Motion-blurred skater in a blue sweater
Breakdown · NYR at EDM

Rangers edge the Oilers in overtime

The verdict · stolen

The Rangers stole one. They lost the expected-goals battle 3.89–4.32 and won anyway.

NYR 4 · EDM 3
◆ By the ModelJul 11, 1:55 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

The Rangers' 4–3 overtime victory masked a game where the Oilers controlled the underlying metrics—and left real points on the ice through a combination of their own underperformance and I. Shesterkin's excellence.

Edmonton generated 4.32 expected goals to New York's 3.89, a 53–47 advantage. The Oilers also won the high-danger chances, 6–3, and held 51% of shot attempts (36–35 on goal). By every structural measure, this was an Oilers game. By the scoreboard, it wasn't.

The breakdown: Edmonton underperformed their xG by 1.32 goals—they received chances worth 4.32 goals and converted only three. Meanwhile, I. Shesterkin stopped 1.3 goals above his expected mark, posting a 0.917 save percentage despite Edmonton's high-quality assault. On the other end, S. Skinner recorded 31 saves on 35 shots (0.886 SV%).

The Oilers' rush game became their undoing. They scored just twice on 34 rush attempts. The Rangers, by contrast, buried four on 32 attempts, and when they crashed the net for rebounds, they generated four opportunities (though converted none).

J.T. Miller ended it with a wrist shot from the slot at 02:49 of overtime, converting the single chance that mattered most.

Three Stars

  • #25 D. Nurse (EDM) — 2G in 21:00
  • #4 B. Schneider (NYR) — 1G, 1A in 20:48
  • #96 J. Walman (EDM) — 2A in 18:42

Final: NYR 4 – EDM 3 (OT)

The breakdown in twelve frames

Swipe it

Every number is from this page
Final · OT · Oct 30
NYR
4
EDM
3

Rangers edge the Oilers in overtime

Chances 3.9 – 4.3Did they deserve it? →
Did they deserve it?

The Oilers deserved better.

Expected goals · chance value
NYR
3.89
EDM
4.32
47% of the chances53%

The board read NYR 4, EDM 3. The chances read NYR 3.9, EDM 4.3.

Our xG model · NHL play-by-play · all situations
Luck check
NYR
+0.1
goals above expected
NYR3.89 expected · 4 scored
Expected
Scored
EDM4.32 expected · 3 scored
Expected
Scored

Both sides finished close to what their chances were worth. This one was earned on the ice.

PDO = sh% + sv% · drifts to 1.000 over a season
Every goal, in order
  1. P1 05:44NYRJ. Brodzinski1–0
  2. P1 06:51EDMD. Nurse1–1
  3. P2 08:48EDMM. SavoiePP1–2
  4. P2 10:24EDMD. Nurse1–3
  5. P3 08:18NYRB. Schneider2–3
  6. P3 12:04NYRT. Raddysh3–3
  7. OT 02:49NYRJ. Miller4–3
NHL play-by-play · chance value from our xG model
Where the shots came from
NYR
52 shots
4
Final
97 shots
EDM
45 shots
3
NYR attackEDM attack
NYR EDM Goal
52
shots · 4 in
45
shots · 3 in
Every unblocked shot · press play to replay it
Chances by danger
NYREDM
1 / 3
0.72 xG
High danger
2 / 6
1.85 xG
3 / 22
2.52 xG
Medium
1 / 16
1.81 xG
0 / 40
0.64 xG
Low
0 / 37
0.66 xG

High-danger looks: NYR 1 of 3, EDM 2 of 6.

Danger tiers by our xG model · high ≥ 20% chance
In the net
B+
I. Shesterkin
+1.3
NYR · 33/36
C
S. Skinner
−0.1
EDM · 31/35
The numbers, checked
BACKCHECK

Rangers edge the Oilers in overtime

A model, not a newsroom. Every number on these frames comes from the NHL's play-by-play and our own models. Nothing was watched, guessed or heard from anyone.

