Backcheck
Recap · TOR at NYI

Islanders edge the Maple Leafs in overtime

The Islanders stole one. They lost the expected-goals battle 3.08–2.75 and won anyway.

By the ModelJul 11, 11:07 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
TOR
Toronto Maple Leafs
3
Home
NYI
New York Islanders
4
FINAL / OT
Process vs result

The underlying story

3.08Expected goals2.75
53% share for the better side
21Shot attempts (SOG)25
3High-danger chances3
54Corsi (all attempts)58
Score-adjusted: 48% / 52%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

The Maple Leafs held the underlying edge but lost 4–3 in overtime. Expected goals split 2.75–3.08, a 47–53 percent split favoring Toronto. The Islanders overperformed their xG by 1.25 goals. J. Woll simultaneously underperformed, surrendering 1.2 more than expected.

The shot volume tilt went New York's way: 54 percent of shot attempts (25–21 on goal). High-danger chances stayed even at 3–3. The rush game differentiated both offenses: New York scored 3 goals on 33 rush chances; Toronto scored 2 on 23.

M. Schaefer's snap shot from the high slot at 04:11 of overtime ended it. Woll finished 21 of 25 at 0.840 SV%. D. Rittich posted 0.857 on 18 of 21 stops.

Three Stars

  • #13 M. Barzal (NYI) — 2A in 22:49
  • #34 A. Matthews (TOR) — 2G in 22:29
  • #48 M. Schaefer (NYI) — 2G in 22:11
How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
TOR0 / 3 · 0.74 xG
NYI2 / 3 · 0.70 xG
Medium dangermid-range
TOR3 / 15 · 1.78 xG
NYI1 / 12 · 1.10 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
TOR0 / 36 · 0.55 xG
NYI1 / 43 · 0.95 xG

NYI went 2-for-3 from high danger on 0.70 expected goals — 1.3 above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
TOR
3 G · 3.08 xG · -0.1
NYI
4 G · 2.75 xG · +1.3
012345
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
J. WollTOR
-1.2
D. RittichNYI
+0.1

TOR finished -0.1 against expected, NYI +1.3 — J. Woll (TOR) allowed 1.2 more goals than expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
TOR
SNAP2/25
WRIST1/2
BACKHAND0/6
TIP IN0/3
SLAP0/2
DEFLECTED0/1
BAT0/0
OTHER0/15
NYI
SNAP2/8
WRIST2/23
BACKHAND0/3
TIP IN0/6
SLAP0/3
DEFLECTED0/1
BAT0/1
OTHER0/13
TOR
NYI
Off the rush
2 G on 23 · 1.93 xG
3 G on 33 · 2.13 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 2 · 0.21 xG
0 G on 2 · 0.21 xG

Snap shots carried the volume: TOR went 2-for-25, NYI 2-for-8. NYI scored 3 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
M. Barzal
#13 · C · NYI
0 G · 2 A · 2 SOG · 22:49 TOI · +1
A. Matthews
#34 · C · TOR
2 G · 0 A · 6 SOG · 22:29 TOI
M. Schaefer
#48 · D · NYI
2 G · 0 A · 2 SOG · 22:11 TOI · +1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • J. Woll (TOR) gave up 1.2 goals more than expected — well below their workload.
  • NYI was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 33 rush chances.
  • TOR was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 23 rush chances.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · TOR at NYI · 7:00 PM ET

Maple Leafs at Islanders: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 11, 11:06 PMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

54%
NYI
Model favorite
46%
54%
TOR50NYI

NYI by 8 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score TOR 2.52.7 NYI; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

TOR← edge
edge →NYI
46.0%5v5 xG%48.0%
45.0%Corsi%49.0%
2.24xGF / 602.48
2.67xGA / 602.69
2.09Goals for / gm1.78
2.52Goals against / gm1.94
1.002PDO — luck, not skill0.993

NYI holds 4 of 6 process categories — and PDO (1.002 vs 0.993) says TOR has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

This is about as close to a pick'em as you'll find. The model projects a 2.5–2.7 xG game with the Islanders at 54% win probability.

The Islanders will control play. Their 49.0% Corsi to Toronto's 45.0% means expect the Leafs defending their own end for stretches. Toronto's 46.0% xG% to New York's 48.0% hints at better chance quality when they attack, but shot volume favors the Islanders. Neither team's PDO (Toronto 1.002, New York 0.993) suggests unsustainable luck — the game will likely play close to expectation.

D. Hildeby on a back-to-back bears watching. A backup start or a tired starter becomes a potential edge for Toronto's offense.

The forwards matchup shapes everything. Auston Matthews (1.10 xG/60, 17 goals, 10.6% shooting) is Toronto's high-volume threat; John Tavares (0.91 xG/60, 15 goals, 24 assists, 12.4% shooting) adds further scoring depth. Anders Lee (1.20 xG/60, 9 goals, 6.4% shooting) generates the Islanders' best chances but hasn't converted at volume. Bo Horvat (0.87 xG/60, 18 goals, 12.8% shooting) leads the Islanders in goals despite lower expected-goal generation than Lee.

Both teams sit at 0% for high-danger goals and 0% for rebound conversions — they don't score from scrambles or second chances.

Toronto's Bo Groulx and New York's Alexander Romanov represent each team's defensive vulnerability.

The Islanders have the edge. But in a game that hinges on possession versus efficiency, the gap is negligible.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

TOR
Auston Matthews17G 13A
1.10 xG/60 · 1 HD · 10.6% sh
John Tavares15G 24A
0.91 xG/60 · 3 HD · 12.4% sh
NYI
Anders Lee9G 20A
1.20 xG/60 · 2 HD · 6.4% sh
Bo Horvat18G 10A
0.87 xG/60 · 3 HD · 12.8% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters