gauge. It sits near 1.000 over a season, so a game far from it usually means the bounces decided it.
Shot by shot

In the net

Graded on goals saved above expected
B. Bussi
CAR · 22/22 · 1.000
started · 60:00 · win
+2.3
saved above expected
A
the night
Attempts faced
31
Avg chance faced
7.4%
Stopped vs expected
1.000 vs 0.926
Rebounds allowed
1
By dangerG/attxGsaved
High danger0/10.3+0.3
Medium0/161.7+1.7
Low0/140.3+0.3
Shorthanded0/70.9+0.9
Tips & deflections0/20.2+0.2
The save
26% chance stopped, a snap from 9 ft · P1 16:07

A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

J. Saros
NSH · 20/26 · .769
started · 59:08 · loss
-2.3
saved above expected
F
the night
Attempts faced
38
Avg chance faced
9.7%
Stopped vs expected
0.842 vs 0.903
Rebounds allowed
0
By dangerG/attxGsaved
High danger1/61.3+0.3
Medium5/172.1-2.9
Low0/150.3+0.3
Shorthanded3/90.9-2.1
Tips & deflections0/10.0+0.0
The save
30% chance stopped, a wrist from 25 ft · P3 15:07
The one to have back
6% chance went in, a wrist from 41 ft · P3 09:21

A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

Every skater who dressed

Who played

Rated on what they produced and how fast

Best skater on the ice by our rating: J. Blake (CAR), 15:02 of ice, 1-2, 73% of the expected goals while he was out.

CAR18 skaters
SkaterTOIG-AxG%Grade
J. BlakeR15:021-273A+
N. EhlersL13:131-177A+
S. AhoC20:010-259A+
L. StankovenC16:291-073A
F. Unger SorumR15:050-160A
M. JankowskiL16:231-064A
J. MartinookL13:281-052A
T. HallL12:310-180A
A. SvechnikovR16:191-064B
S. GostisbehereD20:080-177B
J. StaalC13:220-147B
W. CarrierL11:530-075B
E. RobinsonL12:230-066B
S. WalkerD19:090-068C
K. MillerD21:370-069C
C. LegaultD17:450-070C
J. SlavinD18:220-048C
J. ChatfieldD16:500-044D
NSH18 skaters
SkaterTOIG-AxG%Grade
M. WoodR17:400-057B
M. BourqueC16:300-038B
R. O'ReillyC17:420-069C
R. JosiD22:050-050C
F. ForsbergL19:090-048C
S. StamkosC13:430-055C
A. KerfootC15:190-031D
N. HoglanderL13:400-046D
A. WilsbyD18:250-038D
I. LyubushkinD15:020-030D
V. PinchukC14:190-040D
R. ColtonC12:140-024D
A. EdstromC10:220-013D
B. SkjeiD19:430-027F
N. HagueD18:440-030F
J. AhcanD16:240-028F
J. MarchessaultR16:340-039F
J. DruryC16:110-015F

xG% = share of expected goals while on the ice · PD/PT = penalties drawn / taken · “in N min” = a per-60 rate far above the raw total. Impact = 0.75 G + 0.7 A1 + 0.55 A2 + 0.075 SOG + 0.05 BLK + 0.15 penalties drawn − 0.15 taken + 0.01 faceoff wins − 0.01 losses + 0.3 individual xG + 0.5 on-ice xG for − 0.5 on-ice xG against. Rating = 65% impact + 35% impact per 60, as a percentile among the skaters in this game.

Scratched, CAR: N. Deslauriers, M. Reilly, J. Välimäki, P. Joseph, S. Brind'Amour, J. Kotkaniemi and 43 more. Scratched, NSH: K. Gravel, T. Jost, K. Volkov, N. Perbix, J. Annunen, J. Farinacci and 36 more. Referees Tom Chmielewski and Nick Isaacson; linesmen James Tobias and CJ Murray.

Graded against a league-average game

Report card

Seven dimensions · A+ to F
DimensionCARNSH
Offense
▸Basis

CAR Created 3.68 xG against a ~2.70 league-average game; 6 high-danger shots (1.32 xG) and 28 rush shots (3.33 xG).

NSH Created 2.28 xG against a ~2.70 league-average game; 1 high-danger shots (0.26 xG) and 21 rush shots (1.95 xG).

A
96
C-
72
Defense
▸Basis

CAR Allowed 2.28 xG against a ~2.70 league-average game; conceded 1 high-danger shots (0.26 xG) and 21 rush shots (1.95 xG).

NSH Allowed 3.68 xG against a ~2.70 league-average game; conceded 6 high-danger shots (1.32 xG) and 28 rush shots (3.33 xG).

C+
78
F
54
Transition
▸Basis

CAR Rush shots 28–21, rush xG 3.33–1.95 (rush-based; public data has no zone entries).

NSH Rush shots 21–28, rush xG 1.95–3.33 (rush-based; public data has no zone entries).

A-
92
F
58
Special teams
▸Basis

CAR 3-for-4 on the power play (75%; league ≈21%) with 0.93 PP xG.

NSH 0-for-5 on the power play (0%; league ≈21%) with 0.88 PP xG.

A+
100
F
55
Goaltending
▸Basis

CAR +2.28 goals saved above expected on 22 shots against.

NSH -2.32 goals saved above expected on 26 shots against.

A+
98
F
52
Discipline
▸Basis

CAR Took 5 penalties for 10 PIM vs 4 for 8 on the other side.

NSH Took 4 penalties for 8 PIM vs 5 for 10 on the other side.

C-
70
B-
80
Luck

Grades bounces, not skill — C is neutral

▸Basis

CAR Finishing +2.32 goals vs xG plus +2.28 GSAx of save luck = +4.60 total. This grades luck, not skill — C is neutral, A is very lucky.

NSH Finishing -2.28 goals vs xG plus -2.32 GSAx of save luck = -4.60 total. This grades luck, not skill — C is neutral, A is very lucky.

A+
100
F
38
Source · NHL play-by-play · xG engine · luck graded separately
What the model flagged
STRENGTHCAR

Dangerous off the rush

6 goals on 28 rush shots worth 3.33 xG.

WARNINGNSH

Rush defense leaked all night

Gave up 28 rush shots worth 3.33 xG (6 goals) — transition gaps were there every period.

Tighten neutral-zone structure and keep D gaps closed on entries.

WARNINGNSH

J. Saros couldn't make the stop

J. Saros allowed 6 on 26 shots (0.769) — 2.32 goals worse than expected.

Reassess the crease rotation before the next start.

LUCKNSH

PDO ran cold

Single-game PDO of 0.867 — the bounces went against them tonight.

LUCKCAR

PDO ran hot

Single-game PDO of 1.133 — the bounces went their way tonight.

STRENGTHCAR

B. Bussi stole it

B. Bussi stopped 22 of 22 (1.000) — +2.28 goals saved above expected in a 6-goal game.

69 shots · press play to watch the game back

Where the shots came from

NHL play-by-play coordinates
CAR
38 shots
6
Final
69 shots
NSH
31 shots
0
CAR attackNSH attack
CAR NSH Goal

Each club shoots toward its own end — CAR left, NSH right — the way you would watch it. A dot's size is how dangerous the look was, from distance and angle; it is a proxy for shot quality, not the xG model the article is written from. Hover a dot for the shooter and the clock.

Ranked from the box score

Three stars

Points first
Three stars · computed, not voted
J. Blake
#53 · R · CAR
1 G · 2 A · 3 SOG · 15:02 on ice · +1
S. Aho
#20 · C · CAR
0 G · 2 A · 2 SOG · 20:01 on ice
N. Ehlers
#27 · L · CAR
1 G · 1 A · 1 SOG · 13:13 on ice · +2
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model said beforehand

Before the game

Written Sat, Sep 26
Open the pre-game read
Written from the numbers

The read

Edited for clarity
Preseason · exhibition

Split squads and prospects, not the club that will take the ice in October. The rates below are last season's; this exhibition will not count toward season records, form, rankings or player numbers.

◆ By the ModelSep 26, 1:34 PMEdited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

The model projects a 3.4–3.1 Hurricanes win with Carolina at 55% to take it. This is as close to a pick'em as the preseason gets.

Carolina owns the underlying play. The Hurricanes control 55.7% of expected goals. They drive 59.1% of shot attempts, establishing territorial dominance that should decide most matchups. But Juuse Saros, Nashville's goaltender, has given up 13.6 more goals than his workload should have allowed through 59 games—a leak that threatens to muddy the picture.

Goaltending splits the difference. J. Annunen, Nashville's starter, has saved 11.5 more goals than expected through 28 games. P. Kochetkov, Carolina's option, has allowed 0.6 more goals than expected in nine games. That gap—12.1 goals worth—gives Annunen's Predators a tangible edge despite Carolina's structural advantage.

Jackson Blake generates 1.20 expected goals per 60 minutes with 14 goals and 31 assists. Logan Stankoven, the other Carolina engine, contributes 1.16 expected goals per 60 with 15 goals, including 13 from high-danger areas. Jonathan Marchessault drives Nashville's attack at 1.01 expected goals per 60, posting seven goals and seven high-danger goals.

The slot is the battleground. Carolina scores 53% of its goals from high-danger areas. P. Kochetkov saves 78.9% of high-danger shots—a gap that invites pressure. Nashville counters with 57% of its goals from the same zones. The Predators score 34 rebound goals, accounting for 22% of their total—a volume that invites Carolina to hunt second chances.

The underlying metrics favor Carolina, and the goaltending favors Annunen. Expect a tight game where whoever controls the slot controls the outcome, and whoever executes closer to that 55% projection takes it.

Season rates in this preview are from 2025-26 — this season's sample isn't live yet.

What the model said beforehand

The model's lean

CAR 55%
55%
CAR
Model favorite
55%
45%
CAR50NSH

CAR by 10 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score CAR 3.4–3.1 NSH; 16% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season rates · 5v5

Tale of the tape

NHL stats API · our xG
CAR← edge
edge →NSH
55.7%48.7%
59.1%49.5%
3.593.09
2.853.24
3.552.95
2.883.26
0.9840.992

CAR holds 6 of 6 process categories — and the luck row (0.984 vs 0.992) says NSH has been getting the bounces, which tends not to last.

Source · NHL stats API + our xG · 5v5
Form · No games yet
CAR
0-0-0
+0 GD · 0d rest
NSH
0-0-0
+0 GD · 0d rest
0.984
CAR PDO
Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
0.992
NSH PDO
Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
What decides it

Keys to the game

WARNINGNSH

Juuse Saros has leaked goals all season

Juuse Saros: -13.6 GSAx over 59 games.

Shoot from everywhere — volume beats a cold crease.

STRENGTHCAR

Jackson Blake drives the Hurricanes offense

Jackson Blake: 14G 31A, 1.20 xG/60, 6 high-danger goals.

WARNINGCAR

Exploitable minutes: Bradly Nadeau

Bradly Nadeau is on ice for 2.35 xGA/60 and 16 high-danger shots against this season.

Hunt matchups against Bradly Nadeau's shifts with the top line.

WARNINGNSH

Exploitable minutes: Jonathan Marchessault

Jonathan Marchessault is on ice for 2.40 xGA/60 and 76 high-danger shots against this season.

Hunt matchups against Jonathan Marchessault's shifts with the top line.

Where the edges live
  • The Hurricanes own the underlying play — 55.7% 5v5 xG vs 48.7%.
  • The Hurricanes drive Corsi at 59.1% — expect territorial tilt.
Regression watch
  • The Hurricanes' PDO is 0.984 — running cold, due for positive regression.
Things to watch
  • The Hurricanes own the underlying play — 55.7% 5v5 xG vs 48.7%.
  • The Hurricanes drive Corsi at 59.1% — expect territorial tilt.
  • Goalie matchup: P. Kochetkov (-0.6 GSAx in 9 GP, 89.9% SV) vs J. Annunen (+11.5 GSAx in 28 GP, 90.7% SV).
  • J. Annunen has the GSAx edge — 12.1 goals above his counterpart this season.
  • The Hurricanes' PDO is 0.984 — running cold, due for positive regression.
Last game's lineup · confirmed at warm-up

Lineups

NHL box score
CAR
preseason · vs NSH · Thu, Sep 24
Expected in goal
P. Kochetkov
1 day rest.821 last start59:41 played
Backup Brandon Bussi · -3.3 GSAx this season
Forwards · 12
  • L. Stankoven
  • J. Slavin
  • B. Nadeau
  • F. Unger Sorum
  • C. Cerrato
  • J. Robidas
  • J. Blake
  • J. Jaaska
  • T. Hall
  • S. Brind'Amour
  • Z. Lansard
  • J. Kotkaniemi
Defence · 6
  • P. Joseph
  • J. Välimäki
  • A. Heimosalmi
  • C. Legault
  • D. Badinka
  • N. Fransén
NSH
preseason · vs CAR · Thu, Sep 24
Expected in goal
J. Annunen
1 day rest.806 last start60:00 played
Backup Juuse Saros · -13.6 GSAx this season
Forwards · 11
  • A. Kerfoot
  • J. Drury
  • C. O'Hara
  • M. Bourque
  • B. Martin
  • R. Schaefer
  • V. Pinchuk
  • F. Nilsson
  • R. Colton
  • J. Marchessault
  • A. Edstrom
Defence · 7
  • A. Wilsby
  • R. Ufko
  • N. Hague
  • I. Lyubushkin
  • N. Perbix
  • T. Molendyk
  • H. Skinner

Lineups are the players who dressed in each club's last game, with their minutes; clubs confirm tonight's at warm-up. Every player this preview names was in that lineup.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

NHL stats API · our xG
CAR
Jackson Blake14G 31A
1.20 xG/60 · 6 HD · 8.0% sh
Logan Stankoven15G 23A
1.16 xG/60 · 13 HD · 9.0% sh
NSH
Jonathan Marchessault7G 19A
1.01 xG/60 · 7 HD · 5.3% sh
Keep going

Where to next