Motion-blurred skater in a Washington Capitals sweater
Breakdown · CBJ at WSH

Capitals pull away from the Blue Jackets

The verdict · earned

The Capitals earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

CBJ 1 · WSH 5
◆ By the ModelJul 11, 5:30 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

L. Thompson's performance explained the gap: Washington's 5–1 victory looked decisive but sat atop underlying metrics that suggested a closer contest. Expected goals gave the Capitals barely a 54–46 edge (3.44–2.91), yet the final margin was four.

The Capitals dominated shot volume, controlling 57% of attempts (31–23 on goal). They converted low-danger chances at rates that punished the opposing goalkeeper—two goals from spots E. Merzlikins should have closed out. Washington was also lethal in transition, scoring twice on 26 rush chances.

But the true separation lived in net. L. Thompson saved 1.9 goals above expected, converting a close underlying contest into a rout. E. Merzlikins surrendered 1.6 more than his workload warranted—an uncharacteristic poor outing for the otherwise reliable Columbus starter. The Blue Jackets generated five high-danger chances to Washington's three, yet scored once. Quality wasted.

J. Chychrun led the way with two goals in 24:54, while J. Carlson (1G, 1A in 19:41) and T. Wilson (1G, 1A in 17:39) added support. The three combined for four of Washington's five goals.

Columbus never recovered. The Blue Jackets' defeat wasn't about being outhustled—it was about variance compounding: out-shot, out-goaltended, and unable to convert the quality chances they did generate.

The breakdown in twelve frames

Swipe it

Every number is from this page
Final · Nov 24
CBJ
1
WSH
5

Capitals pull away from the Blue Jackets

Chances 2.9 – 3.4Did they deserve it? →
Did they deserve it?

The Capitals earned this one.

Expected goals · chance value
CBJ
2.91
WSH
3.44
46% of the chances54%

The board read CBJ 1, WSH 5. The chances read CBJ 2.9, WSH 3.4.

Our xG model · NHL play-by-play · all situations
Luck check
WSH
+1.6
goals above expected
WSH3.44 expected · 5 scored
Expected
Scored
CBJ2.91 expected · 1 scored
Expected
Scored

The Capitals scored 1.6 more than their chances were worth. That does not repeat.

PDO = sh% + sv% · drifts to 1.000 over a season
Every goal, in order
  1. P1 06:05WSHJ. Chychrun0–1
  2. P2 16:29WSHT. Wilson0–2
  3. P2 19:45WSHJ. ChychrunPP0–3
  4. P2 19:57WSHJ. Carlson0–4
  5. P3 04:05WSHM. Fehérváry0–5
  6. P3 05:50CBJD. Mateychuk1–5
NHL play-by-play · chance value from our xG model
Where the shots came from
CBJ
36 shots
1
Final
82 shots
WSH
46 shots
5
CBJ attackWSH attack
CBJ WSH Goal
36
shots · 1 in
46
shots · 5 in
Every unblocked shot · press play to replay it
Chances by danger
CBJWSH
1 / 5
1.20 xG
High danger
0 / 3
0.74 xG
0 / 10
1.22 xG
Medium
3 / 19
1.97 xG
0 / 36
0.48 xG
Low
2 / 34
0.74 xG

High-danger looks: CBJ 1 of 5, WSH 0 of 3.

Danger tiers by our xG model · high ≥ 20% chance
In the net
A
L. Thompson
+1.9
WSH · 22/23
F
E. Merzlikins
−1.6
CBJ · 26/31
The numbers, checked
BACKCHECK

Capitals pull away from the Blue Jackets

A model, not a newsroom. Every number on these frames comes from the NHL's play-by-play and our own models. Nothing was watched, guessed or heard from anyone.

