Devils steal one from the Mammoth against the run of play
The Devils stole one. They lost the expected-goals battle 2.40–4.12 and won anyway.
The underlying story
The Mammoth were robbed. They created chances worth 4.12 expected goals to the Devils' 2.40, controlled 63% of the dangerous opportunities, and lost anyway 2-1. The Devils won on luck and goaltending, not hockey.
J. Markstrom made this possible. The Devils' goaltender saved 3.12 goals above expected on a night when the Mammoth's offense created quality looks but couldn't finish. He stopped 7 of 7 high-danger chances—perfect. K. Vejmelka made 20 saves but couldn't hold the line.
The Mammoth dominated shot quality. They fired 33 shots to New Jersey's 22, and their expected-goal count (4.12 to 2.40) showed how much better their looks were. Seven high-danger chances landed in Markstrom's crease; three in Vejmelka's. The Mammoth created 6 rebound opportunities and converted one. That kind of efficiency doesn't survive.
Stefan Noesen's wrist shot from the doorstep (P3, 04:20) marked the turning point—the moment the Mammoth's chances began to slip. The Devils capitalized where it mattered; the Mammoth's inability to finish turned dominance into defeat.
N. Hischier orchestrated the win with two assists, logging 22:08. C. Brown scored in 22:16. L. Hughes contributed an assist in 20:33. Three Devils stars. None was the Mammoth's K. Vejmelka, who faced an onslaught and held firm when the game came down to what could have been.
The danger ladder
UTA went 0-for-7 from high danger on 1.71 expected goals — 1.7 left on the table.
Finishing vs expected
NJD finished -0.4 against expected, UTA -3.1 — J. Markstrom (NJD) saved 3.1 goals above expected.
Shot diet
Snap shots carried the volume: NJD went 1-for-20, UTA 0-for-19.
- NJD stole this one. UTA owned 63% of the xG and lost.
- J. Markstrom (NJD) stopped 3.1 goals above expected.
- UTA couldn't convert — 0/7 on high-danger chances. That won't happen often.
- UTA created 6 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
- NJD created 4 rebound opportunities (1 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
- UTA underperformed xG by 3.1 — wasted quality chances.
- J. Markstrom (NJD) saved 3.1 goals above expected — stole the show.
- J. Markstrom was a wall on HD chances — 100% SV on 7 high-danger shots.