Backcheck
Recap · PHI at CHI

Flyers run the Blackhawks off the ice on the underlying numbers

The Flyers earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

By the ModelJul 11, 9:49 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
PHI
Philadelphia Flyers
3
Home
CHI
Chicago Blackhawks
1
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

4.36Expected goals2.85
61% share for the better side
26Shot attempts (SOG)21
9High-danger chances2
53Corsi (all attempts)54
Score-adjusted: 45% / 55%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

The Flyers won 3–1. High-danger chances told a larger story: the Flyers had nine to Chicago's two, a gap that dwarfed the scoreline.

Philadelphia controlled 60% of 5v5 expected goals (2.85–4.36 favoring the Flyers). They generated the higher-quality looks: 0.082 xG per shot versus Chicago's 0.053. The Blackhawks held 45% of shot attempts and ceded control in both volume and efficiency.

Chicago underperformed their xG by 1.85 goals; Philadelphia underperformed theirs by 1.36. Neither converted at their underlying rate, but the Flyers' dominance in chance creation proved decisive. Philadelphia was lethal on the rush, scoring 3 goals on 20 chances. Chicago converted zero rebound opportunities despite generating five.

S. Ersson (PHI) saved 1.85 goals above expected on 21 saves. S. Knight (CHI) posted +2.36, a showing that kept Chicago competitive in the underlying metrics. Carl Grundstrom's wrist shot from the high slot at 17:52 of the third period marked the turning point.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
PHI3 / 9 · 2.51 xG
CHI0 / 2 · 0.69 xG
Medium dangermid-range
PHI0 / 11 · 1.28 xG
CHI0 / 16 · 1.61 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
PHI0 / 33 · 0.57 xG
CHI1 / 36 · 0.55 xG

CHI went 0-for-16 from medium danger on 1.61 expected goals — 1.6 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
PHI
3 G · 4.36 xG · -1.4
CHI
1 G · 2.85 xG · -1.9
012345
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
S. ErssonPHI
+1.8
S. KnightCHI
+2.4

PHI finished -1.4 against expected, CHI -1.9 — S. Knight (CHI) saved 2.4 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
PHI
WRIST2/23
SLAP0/3
SNAP1/7
DEFLECTED0/3
TIP IN0/2
BACKHAND0/3
WRAP AROUND0/0
OTHER0/12
CHI
WRIST1/19
SLAP0/8
SNAP0/4
DEFLECTED0/3
TIP IN0/2
BACKHAND0/0
WRAP AROUND0/1
OTHER0/17
PHI
CHI
Off the rush
3 G on 20 · 2.89 xG
1 G on 24 · 1.56 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 5 · 0.41 xG
0 G on 5 · 0.51 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: PHI went 2-for-23, CHI 1-for-19. PHI scored 3 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
T. Konecny
#11 · R · PHI
1 G · 1 A · 2 SOG · 19:18 TOI · +1
S. Couturier
#14 · C · PHI
0 G · 2 A · 1 SOG · 15:44 TOI · +2
A. Levshunov
#55 · D · CHI
0 G · 1 A · 0 SOG · 24:04 TOI
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • S. Ersson (PHI) stopped 1.8 goals above expected.
  • PHI had the higher quality looks — 0.082 xG/shot vs 0.053.
  • PHI was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 20 rush chances.
  • CHI created 5 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • PHI created 5 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • CHI underperformed xG by 1.9 — wasted quality chances.
  • S. Ersson (PHI) saved 1.9 goals above expected — stole the show.
  • S. Knight (CHI) saved 2.4 goals above expected — stole the show.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · PHI at CHI · 9:00 PM ET

The Flyers are the model's lean over the Blackhawks on the underlying numbers

By the ModelJul 11, 9:47 PMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

55%
PHI
Model favorite
55%
45%
PHI50CHI

PHI by 10 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score PHI 2.62.3 CHI; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

PHI← edge
edge →CHI
51.0%5v5 xG%42.0%
48.0%Corsi%46.0%
2.26xGF / 602.17
2.20xGA / 602.94
1.96Goals for / gm1.84
1.82Goals against / gm2.41
1.008PDO — luck, not skill0.996

PHI holds 6 of 6 process categories — and PDO (1.008 vs 0.996) says PHI has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

Philadelphia is the model's choice here. The projection has the Flyers winning 2.6 to 2.3, with a 55% win probability for the home side.

That edge comes from the underlying play. Philadelphia leads in expected goals at 51.0% to Chicago's 42.0%, a nine-point gap in the metric that best predicts shots actually taken. The Flyers also lead in Corsi percentage (48.0% vs. 46.0%), though more modestly. Philadelphia's PDO sits at 1.008 against Chicago's 0.996, suggesting the Flyers are slightly outperforming their offensive efficiency while the Blackhawks underperform theirs.

The recency picture favors Philadelphia as well. The Flyers have posted a 3-3-4 record in their last 10 games—not a perfect streak, but solid enough. Chicago has struggled: the Blackhawks show a minus-20 goal differential over the same span, a stark reminder that their underlying process has cratered recently.

For Philadelphia, the production engine turns on Owen Tippett and Christian Dvorak. Tippett carries 19 goals and 18 assists with an xG rate of 0.88 per 60 minutes and two high-danger goals; his 12.1% shooting rate suggests room for positive variance. Dvorak has 12 goals and 21 assists at 0.81 xG/60, with three high-danger goals and an 11.2% shooting rate. Both are performing at a level above their modeling would predict, which could mean regression.

Chicago's attack centers on Tyler Bertuzzi and Connor Bedard. Bertuzzi leads with 20 goals and 15 assists at 0.85 xG/60, paired with seven high-danger goals and an 18.0% shooting rate—a rate that suggests he's converted at a significantly elevated clip. Bedard has 17 goals and 27 assists at 0.82 xG/60 with five high-danger goals and 11.8% shooting, closer to league average.

The model's lean to Philadelphia is real but not overwhelming. Chicago can play this game.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

PHI
Owen Tippett19G 18A
0.88 xG/60 · 2 HD · 12.1% sh
Christian Dvorak12G 21A
0.81 xG/60 · 3 HD · 11.2% sh
CHI
Tyler Bertuzzi20G 15A
0.85 xG/60 · 7 HD · 18.0% sh
Connor Bedard17G 27A
0.82 xG/60 · 5 HD · 11.8% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters