Motion-blurred skater in a Ottawa Senators sweater
Breakdown · OTT at CBJ

Senators pull away from the Blue Jackets

The verdict · earned

The Senators earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

OTT 6 · CBJ 3
◆ By the ModelJul 11, 8:01 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

The Senators won 6-3, but the underlying numbers say it was close to even. Expected goals favored Ottawa 2.84–2.48—a margin thin enough to suggest variance, not superiority. The real story: Ottawa overperformed its xG by 3.16 goals, a gap large enough to obscure that Columbus nearly matched Ottawa in shot quality.

Ottawa held a modest edge in structure. At 0.058 xG per shot versus Columbus's 0.042, the Senators generated slightly cleaner looks, and high-danger chances went 5–4 in their favor. But when both teams had room to move—on the rush—they were equally lethal: each scored three rush goals, Columbus on 19 chances and Ottawa on 22. The separation came elsewhere.

The difference was goaltending. L. Ullmark stopped all 5 high-danger shots; E. Merzlikins allowed 2.5 more goals than expected. The gap between them decided an even match.

Claude Giroux's wrist shot from the point (P3, 18:37) served as the turning point.

The breakdown in twelve frames

Swipe it

Every number is from this page
Final · Dec 11
OTT
6
CBJ
3

Senators pull away from the Blue Jackets

Chances 2.8 – 2.5Did they deserve it? →
Did they deserve it?

The Senators earned this one.

Expected goals · chance value
OTT
2.84
CBJ
2.48
53% of the chances47%

The board read OTT 6, CBJ 3. The chances read OTT 2.8, CBJ 2.5.

Our xG model · NHL play-by-play · all situations
Luck check
OTT
+3.2
goals above expected
OTT2.84 expected · 6 scored
Expected
Scored
CBJ2.48 expected · 3 scored
Expected
Scored

The Senators scored 3.2 more than their chances were worth. That does not repeat.

PDO = sh% + sv% · drifts to 1.000 over a season
Every goal, in order
  1. P1 06:58OTTD. Perron1–0
  2. P1 08:11OTTD. Batherson2–0
  3. P1 14:55OTTT. StützlePP3–0
  4. P1 18:04CBJB. Jenner3–1
  5. P1 19:26OTTM. Amadio4–1
  6. P2 03:02CBJD. Fabbro4–2
  7. P2 08:10CBJD. VoronkovPP4–3
+2 more on the full breakdown
NHL play-by-play · chance value from our xG model
Where the shots came from
OTT
36 shots
6
Final
72 shots
CBJ
36 shots
3
OTT attackCBJ attack
OTT CBJ Goal
36
shots · 6 in
36
shots · 3 in
Every unblocked shot · press play to replay it
Chances by danger
OTTCBJ
1 / 4
1.23 xG
High danger
0 / 5
1.09 xG
4 / 12
1.23 xG
Medium
2 / 9
0.95 xG
1 / 33
0.38 xG
Low
1 / 45
0.44 xG

The Blue Jackets went 0 for 5 from the slot.

Danger tiers by our xG model · high ≥ 20% chance
In the net
B+
J. Greaves
+0.8
CBJ · 21/23
C
E. Merzlikins
−0.2
CBJ · 2/5
+1 more on the full breakdown
The numbers, checked
BACKCHECK

Senators pull away from the Blue Jackets

A model, not a newsroom. Every number on these frames comes from the NHL's play-by-play and our own models. Nothing was watched, guessed or heard from anyone.

Read the full breakdown
backcheckreport.com
01 / 08 · Final
Every goal, in order

How it happened

NHL play-by-play
1stshots 7–9
  1. 06:58OTTD. Perron(D. Cozens, D. Batherson)1–0
  2. 08:11OTTD. Batherson(D. Perron, D. Cozens)2–0
  3. 14:55OTTT. Stützlepower play(D. Batherson, D. Cozens)3–0
  4. 18:04CBJB. Jenner(A. Fantilli, Z. Werenski)3–1
  5. 19:26OTTM. Amadio(C. Giroux, R. Greig)4–1
2ndshots 12–11
  1. 03:02CBJD. Fabbro(B. Jenner, K. Johnson)4–2
  2. 08:10CBJD. Voronkovpower play(K. Marchenko, Z. Werenski)4–3
  3. 17:59OTTT. Stützle(M. Amadio, A. Zub)5–3
3rdshots 10–7
  1. 18:37OTTC. Girouxempty net(M. Amadio)6–3

score reads OTT–CBJ

Source · NHL play-by-play (api-web.nhle.com)
Process vs result

The numbers

XGBoost xG · NHL play-by-play
2.84
OTT chances
Goals their shots were worth
+3.2
Finishing
Goals above what those chances were worth
1.072
OTT puck luck
Above 1.000 — the bounces went their way
45.4%
Shot attempts
Under half — they were outshot
Split by club

Who controlled the game

2.84Expected goals2.48
OTT 53% of the chance quality
29Shots on goal27
4High-danger chances5
49All attempts (Corsi)59
Adjusted for score: OTT 39% · CBJ 61%
Faceoffs · CBJ won29%off54%neu36%def
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG
How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
OTT1 / 4 · 1.23 xG
CBJ0 / 5 · 1.09 xG
Medium dangermid-range
OTT4 / 12 · 1.23 xG
CBJ2 / 9 · 0.95 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
OTT1 / 33 · 0.38 xG
CBJ1 / 45 · 0.44 xG

OTT went 4-for-12 from medium danger on 1.23 expected goals — 2.8 above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
OTT
6 G · 2.84 xG · +3.2
CBJ
3 G · 2.48 xG · +0.5
01234567

OTT finished +3.2 against expected, CBJ +0.5.

Source · Backcheck xG model
Shot types · rush and rebound chancesopen +
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
OTT
WRIST2/14
SNAP1/8
BACKHAND2/9
SLAP0/3
TIP IN1/2
OTHER0/13
CBJ
WRIST0/15
SNAP0/9
BACKHAND0/4
SLAP1/4
TIP IN2/4
OTHER0/23
OTT
CBJ
Off the rush
3 G on 22
2.02 xG
3 G on 19
1.69 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 0
0.00 xG
0 G on 2
0.26 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: OTT went 2-for-14, CBJ 0-for-15. OTT scored 3 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
New to these numbers?

Two things happened in this game: who created the better chances, and who put the puck in the net. They are not the same thing, and this page separates them on purpose.

The one to watch is expected goals— the best single read on who deserved to win. When it disagrees with the scoreboard, that disagreement is usually the story. Nothing here is a projection; every figure is computed from this game's play-by-play. Full glossary →

xG
Expected goals. Every shot scored by how often that exact look goes in. 2.5 xG means the chances were worth about two and a half goals.
HD
High-danger chances — shots from the slot and the crease, where shots actually become goals.
Corsi
Every shot attempt, including the ones that missed or got blocked. A rough read on who had the puck.
Adj.
Score-adjusted. Teams that trail shoot more and teams that lead sit back, so this corrects the attempt count for the scoreboard.
GSAx
Goals saved above expected. A positive number means the goalie stopped more than an average goalie would have on those shots.
PDO
Shooting % plus save % — a luck gauge. It sits near 1.000 over a season, so a game far from it usually means the bounces decided it.
Shot by shot

In the net

Graded on goals saved above expected
L. Ullmark
OTT · 24/27 · .889
-0.5
saved above expected
D
the night
By dangerG/attxGsaved
High danger0/51.1+1.1
Medium2/90.9-1.1
Low1/450.4-0.6

A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

J. Greaves
CBJ · 21/23 · .913
+0.8
saved above expected
B+
the night
By dangerG/attxGsaved
High danger1/41.2+0.2
Medium4/121.2-2.8
Low1/330.4-0.6

A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

E. Merzlikins
CBJ · 2/5 · .400
-0.2
saved above expected
C
the night
By dangerG/attxGsaved
High danger1/41.2+0.2
Medium4/121.2-2.8
Low1/330.4-0.6

A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

72 shots · press play to watch the game back

Where the shots came from

NHL play-by-play coordinates
OTT
36 shots
6
Final
72 shots
CBJ
36 shots
3
OTT attackCBJ attack
OTT CBJ Goal

Each club shoots toward its own end — OTT left, CBJ right — the way you would watch it. A dot's size is how dangerous the look was, from distance and angle; it is a proxy for shot quality, not the xG model the article is written from. Hover a dot for the shooter and the clock.

Ranked from the box score

Three stars

Points first
Three stars · computed, not voted
M. Amadio
#22 · R · OTT
1 G · 2 A · 3 SOG · 19:35 on ice · +3
D. Batherson
#19 · R · OTT
1 G · 2 A · 2 SOG · 18:27 on ice · +1
D. Cozens
#24 · C · OTT
0 G · 3 A · 3 SOG · 17:26 on ice · +1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model said beforehand

Before the game

Written Thu, Dec 11
Open the pre-game read
Written from the numbers

The read

Edited for clarity
◆ By the ModelJul 11, 7:59 PMEdited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

The model projects a 2.5–2.5 game with the Senators at 51% win probability. This is about as close to a pick'em as you'll find.

