Motion-blurred skater in a red sweater
Breakdown · CHI at WSH

Blackhawks edge the Capitals in a shootout

The verdict · stolen

The Blackhawks stole one. They lost the expected-goals battle 3.45–3.90 and won anyway.

CHI 3 · WSH 2
◆ By the ModelJul 11, 11:06 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

Chicago won a game that didn't belong to them. The Capitals generated 3.90 expected goals to the Blackhawks' 3.45—a 53-47 split that suggested a coin flip—but fell 3-2 in a shootout after S. Knight (CHI) saved 1.9 goals above expectation.

The Capitals created the better chances. They held 51% of shot attempts (34–33) and led 6–5 in high-danger opportunities. Yet they converted zero of those six HD chances, while Chicago cashed 2 goals on 28 rush attempts. That inefficiency—wasting quality—cost them the game more than the underlying play did.

S. Knight was the difference. He stopped every high-danger shot he faced, finishing with a 0.941 SV%, the kind of outlier performance that erases advantages in process. L. Thompson (WSH) also played well, posting a 0.939 SV%, but faced a shootout where Nick Foligno buried from the slot.

The Capitals' rebound work (5 created, 2 converted) showed effort. Chicago's rebound game was less productive (3 created, 0 converted), a gap that would normally doom them. But at even strength and overtime, this was decided at the margins: shot volume was even, quality was split, both goalies played above the line. The shootout was noise.

  • #17 D. Strome (WSH) — 1G in 21:12
  • #28 A. Burakovsky (CHI) — 1A in 20:37
  • #9 R. Leonard (WSH) — 1G in 20:21
The breakdown in twelve frames

Swipe it

Every number is from this page
Final · SO · Jan 3
CHI
3
WSH
2

Blackhawks edge the Capitals in a shootout

Chances 3.5 – 3.9Did they deserve it? →
Did they deserve it?

The Capitals deserved better.

Expected goals · chance value
CHI
3.45
WSH
3.90
47% of the chances53%

The board read CHI 3, WSH 2. The chances read CHI 3.5, WSH 3.9.

Our xG model · NHL play-by-play · all situations
Luck check
CHI
−0.5
goals above expected
CHI3.45 expected · 3 scored
Expected
Scored
WSH3.90 expected · 2 scored
Expected
Scored

The Capitals left 1.9 goals on the table against what their chances were worth.

PDO = sh% + sv% · drifts to 1.000 over a season
Every goal, in order
  1. P1 01:13CHIR. Donato1–0
  2. P1 04:46WSHD. Strome1–1
  3. P2 04:24CHIT. TeravainenPP2–1
  4. P3 11:18WSHR. Leonard2–2
  5. SO 00:00CHIN. LardisPP2–2
  6. SO 00:00WSHD. StromePP2–2
  7. SO 00:00WSHS. MilanoPP2–2
+2 more on the full breakdown
NHL play-by-play · chance value from our xG model
Where the shots came from
CHI
48 shots
5
Final
103 shots
WSH
55 shots
4
CHI attackWSH attack
CHI WSH Goal

Shootout goals are not shots and are not drawn; the scoreboard above counts goals from the shot log.

48
shots · 5 in
55
shots · 4 in
Every unblocked shot · press play to replay it
Chances by danger
CHIWSH
1 / 5
1.38 xG
High danger
0 / 6
1.45 xG
1 / 14
1.53 xG
Medium
2 / 15
1.81 xG
0 / 42
0.55 xG
Low
0 / 39
0.65 xG

The Capitals went 0 for 6 from the slot.

Danger tiers by our xG model · high ≥ 20% chance
In the net
A
S. Knight
+1.9
CHI · 32/34
B+
L. Thompson
+1.4
WSH · 31/33
The numbers, checked
BACKCHECK

Blackhawks edge the Capitals in a shootout

A model, not a newsroom. Every number on these frames comes from the NHL's play-by-play and our own models. Nothing was watched, guessed or heard from anyone.

Read the full breakdown
backcheckreport.com
01 / 08 · Final
Every goal, in order

How it happened

NHL play-by-play
1stshots 9–13
  1. 01:13CHIR. Donato(I. Mikheyev)1–0
  2. 04:46WSHD. Strome(E. Frank, T. van Riemsdyk)1–1
2ndshots 9–7
  1. 04:24CHIT. Teravainenpower play(T. Bertuzzi, A. Burakovsky)2–1
3rdshots 13–14
  1. 11:18WSHR. Leonard(M. Roy, A. Beauvillier)2–2
OTshots 2–0no goals
    SO
    1. 00:00CHIN. Lardispower play2–2
    2. 00:00WSHD. Stromepower play2–2
    3. 00:00WSHS. Milanopower play2–2
    4. 00:00CHIA. Burakovskypower play2–2
    5. 00:00CHIN. Folignopower play2–2

    score reads CHI–WSH

    Source · NHL play-by-play (api-web.nhle.com)
    Process vs result

    The numbers

    XGBoost xG · NHL play-by-play
    3.45
    CHI chances
    Goals their shots were worth
    −0.5
    Finishing
    Goals below what those chances were worth
    1.000
    CHI puck luck
    About 1.000 — a normal night for bounces
    50.4%
    Shot attempts
    Over half — they had the puck more
    Split by club

    Who controlled the game

    3.45Expected goals3.90
    WSH 53% of the chance quality
    33Shots on goal34
    5High-danger chances6
    61All attempts (Corsi)60
    Adjusted for score: CHI 48% · WSH 52%
    Faceoffs · WSH won53%off44%neu57%def
    Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG
    How the game was won

    The danger ladder

    shotsgoalsexpected
    High dangerslot & crease
    CHI1 / 5 · 1.38 xG
    WSH0 / 6 · 1.45 xG
    Medium dangermid-range
    CHI1 / 14 · 1.53 xG
    WSH2 / 15 · 1.81 xG
    Low dangerperimeter & point
    CHI0 / 42 · 0.55 xG
    WSH0 / 39 · 0.65 xG

    WSH went 0-for-6 from high danger on 1.45 expected goals — 1.4 left on the table.

    Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
    The luck layer

    Finishing vs expected

    expectedactual
    CHI
    3 G · 3.45 xG · -0.5
    WSH
    2 G · 3.90 xG · -1.9
    012345

    CHI finished -0.5 against expected, WSH -1.9.

    Source · Backcheck xG model
    Shot types · rush and rebound chancesopen +
    What they shot — and what went in

    Shot diet

    goalsshots
    CHI
    SNAP1/29
    WRIST0/7
    SLAP0/2
    TIP IN1/1
    BACKHAND0/2
    BAT0/0
    DEFLECTED0/1
    OTHER0/19
    WSH
    SNAP1/29
    WRIST0/3
    SLAP0/6
    TIP IN0/6
    BACKHAND0/3
    BAT1/2
    DEFLECTED0/0
    OTHER0/11
    CHI
    WSH
    Off the rush
    2 G on 28
    2.45 xG
    0 G on 29
    2.95 xG
    Off rebounds
    0 G on 3
    0.38 xG
    2 G on 5
    0.78 xG

    Snap shots carried the volume: CHI went 1-for-29, WSH 1-for-29. CHI scored 2 of theirs off the rush.

    Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
    New to these numbers?

    Two things happened in this game: who created the better chances, and who put the puck in the net. They are not the same thing, and this page separates them on purpose.

    The one to watch is expected goals— the best single read on who deserved to win. When it disagrees with the scoreboard, that disagreement is usually the story. Nothing here is a projection; every figure is computed from this game's play-by-play. Full glossary →

    xG
    Expected goals. Every shot scored by how often that exact look goes in. 2.5 xG means the chances were worth about two and a half goals.
    HD
    High-danger chances — shots from the slot and the crease, where shots actually become goals.
    Corsi
    Every shot attempt, including the ones that missed or got blocked. A rough read on who had the puck.
    Adj.
    Score-adjusted. Teams that trail shoot more and teams that lead sit back, so this corrects the attempt count for the scoreboard.
    GSAx
    Goals saved above expected. A positive number means the goalie stopped more than an average goalie would have on those shots.
    PDO
    Shooting % plus save % — a luck gauge. It sits near 1.000 over a season, so a game far from it usually means the bounces decided it.
    Shot by shot

    In the net

    Graded on goals saved above expected
    S. Knight
    CHI · 32/34 · .941
    +1.9
    saved above expected
    A
    the night
    By dangerG/attxGsaved
    High danger0/61.4+1.4
    Medium2/151.8-0.2
    Low0/390.7+0.7

    A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

    L. Thompson
    WSH · 31/33 · .939
    +1.4
    saved above expected
    B+
    the night
    By dangerG/attxGsaved
    High danger1/51.4+0.4
    Medium1/141.5+0.5
    Low0/420.6+0.6

    A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

    103 shots · press play to watch the game back

    Where the shots came from

    NHL play-by-play coordinates
    CHI
    48 shots
    5
    Final
    103 shots
    WSH
    55 shots
    4
    CHI attackWSH attack
    CHI WSH Goal

    Shootout goals are not shots and are not drawn; the scoreboard above counts goals from the shot log.

    Each club shoots toward its own end — CHI left, WSH right — the way you would watch it. A dot's size is how dangerous the look was, from distance and angle; it is a proxy for shot quality, not the xG model the article is written from. Hover a dot for the shooter and the clock.

