Backcheck
Recap · WSH at OTT

Senators run the Capitals off the ice on the underlying numbers

The Senators earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

By the ModelJul 11, 11:52 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
WSH
Washington Capitals
3
Home
OTT
Ottawa Senators
4
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

2.36Expected goals4.50
66% share for the better side
29Shot attempts (SOG)32
2High-danger chances5
53Corsi (all attempts)67
Score-adjusted: 43% / 57%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

The Senators ran the Capitals off the ice — not in the scoreline, but in everything that mattered. Ottawa won 4–3, but the underlying numbers told a much darker story for Washington: the Senators controlled 66% of 5v5 expected goals (4.50–2.36).

A one-goal game concealing a rout.

The Senators' dominance came from shot quality. They generated 0.067 expected goals per shot compared to Washington's 0.045. The high-danger chances tell the story: Ottawa created 5 to Washington's 2. That's not luck; that's control.

Goaltending proved split. L. Thompson made 28 saves on 32 shots (0.875 SV%); L. Meriläinen finished 26 saves on 29 (0.897 SV%). Neither goalie was the deciding factor. The gap was elsewhere.

Both teams struck twice off the rush, yet the Capitals' efficiency was sharper: 2 goals on 20 chances versus Ottawa's 2 on 30. Rebound chances went Washington 5, Ottawa 4, but each team scored once. Where Ottawa won the game was volume—five high-danger looks to Washington's two. That margin doesn't fit a one-goal decision, but that's what the underlying numbers say.

The turning point came early in the third: Fabian Zetterlund's snap shot from the slot at 17:38.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
WSH1 / 2 · 0.40 xG
OTT1 / 5 · 1.78 xG
Medium dangermid-range
WSH1 / 16 · 1.50 xG
OTT2 / 18 · 2.08 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
WSH1 / 35 · 0.46 xG
OTT1 / 44 · 0.64 xG

OTT went 1-for-5 from high danger on 1.78 expected goals — 0.8 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
WSH
3 G · 2.36 xG · +0.6
OTT
4 G · 4.50 xG · -0.5
012345
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
L. ThompsonWSH
+0.5
L. MeriläinenOTT
-0.6

WSH finished +0.6 against expected, OTT -0.5 — L. Meriläinen (OTT) allowed 0.6 more goals than expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
WSH
WRIST3/24
SNAP0/2
SLAP0/5
BACKHAND0/4
TIP IN0/4
DEFLECTED0/0
OTHER0/14
OTT
WRIST1/22
SNAP2/10
SLAP0/5
BACKHAND0/3
TIP IN0/3
DEFLECTED1/1
OTHER0/23
WSH
OTT
Off the rush
2 G on 20 · 1.11 xG
2 G on 30 · 2.48 xG
Off rebounds
1 G on 5 · 0.80 xG
1 G on 4 · 0.45 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: WSH went 3-for-24, OTT 1-for-22. WSH scored 2 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
T. Wilson
#43 · R · WSH
1 G · 1 A · 3 SOG · 22:51 TOI · +1
S. Pinto
#12 · C · OTT
0 G · 2 A · 1 SOG · 18:54 TOI · +1
J. Sourdif
#34 · C · WSH
0 G · 2 A · 1 SOG · 13:25 TOI · +2
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • WSH generated higher-quality looks than the shot total suggests.
  • OTT generated far more dangerous chances — 0.067 xG/shot vs 0.045. Quality over quantity.
  • OTT was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 30 rush chances.
  • WSH was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 20 rush chances.
  • OTT created 4 rebound opportunities (1 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • WSH created 5 rebound opportunities (1 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · WSH at OTT · 1:00 PM ET

The Senators are the model's lean over the Capitals — with PDO regression in play

By the ModelJul 11, 10:39 PMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

57%
OTT
Model favorite
43%
57%
WSH50OTT

OTT by 14 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score WSH 2.42.8 OTT; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

WSH← edge
edge →OTT
50.0%5v5 xG%56.0%
49.0%Corsi%53.0%
2.62xGF / 602.66
2.62xGA / 602.12
2.18Goals for / gm2.18
1.79Goals against / gm1.99
1.018PDO — luck, not skill0.993

OTT holds 5 of 6 process categories — and PDO (1.018 vs 0.993) says WSH has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model projects a 2.4–2.8 goal game favoring Ottawa at 57% win probability. This is a matchup where the underlying numbers align: the Senators own the territorial edge.

Washington has crumbled lately, sitting at -12 in goal differential over its last 10 games. But the model's confidence rests on what Ottawa dominates at 5v5: the Senators post 56.0% expected goals share against Washington's 50.0%—a clean, repeatable edge. Corsi tells the same story. Ottawa drives play at 53.0% against 49.0%, meaning you'll watch the Capitals defend most of this game.

The turnover lives in PDO. Washington runs at 1.018—significantly elevated—while Ottawa sits cool at 0.993. At this point in the season, PDO regresses. The Capitals' hot shooting and goaltending are not sustainable; the Senators' luck is overdue to reverse. The model is betting on Washington returning to earth.

One wrinkle: C. Lindgren faces a back-to-back, which may force a backup start or deploy an underrested starter. This introduces noise into an otherwise clean possession argument.

The player edge goes to Ottawa. Brady Tkachuk leads at 1.19 expected goals per 60 minutes, posting 11 goals on 7.5% shooting—suggesting more upside. Dylan Cozens, at 1.00 xG/60, has found goals at 9.5%, also leaving room to run. Washington counters with Alex Ovechkin (0.97 xG/60, 19 goals, 13.8% shooting) and Anthony Beauvillier (0.89 xG/60, 14 goals, 10.4%), both running at elite conversion rates that won't hold.

Players to Watch

WSH: Alex Ovechkin (19G, 0.97 xG/60) · Anthony Beauvillier (14G, 10.4% shooting)

OTT: Brady Tkachuk (11G, 1.19 xG/60) · Dylan Cozens (13G, 9.5% shooting)

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

WSH
Alex Ovechkin19G 17A
0.97 xG/60 · 2 HD · 13.8% sh
Anthony Beauvillier14G 9A
0.89 xG/60 · 2 HD · 10.4% sh
OTT
Brady Tkachuk11G 20A
1.19 xG/60 · 2 HD · 7.5% sh
Dylan Cozens13G 15A
1.00 xG/60 · 1 HD · 9.5% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters