Backcheck
Recap · STL at WSH

Capitals pull away from the Blues

The Capitals earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

By the ModelJul 11, 2:41 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
STL
St. Louis Blues
1
Home
WSH
Washington Capitals
6
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

3.07Expected goals4.60
60% share for the better side
24Shot attempts (SOG)32
5High-danger chances7
51Corsi (all attempts)70
Score-adjusted: 48% / 53%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

Washington's 6–1 victory masked a much tighter underlying battle. Expected goals favored the Capitals 4.60–3.07 (a 60–40 split), yet they won by five. Goaltending performance and execution gaps created the gulf.

The Capitals dominated tactically. They held 57% of shot attempts (32–24) and 60% of 5v5 expected goals. High-danger chances split 7–5 in their favor. On underlying metrics, this was a 4–3 or 5–2 game at most.

Execution is where the scoreline exploded. J. Binnington (11/15 saves, 0.733 SV%) conceded 1.8 goals above expected—unsustainable against this volume. St. Louis couldn't finish: 0 for 5 on high-danger chances, squandering their most dangerous looks.

Washington's complementary play amplified the damage. L. Thompson (23/24 saves, 0.958 SV%) stopped 2.07 more than expected and was impenetrable on high-danger shots (5-for-5). The Capitals were lethal off the rush (4 goals on 36 chances) and aggressive on rebounds (2 conversions on 4 created).

Tom Wilson's snap shot from the slot (third period, 09:00) was the dagger.

J. Chychrun orchestrated with 3 assists. J. Carlson (1G, 1A) and A. Beauvillier (2G) supplied the bulk of the finishing.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
STL0 / 5 · 1.20 xG
WSH1 / 7 · 1.59 xG
Medium dangermid-range
STL1 / 14 · 1.48 xG
WSH4 / 20 · 2.49 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
STL0 / 32 · 0.38 xG
WSH1 / 43 · 0.53 xG

WSH went 4-for-20 from medium danger on 2.49 expected goals — 1.5 above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
STL
1 G · 3.07 xG · -2.1
WSH
6 G · 4.60 xG · +1.4
01234567
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
J. HoferSTL
+0.4
J. BinningtonSTL
-1.8
L. ThompsonWSH
+2.1

STL finished -2.1 against expected, WSH +1.4 — L. Thompson (WSH) saved 2.1 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
STL
SNAP0/20
SLAP0/6
TIP IN0/2
BACKHAND1/4
WRIST0/3
BAT0/1
DEFLECTED0/0
OTHER0/15
WSH
SNAP3/28
SLAP0/3
TIP IN1/6
BACKHAND2/4
WRIST0/3
BAT0/0
DEFLECTED0/1
OTHER0/25
STL
WSH
Off the rush
0 G on 24 · 2.12 xG
4 G on 36 · 3.87 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 3 · 0.53 xG
2 G on 4 · 0.64 xG

Snap shots carried the volume: STL went 0-for-20, WSH 3-for-28. WSH scored 4 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
J. Chychrun
#6 · D · WSH
0 G · 3 A · 3 SOG · 22:47 TOI · +3
J. Carlson
#74 · D · WSH
1 G · 1 A · 3 SOG · 21:05 TOI · +1
A. Beauvillier
#72 · R · WSH
2 G · 0 A · 2 SOG · 15:10 TOI · +3
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • L. Thompson (WSH) stopped 2.1 goals above expected.
  • J. Binnington (STL) gave up 1.8 goals more than expected — well below their workload.
  • STL couldn't convert — 0/5 on high-danger chances. That won't happen often.
  • WSH was lethal off the rush — 4 goals on 36 rush chances.
  • WSH created 4 rebound opportunities (2 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • STL created 3 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • STL underperformed xG by 2.1 — wasted quality chances.
  • J. Hofer (STL) saved 2.6 goals above expected — stole the show.
  • L. Thompson (WSH) saved 2.1 goals above expected — stole the show.
  • L. Thompson was a wall on HD chances — 100% SV on 5 high-danger shots.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · STL at WSH · 7:30 PM ET

Blues at Capitals: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 11, 2:40 PMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

53%
WSH
Model favorite
47%
53%
STL50WSH

WSH by 6 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score STL 2.52.6 WSH; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

STL← edge
edge →WSH
49.0%5v5 xG%50.0%
48.0%Corsi%49.0%
2.34xGF / 602.62
2.40xGA / 602.62
2.00Goals for / gm2.18
2.12Goals against / gm1.79
1.000PDO — luck, not skill1.018

WSH holds 5 of 6 process categories — and PDO (1.000 vs 1.018) says WSH has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model projects a 2.5- to 2.6-goal game with Washington favored at 53%—essentially a pick'em. The underlying numbers confirm it: both teams sit in the narrow middle of the league, and the winner will be whichever executes on its few scoring chances.

Washington arrives as the hotter team. The Capitals are 5-4-1 in their last 10 games; St. Louis is -16 in goal differential over the same span. But the underlying play is nearly identical. Washington owns 50.0% expected goals and 49.0% Corsi at 5v5 this season, compared to St. Louis's 49.0% xG% and 48.0% Corsi. Neither team dominates possession or chance creation. The Capitals' 1.018 PDO suggests they're running hot—expect some regression—but the margin is modest enough that variance alone won't decide it.

Washington holds a tangible rest edge: four days since their last game versus St. Louis's one. That compounds in the third period, when tired legs lead to softer coverage. J. Binnington bears watching; the Blues may start a backup if he's worn from recent duty, or field a starter who hasn't fully recovered between starts. Goaltending will be the tiebreaker in this evenly matched game.

St. Louis will lean on its top two forwards to generate scoring opportunities; Washington will counter with elite finishing and secondary depth. Whichever team's stars stay engaged—and whichever goalie makes the crucial stops—will escape with the narrow win. The metrics are balanced and form is the only real differentiator.

Players to Watch

St. Louis

  • Jimmy Snuggerud — 0.86 xG/60, 15G 22A, 2 HD goals, 11.9% shooting
  • Dylan Holloway — 0.82 xG/60, 13G 24A, 1 HD goals, 10.8% shooting

Washington

  • Alex Ovechkin — 0.97 xG/60, 19G 17A, 2 HD goals, 13.8% shooting
  • Anthony Beauvillier — 0.89 xG/60, 14G 9A, 2 HD goals, 10.4% shooting
Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

STL
Jimmy Snuggerud15G 22A
0.86 xG/60 · 2 HD · 11.9% sh
Dylan Holloway13G 24A
0.82 xG/60 · 1 HD · 10.8% sh
WSH
Alex Ovechkin19G 17A
0.97 xG/60 · 2 HD · 13.8% sh
Anthony Beauvillier14G 9A
0.89 xG/60 · 2 HD · 10.4% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters