Backcheck
Recap · COL at MIN

Wild edge the Avalanche in a shootout

The Wild earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

By the ModelJul 11, 5:53 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
COL
Colorado Avalanche
2
Home
MIN
Minnesota Wild
3
FINAL / OT
Process vs result

The underlying story

4.34Expected goals5.21
55% share for the better side
41Shot attempts (SOG)39
7High-danger chances9
83Corsi (all attempts)69
Score-adjusted: 55% / 45%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

Both goalies significantly outperformed expected—S. Wedgewood (COL) +3.21, J. Wallstedt (MIN) +2.34. A game this close to even—the Wild held a slight edge in expected goals (5.21–4.34) and high-danger chances (9–7), while shot attempts split nearly 50-50—hinged on goaltending, not team play.

The Wild generated higher-quality chances (0.075 xG per shot vs. the Avalanche's 0.052), converting twice on the rush from 35 chances. The Avalanche also scored twice on 33 rush attempts. The Wild created 7 rebound opportunities but converted none; the Avalanche created 3 with the same result.

Both teams massively underperformed their expected goals. The Wild left 2.21 on the table; the Avalanche left 2.34. In a shootout, none of that mattered.

Matt Boldy's wrist shot from the doorstep won it.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
COL2 / 7 · 1.47 xG
MIN1 / 9 · 2.39 xG
Medium dangermid-range
COL0 / 19 · 2.04 xG
MIN1 / 18 · 2.21 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
COL0 / 57 · 0.82 xG
MIN0 / 42 · 0.61 xG

COL went 0-for-19 from medium danger on 2.04 expected goals — 2.0 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
COL
2 G · 4.34 xG · -2.3
MIN
3 G · 5.21 xG · -2.2
0123456
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
S. WedgewoodCOL
+3.2
J. WallstedtMIN
+2.3

COL finished -2.3 against expected, MIN -2.2 — S. Wedgewood (COL) saved 3.2 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
COL
WRIST1/30
SNAP1/16
TIP IN0/6
SLAP0/4
DEFLECTED0/1
BACKHAND0/0
POKE0/1
WRAP AROUND0/1
BAT0/1
OTHER0/23
MIN
WRIST0/35
SNAP1/6
TIP IN0/5
SLAP0/1
DEFLECTED1/2
BACKHAND0/3
POKE0/1
WRAP AROUND0/1
BAT0/0
OTHER0/15
COL
MIN
Off the rush
2 G on 33 · 2.62 xG
2 G on 35 · 3.12 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 3 · 0.58 xG
0 G on 7 · 1.59 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: COL went 1-for-30, MIN 0-for-35. COL scored 2 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
K. Kaprizov
#97 · L · MIN
2 G · 0 A · 4 SOG · 25:25 TOI · +1
N. MacKinnon
#29 · C · COL
1 G · 1 A · 4 SOG · 23:58 TOI · +2
C. Makar
#8 · D · COL
0 G · 1 A · 5 SOG · 27:50 TOI · +1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • S. Wedgewood (COL) stopped 3.2 goals above expected.
  • Open game — 16 high-danger chances combined (MIN 9, COL 7).
  • MIN generated far more dangerous chances — 0.075 xG/shot vs 0.052. Quality over quantity.
  • MIN was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 35 rush chances.
  • COL was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 33 rush chances.
  • MIN created 7 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • COL created 3 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • MIN underperformed xG by 3.2 — wasted quality chances.
  • COL underperformed xG by 2.3 — wasted quality chances.
  • S. Wedgewood (COL) saved 3.2 goals above expected — stole the show.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · COL at MIN · 3:30 PM ET

Avalanche at Wild: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 11, 5:52 PMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

53%
COL
Model favorite
53%
47%
COL50MIN

COL by 6 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score COL 2.72.5 MIN; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

COL← edge
edge →MIN
57.0%5v5 xG%52.0%
57.0%Corsi%48.0%
3.03xGF / 602.55
2.30xGA / 602.40
2.63Goals for / gm2.04
1.56Goals against / gm1.93
1.021PDO — luck, not skill1.007

COL holds 6 of 6 process categories — and PDO (1.021 vs 1.007) says COL has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model projects a 2.7 - 2.5 Avalanche win with Colorado at 53% probability. This is about as close to a coin flip as the numbers get.

Colorado owns the underlying play. The Avalanche drive 57.0% 5v5 xG against 52.0% for Minnesota, and their Corsi advantage is even starker at 57.0% to 48.0%. That territorial tilt should show up on the scoreboard—yet Colorado's 1.021 PDO means the team is running hot and due for some regression. Minnesota sits at 1.007, closer to the mean.

The goaltending matchup hinges on wear: F. Gustavsson plays on a back-to-back, as does M. Blackwood. Minnesota may turn to a backup, or Gustavsson takes the net tired. Either way, this is leverage for a team that already dominates play.

Colorado's scoring punch comes from depth. Artturi Lehkonen carries 1.11 xG/60 with 18G 22A and 6 high-danger goals at a 14.9% shooting rate. Ross Colton sits at 1.10 xG/60, though his 4.9% shot conversion (7G 15A, 1 HD goal) suggests he's running below expectation—a risk if variance swings back.

Minnesota counters with Matt Boldy, who leads with 22G and a 0.89 xG/60 rate; his 5 high-danger goals and 13.7% shooting rate make him efficient, not fluky. Robby Fabbri (0.88 xG/60, 2G 3A, 1 HD goal, 6.9% shooting) is marked inactive, removing Minnesota's second scorer.

The deeper issue for both teams: neither generates separation through high-danger scoring. Colorado sits at 0% HD goal and rebound-goal rates—a statistical artifact that won't hold. Minnesota's 0% rates mirror that fragility. The defensive weak link for Colorado is Nazem Kadri; Matt Kiersted fills that role for Minnesota.

Colorado has the edge. They control play throughout, benefit from Minnesota's goaltending uncertainty, and face a depleted roster. But 53% is as tight as edges get.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

COL
Artturi Lehkonen18G 22A
1.11 xG/60 · 6 HD · 14.9% sh
Ross Colton7G 15A
1.10 xG/60 · 1 HD · 4.9% sh
MIN
Matt Boldy22G 18A
0.89 xG/60 · 5 HD · 13.7% sh
Robby Fabbri2G 3A
0.88 xG/60 · 1 HD · 6.9% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters