Shutdown Assignment: Blue Jackets
Key matchup: Neutralize Brandon Hagel (23G, 1.10 xG/60, 2 HD goals)
Key matchup: Neutralize Brandon Hagel (23G, 1.10 xG/60, 2 HD goals)

The scoreline reads 3–2, Columbus escaping with a win. But high-danger chances finished 8–8. This game should not have had a winner—the underlying numbers say coin flip, yet Columbus netted the extra goal.
Tampa Bay's problem wasn't volume. Expected goals split 4.29–3.89 in Columbus's favor—close enough to be noise, a 52–48 split. High-danger chances landed even. But 0/8 on prime scoring opportunities doesn't convert to a win, not when your opponent buries theirs. J. Greaves stopped 1.89 goals above expected, facing eight high-danger shots and saving all eight. J. Johansson matched him in outperformance—1.29 above expected—but his team's skaters never gave him a chance.
Columbus's advantage materialized on the rush. Three goals on 28 rush attempts. Tampa Bay notched two on 21. Kirill Marchenko's wrist shot from the high slot (P3, 01:15) became the margin—the turning point in a game that easily could have been 2–2 into overtime.
Both teams crashed the net ineffectively in rebound situations. Columbus created three rebound opportunities and converted zero. Tampa created five and converted zero. Neither team found secondary scoring.
The variance here is stark. Tampa Bay underperformed their xG by 1.9 goals. Columbus underperformed by 1.29. Both goalies played above expectation, which means both teams' skaters disappointed—but Columbus disappointed less. One unit couldn't close, the other sealed it when it mattered.
Blue Jackets hold off the Lightning
The Blue Jackets earned this one.
The board read TBL 2, CBJ 3. The chances read TBL 3.9, CBJ 4.3.
The Lightning left 1.9 goals on the table against what their chances were worth.
The Lightning went 0 for 8 from the slot.
Blue Jackets hold off the Lightning
A model, not a newsroom. Every number on these frames comes from the NHL's play-by-play and our own models. Nothing was watched, guessed or heard from anyone.
Read the full breakdownscore reads TBL–CBJ
TBL went 0-for-8 from high danger on 2.21 expected goals — 2.2 left on the table.
TBL finished -1.9 against expected, CBJ -1.3.
Wrist shots carried the volume: TBL went 1-for-19, CBJ 2-for-30. CBJ scored 3 of theirs off the rush.
Two things happened in this game: who created the better chances, and who put the puck in the net. They are not the same thing, and this page separates them on purpose.
The one to watch is expected goals— the best single read on who deserved to win. When it disagrees with the scoreboard, that disagreement is usually the story. Nothing here is a projection; every figure is computed from this game's play-by-play. Full glossary →
A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5
A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5
Each club shoots toward its own end — TBL left, CBJ right — the way you would watch it. A dot's size is how dangerous the look was, from distance and angle; it is a proxy for shot quality, not the xG model the article is written from. Hover a dot for the shooter and the clock.
This is a pick'em. The model projects a 3.3–3.2 Lightning win with Tampa at 51% probability—close enough that you should view it as a coin flip.
Tampa owns the underlying play. The Lightning carry a 53.7% 5v5 xG share to Columbus's 50.0%, and their 53.0% Corsi% edges the Blue Jackets' 51.1%. The gap is modest but real. Yet Tampa's PDO of 1.019 is running hot; expect some regression. Columbus sits at 1.003, closer to sustainable.
The Lightning's offense runs through Brandon Hagel. At 1.10 xG/60, Hagel has driven 23 goals and 26 assists with 2 high-danger goals and a 15.8% shooting rate. Anthony Cirelli adds 0.95 xG/60 with 15 goals, 18 assists, 5 high-danger goals, and a 17.0% shot. Columbus's answer is Boone Jenner, who operates at 0.98 xG/60 with 11 goals, 21 assists, 2 high-danger goals, but just 9.6% shooting—a sign he's overdue for positive variance. Mathieu Olivier provides secondary scoring at 0.89 xG/60 with 12 goals and 9 assists.
For Tampa to pull away, Hagel must impose his pace on the Blue Jackets' structure. For Columbus to stay in it, containing Hagel's creation and letting Jenner's shooting regress toward the mean are essential.
TBL
CBJ
Data: NHL API, Backcheck xG model
Season rates in this preview are from 2025-26 — this season's sample isn't live yet.
TBL by 2 points of win probability — effectively a coin flip. Projected score TBL 3.3–3.2 CBJ; 16% chance it's tied after 60.
TBL holds 6 of 6 process categories — and the luck row (1.019 vs 1.003) says TBL has been getting the bounces, which tends not to last.
Key matchup: Neutralize Brandon Hagel (23G, 1.10 xG/60, 2 HD goals)
Key matchup: Neutralize Brandon Hagel (23G, 1.10 xG/60, 2 HD goals)
Key matchup: Neutralize Boone Jenner (11G, 0.98 xG/60, 2 HD goals)
Key matchup: Neutralize Boone Jenner (11G, 0.98 xG/60, 2 HD goals)
Brandon Hagel: 23G 26A, 1.10 xG/60, 2 high-danger goals.
Victor Hedman is on ice for 2.69 xGA/60 and 20 high-danger shots against this season.
Hunt matchups against Victor Hedman's shifts with the top line.