Motion-blurred skater in a St. Louis Blues sweater
Breakdown · CBJ at STL

Blues run the Blue Jackets off the ice on the underlying numbers

The verdict · earned

The Blues earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

CBJ 3 · STL 5
◆ By the ModelOct 10, 9:48 PMxG: xgboost-0.765Edited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

St. Louis beat Columbus 5-3 by coming back from a two-goal deficit. J. Snuggerud scored twice in the second period, and D. Holloway assisted on three of the Blues' goals.

The number that most disagrees with the scoreboard is Columbus's finishing. The Blue Jackets scored 1.32 goals more than their chances were worth, a bigger gap than St. Louis posted.

Look at the play itself and the margin gets wider. Over 5-on-5 play, the Blues generated 70% of expected goals, a figure that scores each shot by how often shots like it become goals. St. Louis also had 6 high-danger chances to Columbus's 2, so the edge came from the quality of looks more than the volume.

J. Binnington gave up 1.3 more goals than the shots he faced should have allowed. The chances say he should have stopped more.

Columbus's weakest area was defending the rush. It allowed 21 rush shots, and the gaps showed up in every period. Those chances were worth 2.61 expected goals, and St. Louis scored twice off the rush.

The turning point came late in the third. P. Buchnevich's wrist shot from the point, at 19:17, went into an empty net.

Three stars

  • D. Holloway (St. Louis), 3 assists
  • J. Snuggerud (St. Louis), 2 goals
  • Z. Werenski (Columbus), 1 assist

The numbers cannot say whether the finishing was luck or skill, or what was said in the room. That is the beat's story, and it is worth reading.

Data: NHL play-by-play and shift charts, Backcheck expected goals model

The goals

  • CBJ 1–0, 16:10 of the first. V. Nichushkin, deflection from 4 feet, a 20% chance by the model (off the rush), past J. Binnington. Assists: S. Monahan, E. Gudbranson. 6 seconds after a CBJ faceoff win by S. Monahan. Win probability moved 18 points.
  • CBJ 2–0, 19:48 of the first. K. Johnson, wrist shot from 26 feet, an 11% chance by the model (off the rush), past J. Binnington. Assists: A. Fantilli, Z. Werenski. Win probability moved 15 points.
  • STL 2–1, 06:10 of the second. J. Neighbours, slap shot from 10 feet, an 11% chance by the model, past J. Greaves. Assists: J. Barron, D. Holloway. 4 seconds after a STL shot by J. Barron. Win probability moved 16 points.
  • STL 2–2, 09:02 of the second. J. Snuggerud, deflection from 6 feet, a 20% chance by the model (off the rush), past J. Greaves. Assists: P. Broberg, D. Holloway. Win probability moved 22 points.
  • STL 2–3, 12:32 of the second. J. Snuggerud, wrist shot from 31 feet, a 2% chance by the model (off the rush), past J. Greaves. Assists: R. Thomas, D. Holloway. Win probability moved 22 points.
  • CBJ 3–3, 06:51 of the third. C. Sillinger, wrist shot from 9 feet, a 12% chance by the model (a rebound), past J. Binnington. Assists: C. Coyle, C. Soucy. 2 seconds after a CBJ shot by C. Coyle. Win probability moved 28 points.
  • STL 3–4, 09:33 of the third. J. Berggren, wrist shot from 6 feet, a 14% chance by the model (a rebound), past J. Greaves. Assists: M. McTavish, C. Parayko. 2 seconds after a STL shot by M. McTavish. Win probability moved 30 points.
  • STL 3–5, 19:17 of the third into an empty net. P. Buchnevich, wrist shot from 90 feet, a 51% chance by the model.

What the numbers can't tell you. Whether the finishing was luck or skill, why the benches were run the way they were, who was hurt, and anything said in the room. That is the beat's story, and it is worth reading.

The breakdown in twelve frames

Swipe it

Every number is from this page
Final · Oct 10
CBJ
3
STL
5

Blues run the Blue Jackets off the ice on the underlying numbers

Chances 1.7 – 3.9Did they deserve it? →
Did they deserve it?

The Blues earned this one.

Expected goals · chance value
CBJ
1.68
STL
3.90
30% of the chances70%

The board read CBJ 3, STL 5. The chances read CBJ 1.7, STL 3.9.

Our xG model · NHL play-by-play · all situations
Luck check
STL
+1.1
goals above expected
STL3.90 expected · 5 scored
Expected
Scored
CBJ1.68 expected · 3 scored
Expected
Scored

Both sides finished close to what their chances were worth. This one was earned on the ice.

PDO = sh% + sv% · drifts to 1.000 over a season
The swing
+30
win-probability points
53% → 83% for STL
STL 100%the game, start to finish
CBJ 100%P1 · P2 · P3
STLP3 09:33

J. Berggren makes it 3–4.

In-game win model · fitted on 5,248 games
Every goal, in order
  1. P1 16:10CBJV. Nichushkin20%1–0
  2. P1 19:48CBJK. Johnson11%2–0
  3. P2 06:10STLJ. Neighbours11%2–1
  4. P2 09:02STLJ. Snuggerud20%2–2
  5. P2 12:32STLJ. Snuggerud2%2–3
  6. P3 06:51CBJC. Sillinger12%3–3
  7. P3 09:33STLJ. Berggren14%3–4
+1 more on the full breakdown
NHL play-by-play · chance value from our xG model
Where the shots came from
CBJ
39 shots
3
Final
76 shots
STL
37 shots
5
CBJ attackSTL attack
CBJ STL Goal
39
shots · 3 in
37
shots · 5 in
Every unblocked shot · press play to replay it
Chances by danger
CBJSTL
1 / 2
0.39 xG
High danger
2 / 6
1.67 xG
2 / 11
0.87 xG
Medium
2 / 17
1.97 xG
0 / 35
0.42 xG
Low
1 / 35
0.26 xG

The Blues buried 2 of 6 high-danger looks.

Danger tiers by our xG model · high ≥ 20% chance
In the net
D
J. Greaves
−0.6
CBJ · 22/26 · 58:46
Best save · a 32% chance, snap from 4 ft · P1 07:33
D-
J. Binnington
−1.3
STL · 20/23 · 60:00
Best save · a 20% chance, snap from 25 ft · P2 01:21
Best skater on the ice
A+
STL
D. Holloway
L · impact 2.16
16:34
Ice time
0–3
G – A
0.34
Own xG
76%
xG share
Impact · top 4
D. Holloway2.2A+
J. Snuggerud2.0A+
M. McTavish1.6A+
P. Buchnevich1.4A
Report card
CBJSTL
OffenseDA+
DefenseFB
TransitionD-B+
Special teamsFD
GoaltendingCD-
DisciplineCC
LuckBC
Seven dimensions, A+ to F · basis on the breakdown
Why it went the way it went
Why STL won
  1. 01Dangerous off the rush
  2. 02Won on the merits
  3. 03Clinical in the slot
Why CBJ lost
  1. 01Rush defense leaked all night
  2. 02Ran hot in front of the net
  3. 03Allowed 3.90 xG against a ~2.70 league-average game; conceded 6 high-danger shots (1.67 xG) and 21 rush shots (2.61 xG).
Our storyline model · reasoning on the breakdown
The numbers, checked
BACKCHECK

Blues run the Blue Jackets off the ice on the underlying numbers

A model, not a newsroom. Every number on these frames comes from the NHL's play-by-play and our own models. Nothing was watched, guessed or heard from anyone.

Read the full breakdown
backcheckreport.com
01 / 12 · Final
Every goal, in order

How it happened

NHL play-by-play
1stshots 10–4
  1. 16:10CBJV. Nichushkin(S. Monahan, E. Gudbranson)1–0

    Deflection from 4 feet, a 20% chance (off the rush), past J. Binnington. 6s after a CBJ faceoff win by S. Monahan. Win probability moved 18 points.On the ice: E. Gudbranson, D. Heinen, Z. Werenski, C. Garland, R. Lomberg · against R. Johnston, P. Suter, P. Broberg, Z. Dean, A. Jiricek

  2. 19:48CBJK. Johnson(A. Fantilli, Z. Werenski)2–0

    Wrist shot from 26 feet, an 11% chance (off the rush), past J. Binnington. Win probability moved 15 points.On the ice: C. Coyle, D. Severson, Z. Werenski, M. Olivier, C. Sillinger · against C. Parayko, J. Berggren, C. McMichael, J. Barron, M. McTavish

2ndshots 3–12
  1. 06:10STLJ. Neighbours(J. Barron, D. Holloway)2–1

    Slap shot from 10 feet, an 11% chance, past J. Greaves. 4s after a STL shot by J. Barron. Win probability moved 16 points.On the ice: C. Parayko, R. Johnston, P. Suter, J. Barron, Z. Dean · against D. Severson, S. Monahan, V. Nichushkin, Z. Werenski, D. Voronkov

  2. 09:02STLJ. Snuggerud(P. Broberg, D. Holloway)2–2

    Deflection from 6 feet, a 20% chance (off the rush), past J. Greaves. Win probability moved 22 points.On the ice: C. Parayko, R. Johnston, P. Suter, J. Barron, Z. Dean · against E. Gudbranson, D. Heinen, C. Garland, R. Lomberg, J. Christiansen

  3. 12:32STLJ. Snuggerud(R. Thomas, D. Holloway)2–3

    Wrist shot from 31 feet, a 2% chance, a shot that rarely goes in (off the rush), past J. Greaves. Win probability moved 22 points.On the ice: C. Fowler, C. Parayko, P. Buchnevich, J. Neighbours, D. Dvorsky · against D. Severson, S. Monahan, V. Nichushkin, Z. Werenski, D. Voronkov

3rdshots 10–11
  1. 06:51CBJC. Sillinger(C. Coyle, C. Soucy)3–3

    Wrist shot from 9 feet, a 12% chance (a rebound), past J. Binnington. 2s after a CBJ shot by C. Coyle. Win probability moved 28 points.On the ice: D. Severson, S. Monahan, D. Heinen, Z. Werenski, M. Olivier · against J. Berggren, C. McMichael, P. Broberg, M. McTavish, A. Jiricek

  2. 09:33STLJ. Berggren(M. McTavish, C. Parayko)3–4

    Wrist shot from 6 feet, a 14% chance (a rebound), past J. Greaves. 2s after a STL shot by M. McTavish. Win probability moved 30 points.On the ice: R. Johnston, P. Suter, J. Barron, Z. Dean · against E. Gudbranson, S. Monahan, V. Nichushkin, C. Garland, J. Christiansen

  3. 19:17STLP. Buchnevichempty net3–5

    Wrist shot from 90 feet, a 51% chance.

score reads CBJ–STL

Source · NHL play-by-play (api-web.nhle.com)
Process vs result

The numbers

XGBoost xG · NHL play-by-play
3.90
STL chances
Goals their shots were worth
+1.1
Finishing
Goals above what those chances were worth
1.024
STL puck luck
Above 1.000 — the bounces went their way
54.7%
Shot attempts
Over half — they had the puck more
Split by club

Who controlled the game

1.68Expected goals3.90
STL 70% of the chance quality
23Shots on goal27
2High-danger chances6
48All attempts (Corsi)58
Adjusted for score: CBJ 45% · STL 55%
Faceoffs · STL won40%off42%neu46%def
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG
How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
CBJ1 / 2 · 0.39 xG
STL2 / 6 · 1.67 xG
Medium dangermid-range
CBJ2 / 11 · 0.87 xG
STL2 / 17 · 1.97 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
CBJ0 / 35 · 0.42 xG
STL1 / 35 · 0.26 xG

CBJ went 2-for-11 from medium danger on 0.87 expected goals — 1.1 above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
CBJ
3 G · 1.68 xG · +1.3
STL
5 G · 3.90 xG · +1.1
0123456

CBJ finished +1.3 against expected, STL +1.1.

Source · Backcheck xG model
Shot types · rush and rebound chancesopen +
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
CBJ
WRIST2/25
SNAP0/3
SLAP0/3
BACKHAND0/3
DEFLECTED1/1
TIP IN0/2
WRAP AROUND0/1
POKE0/1
OTHER0/9
STL
WRIST3/12
SNAP0/15
SLAP1/5
BACKHAND0/1
DEFLECTED1/3
TIP IN0/0
WRAP AROUND0/1
POKE0/0
OTHER0/21
CBJ
STL
Off the rush
2 G on 23
1.25 xG
2 G on 21
2.61 xG
Off rebounds
1 G on 3
0.25 xG
1 G on 4
0.46 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: CBJ went 2-for-25, STL 3-for-12. CBJ scored 2 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
New to these numbers?

Two things happened in this game: who created the better chances, and who put the puck in the net. They are not the same thing, and this page separates them on purpose.

The one to watch is expected goals— the best single read on who deserved to win. When it disagrees with the scoreboard, that disagreement is usually the story. Nothing here is a projection; every figure is computed from this game's play-by-play. Full glossary →

xG
Expected goals. Every shot scored by how often that exact look goes in. 2.5 xG means the chances were worth about two and a half goals.
HD
High-danger chances — shots from the slot and the crease, where shots actually become goals.
Corsi
Every shot attempt, including the ones that missed or got blocked. A rough read on who had the puck.
Adj.
Score-adjusted. Teams that trail shoot more and teams that lead sit back, so this corrects the attempt count for the scoreboard.
GSAx
Goals saved above expected. A positive number means the goalie stopped more than an average goalie would have on those shots.
PDO
Shooting % plus save % — a luck gauge. It sits near 1.000 over a season, so a game far from it usually means the bounces decided it.
Shot by shot

In the net

Graded on goals saved above expected
J. Greaves
CBJ · 22/26 · .846
started · 58:46 · loss
-0.6
saved above expected
D
the night
Attempts faced
36
Avg chance faced
9.4%
Stopped vs expected
0.889 vs 0.906
Rebounds allowed
4 · 1 scored on
By dangerG/attxGsaved
High danger1/51.2+0.2
Medium2/172.0-0.0
Low1/140.3-0.7
Shorthanded0/30.5+0.5
Tips & deflections1/30.4-0.6
The save
32% chance stopped, a snap from 4 ft · P1 07:33
The one to have back
2% chance went in, a wrist from 31 ft · P2 12:32

A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

J. Binnington
STL · 20/23 · .870
started · 60:00 · win
-1.3
saved above expected
D-
the night
Attempts faced
38
Avg chance faced
4.4%
Stopped vs expected
0.921 vs 0.956
Rebounds allowed
3 · 1 scored on
By dangerG/attxGsaved
High danger1/20.4-0.6
Medium2/110.9-1.1
Low0/250.4+0.4
Shorthanded0/10.1+0.1
Tips & deflections1/20.3-0.7
The save
20% chance stopped, a snap from 25 ft · P2 01:21
The one to have back
11% chance went in, a wrist from 26 ft · P1 19:48

A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

Every skater who dressed

Who played

Rated on what they produced and how fast

Best skater on the ice by our rating: D. Holloway (STL), 16:34 of ice, 0-3, 76% of the expected goals while he was out.

CBJ18 skaters
SkaterTOIG-AxG%Grade
A. FantilliC18:280-177A
K. JohnsonC17:021-080A
V. NichushkinR16:271-031B
C. SillingerC16:001-028B
C. SoucyD11:350-132C
Z. WerenskiD28:130-141C
R. LombergL9:390-065C
S. MonahanC18:370-125C
D. HeinenL12:040-068C
E. GudbransonD19:350-125C
C. CoyleC16:380-116D
C. GarlandR14:580-056D
D. MateychukD21:130-050D
D. SeversonD24:420-040F
D. VoronkovL12:390-038F
J. ChristiansenD12:480-012F
M. KniesL14:400-026F
M. OlivierR11:560-019F
STL18 skaters
SkaterTOIG-AxG%Grade
D. HollowayL16:340-376A+
J. SnuggerudR15:132-056A+
M. McTavishC18:080-165A+
P. BuchnevichL17:021-084A
J. BarronD16:140-172A
J. NeighboursL13:261-071A
J. BerggrenR16:561-047B
R. ThomasC18:170-173B
C. ParaykoD23:040-150B
P. BrobergD23:190-143B
C. McMichaelL18:070-067B
D. DvorskyR12:060-085C
C. FowlerD21:460-074C
R. JohnstonL9:060-065D
P. SuterC12:560-054D
A. JiricekD15:500-056D
B. CarloD18:050-057D
Z. DeanC9:510-057D

xG% = share of expected goals while on the ice · PD/PT = penalties drawn / taken · “in N min” = a per-60 rate far above the raw total. Impact = 0.75 G + 0.7 A1 + 0.55 A2 + 0.075 SOG + 0.05 BLK + 0.15 penalties drawn − 0.15 taken + 0.01 faceoff wins − 0.01 losses + 0.3 individual xG + 0.5 on-ice xG for − 0.5 on-ice xG against. Rating = 65% impact + 35% impact per 60, as a percentile among the skaters in this game.