Read the full breakdown
backcheckreport.com
01 / 08 · Final
Every goal, in order

How it happened

NHL play-by-play
1stshots 7–10
  1. 06:05WSHJ. Chychrun(R. Leonard, H. Lapierre)0–1
2ndshots 7–12
  1. 16:29WSHT. Wilson(A. Protas, J. Sourdif)0–2
  2. 19:45WSHJ. Chychrunpower play(T. Wilson)0–3
  3. 19:57WSHJ. Carlson(A. Ovechkin, J. Sourdif)0–4
3rdshots 9–9
  1. 04:05WSHM. Fehérváry(C. McMichael, J. Carlson)0–5
  2. 05:50CBJD. Mateychuk(B. Gaunce, J. Christiansen)1–5

score reads CBJ–WSH

Source · NHL play-by-play (api-web.nhle.com)
Process vs result

The numbers

XGBoost xG · NHL play-by-play
3.44
WSH chances
Goals their shots were worth
+1.6
Finishing
Goals above what those chances were worth
1.070
WSH puck luck
Above 1.000 — the bounces went their way
52.3%
Shot attempts
Over half — they had the puck more
Split by club

Who controlled the game

2.91Expected goals3.44
WSH 54% of the chance quality
23Shots on goal31
5High-danger chances3
51All attempts (Corsi)56
Adjusted for score: CBJ 53% · WSH 47%
Faceoffs · WSH won50%off33%neu50%def
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG
How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
CBJ1 / 5 · 1.20 xG
WSH0 / 3 · 0.74 xG
Medium dangermid-range
CBJ0 / 10 · 1.22 xG
WSH3 / 19 · 1.97 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
CBJ0 / 36 · 0.48 xG
WSH2 / 34 · 0.74 xG

WSH went 2-for-34 from low danger on 0.74 expected goals — 1.3 above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
CBJ
1 G · 2.91 xG · -1.9
WSH
5 G · 3.44 xG · +1.6
0123456

CBJ finished -1.9 against expected, WSH +1.6.

Source · Backcheck xG model
Shot types · rush and rebound chancesopen +
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
CBJ
SNAP1/22
SLAP0/7
WRIST0/1
BACKHAND0/4
TIP IN0/2
OTHER0/15
WSH
SNAP2/23
SLAP2/9
WRIST1/9
BACKHAND0/3
TIP IN0/2
OTHER0/10
CBJ
WSH
Off the rush
0 G on 23
1.33 xG
2 G on 26
2.07 xG
Off rebounds
1 G on 8
1.49 xG
0 G on 5
0.73 xG

Snap shots carried the volume: CBJ went 1-for-22, WSH 2-for-23. WSH scored 2 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
New to these numbers?

Two things happened in this game: who created the better chances, and who put the puck in the net. They are not the same thing, and this page separates them on purpose.

The one to watch is expected goals— the best single read on who deserved to win. When it disagrees with the scoreboard, that disagreement is usually the story. Nothing here is a projection; every figure is computed from this game's play-by-play. Full glossary →

xG
Expected goals. Every shot scored by how often that exact look goes in. 2.5 xG means the chances were worth about two and a half goals.
HD
High-danger chances — shots from the slot and the crease, where shots actually become goals.
Corsi
Every shot attempt, including the ones that missed or got blocked. A rough read on who had the puck.
Adj.
Score-adjusted. Teams that trail shoot more and teams that lead sit back, so this corrects the attempt count for the scoreboard.
GSAx
Goals saved above expected. A positive number means the goalie stopped more than an average goalie would have on those shots.
PDO
Shooting % plus save % — a luck gauge. It sits near 1.000 over a season, so a game far from it usually means the bounces decided it.
Shot by shot

In the net

Graded on goals saved above expected
E. Merzlikins
CBJ · 26/31 · .839
-1.6
saved above expected
F
the night
By dangerG/attxGsaved
High danger0/30.7+0.7
Medium3/192.0-1.0
Low2/340.7-1.3

A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

L. Thompson
WSH · 22/23 · .957
+1.9
saved above expected
A
the night
By dangerG/attxGsaved
High danger1/51.2+0.2
Medium0/101.2+1.2
Low0/360.5+0.5

A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

82 shots · press play to watch the game back

Where the shots came from

NHL play-by-play coordinates
CBJ
36 shots
1
Final
82 shots
WSH
46 shots
5
CBJ attackWSH attack
CBJ WSH Goal

Each club shoots toward its own end — CBJ left, WSH right — the way you would watch it. A dot's size is how dangerous the look was, from distance and angle; it is a proxy for shot quality, not the xG model the article is written from. Hover a dot for the shooter and the clock.

