Motion-blurred skater in a San Jose Sharks sweater
Breakdown · SJS at NYR

Sharks edge the Rangers in overtime

The verdict · earned

The Sharks earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

SJS 6 · NYR 5
◆ By the ModelJul 11, 1:11 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

Both teams overperformed their expected goals—the Rangers by 1.91 goals and the Sharks by 2.53—which means this 6-5 result masks a nearly even underlying game.

The Sharks' 3.47 xG to 3.09 barely justified their one-goal advantage. New York controlled play with 54% of shot attempts (28–24 on goal), but generated fewer high-quality looks (5 high-danger chances vs. 8). San Jose's win came down to goaltending and variance. A. Nedeljkovic made 23 of 28 shots while allowing 1.91 fewer goals than expected—an elite performance on the moments that counted, stopping all five high-danger attempts. I. Shesterkin faced a softer workload (18/24 saves) but still allowed 2.53 more than expected, partly betrayed by the Rangers' finishing: they scored twice from low-danger spots.

New York was lethal on the rush (4 goals on 26 chances) while San Jose converted twice on 22. Yet both offenses ran hot overall. The Sharks proved sharper in shot quality: 0.075 xG per attempt vs. the Rangers' 0.049, a genuine edge despite New York's volume advantage.

Will Smith's slap shot from the high slot at 01:38 of overtime decided it—a fitting finish for a forward with 2 goals and 2 assists.

The clearest takeaway: both goaltenders leaked and both offenses clicked. Under those conditions, San Jose's superior offensive quality was enough. A. Nedeljkovic's perfection on dangerous chances ultimately settled a contest where expected goals wanted to call it nearly even.

The breakdown in twelve frames

Swipe it

Every number is from this page
Final · OT · Oct 23
SJS
6
NYR
5

Sharks edge the Rangers in overtime

Chances 3.5 – 3.1Did they deserve it? →
Did they deserve it?

The Sharks earned this one.

Expected goals · chance value
SJS
3.47
NYR
3.09
53% of the chances47%

The board read SJS 6, NYR 5. The chances read SJS 3.5, NYR 3.1.

Our xG model · NHL play-by-play · all situations
Luck check
SJS
+2.5
goals above expected
SJS3.47 expected · 6 scored
Expected
Scored
NYR3.09 expected · 5 scored
Expected
Scored

The Sharks scored 2.5 more than their chances were worth. That does not repeat.

PDO = sh% + sv% · drifts to 1.000 over a season
Every goal, in order
  1. P1 01:58SJSA. Gaudette1–0
  2. P1 06:17SJSM. CelebriniPP2–0
  3. P1 14:19NYRT. Raddysh2–1
  4. P1 19:51SJSM. Celebrini3–1
  5. P2 04:04NYRM. ZibanejadPP3–2
  6. P2 06:47NYRJ. Parssinen3–3
  7. P2 12:10NYRT. RaddyshSH3–4
+4 more on the full breakdown
NHL play-by-play · chance value from our xG model
Where the shots came from
SJS
35 shots
6
Final
77 shots
NYR
42 shots
5
SJS attackNYR attack
SJS NYR Goal
35
shots · 6 in
42
shots · 5 in
Every unblocked shot · press play to replay it
Chances by danger
SJSNYR
3 / 8
2.16 xG
High danger
0 / 5
1.13 xG
3 / 7
0.69 xG
Medium
3 / 14
1.38 xG
0 / 31
0.62 xG
Low
2 / 44
0.57 xG

The Rangers went 0 for 5 from the slot.

Danger tiers by our xG model · high ≥ 20% chance
In the net
F
A. Nedeljkovic
−1.9
SJS · 23/28
F
I. Shesterkin
−2.5
NYR · 18/24
The numbers, checked
BACKCHECK

Sharks edge the Rangers in overtime

A model, not a newsroom. Every number on these frames comes from the NHL's play-by-play and our own models. Nothing was watched, guessed or heard from anyone.

Read the full breakdown
backcheckreport.com
01 / 08 · Final
Every goal, in order

How it happened

NHL play-by-play
1stshots 9–5
  1. 01:58SJSA. Gaudette(C. Graf, M. Misa)1–0
  2. 06:17SJSM. Celebrinipower play(W. Eklund, D. Orlov)2–0
  3. 14:19NYRT. Raddysh(S. Carrick, C. Soucy)2–1
  4. 19:51SJSM. Celebrini(W. Smith, W. Eklund)3–1
2ndshots 10–14
  1. 04:04NYRM. Zibanejadpower play(A. Lafrenière, J. Miller)3–2
  2. 06:47NYRJ. Parssinen(C. Sheary)3–3
  3. 12:10NYRT. Raddyshshorthanded3–4
  4. 19:54SJSM. Celebrini(W. Smith, D. Orlov)4–4
3rdshots 3–8
  1. 06:31SJSW. Smith(W. Eklund, M. Celebrini)5–4
  2. 11:50NYRT. Raddysh(J. Miller, A. Fox)5–5
OTshots 2–1
  1. 01:38SJSW. Smith(M. Celebrini, A. Nedeljkovic)6–5

score reads SJS–NYR

Source · NHL play-by-play (api-web.nhle.com)
Process vs result

The numbers

XGBoost xG · NHL play-by-play
3.47
SJS chances
Goals their shots were worth
+2.5
Finishing
Goals above what those chances were worth
1.051
SJS puck luck
Above 1.000 — the bounces went their way
42.2%
Shot attempts
Under half — they were outshot
Split by club

Who controlled the game

3.47Expected goals3.09
SJS 53% of the chance quality
24Shots on goal28
8High-danger chances5
46All attempts (Corsi)63
Adjusted for score: SJS 40% · NYR 60%
Faceoffs · NYR won64%off65%neu31%def
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG
How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
SJS3 / 8 · 2.16 xG
NYR0 / 5 · 1.13 xG
Medium dangermid-range
SJS3 / 7 · 0.69 xG
NYR3 / 14 · 1.38 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
SJS0 / 31 · 0.62 xG
NYR2 / 44 · 0.57 xG

SJS went 3-for-7 from medium danger on 0.69 expected goals — 2.3 above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
SJS
6 G · 3.47 xG · +2.5
NYR
5 G · 3.09 xG · +1.9
01234567

SJS finished +2.5 against expected, NYR +1.9.

Source · Backcheck xG model
Shot types · rush and rebound chancesopen +
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
SJS
WRIST4/20
SNAP1/5
SLAP1/8
DEFLECTED0/1
TIP IN0/1
BACKHAND0/0
OTHER0/11
NYR
WRIST3/18
SNAP1/10
SLAP1/6
DEFLECTED0/4
TIP IN0/3
BACKHAND0/1
OTHER0/21
SJS
NYR
Off the rush
2 G on 22
2.11 xG
4 G on 26
2.39 xG
Off rebounds
1 G on 2
0.59 xG
0 G on 1
0.05 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: SJS went 4-for-20, NYR 3-for-18. NYR scored 4 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
New to these numbers?

Two things happened in this game: who created the better chances, and who put the puck in the net. They are not the same thing, and this page separates them on purpose.

The one to watch is expected goals— the best single read on who deserved to win. When it disagrees with the scoreboard, that disagreement is usually the story. Nothing here is a projection; every figure is computed from this game's play-by-play. Full glossary →

xG
Expected goals. Every shot scored by how often that exact look goes in. 2.5 xG means the chances were worth about two and a half goals.
HD
High-danger chances — shots from the slot and the crease, where shots actually become goals.
Corsi
Every shot attempt, including the ones that missed or got blocked. A rough read on who had the puck.
Adj.
Score-adjusted. Teams that trail shoot more and teams that lead sit back, so this corrects the attempt count for the scoreboard.
GSAx
Goals saved above expected. A positive number means the goalie stopped more than an average goalie would have on those shots.
PDO
Shooting % plus save % — a luck gauge. It sits near 1.000 over a season, so a game far from it usually means the bounces decided it.
Shot by shot

In the net

Graded on goals saved above expected
A. Nedeljkovic
SJS · 23/28 · .821
-1.9
saved above expected
F
the night
By dangerG/attxGsaved
High danger0/51.1+1.1
Medium3/141.4-1.6
Low2/440.6-1.4

A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

I. Shesterkin
NYR · 18/24 · .750
-2.5
saved above expected
F
the night
By dangerG/attxGsaved
High danger3/82.2-0.8
Medium3/70.7-2.3
Low0/310.6+0.6

A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

77 shots · press play to watch the game back

Where the shots came from

NHL play-by-play coordinates
SJS
35 shots
6
Final
77 shots
NYR
42 shots
5
SJS attackNYR attack
SJS NYR Goal

Each club shoots toward its own end — SJS left, NYR right — the way you would watch it. A dot's size is how dangerous the look was, from distance and angle; it is a proxy for shot quality, not the xG model the article is written from. Hover a dot for the shooter and the clock.

Ranked from the box score

Three stars

Points first
Three stars · computed, not voted
M. Celebrini
#71 · C · SJS
3 G · 2 A · 5 SOG · 22:40 on ice · +2
W. Smith
#2 · C · SJS
2 G · 2 A · 2 SOG · 19:40 on ice · +2
W. Eklund
#72 · L · SJS
0 G · 3 A · 4 SOG · 20:51 on ice · -1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model said beforehand

Before the game

Written Thu, Oct 23
Open the pre-game read
Written from the numbers

The read

Edited for clarity
◆ By the ModelJul 11, 12:51 PMEdited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

The model projects a 2.4–2.5 goal game with New York at 53% win probability. That's as close to a coin flip as the numbers get. San Jose arrives wounded: minus-16 in goal differential over the last ten signals a team that's collapsing, not just variance-unlucky.

The underlying rate statistics are nearly identical. Both teams generate 48.0% xG at even strength. San Jose lags slightly in puck possession (47.0 Corsi% vs. New York's 49.0%), but luck margins offset the imbalance. The Sharks' 0.998 PDO sits below parity, suggesting positive regression; the Rangers' 1.009 shows they're running hot.

San Jose loses Pavol Regenda to an inactive listing, forcing Igor Chernyshov into the focal-point role for an offense already underwater. New York must contain Chernyshov, while San Jose must account for Adam Sykora's efficiency and Gabe Perreault's secondary involvement. Defensively, San Jose leaks through Chernyshov; New York's weak link is Vincent Iorio.

Players to Watch

San Jose

  • Pavol Regenda — 1.10 xG/60, 5G 1A, 2 HD goals, 16.1% shooting
  • Igor Chernyshov — 0.91 xG/60, 6G 8A, 1 HD goal, 15.0% shooting

New York

  • Adam Sykora — 0.91 xG/60, 3G 1A, 20.0% shooting
  • Gabe Perreault — 0.79 xG/60, 8G 11A, 2 HD goals, 13.1% shooting

Neither offense generates high-danger chances or rebounds at meaningful rates. Both carry 0% HD goal rates and 0% rebound rates, flattening the playmaking premium. This is a possession game masquerading as a skill contest—marginal edges in puck control and individual finishing decide it.

What the model said beforehand

The model's lean

NYR 53%
53%
NYR
Model favorite
47%
53%
SJS50NYR

NYR by 6 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score SJS 2.4–2.5 NYR; 19% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season rates · 5v5

Tale of the tape

NHL stats API · our xG
SJS← edge
edge →NYR
48.0%48.0%
47.0%49.0%
2.332.26
2.562.40
1.991.88
2.321.90
0.9981.009

NYR holds 4 of 6 process categories — and the luck row (0.998 vs 1.009) says NYR has been getting the bounces, which tends not to last.

Source · NHL stats API + our xG · 5v5
Form · Last 10
SJS
1-7-2
-16 GD · 2d rest
NYR
3-6-1
-4 GD · 3d rest
0.998
SJS PDO
Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
1.009
NYR PDO
Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
What decides it

Keys to the game

Things to watch
  • The Sharks are underwater at -16 goal differential over their last 10.
Last game's lineup · confirmed at warm-up

Lineups

NHL box score
SJS
Expected in goal
Y. Askarov
2 days rest.852 last start
Backup Yaroslav Askarov · -18.9 GSAx this season

No completed game on file for this club yet.

NYR
Expected in goal
I. Shesterkin
3 days rest.935 last start
Backup Igor Shesterkin · +21.3 GSAx this season

No completed game on file for this club yet.

Lineups are the players who dressed in each club's last game, with their minutes; clubs confirm tonight's at warm-up. Every player this preview names was in that lineup.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

NHL stats API · our xG
SJS
Pavol Regenda5G 1A
1.10 xG/60 · 2 HD · 16.1% sh
Igor Chernyshov6G 8A
0.91 xG/60 · 1 HD · 15.0% sh
NYR
Adam Sykora3G 1A
0.91 xG/60 · 0 HD · 20.0% sh
Gabe Perreault8G 11A
0.79 xG/60 · 2 HD · 13.1% sh
Keep going

Where to next