Shutdown Assignment: Rangers
Key matchup: Neutralize Anthony Beauvillier (14G, 0.89 xG/60, 2 HD goals)
Key matchup: Neutralize Anthony Beauvillier (14G, 0.89 xG/60, 2 HD goals)

Washington's shut out was built on the one thing the Rangers couldn't generate: dangerous looks. New York owned 62% of shot attempts (35–21 on goal) but just 49% of expected goals. Their shots lacked teeth — 0.042 xG per attempt versus Washington's 0.062. Close underneath, punished on the ice.
The puck broke Washington's way at 13:47 of the second period: A. Beauvillier's tip-in from the slot.
Both goalies outperformed their save expectations. C. Lindgren (WSH) made 35 of 35 saves and saved 3.00 goals above expected; J. Quick (NYR) stopped 20 of 21 and saved 2.17 goals above expected. The Rangers underperformed their xG by 3.00 goals. Washington underperformed theirs by 2.17. Both teams crashed the net for rebounds — New York six, Washington three — and neither converted. When the underlying numbers are this tight and the difference is goaltending and inches, execution decides.
Capitals shut out the Rangers, 1-0
Dead even on chances. The Capitals took it anyway.
The board read WSH 1, NYR 0. The chances read WSH 3.2, NYR 3.0.
The Rangers left 3.0 goals on the table against what their chances were worth.
The Rangers went 0 for 4 from the slot.
Capitals shut out the Rangers, 1-0
A model, not a newsroom. Every number on these frames comes from the NHL's play-by-play and our own models. Nothing was watched, guessed or heard from anyone.
Read the full breakdownscore reads WSH–NYR
NYR went 0-for-14 from medium danger on 1.48 expected goals — 1.5 left on the table.
WSH finished -2.2 against expected, NYR -3.0.
Wrist shots carried the volume: WSH went 0-for-12, NYR 0-for-25.
Two things happened in this game: who created the better chances, and who put the puck in the net. They are not the same thing, and this page separates them on purpose.
The one to watch is expected goals— the best single read on who deserved to win. When it disagrees with the scoreboard, that disagreement is usually the story. Nothing here is a projection; every figure is computed from this game's play-by-play. Full glossary →
A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5
A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5
Each club shoots toward its own end — WSH left, NYR right — the way you would watch it. A dot's size is how dangerous the look was, from distance and angle; it is a proxy for shot quality, not the xG model the article is written from. Hover a dot for the shooter and the clock.
The model projects a WSH 3.2 - 3.2 NYR game with the Rangers at 50% win probability. This is about as close to a pick'em as you'll find.
Keys to the game
| Metric | WSH | NYR |
|---|---|---|
| xG% | 49.6% | 47.5% |
| Corsi% | 49.5% | 48.6% |
| PDO | 1.018 | 1.009 |
Rates from 2025-26 — the 2026-27 sample isn't live yet.
WSH
NYR
WSH
NYR
Data: NHL API, Backcheck xG model
NYR by 0 points of win probability — effectively a coin flip. Projected score WSH 3.2–3.2 NYR; 16% chance it's tied after 60.
WSH holds 5 of 6 process categories — and the luck row (1.018 vs 1.009) says WSH has been getting the bounces, which tends not to last.
Key matchup: Neutralize Anthony Beauvillier (14G, 0.89 xG/60, 2 HD goals)
Key matchup: Neutralize Anthony Beauvillier (14G, 0.89 xG/60, 2 HD goals)
Key matchup: Neutralize Adam Sykora (3G, 0.91 xG/60, 0 HD goals)
Key matchup: Neutralize Adam Sykora (3G, 0.91 xG/60, 0 HD goals)
Declan Chisholm is on ice for 3.21 xGA/60 and 25 high-danger shots against this season.
Hunt matchups against Declan Chisholm's shifts with the top line.
Vincent Iorio is on ice for 3.12 xGA/60 and 27 high-danger shots against this season.
Hunt matchups against Vincent Iorio's shifts with the top line.