The fundamental tension is straightforward: Ottawa owns the underlying play, but both teams have cratered recently. The Senators control 56.0% of 5v5 expected goals with a 53.0% Corsi edge. Columbus counters with a PDO of 1.003 suggesting regression ahead; Ottawa's 0.993 suggests the opposite. Yet over their last 10 games, the Senators sit at -5 goal differential while the Blue Jackets are worse at -9, erasing the expected-goals advantage almost entirely.

Both teams face goaltending uncertainty. J. Greaves starts a back-to-back scenario, raising the chance of a backup start or a fatigued opener. The same applies to L. Ullmark. Neither team is equipped to absorb a flat goaltending performance.

Ottawa's edge lives in shot generation. Brady Tkachuk leads at 1.19 xG per 60 minutes, backing his 11 goals and 20 assists with 2 high-danger chances and a 7.5% shooting rate that merits scrutiny. Dylan Cozens generates 1.00 xG/60, posted 13 goals and 15 assists with 1 high-danger goal, and carries a 9.5% shooting rate—solid execution that punishes missed coverage.

Columbus counters with Boone Jenner (0.98 xG/60, 11 goals, 21 assists, 2 high-danger goals, 9.6% shooting) and Mathieu Olivier (0.89 xG/60, 12 goals, 9 assists, 1 high-danger goal, 13.3% shooting). Olivier's conversion rate is the wildest number here; he's cashing chances at a rate that won't hold, but he's doing it today.

Neither team has cracked high-danger finishing—Ottawa and Columbus each sit at 0% on both high-danger and rebound goals. That's either elite defensive discipline or predictive noise. If true, it tilts toward Ottawa's underlying dominance eventually surfacing; if noise, it underscores how close this really is.

Columbus exposes Conor Garland on the back end. Ottawa leaves Nick Jensen in a similar spot. Both sides have a defensive liability, making this matchup decided at the net.

With model and recent form splitting the verdict, lean on xG and shot metrics to break the tie—they favor Ottawa. But the Senators' shooting-rate concerns, coupled with both teams' inability to convert danger, leave the outcome genuinely uncertain.

What the model said beforehand

The model's lean

OTT 51%
51%
OTT
Model favorite
51%
49%
OTT50CBJ

OTT by 2 points of win probability — effectively a coin flip. Projected score OTT 2.5–2.5 CBJ; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season rates · 5v5

Tale of the tape

NHL stats API · our xG
OTT← edge
edge →CBJ
56.0%52.0%
53.0%51.0%
2.662.63
2.122.43
2.182.12
1.991.98
0.9931.003

OTT holds 5 of 6 process categories — and the luck row (0.993 vs 1.003) says CBJ has been getting the bounces, which tends not to last.

Source · NHL stats API + our xG · 5v5
Form · Last 10
OTT
4-6-0
-5 GD · 1d rest
CBJ
3-3-4
-9 GD · 1d rest
0.993
OTT PDO
Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
1.003
CBJ PDO
Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
What decides it

Keys to the game

Where the edges live
  • The Senators own the underlying play — 56.0% 5v5 xG vs 52.0%.
Things to watch
  • The Senators own the underlying play — 56.0% 5v5 xG vs 52.0%.
  • J. Greaves is on a back-to-back — watch for a backup start or a tired starter.
  • L. Ullmark is on a back-to-back — watch for a backup start or a tired starter.
  • The Blue Jackets are underwater at -9 goal differential over their last 10.
  • The Senators are underwater at -5 goal differential over their last 10.
Last game's lineup · confirmed at warm-up

Lineups

NHL box score
OTT
Expected in goal
L. Ullmark
back-to-back.875 last start
Backup Linus Ullmark · -12.8 GSAx this season
Back-to-back: the backup often gets this one. Treat the starter as unconfirmed.

No completed game on file for this club yet.

CBJ
Expected in goal
J. Greaves
back-to-back.903 last start
Backup Jet Greaves · +16.5 GSAx this season
Back-to-back: the backup often gets this one. Treat the starter as unconfirmed.

No completed game on file for this club yet.

Lineups are the players who dressed in each club's last game, with their minutes; clubs confirm tonight's at warm-up. Every player this preview names was in that lineup.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

NHL stats API · our xG
OTT
Brady Tkachuk11G 20A
1.19 xG/60 · 2 HD · 7.5% sh
Dylan Cozens13G 15A
1.00 xG/60 · 1 HD · 9.5% sh
CBJ
Boone Jenner11G 21A
0.98 xG/60 · 2 HD · 9.6% sh
Mathieu Olivier12G 9A
0.89 xG/60 · 1 HD · 13.3% sh
Keep going

Where to next