Scratched, CBJ: E. Andrae, L. Del Bel Belluz. Scratched, STL: T. Lindstein. Referees Jon McIsaac and Carter Sandlak; linesmen Shandor Alphonso and Anthony Lapointe.

Graded against a league-average game

Report card

Seven dimensions · A+ to F
DimensionCBJSTL
Offense
▸Basis

CBJ Created 1.68 xG against a ~2.70 league-average game; 2 high-danger shots (0.39 xG) and 23 rush shots (1.25 xG).

STL Created 3.90 xG against a ~2.70 league-average game; 6 high-danger shots (1.67 xG) and 21 rush shots (2.61 xG).

D
64
A+
97
Defense
▸Basis

CBJ Allowed 3.90 xG against a ~2.70 league-average game; conceded 6 high-danger shots (1.67 xG) and 21 rush shots (2.61 xG).

STL Allowed 1.68 xG against a ~2.70 league-average game; conceded 2 high-danger shots (0.39 xG) and 23 rush shots (1.25 xG).

F
53
B
86
Transition
▸Basis

CBJ Rush shots 23–21, rush xG 1.25–2.61 (rush-based; public data has no zone entries).

STL Rush shots 21–23, rush xG 2.61–1.25 (rush-based; public data has no zone entries).

D-
62
B+
88
Special teams
▸Basis

CBJ 0-for-1 on the power play (0%; league ≈21%) with 0.00 PP xG.

STL 0-for-1 on the power play (0%; league ≈21%) with 0.45 PP xG.

F
48
D
66
Goaltending
▸Basis

CBJ -0.10 goals saved above expected on 26 shots against.

STL -1.32 goals saved above expected on 23 shots against.

C
74
D-
62
Discipline
▸Basis

CBJ Took 3 penalties for 9 PIM vs 3 for 9 on the other side.

STL Took 3 penalties for 9 PIM vs 3 for 9 on the other side.

C
75
C
75
Luck

Grades bounces, not skill — C is neutral

▸Basis

CBJ Finishing +1.32 goals vs xG plus -0.10 GSAx of save luck = +1.22 total. This grades luck, not skill — C is neutral, A is very lucky.

STL Finishing +1.10 goals vs xG plus -1.32 GSAx of save luck = -0.22 total. This grades luck, not skill — C is neutral, A is very lucky.

B
85
C
73
Source · NHL play-by-play · xG engine · luck graded separately
What the model flagged
WARNINGCBJ

Rush defense leaked all night

Gave up 21 rush shots worth 2.61 xG (2 goals) — transition gaps were there every period.

Tighten neutral-zone structure and keep D gaps closed on entries.

STRENGTHSTL

Dangerous off the rush

2 goals on 21 rush shots worth 2.61 xG.

STRENGTHSTL

Won on the merits

The Blues controlled 70% of expected goals (3.90–1.68) and won 5-3 — result matched process.

WARNINGSTL

Rush defense leaked all night

Gave up 23 rush shots worth 1.25 xG (2 goals) — transition gaps were there every period.

Tighten neutral-zone structure and keep D gaps closed on entries.

STRENGTHCBJ

Dangerous off the rush

2 goals on 23 rush shots worth 1.25 xG.

STRENGTHSTL

Clinical in the slot

2 goals on 6 high-danger shots (33% conversion on 1.67 xG).

76 shots · press play to watch the game back

Where the shots came from

NHL play-by-play coordinates
CBJ
39 shots
3
Final
76 shots
STL
37 shots
5
CBJ attackSTL attack
CBJ STL Goal

Each club shoots toward its own end — CBJ left, STL right — the way you would watch it. A dot's size is how dangerous the look was, from distance and angle; it is a proxy for shot quality, not the xG model the article is written from. Hover a dot for the shooter and the clock.

Ranked from the box score

Three stars

Points first
Three stars · computed, not voted
D. Holloway
#81 · L · STL
0 G · 3 A · 3 SOG · 16:34 on ice · +1
J. Snuggerud
#21 · R · STL
2 G · 0 A · 3 SOG · 15:13 on ice · +1
Z. Werenski
#8 · D · CBJ
0 G · 1 A · 1 SOG · 28:13 on ice
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
Keep going

Where to next