Ranked from the box score

Three stars

Points first
Three stars · computed, not voted
J. Chychrun
#6 · D · WSH
2 G · 0 A · 4 SOG · 24:54 on ice · +1
J. Carlson
#74 · D · WSH
1 G · 1 A · 5 SOG · 19:41 on ice · +3
T. Wilson
#43 · R · WSH
1 G · 1 A · 2 SOG · 17:39 on ice · +2
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model said beforehand

Before the game

Written Mon, Nov 24
Open the pre-game read
Written from the numbers

The read

Edited for clarity
◆ By the ModelJul 11, 5:32 PMEdited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

The model projects a CBJ 2.6–2.7 WSH game, making the Capitals precisely a 50% win probability—a pick'em with no lean.

Columbus shows structural superiority in underlying metrics: 52.0% expected goals and 51.0% Corsi. Yet they're -7 in goal differential over their last ten games, evidence that results lag underlying play. Washington counters with a 1.018 PDO that defies long-term sustainability; expect regression to pull the Capitals back.

C. Lindgren starts on a back-to-back. Watch whether the workload eases into a backup appearance or fatigue shows.

Boone Jenner leads Columbus with 11 goals, 21 assists, 0.98 xG/60, and 9.6% shooting. Mathieu Olivier follows with 12 goals and 13.3% shooting. Alex Ovechkin leads Washington with 19 goals, 17 assists, 0.97 xG/60, and 13.8% shooting. Anthony Beauvillier adds 14 goals at 10.4% shooting.

Defensively, Conor Garland represents Columbus's weakness; Declan Chisholm's play invites risk for Washington. The underlying metrics split this game evenly. Columbus's possession edge masks a team whose scoresheet lags its play; Washington's inflated PDO marks a team due for regression. Lindgren's fitness is the sole tactical variable. Absent injury, this stays a pick'em.

What the model said beforehand

The model's lean

WSH 51%
50%
WSH
Model favorite
50%
50%
CBJ50WSH

WSH by 0 points of win probability — effectively a coin flip. Projected score CBJ 2.6–2.7 WSH; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season rates · 5v5

Tale of the tape

NHL stats API · our xG
CBJ← edge
edge →WSH
52.0%50.0%
51.0%49.0%
2.632.62
2.432.62
2.122.18
1.981.79
1.0031.018

CBJ holds 4 of 6 process categories — and the luck row (1.003 vs 1.018) says WSH has been getting the bounces, which tends not to last.

Source · NHL stats API + our xG · 5v5
Form · Last 10
CBJ
4-3-3
-7 GD · 2d rest
WSH
5-4-1
+7 GD · 1d rest
1.003
CBJ PDO
Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
1.018
WSH PDO
Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
What decides it

Keys to the game

Regression watch
  • The Capitals' PDO is 1.018 — running hot, expect some regression.
Things to watch
  • C. Lindgren is on a back-to-back — watch for a backup start or a tired starter.
  • The Blue Jackets are underwater at -7 goal differential over their last 10.
  • The Capitals' PDO is 1.018 — running hot, expect some regression.
Last game's lineup · confirmed at warm-up

Lineups

NHL box score
CBJ
Expected in goal
J. Greaves
2 days rest.879 last start
Backup Jet Greaves · +16.5 GSAx this season

No completed game on file for this club yet.

WSH
Expected in goal
C. Lindgren
back-to-back.900 last start
Backup Logan Thompson · +29.3 GSAx this season
Back-to-back: the backup often gets this one. Treat the starter as unconfirmed.

No completed game on file for this club yet.

Lineups are the players who dressed in each club's last game, with their minutes; clubs confirm tonight's at warm-up. Every player this preview names was in that lineup.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

NHL stats API · our xG
CBJ
Boone Jenner11G 21A
0.98 xG/60 · 2 HD · 9.6% sh
Mathieu Olivier12G 9A
0.89 xG/60 · 1 HD · 13.3% sh
WSH
Alex Ovechkin19G 17A
0.97 xG/60 · 2 HD · 13.8% sh
Anthony Beauvillier14G 9A
0.89 xG/60 · 2 HD · 10.4% sh
Keep going

Where to next