    Ranked from the box score

    Three stars

    Points first
    Three stars · computed, not voted
    D. Strome
    #17 · C · WSH
    1 G · 0 A · 2 SOG · 21:12 on ice
    A. Burakovsky
    #28 · L · CHI
    0 G · 1 A · 4 SOG · 20:37 on ice · -1
    R. Leonard
    #9 · R · WSH
    1 G · 0 A · 3 SOG · 20:21 on ice · +1
    Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
    What the model said beforehand

    Before the game

    Written Sat, Jan 3
    Open the pre-game read
    Written from the numbers

    The read

    Edited for clarity
    ◆ By the ModelJul 11, 11:05 PMEdited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

    The model projects a 2.4–2.9 Washington victory with the Capitals favored at 59% win probability. Both teams are underwater: Chicago is -16 in goal differential over its last 10 games, Washington -12.

    Washington dominates the underlying play. The Capitals own 50.0% of expected goals at 5v5 versus Chicago's 42.0%. They also lead in Corsi% 49.0% to 46.0%. This gap explains the model's lean.

    Washington's PDO sits at 1.018—running hot on shot quality and conversion. Chicago's 0.996 signals regression looming for both sides.

    S. Knight faces a back-to-back start, a potential fatigue factor in a tight game.

    Chicago's offense centers on Tyler Bertuzzi and Connor Bedard. Bertuzzi carries a heavy shot load at 0.85 xG per 60, converting at 18.0% (20 goals, 15 assists) with 7 high-danger goals. Bedard runs at 0.82 xG/60 with 17 goals and 27 assists, though his 11.8% shooting rate flags regression ahead.

    Washington counters with Alex Ovechkin, who leads in shot volume at 0.97 xG/60. His 19 goals and 17 assists include just 2 high-danger tallies, emphasizing his reliance on volume. Anthony Beauvillier adds 0.89 xG/60 with 14 goals and 9 assists, also limited to 2 high-danger goals.

    Both teams show 0% high-danger goal rates and 0% rebound goal rates. Chicago's defensive weak link: Anton Frondell. Washington's: Declan Chisholm.

    What the model said beforehand

    The model's lean

    WSH 59%
    59%
    WSH
    Model favorite
    41%
    59%
    CHI50WSH

    WSH by 18 points of win probability — a clear lean. Projected score CHI 2.4–2.9 WSH; 17% chance it's tied after 60.

    Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
    Season rates · 5v5

    Tale of the tape

    NHL stats API · our xG
    CHI← edge
    edge →WSH
    42.0%50.0%
    46.0%49.0%
    2.172.62
    2.942.62
    1.842.18
    2.411.79
    0.9961.018

    WSH holds 6 of 6 process categories — and the luck row (0.996 vs 1.018) says WSH has been getting the bounces, which tends not to last.

    Source · NHL stats API + our xG · 5v5
    Form · Last 10
    CHI
    2-7-1
    -16 GD · 1d rest
    WSH
    3-6-1
    -12 GD · 2d rest
    0.996
    CHI PDO
    Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
    1.018
    WSH PDO
    Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
    What decides it

    Keys to the game

    Where the edges live
    • The Capitals own the underlying play — 50.0% 5v5 xG vs 42.0%.
    Regression watch
    • The Capitals' PDO is 1.018 — running hot, expect some regression.
    Things to watch
    • The Capitals own the underlying play — 50.0% 5v5 xG vs 42.0%.
    • S. Knight is on a back-to-back — watch for a backup start or a tired starter.
    • The Capitals are underwater at -12 goal differential over their last 10.
    • The Blackhawks are underwater at -16 goal differential over their last 10.
    • The Capitals' PDO is 1.018 — running hot, expect some regression.
    Last game's lineup · confirmed at warm-up

    Lineups

    NHL box score
    CHI
    Expected in goal
    S. Knight
    back-to-back.880 last start
    Backup Spencer Knight · +10.9 GSAx this season
    Back-to-back: the backup often gets this one. Treat the starter as unconfirmed.

    No completed game on file for this club yet.

    WSH
    Expected in goal
    L. Thompson
    2 days rest.875 last start
    Backup Logan Thompson · +29.3 GSAx this season

    No completed game on file for this club yet.

    Lineups are the players who dressed in each club's last game, with their minutes; clubs confirm tonight's at warm-up. Every player this preview names was in that lineup.

    Computed danger · scouting

    Players to watch

    NHL stats API · our xG
    CHI
    Tyler Bertuzzi20G 15A
    0.85 xG/60 · 7 HD · 18.0% sh
    Connor Bedard17G 27A
    0.82 xG/60 · 5 HD · 11.8% sh
    WSH
    Alex Ovechkin19G 17A
    0.97 xG/60 · 2 HD · 13.8% sh
    Anthony Beauvillier14G 9A
    0.89 xG/60 · 2 HD · 10.4% sh
    Keep going

    Where to next