Read the full breakdown
backcheckreport.com
01 / 08 · Final
Every goal, in order

How it happened

NHL play-by-play
1stshots 16–10
  1. 05:44NYRJ. Brodzinski1–0
  2. 06:51EDMD. Nurse(J. Walman, J. Roslovic)1–1
2ndshots 8–14
  1. 08:48EDMM. Savoiepower play(A. Henrique, L. Draisaitl)1–2
  2. 10:24EDMD. Nurse(I. Howard, J. Walman)1–3
3rdshots 10–9
  1. 08:18NYRB. Schneider(W. Cuylle, U. Vaakanainen)2–3
  2. 12:04NYRT. Raddysh(C. Sheary)3–3
OTshots 1–3
  1. 02:49NYRJ. Miller(B. Schneider, A. Lafrenière)4–3

score reads NYR–EDM

Source · NHL play-by-play (api-web.nhle.com)
Process vs result

The numbers

XGBoost xG · NHL play-by-play
3.89
NYR chances
Goals their shots were worth
+0.1
Finishing
Goals above what those chances were worth
1.011
NYR puck luck
About 1.000 — a normal night for bounces
52.4%
Shot attempts
Over half — they had the puck more
Split by club

Who controlled the game

3.89Expected goals4.32
EDM 53% of the chance quality
35Shots on goal36
3High-danger chances6
65All attempts (Corsi)59
Adjusted for score: NYR 54% · EDM 46%
Faceoffs · EDM won40%off56%neu47%def
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG
How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
NYR1 / 3 · 0.72 xG
EDM2 / 6 · 1.85 xG
Medium dangermid-range
NYR3 / 22 · 2.52 xG
EDM1 / 16 · 1.81 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
NYR0 / 40 · 0.64 xG
EDM0 / 37 · 0.66 xG

EDM went 1-for-16 from medium danger on 1.81 expected goals — 0.8 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
NYR
4 G · 3.89 xG · +0.1
EDM
3 G · 4.32 xG · -1.3
012345

NYR finished +0.1 against expected, EDM -1.3.

Source · Backcheck xG model
Shot types · rush and rebound chancesopen +
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
NYR
WRIST3/29
SNAP0/3
TIP IN0/11
SLAP0/3
BACKHAND1/5
DEFLECTED0/1
OTHER0/13
EDM
WRIST0/18
SNAP2/12
TIP IN0/4
SLAP0/6
BACKHAND0/4
DEFLECTED1/1
OTHER0/14
NYR
EDM
Off the rush
4 G on 32
2.53 xG
2 G on 34
3.71 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 4
0.54 xG
1 G on 1
0.42 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: NYR went 3-for-29, EDM 0-for-18. NYR scored 4 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
New to these numbers?

Two things happened in this game: who created the better chances, and who put the puck in the net. They are not the same thing, and this page separates them on purpose.

The one to watch is expected goals— the best single read on who deserved to win. When it disagrees with the scoreboard, that disagreement is usually the story. Nothing here is a projection; every figure is computed from this game's play-by-play. Full glossary →

xG
Expected goals. Every shot scored by how often that exact look goes in. 2.5 xG means the chances were worth about two and a half goals.
HD
High-danger chances — shots from the slot and the crease, where shots actually become goals.
Corsi
Every shot attempt, including the ones that missed or got blocked. A rough read on who had the puck.
Adj.
Score-adjusted. Teams that trail shoot more and teams that lead sit back, so this corrects the attempt count for the scoreboard.
GSAx
Goals saved above expected. A positive number means the goalie stopped more than an average goalie would have on those shots.
PDO
Shooting % plus save % — a luck gauge. It sits near 1.000 over a season, so a game far from it usually means the bounces decided it.
Shot by shot

In the net

Graded on goals saved above expected
I. Shesterkin
NYR · 33/36 · .917
+1.3
saved above expected
B+
the night
By dangerG/attxGsaved
High danger2/61.9-0.1
Medium1/161.8+0.8
Low0/370.7+0.7

A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

S. Skinner
EDM · 31/35 · .886
-0.1
saved above expected
C
the night
By dangerG/attxGsaved
High danger1/30.7-0.3
Medium3/222.5-0.5
Low0/400.6+0.6

A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

97 shots · press play to watch the game back

Where the shots came from

NHL play-by-play coordinates
NYR
52 shots
4
Final
97 shots
EDM
45 shots
3
NYR attackEDM attack
NYR EDM Goal

Each club shoots toward its own end — NYR left, EDM right — the way you would watch it. A dot's size is how dangerous the look was, from distance and angle; it is a proxy for shot quality, not the xG model the article is written from. Hover a dot for the shooter and the clock.

Ranked from the box score

Three stars

Points first
Three stars · computed, not voted
D. Nurse
#25 · D · EDM
2 G · 0 A · 4 SOG · 21:00 on ice · +1
B. Schneider
#4 · D · NYR
1 G · 1 A · 1 SOG · 20:48 on ice · +2
J. Walman
#96 · D · EDM
0 G · 2 A · 1 SOG · 18:42 on ice · +1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model said beforehand

Before the game

Written Thu, Oct 30
Open the pre-game read
Written from the numbers

The read

Edited for clarity
◆ By the ModelJul 11, 2:23 PMEdited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

The model gives Edmonton a 55% win probability in a projected 2.4–2.6 game. That edge rests on clean underlying play, but one variable clouds the forecast: regression.

Edmonton controls the shot equation convincingly. They own 52.0% expected goals versus New York's 48.0%, and nearly identical Corsi supremacy at 50.0% to 49.0%. The Oilers are winning possession and shot quality consistently. Yet their 0.982 PDO—a luck-adjusted metric of actual goals versus expected—reveals they're underperforming their shot talent. When PDO regresses upward, Edmonton's already-slim edge widens.

New York's 1.009 PDO is the counterpoint: the Rangers are running hotter than underlying numbers suggest.

Goaltending adds noise. S. Skinner and J. Quick are both on back-to-backs, creating a coin flip: either a backup appears, or the starter plays on fumes. Whichever team avoids the tired-goalie trap gains a meaningful edge.

Offensively, the talent distribution is lopsided. Zach Hyman leads Edmonton's offense at 1.23 xG/60, translating into 14 goals and 13 assists on a sharp 13.0% shooting rate with one high-danger goal. Connor McDavid's 0.92 xG/60 understates his role: 25 goals and 33 assists with five high-danger tallies represent the engine that will force New York into reactive defense.

New York's attack profiles differently. Adam Sykora operates at 0.91 xG/60 with a remarkable 20.0% shooting rate (3 goals in limited looks), indicating shot quality mastery. Gabe Perreault's 0.79 xG/60 and 13.1% shooting pace yield 8 goals and 2 high-danger tallies—he's finding premium locations despite lower creation volume.

Defensively, both teams have liabilities. Jake Walman is Edmonton's weak link; Vincent Iorio is New York's. The model assumes neither team fully exploits these avenues, but if either side executes the transition game, these names become the first pressure points.

The model's lean is sound: Edmonton's possession edge, even discounting for PDO regression, should prevail. The 55% probability already prices in regress-to-mean luck. Watch for tired goaltending to accelerate that margin.

What the model said beforehand

The model's lean

EDM 55%
55%
EDM
Model favorite
45%
55%
NYR50EDM

EDM by 10 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score NYR 2.4–2.6 EDM; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season rates · 5v5

Tale of the tape

NHL stats API · our xG
NYR← edge
edge →EDM
48.0%52.0%
49.0%50.0%
2.262.64
2.402.47
1.882.13
1.902.29
1.0090.982

EDM holds 4 of 6 process categories — and the luck row (1.009 vs 0.982) says NYR has been getting the bounces, which tends not to last.

Source · NHL stats API + our xG · 5v5
Form · Last 10
NYR
4-4-2
+1 GD · 1d rest
EDM
5-4-1
+1 GD · 1d rest
1.009
NYR PDO
Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
0.982
EDM PDO
Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
What decides it

Keys to the game

Where the edges live
  • The Oilers own the underlying play — 52.0% 5v5 xG vs 48.0%.
Regression watch
  • The Oilers' PDO is 0.982 — running cold, due for positive regression.
Things to watch
  • The Oilers own the underlying play — 52.0% 5v5 xG vs 48.0%.
  • S. Skinner is on a back-to-back — watch for a backup start or a tired starter.
  • J. Quick is on a back-to-back — watch for a backup start or a tired starter.
  • The Oilers' PDO is 0.982 — running cold, due for positive regression.
Last game's lineup · confirmed at warm-up

Lineups

NHL box score
NYR
Expected in goal
J. Quick
back-to-back1.000 last start
Backup Igor Shesterkin · +21.3 GSAx this season
Back-to-back: the backup often gets this one. Treat the starter as unconfirmed.

No completed game on file for this club yet.

EDM
Expected in goal
S. Skinner
back-to-back.870 last start
Backup Connor Ingram · +1.7 GSAx this season
Back-to-back: the backup often gets this one. Treat the starter as unconfirmed.

No completed game on file for this club yet.

Lineups are the players who dressed in each club's last game, with their minutes; clubs confirm tonight's at warm-up. Every player this preview names was in that lineup.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

NHL stats API · our xG
NYR
Adam Sykora3G 1A
0.91 xG/60 · 0 HD · 20.0% sh
Gabe Perreault8G 11A
0.79 xG/60 · 2 HD · 13.1% sh
EDM
Zach Hyman14G 13A
1.23 xG/60 · 1 HD · 13.0% sh
Connor McDavid25G 33A
0.92 xG/60 · 5 HD · 13.7% sh
Keep going

Where to next