Backcheck
Recap · CAR at COL

Hurricanes steal one from the Avalanche against the run of play

The Hurricanes stole one. They lost the expected-goals battle 2.78–6.08 and won anyway.

By the ModelJul 12, 1:20 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
CAR
Carolina Hurricanes
5
Home
COL
Colorado Avalanche
4
FINAL / OT
Process vs result

The underlying story

2.78Expected goals6.08
69% share for the better side
31Shot attempts (SOG)48
2High-danger chances10
54Corsi (all attempts)81
Score-adjusted: 36% / 64%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

Colorado dominated this game by every measure except the scoreboard. The Hurricanes won 5-4 in a shootout despite being outshot 48-31 and generating just 2.78 expected goals to the Avalanche's 6.08—a 69-31 xG split that should have produced a comfortable Colorado victory.

Instead, Carolina executed a heist. F. Andersen was exceptional, stopping 44 of 48 shots and saving 2.08 goals above expected. S. Wedgewood faced 11 shots and allowed 3.02 more goals than expected—a clear mismatch. T. Miner took over in relief, stopping everything and adding 1.79 goals above expected.

Colorado created far higher-quality chances: 0.075 expected goals per shot versus Carolina's 0.051. The Avalanche generated 10 high-danger opportunities to Carolina's 2 and were lethal on the rush, scoring twice on 42 chances. But Carolina was surgical in transition, converting 3 of 18 rush attempts.

Colorado underperformed their expected goals by 2.1 goals—a devastating inefficiency against a team that overperformed by 2.22. S. Jarvis's wrist shot from the doorstep ended it in the shootout, converting what should have been a comfortable Colorado win into a theft.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
CAR2 / 2 · 0.46 xG
COL2 / 10 · 2.34 xG
Medium dangermid-range
CAR1 / 12 · 1.61 xG
COL1 / 27 · 2.96 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
CAR1 / 40 · 0.71 xG
COL1 / 44 · 0.79 xG

COL went 1-for-27 from medium danger on 2.96 expected goals — 2.0 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
CAR
5 G · 2.78 xG · +2.2
COL
4 G · 6.08 xG · -2.1
01234567
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
F. AndersenCAR
+2.1
S. WedgewoodCOL
-3.0
T. MinerCOL
+1.8

CAR finished +2.2 against expected, COL -2.1 — S. Wedgewood (COL) allowed 3.0 more goals than expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
CAR
WRIST1/21
BACKHAND1/8
SNAP1/4
SLAP0/4
TIP IN0/1
BAT0/1
WRAP AROUND0/1
DEFLECTED1/1
OTHER0/13
COL
WRIST1/34
BACKHAND1/7
SNAP1/10
SLAP0/9
TIP IN0/3
BAT0/3
WRAP AROUND0/2
DEFLECTED1/1
OTHER0/12
CAR
COL
Off the rush
3 G on 18 · 1.38 xG
2 G on 42 · 3.93 xG
Off rebounds
1 G on 5 · 0.70 xG
1 G on 7 · 0.96 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: CAR went 1-for-21, COL 1-for-34. CAR scored 3 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
S. Jarvis
#24 · R · CAR
1 G · 1 A · 5 SOG · 23:01 TOI
V. Nichushkin
#13 · R · COL
2 G · 0 A · 7 SOG · 22:05 TOI
C. Makar
#8 · D · COL
0 G · 1 A · 4 SOG · 28:30 TOI
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • CAR stole this one. COL owned 69% of the xG and lost.
  • F. Andersen (CAR) stopped 2.1 goals above expected.
  • S. Wedgewood (COL) gave up 3.0 goals more than expected — well below their workload.
  • COL generated far more dangerous chances — 0.075 xG/shot vs 0.051. Quality over quantity.
  • COL was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 42 rush chances.
  • CAR was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 18 rush chances.
  • COL created 7 rebound opportunities (1 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • CAR created 5 rebound opportunities (1 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • COL underperformed xG by 2.1 — wasted quality chances.
  • F. Andersen (CAR) saved 2.1 goals above expected — stole the show.
  • T. Miner (COL) saved 2.8 goals above expected — stole the show.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · CAR at COL · 9:00 PM ET

Hurricanes at Avalanche: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 11, 12:55 PMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

53%
COL
Model favorite
47%
53%
CAR50COL

COL by 6 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score CAR 2.62.8 COL; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

CAR← edge
edge →COL
56.0%5v5 xG%57.0%
60.0%Corsi%57.0%
2.98xGF / 603.03
2.31xGA / 602.30
2.26Goals for / gm2.63
1.95Goals against / gm1.56
0.984PDO — luck, not skill1.021

COL holds 5 of 6 process categories — and PDO (0.984 vs 1.021) says COL has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model projects a 2.6-2.8 COL game with the Avalanche holding 53% win probability—as close to even as a prediction gets.

Carolina's territorial edge is clear: a 60.0% Corsi rating will tilt play in their direction. Colorado answers with a 57.0% xG%, suggesting they make their chances count. Carolina's 56.0% xG% is sharp but leaves room for variance, and variance will decide a game this close.

Puck luck is the invisible force here. Colorado's 1.021 PDO means both goaltending and shooting are running hot—expect that to regress. Carolina's 0.984 is the inverse: the Hurricanes are performing below their bases and due for a bounce. These gaps matter in a tight game.

S. Wedgewood faces a back-to-back, muddying the goaltending picture. Whether he starts tired or a backup gets the call, that situation bears watching.

Jackson Blake is Carolina's primary offensive engine at 1.06 xG/60 with 14G and a 10.9% shooting rate (2 HD goals). Stopping him is Colorado's defensive priority. Seth Jarvis (17G, 11.9% shooting, 0.98 xG/60) is the secondary threat.

Colorado's best player is Artturi Lehkonen: 1.11 xG/60, 18G, and a 14.9% shooting rate driven by his 6 HD goals. He's finding high-danger looks consistently. Ross Colton (1.10 xG/60, 7G, 4.9% shooting) generates similar opportunity with fewer goals.

Both teams sit at 0% HD goal rate and 0% rebound goal rate, meaning neither has found a sustainable secondary scoring channel. Whoever breaks that pattern first may break the game open.

Defensively, Carolina shows weakness through Charles Alexis Legault; Colorado leans on Nazem Kadri as a liability. Both will face pressure.

Corsi favors the Hurricanes. Puck luck favors the Avalanche. Everything else is noise.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

CAR
Jackson Blake14G 19A
1.06 xG/60 · 2 HD · 10.9% sh
Seth Jarvis17G 12A
0.98 xG/60 · 1 HD · 11.9% sh
COL
Artturi Lehkonen18G 22A
1.11 xG/60 · 6 HD · 14.9% sh
Ross Colton7G 15A
1.10 xG/60 · 1 HD · 4.9% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters